1 INTRODUCTION

There are considerations around the evolution of fundamental rights, for which reason the main problematization and challenge in modernization processes through technology does not lie in the technology itself. Nevertheless in practical issues such as the need to establish agreements between institutions for the exchange of information and the difficulty of identifying physically absent citizens, this for compliance with the fundamental right of access to information and communication technologies (ICT).

This approximation has the objective of understanding the processes to comply with this right, given which it is necessary to understand the digital conception that has been presented in the Mexican case from public institutions and to be able to recognize the areas of opportunity that can be generated with respect to Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in general, and fundamentally in relation to cybersecurity and information security in particular, these as public policy from the approach of national planning applied to the recognition of this fundamental right.

The methodology used is based, on the one hand, on an evolutionary diachrony that allows us to know the background, evolution and status of the National Digital Strategy to develop the potential of ICT in digital government, as well as the results in the increase in digitization of the country. This entails the hypothesis of determining whether, in terms of national planning, the Mexican Federal Executive has contributed to establishing the conditions to ensure the right of access to ICTs for the Mexican population. This will configure the analysis in the institutional transit that becomes cybersecurity and information security, this from the perspective of performance evaluation regarding the fundamental right of access to information and communication technologies (ICT) from the perspective of the New Public Management.

The explicit methodological procedure required by the publication implies that the elements that define it will first be defined by applying the concepts to the planning model and the National Development Plan (PND), which is understood in terms of PPG as New Public Management, as MAN regarding Management by results and, as KG regarding the progress of indicators. All the previous, applied to the case of the Program for a Close and Modern Government (2012-2018), and the National Program to Combat Corruption and Impunity, and Improvement of Public Management (2019-2024). Subsequently, the planning models used in the specified time frames are reviewed and a diachronic evolution of the results obtained by the Coordinator of the National Digital Strategy CEDN. It is generated to know how the evolution and current situation of the National Digital Strategy is situated to develop the potential of ICT in digital government, as well as in compliance with the fundamental right of access to information and communication technologies.

The results obtained from the evolution analysis presented must be interpreted with caution because, despite the fact that an obvious connection can be identified, there is a risk of generating a cognitive discrepancy between correlation and causation. Therefore, the exploratory results provide us with a general idea of how the evolution and current situation of the National Digital Strategy is situated to develop the potential of ICT in digital government, as well as in compliance with the fundamental right of access to technologies of information and communication (ICT) by the Mexican state. Although the determination regarding whether the Federal Executive has contributed to establishing the conditions to ensure this right to the Mexican population is not totally conclusive, it does provide us with a panoramic view of the relationship that contributes to understanding the evolution of the right fundamental established in relation to national planning and the results obtained. This confirms the need to recognize in the Rule of Law the institutional transit that becomes cybersecurity and information security, from the programmatic, budgetary and performance evaluation perspective, to base new specific comparative analyzes from this perspective both at the international level, as well as at the regional level in Latin America, according to the clarifications addressed.

2 ARTICLE DEVELOPMENT

The main current demand on organizations in general is to work more effectively and efficiently with the available resources. The New Public Management recognizes that the State is an indispensable instrument for the economic, political and social development of any country, and that in the region it implies the recovery of the capacity of Ibero-American public administrations as useful and effective instruments at the service of the common good².

With these approaches, it is corroborated that the New Public Management bases its purpose to intervene biunivocally, at the economic-political threshold in its ontological dimension, synergistically in the scaffolding and institutional platform in its epistemological dimension, and multifunctionally (with techniques derived from parameterizing the economy, effectiveness, efficiency, quality, responsibility) in its methodological dimension in terms of the objectives, performance and results of the members of the multidimensional public sphere, with the inevitable passage through the institutional sieve in the consideration of the elements of the system in an integral way and not only subserviently. In this regard, it is taken with emphasis to consider the New Public Management as a philosophy and current of modernization of public administration that has been developed since the 80s, oriented towards administrative reforms in the search for results and efficiency, fundamentally based on principles such as clarity of objectives, freedom to manage, accountability, adequate information flows and effective performance evaluation (Richardson, 2001:6).

However, a next transition arises that comes from letting public managers manage by granting them greater flexibility and devolution of authority, by ensuring their accountability with administrative reforms (^{Barzelay, 2001}:35). These elements can be further diversified to settle the problems that have been inherited from the bureaucratic administration (Pérez Parra, 2013:214). In this regard, Barzelay refers to the following for the proposed models:

The set of doctrinal proposals on organizational design problems…. It can be assumed as the theory of said entity, T, with respect to public management. A general model of the reasoning followed by the Treasury department at the doctrine level is, therefore, the following: T = A (NIE (Tpc, TCE, Tpa)) (^{Barzelay, 2001}:35).

From the above we can define according to the proposal that the author implies, deriving the following elements:

In accordance with the above, the initial considerations are reinterpreted to recognize the meaning of the proposed equation:

The interpretation that the New Institutional Economics constitutes the intellectual foundation of the New Public Management is due, as can be seen, to directing attention to the right side of a unit of argument within a larger and specifically situated discussion. (^{Barzelay, 2001}, p. 8).

Given the initial approach, we can make considerations regarding the application of the model proposed for the Mexican case, given which it is important to define the theoretical elements that Barzelay mentions. Therefore, we will first understand the concepts of the New Institutional Economics driven by governmental change through instruments such as the main agent theory, quasi-market approaches, transaction costs, collective action dilemmas and the rational definition of property rights (^{Arellano & Lepore, 2006}: p.2).

Therefore, it is integrated into the Public Election Theory regarding the government, conceiving it as an expensive (due to the cost of its financing and maintenance) but necessary to generate the common good (^{Ramírez & Ramírez, 2004}:121). Corresponding to this, we find the Theory of Transaction Costs, which considers consensus as transaction costs (^{North, 1990a}: 76), which derive from costs associated with information asymmetries and motivation costs arising from the coordination of two or more participants in a collective decision (^{North, 1990b}:2). Finally, the element that we lack to integrate this proposal is found in the New Institutional Economics in the Agency Theory or Principal-agent Theory, where the vision of converting the public administration into a new institution that guarantees public services of high quality for citizens (^{Pérez, 2013}:174), understanding this modeling as a set of contracts between an individual (principal) who hires another (agent) delegating to him the execution of a certain task, is defined by the difference between the utility relations of each one of the members of the contract (^{Gimeno, 1997}:47). In accordance with this, we derive the application to the case of the National Development Plan based on what ^{Barzelay (2001}:21) mentions in the Mexican case, which implies that for governments to work they must be monitored with visible and specific managers. In this case condensed into:

d1 = A (PPG, MAN, KG),

where the terms inside A (.) refer to three great universes of discourse: public philosophies of government (PPG), management (MAN) and knowledge of the government process (KG) (^{BARZELAY, 2001}, p. 21)

In this case, this modeling will be applied as a critical success factor to achieve the aspirations emanating from the budget reform at the time, applying the concepts to the planning model and the National Development Plan (PND), which is understood in terms of PPG as New Public Management, as MAN regarding Management by results and, as KG regarding the progress of indicators, applied to the case of the Program for a Close and Modern Government (2012-2018), and the National Program to Combat Corruption and Impunity, and Improvement of Public Management (2019-2024), which have had an evolution that has allowed the establishment of National Planning in Mexico in terms of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)³ in general and, cybersecurity⁴ and information security⁵ in particular.

In this context, the resources available in a nation are generally limited to cover all the needs, for which it is essential to establish priorities and determine the distribution of expenses and income and the specific decisions in this direction are reflected in the budget (^{Cabrera, Gutierrez & Miguel, 2005}:37), therefore, the budgeting process is carried out through a diagnosis of the country's economic situation, the identification of challenges coupled with the formulation of income and spending strategies in accordance with the National Plan of Development⁶.

This undoubtedly contrasts with other conceptions of planning in the digital field, where the generation of a strategy that has been established first and later the generation of an agenda that derives in an action plan as we can see with the following scheme generated by Barros⁷ regarding the generation of digital policies:

Note: Own elaboration based on the reviewed information.

GRAPH 1 INITIAL PLANNING MODEL 

In accordance with the proposal generated by Barros, it starts from the Strategy (a long-term vision that is in tune with the development model that the nation agreed upon to guarantee its stability beyond changes in government), then the potentialities are considered to generate an Agenda (medium-term element that requires establishing a comprehensive digital agenda that encompasses the most relevant areas) and finally specifying the Action Plan (crucial short-term element related to specific activities, assignment of responsibilities, expected results, estimates of costs and a precise calendar for the process of the current priorities of the government in office). These elements serve as a reference to continue establishing the future of National Planning in Mexico first and, of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) later.

According to the historical records in Mexico, in the National Development Plan (PND) 2007-2012, the Special Management Improvement Program in the Federal Public Administration 2008-2012 (PMG) is established, whose objective 1 was oriented to the “ Strategy 1.2 improve the delivery of public services through the use and exploitation of information and communication technologies”⁸, all this in the context of the establishment of the Digital Government Agenda⁹ presented by the Intersecretarial Commission for the Development of Electronic Government (CIDGE)¹⁰ through the Adequate coordination of actions proposed by the Ministry of Public Function, with the dependencies of the Federal Public Administration and, through these, with parastatal entities.

According to the above, this was the mechanism that was held to establish the purposes and define the fundamental principles to modernize the government through the effective use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) through the Federal Digital Government strategy for dependencies and entities of the Federal Public Administration (APF), industry, academia, the powers of the union and society as a whole.

In this context, regarding the management of public resources in 2008, a relevant reform to article 134 of the Political Constitution of the United Mexican States was also carried out to significantly improve government management and the use thereof, seeking achieve a more transparent, responsible and efficient administration, which was accompanied by the New Public Management approach based on Public Administration, and in turn, as mentioned by the Inter-American Development Bank, Public Administration is the foundation of Public Management and is basis for Managing for Results¹¹. This is relevant since, from that moment on, the National Development Plan (PND) is institutionally condensed in terms of PPG as New Public Management, accompanied by MAN regarding Management by Results and KG regarding the progress of indicators, in accordance with the Results-Based Budget methodology, which is based both on the New Public Management, as well as on Management by results and the generation of progress by results in order to achieve its mission after the reform of article 134 of the Mexican constitution.

Subsequently, from the National Development Plan (PND) of 2013-2018, substantial changes are generated in terms of public policy in relation to ICT, on the one hand, it is established as a specific objective within the Plan to “Establish a Strategy Digital Nacional to promote the adoption and development of information and communication technologies, and promote an effective government that inserts Mexico into the Knowledge Society”, on the other hand, the Program for a Close and Modern Government (PGCM)¹² is generated based on one of its objectives to “Establish a National Digital Strategy that accelerates the insertion of Mexico in the Information and Knowledge Society”¹³, which led to strategy 5.6 regarding the establishment of ICT enablers for connectivity and affordability, digital inclusion and interoperability, all coordinated by the Office of the Presidency of the Republic (OPR), given the reform of the Organic Law¹⁴ of the Federal Public Administration (LOAPF)¹⁵, through its technical support unit, the Coordination of the National Digital Strategy (CEDN), which establishes its mission related to the National Digital Strategy (EDN)¹⁶.

All of this is important because in parallel, in 2013, a far-reaching constitutional reform was carried out in the field of telecommunications, embodied in article 6, third paragraph, which recognized the fundamental right of access to Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), as well as radio broadcasting and telecommunications services, including access to broadband and internet¹⁷. In summary, the objective was to guarantee equity and digital inclusion in the country, allowing a greater number of people to take advantage of opportunities offered by Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in line with what is established in the Plan National Development Program (PND) 2013-2018 and the creation of the National Digital Strategy (EDN).

In turn, in terms of cybersecurity and information security, numeral 1.2.3 was established within the 2013-2018 National Development Plan (PND) in the “Close and Modern Government” section to “Strengthen the intelligence of the Mexican State to identify, prevent and counter risks and threats to National Security”, together with the line of action of “Design and promote an information security strategy, in order to guarantee the integrity, confidentiality and availability of information from people and public and private institutions in Mexico”¹⁸. This is when, at the national strategic planning level, information security is already being taken into consideration as a state policy. In turn, from a programmatic position in accordance with the above, the Program for a Close and Modern Government (PGCM) refers in its strategy 5.6 to "Establish and operate ICT enablers for connectivity and affordability, digital inclusion and interoperability" and in its numeral 5.6.8. “Promote Information Security within the Systems and Applications of dependencies and entities”¹⁹.

In parallel, the National Digital Strategy (EDN) refers to Enabler 4. Legal Framework for Information Security and Computer Crime, subsequent to its numeral 6 "Promote the incorporation into the regulatory framework of best practices in terms of prevention and citizen security”²⁰ by the National Digital Strategy Coordination (CEDN). However, later the intention to generate a specific strategy in terms of cybersecurity and information security is manifested when the National Cybersecurity Strategy is created²¹, which would be coordinated (in an initial stage) by the Intersecretarial Commission for the Development of Electronic Government. (CIDGE) and the Digital Government Unit (UGD), which served as the Executive Secretary in the CIDGE, since 2005 and which was dependent on the Ministry of Public Administration with the obligation to implement the coordination mechanisms that would allow it to comply with digital government policy²². As indicated, the following scheme can be identified regarding the national planning addressed:

Note: Own elaboration based on the reviewed information.

GRAPH 2 NATIONAL PLANNING 2013-2018 

The foregoing is relevant from the considering point of view, since as can be seen, for the first time both a national digital strategy and a digital strategy in cybersecurity are established. However, there is a paradox, since while the EDN was in force from its creation in 2013 until the generation of the Agreement that issues the National Digital Strategy 2021-2024, the National Cybersecurity Strategy (ENCS) did not have a fully defined institutional character, since despite the fact that the CIDGE Cybersecurity Subcommittee was created for coordination purposes for an initial stage, a specific period of time was not established for this threshold, and despite its alignment with the PND 2013-2018, it is not specified valid for its operation.

Finally, in the National Development Plan (PND) 2019-2024, ICTs are considered from Transversal Axis 2 “Fighting corruption and improving public management" established in Criterion 2 where "The use of information technologies will be promoted information and communication to promote transparency and democratic accountability to be simple, efficient and expeditious”²³, this in accordance with the National Program to Combat Corruption and Impunity, and to Improve Public Management 2019-2024 (PNCCIMGP) that establishes the “Priority Strategy 3.6.- Promote the transformation of the Federal Public Administration through the use and exploitation of ICT, for the direct benefit of the population”²⁴, all of which is in charge of the National Digital Strategy Coordination of the Presidency of the Republic (CEDN).

As previously mentioned, in the management of the national public administration of the Executive Power, continuity was given to the EDN of the previous period until the Agreement that issues the National Digital Strategy 2021-2024 was published, which establishes the relationship of ICTs as regards a digital policy to “...Transform the Federal Public Administration through the use and exploitation of ICTs to improve and make government services provided to citizens more transparent”²⁵, and recognizes in terms of information security Specific Objective 5 to “Promote a culture of information security that generates certainty and trust for the users of institutional and governmental technological services”²⁶.

Regarding the internal operation, as of 2019, the Regulations of the Office of the Presidency of the Republic, published on April 2, 2013 in the Official Gazette of the Federation (Diario Oficial de la Federacion), are repealed, and the new regulations are published to establish in the CEDN²⁷ the attribution of “Preparing and coordinating the National Digital Strategy, as well as developing information and communication technologies for use by the Federal Public Administration”²⁸. This would seem like a normal change given the change in the Public Administration of the Federal Executive, however, a transition occurs that brings together the CEDN (created in the 2013-2018 period) with the CIDGE (inter-secretariat coordinator created since 2005), thus creating the Intersecretarial Commission for Information and Communication Technologies, and Information Security (CITICSI)²⁹ which is defined in its purpose to "establish a mechanism for coordination and collegiate conduct of actions for the implementation of federal policies on information and communication technologies, and information security³⁰. With this, it can be said that it is institutionally condensed in terms of PPG as New Public Management, applying MAN regarding Management by results in the unification of two institutions (CEDN and CIDGE), to generate advances in terms of KG in terms of institutional results given that it is expected to be able to comply with the PND guidelines. With this, our framework in terms of national planning could be focused as follows:

Note: Own elaboration based on the reviewed information.

GRAPH 3 NATIONAL PLANNING 2019-2024 

Once the proposed evolution has been addressed, it is worth resolving the following consideration by questioning ourselves whether the Federal Executive has contributed, given all these institutional changes, to establishing the conditions to ensure the right of access to ICTs for the population in the institutional transition that will become to cybersecurity and information security, and in turn, to recognize if an emergency is arising, increase cybersecurity, protection of personal data, and respect for human rights from a performance evaluation perspective. This is not only important internally, since the international perspective also helps to demonstrate progress from an external perspective in terms of meeting international objectives. Added to this, it is important to know if proposals for institutional change (such as a specific legal framework in terms of cybersecurity and information security) could support the task.

We start with performance development. In the 2013-2018 PND, the indicator called the Electronic Government Development Index was established³¹ and, in the 2013-2018 PGCM, two indicators were defined: the OECD Index of Citizens interacting with their government via internet³², and the Digitalization Index ID³³. Of the 3 indicators, only 2 measured the end of the strategy corresponding to the “development and improvement of public policies and the conditions for the enjoyment of the right of access to ICTs of the population”, which are related in turn to the EDN and the objective 5 “Establish a National Digital Strategy that accelerates the insertion of Mexico in the Information and Knowledge Society”. Given this, the first reached an “advanced” performance category by confirming an advance of 109.93%, while the second was classified as “insufficient”, by only reaching 24.74% of the expected advance percentage.

Regarding information regarding the PND 2019-2024, there is still no data available on the CONEVAL website that can help us to elucidate compliance with what has programmatically implicated the National Program to Combat Corruption and Impunity, and to Improve Public Management 2019-2024 (PNCCIMGP), however, there are reports that can give us an incipient response in this regard. The CEDN maintains on its website³⁴, full reference to the budget program “Internet for All”. This is partially consistent with what is established in the PNCCIMGP, which maintains the priority strategy "Priority Strategy 3.6.- Promote the transformation of the Federal Public Administration through the use and exploitation of ICTs, for the direct benefit of the population." This is relevant, since the CEDN has maintained a growing role in the conduction of this strategy since 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022³⁵, however, who is responsible for carrying out said strategy and its respective results, is the Coordination of the Information and Knowledge Society (CSIC), which depends on the "Branch 9 Communications and Transport (2019-2023)" as well as the 32 different SCT Centers (2019-2021) of each of the entities of the Mexican Republic³⁶.

Furthermore, the CEDN responds to the Axis of the PND for Politics and Government, while the CSIC responds to the AXIS of the PND for the Economy. Therefore, despite the fact that the CEDN contributes to the generation of this strategy, the results of the "E009 Internet for All" Program, which is linked to priority objective 3.6 of the PNCCIMGP, for programmatic and budgetary purposes of collecting information of the achievement of the objectives established in the Matrix of Indicators for Results (MIR) and of the Performance Indicator Sheets (FID) in the reports that are associated with a Responsible Unit, it is the CSIS that registers the indicator or indicators by strategic objective³⁷, to objectively measure progress regarding the level of compliance with its institutional objective and is reflected in the Federal Public Treasury Account³⁸.

Therefore, regarding the results obtained by the CEDN, it is attached to the Office of the Presidency of the Republic in Branch 02, which has budgetary programs that can be executed jointly by various Responsible Units for the fulfillment of its consultation objectives and goals regarding its performance information, belonging to the budget key P002 "Advice, coordination, dissemination and technical support of the activities of the President of the Republic", and whose Responsible Unit is the CEDN, among others. From the reviewed data, from 2013 and 2014 there were no indicators to show, and from 2015 to 2022, the same indicator is maintained in order to know the results of the Office of the Presidency and the Responsible Units as a whole, but not in terms of the individual³⁹.

Despite this, it is possible to know the operation of the CEDN based on the information available that is shown in the Public Account by referring to the Budgetary Information in the Analytical State of the Expenditure Budget Exercise of the corresponding fiscal year. This is very important, since it allows us to follow the same logic of the indicator proposed according to the budget key P002 for the Office of the Presidency of the Republic. From this we can observe the following results:

Note: Own elaboration with information from https://www.cuentapublica.hacienda.gob.mx/

GRAPH 4 EVOLUTION OF CEDN RESULTS INDICATOR 2013-2022 

The graph shows us that the CEDN has maintained a tendency to plan and budget above what it has finally exercised in terms of budget. This trend is not so pronounced for the 2014-2018 period, while between 2019 and 2022 the highest percentages of expenditure exercised with respect to programmable expenditure have been generated according to the records of the Public Account. This element, given the congruence with the indicator that the Office of the Presidency proposes, is insufficient to be able to detail the results obtained by the CEDN since its institutionalization, however, the important issue will be to be able to observe if from 2023 its new attribution when forming the CITICSI and integrated by the CIDGE within the same structure, to observe other measurable results in terms of the exercise of resources and measurable impact regarding the progress in the Indicators of the budgetary programs of the Federal Public Administration.

Continuing now with the international perspective, the generation of the indicators gives us an incipient response⁴⁰ since the Millennium Development Goals (MDG) demonstrated significant progress towards 2015, since the world had achieved the first objective, which consisted of reducing to halving the rates of extreme poverty and hunger worldwide. However, the results obtained were not uniform in all regions⁴¹. For example, in 2015 Mexico reached the corresponding goals in 37 of 51 MDG indicators. Subsequently, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) and the 2030 Agenda are agreed, given which a new facet is implemented to incorporate the knowledge acquired in the previous process and reach children who, due to various circumstances, have experienced a delay in their progress and development. In this sense, changes were generated to achieve development for all people and to do so in a sustainable way⁴².

Following up on the above, the two most recent national planning periods are taken into consideration, since they are the ones in which the most important changes are taking place in terms of ICT, cybersecurity and information security. For example, in the PND 2019-2024, in what refers to making ICT affordable, it establishes in Axis 3 of Economic Development in point 3.7: "Facilitate the population, access and transparent and sustainable development to broadcasting networks and telecommunications, with an emphasis on internet and broadband, and promote the integral development of the digital economy”. Element undoubtedly relevant for this document, since of the points established in the PND 2019-2024, it is the one that is related to 7 SDG objectives⁴³.

The foregoing is relevant since, despite the fact that there is a coincidence between the PND and the SDGs, in the SDG Indicator Consultation System it is observed that Mexico lacks indicators to measure the progress of Sustainable Development Goal 9 "Industry , Innovation and Infrastructures" for this period in accordance with the provisions of the 2030 Agenda, and goal 9.c regarding "Significantly increase access to information and communication technology and strive to provide universal and affordable access to the Internet in the least developed countries by 2020”⁴⁴. This is important since this goal is linked to the commitment to guarantee access to the Internet, contravening, at least in terms of compliance through indicators in the international arena, the fundamental right of access to Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) established in article 6, third paragraph of the Mexican Constitution.

Finally, particularly in terms of cybersecurity and information security, many legislative proposals have been generated to address the situation, the most recent on April 25, 2023, the latest initiative is presented as a draft decree issuing the "Federal Cybersecurity Law" and that reforms, adds and repeals various articles of the Organic Laws of the Federal Public Administration; Organic of the Mexican Army and Air Force; of Airports, and of Civil Aviation, in matters of protection of the Mexican airspace, among others⁴⁵. This law, despite the fact that it brings the institutional structure immersed from the time the CITICSI was created, does not present further specification in terms of the budget. What does appear is the adequacy of the proposal in accordance with the National Planning System, briefly considering the mention of strategic indicators for the achievement of objectives, however, the adaptations in terms of programming, budgeting, and evaluation are alluded to without specifying as to this mention. Therefore, in reference to the EDN and the CEDN, the regulations in relation to cybersecurity must be harmonized, and the regulatory framework adapted, involving PPG as New Public Management, MAN as Results-based Management and KG as advancement of performance indicators. the public administration, to be conclusive as to the auspiciousness of the conditions generated by the Federal Executive in terms of ensuring the right to ICT and the institutional transit of cybersecurity and information security from the programmatic, budgetary and evaluation aspects of the performance.

3 FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

In accordance with the above, some possibilities for improvement that can be recognized derived from this document are presented. Above all, being able to go through and have a sample regarding the National Planning model, which does not start from a strategy to later be linked to an agenda for the generation of an action plan, both for general and particular effects in the field of ICT, cybersecurity and information security. In fact, in the different periods observed regarding the planning of the Federal Executive, the order starts from the National Development Plan, oriented towards national agendas (2007-2012) or national digital strategies (2013-2024).

This tour allowed us to observe the differences and similarities, which were later specified for the orientation of national planning in terms of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in general, and fundamentally in relation to cybersecurity and information security in particular, these as public policy from the New Public Management approach from the programmatic, budgetary and performance evaluation of compliance with the fundamental right of access to information and communication technologies (ICT) perspective.

According to this precision, there is potential in terms of being able to accurately delineate the resources destined to the concretion of the cross-cutting strategy derived from the National Development Plan (PND) and established in the National Digital Strategy (EDN), above all because there is a lack of precise quantification both for the operation of the Coordination of the National Digital Strategy (CEDN), as well as for the EDN, as well as for those who contribute to this strategy at the governmental level in the sense of knowing the application of the budget disbursement of the Federal Government and the effective achievement of the objectives set for the adoption and use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT), and cybersecurity coupled with information security.

Derived from the lack of a comprehensive programmatic structure in the context of the National Digital Strategy (EDN), the existing disconnection with the objectives of national, transversal and priority scope is manifested, as well as the resources available for the achievement of said purposes and goals. In this sense, even when some resources can be identified to support the governing execution of the policy in terms of the collaborative and executing actors in the programmatic structures that allocate funds for the development of their adjacent functions in relation to EDN (for example, the In the case of the priority program "Internet for all"), these assignments lack a coherent alignment with the national objectives related to the implementation of a National Digital Strategy, even with respect to the main Axis, since currently Axis 1 of Politics and Government where The Coordination of the National Digital Strategy (CEDN) is located, far from Axis 3 Economy where the Coordination of the Information and Knowledge Society (CSIC) is located.

In reference to the Program for a Close and Modern Government 2013-2018 (PGCM), and the National Program to Combat Corruption and Impunity, and to Improve Public Management 2019-2024 (PNCCIMGP), guiding programs from which it emanates EDN, very dissimilar results were obtained. The first had contrasts since, in terms of performance, it generated results that were sufficient and deficient for the expected progress according to CONEVAL. On the other hand, the second does not establish specific indicators related to the EDN, it does not follow up on the indicators of the previous program, which it would be desirable if CONEVAL could be generated for the PNCCIMPG.

Despite the aforementioned, the results were recognized according to the Public Account, making it possible to exemplify the evolution of the CEDN despite the fact that there is no specific indicator for it in the MIR of the Office of the Presidency of the Republic (OPR), given which could be observed its planning in terms of the indicator that measures the percentage and the difference between the approved and exercised budget, which has had a greater dissonance in the 2019-2022 period than in the 2014-2018 period. Despite the foregoing, the indicator is insufficient to assess compliance with the conduction, coordination, and monitoring of the CEDN in relation to the EDN, as well as the efficiency of its components.

Conducively, at the international level, for the Consultation System of Indicators of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) it is observed that Mexico lacks indicators to measure the progress of Sustainable Development Goal 9 "Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure" and its indicator 9.c, a goal linked to the commitment to guarantee internet access, contravening, at least in terms of compliance through indicators in the international arena, despite the fact that the link between the National Development Plan and the Development Goals has been ratified sustainable development.

In accordance with the approaches to generate a specific regulatory framework for cybersecurity and information security, it is essential to define and identify precisely the resources allocated to the development of this transversal strategy, where the resources assigned to the CEDN are quantified as the driver and coordinator of the National Digital Strategy (EDN), which has now assumed the functions of the Inter-ministerial Commission for the Development of Electronic Government (CIDGE) and which forms the Inter-ministerial Commission for Information and Communication Technologies, and Security of Information (CITICSI), thus generating areas of opportunity from the PPG as New Public Management, MAN as Management by results and KG as progress of indicators accompanied by the public administration, regarding its institutional function with collaborators and operators involved in this initiative to understand the relationship between Federal Government spending and the achievement of objectives related to the use and adoption of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in general, and cybersecurity and information security in particular.

Therefore, it is considered pertinent that the CEDN include indicators to measure the effectiveness of each of the components of the policy, in order to have elements to know the progress in the use of the potential of ICT, both in the governmental sphere as in the daily life of the population. In terms of planning, both the ENCS and the EDN would have to be generated from the beginning of the generation of the PND and the beginning of the period of functions of the Federal Executive, since it is not enough to create a public entity that brings together both, but to establish an entity that can respond to the needs of the population, as well as the program and budget with the results obtained.