Serviços Personalizados
Journal
Artigo
Indicadores
- Citado por SciELO
- Acessos
Links relacionados
- Similares em SciELO
Compartilhar
Revista Portuguesa de Ciências do Desporto
versão impressa ISSN 1645-0523
Rev. Port. Cien. Desp. v.6 n.3 Porto out. 2006
Reprodutibilidade e validade do questionário Baecke para avaliação da atividade física habitual em adolescentes.
Dartagnan P. Guedes
Cynthia C. Lopes
Joana E. R. P. Guedes
Luiz C. Stanganelli
Centro de Educação Física e Desporto, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Paraná, Brasil.
RESUMO
O objetivo do estudo foi analisar indicadores associados à reprodutibilidade e à validade do Questionário de Atividade Física Habitual preconizado por Baecke (BQHPA) em amostra específica de adolescentes. A amostra foi constituída por 161 sujeitos (92 moças e 69 rapazes) com idades entre 12 e 18 anos. Reprodutibilidade foi obtida por intermédio de réplicas de aplicação do questionário, com intervalo de duas semanas, envolvendo o coeficiente de correlação intraclasse (R) e a técnica de Bland e Altman (B-A). A validade foi analisada mediante comparações entre as informações apresentadas pelos adolescentes no BQHPA e por instrumento retrospectivo de auto-recordação das atividades diárias (R-24h). Para tanto, utilizou-se da proporção de concordância Kappa entre categorizações de acordo com a distribuição de quartis dos indicadores de atividade física. Os achados revelaram R entre 0,55 e 0,85 nas moças e entre 0,69 e 0,82 nos rapazes. Embora esses valores sejam semelhantes aos encontrados em outros estudos, mediante a técnica de B-A verifica-se limitada capacidade de concordância entre réplicas de aplicação do questionário. Quanto à validade, os escores de atividade física apresentados pelo BQHPA demonstraram proporção de concordância entre 33,5% e 76,6% com as informações provenientes do R-24h. Os indicadores de validação observados foram mais elevados entre os rapazes com mais idade. Em conclusão, os resultados apresentam evidências de que, em adolescentes de ambos os sexos com mais de 14 anos de idade, o BQHPA demonstra aceitáveis propriedades de medida para monitorar níveis habituais de atividade física. Em adolescentes mais jovens ( ≤ 14 anos), os achados sugerem que o BQHPA deverá ser utilizado com algumas precauções.
Palavras-chave: mensuração, avaliação, métodos, precisão, exatidão.
ABSTRACT
Reproducibility and validity of the Baecke questionnaire for assessing of the habitual physical activity in adolescents.
The present study was designed to analyze the reproducibility and validity of Baecke Questionnaire of Habitual Physical Activity (BQHPA) in specific sample of adolescents. A total of 161 subjects (92 girls and 69 boys) aged 12-17 years old were included in the study. For the assessment of reproducibility intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots were computed between administrations of the questionnaire at baseline, and after two weeks. Validity was determined by comparing questionnaire against a 24-hour recall instrument of the daily activities, which provided an estimate of the diary energy expenditure (kcal/kg/day). Proportion of agreement (kappa values) was calculated, based on categorization of the distributions of the physical activity variables into quartiles. The results showed correlation coefficients ranged from 0,55 to 0,85 in girls and 0,69 to 0,82 in boys. Although these data are comparable to most other self-report reproducibility studies, Bland-Altman plots demonstrated limited capacity of agreement between test-retest of the questionnaire. In terms of validity, the scores of physical activity reported in the BQHPA showed percentage of agreement between 33,5% and 76,6% with the 24-hour recall data. The indicators of validation observed were greater in boys older. In conclusion, these data provide evidence that, in adolescents of both sex with more than 14 years old, the BQHPA has acceptable measurement properties for monitoring levels of habitual physical activity. In youngest adolescents (≤ 14 years old), our findings indicate that the BQHPA should be used with some precautions.
Key-words: measurement, evaluation, methods, accuracy, reliability, validation.
Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.
Full text only available in PDF format.
REFERÊNCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS
1. Aaron DJ, Kriska AM, Dearwater SR, Cauley JA, Metz KF, LaPorte RE (1995). Reproducibility and validity of an epidemiologic questionnaire to assess past year physical activity in adolescents. Am J Epidemiol 142:191-201 [ Links ]
2. Albanes D, Conway JM, Taylor PR, Moe PW, Judd J (1990). Validation and comparison of eight physical activity questionnaires. Epidemiology 1:65-71
3. Atkinson G, Nevill AM (1998). Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med 26:217-38
4. Baecke JAH, Burema J, Frijters JER (1982). A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. Am J Clin Nutr 36:936-42
5. Blair S, Connelly JC (1996). How much physical activity should we do? The case for moderate amounts and intensities of physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport 67:193-205
6. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods for clinical measurement. Lancet 8:307-10
7. Booth ML, Okely AD, Chey TM, Bauman A (2002). The reliability and validity of the Adolescent Physical Activity Recall Questionnaire. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:1986-95
8. Bouchard C, Shephard RJ, Stephns T (1994). Physical Activity, Fitness and Health: International Proceedings and Consensus Statement. Champaign, Illinois; Human Kinetics.
9. Bouchard C, Tremblay A, LeBlanc C, Lortie G, Sauard R, Therialt G (1983). A method to assess energy expenditure in children and adults. Am J Clin Nutr 37:461-7
10. Calfas KJ, Taylor WC (1994). Effects of physical activity on psychological variables in adolescents. Pediat Exerc Sci 6:406-23
11. Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM (1985). Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep 100:126-31
12. Eisenmann JC (2004). Physical activity and cardiovascular disease risk factors in children and adolescents: an overview. Can J Cardiol 20:295-301
13. Kohl HW, Fulton JE, Caspersen CJ (2000). Assessment of physical activity among children and adolescents: a review and synthesis. Prev Med 31:S54-S76
14. Kriska AM, Caspersen CJ (1997). Introduction to a collection of physical activity questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29:S5-S9
15. Laakso L, Viikari J (1997). Physical activity in childhood and adolescence as predictor of physical activity in young adulthood. Am J Prev Med 13:317-23
16. Maia JAR, Loos R, Beunen G, Thomis M, Vlietinck R, Morais FP, Lopes VP (1999). Aspectos genéticos da prática desportiva: um estudo em gêmeos. Rev Paul Educ Fis 13:160-76
17. Maia JAR, Thomis M, Beunen G (2002). Genetic factors in physical activity levels: a twin study. Am J Prev Med 23(2 Suppl): 87-91
18. Miller DL, Freedson PS, Kline GM (1994). Comparison of activity levels using Caltrac accelerometer and five questionnaires. Med Sci Sports Exerc 26:376-82
19. Oliveira MMC, Maia JAR, Lopes VP, Seabre A, Garganta R (2003). Aspectos genéticos da actividade física: um estudo multimodal em gêmeos monozigóticos e dizigóticos. Rev Paul Educ Fis 17:104-18
20. Park J (2003). Adolescent self-concept and health into adulthood. Health Rep 14:41-52
21. Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair S, Haskell W, Macera C, Bouchard C, Ettinger W, Helth G, King A (1995). Physical activity and the public health: A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA 273:402-7
22. Philippaerts RM, Lefevre J (1998). Reliability and validity of three physical activity questionnaires in Flemish males. Am J Epidemiol 147:982-90
23. Pols MA, Peeters PHM, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Ocké MC, Wentink CA, Kemper HCG, Collette HJA (1995). Validity and repeatability of a modified Baecke Questionnaire on Physical Activity. Int J Epidemiol 24:381-7
24. Sallis JF (1991). Self-report measures of childrens physical activity. J Sch Health 61:215-9
25. Sallis JF, Buono MJ, Roby JJ (1993). Seven-day recall and other physical activity self-report in children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25:99-108
26. Sallis JF, Patrick K (1994). Physical activity guidelines for adolescents: consensus statement. Pediat Exerc Sci 6:302-14
27. Sallis JF, Saelens BE (2000). Assessment of physical activity by self-report: status, limitations, and future directions. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:1-14
28. Taylor WC, Blair SN, Cummings SS, Wun CC, Malina RM (1999). Childhood and adolescent physical activity patterns and adult physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31:118-23
29. Trost SG, Pate RR, Sallis JF, Freedson PS, Taylor WC, Dowda M, Sirard J (2002). Age and gender differences in objectively measured physical activity in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:350-5
30. Twisk JW, Kemper HC, van Mechelen W (2000). Tracking of activity and fitness and the relationship with cardiovascular disease risk factors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 32:1456-61
31. US Department of Health and Human Services (1996). Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA; US Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion.
32. Welk GJ, Corbin CB, Dale D (2000). Measurement issues in the assessment of physical activity in children. Res Q Exerc Sport 71:59-73
33.Weston A, Petoso R, Pate RR (1997). Validation of an instrument for measurement of physical activity in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29:138-43
CORRESPONDÊNCIA
Dartagnan Pinto Guedes
Rua Ildefonso Werner 177
Condomínio Royal Golf
CEP 86001-970 – Londrina – Paraná
E-mail: darta@sercomtel.com.br