SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.80 número2Análise epidemiológica do cancro de pele no BrasilAtualização do tratamento cirúrgico da onicocriptose índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Portuguese Journal of Dermatology and Venereology

versão impressa ISSN 2795-501Xversão On-line ISSN 2795-5001

Port J Dermatol Venereol. vol.80 no.2 Lisboa jun. 2022  Epub 02-Ago-2022

https://doi.org/10.24875/pjdv.m22000025 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Dermatophytosis: Clinical and therapeutic study in a reference center in the eastern Amazon

Dermatofitoses: estudo clínico e terapêutico em centro de referência na Amazônia oriental

Carla Andrea Avelar Pires1 

Luiz Filipe Matos da Silva1 

Thábata Chrystye Ribeiro Tenório Fonseca1 

Amanda Gabay Moreira1  *  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5542-4981

Mioni Thieli Figueiredo Magalhães de Brito2 

Guilherme Mestriner Colli1 

Maria Amélia Lopes dos Santos1 

Francisca Regina Oliveira Carneiro1 

1State University of Pará

2Federal University of Pará, Belém, PA, Brazil


Abstract

Introduction:

Dermatophytosis is the most common fungal infection of the skin, hair, and nails in humans. It affects about 20% of the world's population in all age groups.

Objectives:

To analyze clinical, epidemiological, and therapeutic characteristics of patients diagnosed with dermatophytosis treated at a general and tropical dermatology reference service in the Brazilian Amazon region.

Methods:

We analyzed 75 medical records from January 2016 to January 2020, with a researchers' protocol to collect data on clinical forms, treatment, and recurrence. Statistical analysis used the chi-square test of adherence, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

There was a female predominance, mean age of 49 years and 28% of patients had more than 10 lesions. The dominant type of dermatophytosis was onychomycosis in adults, followed by Tinea capitis (24%) in the pediatric group (mean 11.39 years). The elderly (37.33%) and children (26.67%) were the most affected. In most cases, treatment with combined topical and systemic medications was chosen. Griseofulvin and terbinafine were the most prescribed for systemic treatment and ciclopirox olamine was the main prescribed topic (36%). Although 77.3% of the patients attended a follow-up appointment, 25.33% relapsed in less than one year.

Conclusion:

The analyzed data emphasizes the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of dermatophytosis, especially in the extreme age group —pediatric and elderly age groups— besides the active importance of non-pharmacological measures to reduce recurrences and morbidity for patients.

Keywords Dermatophytosis; Tinea; Treatment

Resumo

Introdução:

Dermatofitoses constituem as infecções fúngicas da pele, cabelo e unha mais comuns em seres humanos, acometendo cerca de 20% da população mundial e todas as faixas etárias.

Objetivos:

Analisar características clínicas, epidemiológicas e terapêuticas de pacientes com dermatofitoses atendidos num serviço de referência em dermatologia geral e tropical na região da Amazônia Brasileira.

Métodos:

Foram analisados 75 prontuários do período de janeiro de 2016 a janeiro de 2020, cujos dados sobre formas clínicas, tratamento e recorrência foram coletados em protocolo próprio dos pesquisadores. Foi utilizado o teste Qui-quadrado de aderência na análise estatística e para a tomada de decisão adotou-se p < 0,05.

Resultados:

Houve predomínio do sexo feminino, média de 49 anos de idade, e em 28% dos casos observaram-se mais de 10 lesões no mesmo indivíduo. O principal tipo de dermatofitose foi onicomicose em adultos, seguida por Tinea capitis (24%) na faixa etária pediátrica (média 11,39 anos). De forma geral, idosos (37,33%) e crianças (26,67%) foram os mais atingidos. Optou-se, na maioria dos casos, pelo tratamento com medicações tópicas e sistémicas combinadas, sendo a griseofulvina e a terbinafina as mais prescritas para o tratamento sistêmico e a ciclopirox olamina o principal tópico prescrito (36%). Apesar de 77,3% dos pacientes terem comparecido em consulta subsequente, 25,33% recidivaram em menos de um ano.

Conclusão:

Os dados analisados ressaltam a importância do diagnóstico e tratamento precoce das dermatofitoses, sobretudo em idades extremas —faixa etária pediátrica e idosos— além de destacar a importância ativa das medidas não farmacológicas na viabilização da redução de recidivas e morbilidade aos pacientes.

Palavras-chave Dermatofitoses; Tinea; Tratamento

Introduction

Superficial mycoses or Tinea are fungi infections preferentially affecting the epidermis and its annexes1, caused by dermatophytes, which include genera Microsporum, Trichophyton, and Epidermophyton2. All dermatophytes share morphological and physiological peculiarities in relation to the affected body region. These species have keratinophilic affinity and can cause pathology in humans and animals3.

Dermatophytosis affects approximately 20% of the world population, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. Geographic location, weather, cultural factors (e.g., exposure to domestic animals), socioeconomic conditions, and personal hygiene practices contribute to epidemiological differences between distinct regions4,5.

Fungi can be found in humans, animals, and in the environment. Transmission can occur through direct contact with sick animals or humans or carriers, or even with contaminated objects or environments such as hairbrushes, bedding, carpets, or other contaminated surfaces. The diagnosis of dermatophytosis is clinical, based on anamnesis and physical examination. However, in cases of uncertain diagnosis or treatment failure, direct mycological exam and culture are useful tools to confirm the infection6.

The clinical picture varies on the affected body region and the previous use of topical medications. The relevant forms of infection are Tinea capitis, Tinea corporis, Tinea cruris, Tinea unguium and Tinea pedis. Tinea capitis affects children more frequently and is uncommon in adults. It can cause conditions that range from an isolated or a group of circular pseudoalopecia and scaly lesions (tonsurans) to an intense inflammatory form of high morbidity (kerion). Erythematous plaques associated with an annular border with desquamation and papules and central healing characterize Tinea corporis and Tinea cruris. Tinea unguium or onychomycosis occurs due to invasion of the nail plate and leads to discoloration, hyperkeratosis and fragility of the nails. The appearance of grooves, roughness and fractures, with a yellowish appearance is typical for nail infection7.

Available topical therapies include agents such as azoles, allylamines, butenafine, ciclopirox, and tolnaftate. Oral treatments namely terbinafine, itraconazole, fluconazole, or griseofulvin are reserved for extensive or refractory skin infections and infections that extend to follicles or nails. It is noteworthy that oral ketoconazole increases the risk of severe liver damage, adrenal insufficiency and drug interactions8.

One of the primary concerns of patients is pruritus. In severe forms, it can affect patient's quality of life and the condition can extend and become chronic if treatment is not adequate. Another major impact is the aesthetic aspect, always present in dermatological diseases, because of the clear visibility of the lesions. This limits social interaction and contributes to the loss of quality of life. Considering the prolonged treatment in some forms of tinea, this can cause a financial burden and make it difficult to adhere to treatment9.

Due to the significant prevalence of dermatophytosis in Brazil, especially in the Amazon region, it is of great importance to know the main epidemiological, clinical, and therapeutic aspects in services of reference and excellence in dermatology. Early diagnosis and adequate treatment prevent quality of life reduction in the affected population.

Methods

Ethical aspects and type of study

This is an observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, unicentric study carried out at the dermatology service of the Center for Biological Sciences and Health of the Universidade do Estado do Pará, in Belém, Pará, one of the reference centers for general and tropical dermatological diseases in Amazon region. University's Research Ethics Committee (opinion No. 3,853,185) approved and authorized this research.

Casuistry

The study sample consisted of all patients evaluated at the dermatology outpatient clinic between January 2016 and January 2020, who had a clinical diagnosis of dermatophytosis, regardless of the causative species, location, age and sex, or previous medication use. 75 medical records were analyzed. We performed direct mycological examination and culture only in cases in which the clinical diagnosis was insufficient and there was a need for complementary semiology. Patients with incomplete medical records, as well as those whose diagnosis of dermatophytosis was ruled out after direct mycology and/or culture, were excluded from the study.

Data collection

The authors used a standardized protocol to collect and analyze medical data. The variables collected were epidemiological data and occupation, clinical aspects, type of treatment, recurrence, and presence of comorbidities.

Data analysis

Regarding statistical analysis, Chi-square test of adherence was used. p-value < 0.05 or 5% was considered statistically significative. Significant values were indicated with an asterisk (*). We used Microsoft Word 2016 and Microsoft Excel 2016 software to process the manuscript, graphs, and tables.

Results

The sample comprised 75 patients during the years 2016–2020. Data analysis showed a predominance of females (66.67%) and a mean age of 49 years (Table 1).

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of patients with dermatophytosis treated at a reference service, 2016–2020 

Sociodemographic characteristics n % p-value
Gender
Male 25 33.33 Chi-square
Female 50 66.67 0.0056*
Age group
Under 18 20 26.67 Chi-square
19-29 years 3 4.00 < 0.0001*
30-39 years 6 8.00
40-49 years 9 12.00
50-59 years 9 12.00
60 years or older 28 37.33
Mean ± standard deviation 49 ± 26.41
Occupation
Retired 9 12.00 Chi-square
Domestic worker 9 12.00 0.0092*
Dressmaker 3 4.00
Domestic 2 2.67
Student 15 20.00
Others 12 16.00
No information 25 33.33

As resources for the statistical analysis, the Chi-square test of adherence was used and for decision making, a p-value < 0.05 or 5% was adopted, signaling with an asterisk (*) the significant values.

The dominant type of dermatophytosis diagnosed was onychomycosis (49.33%), followed by Tinea capitis (24.0%) (Table 2). Most patients were treated with topical and systemic medications in combination (75%). Griseofulvin (28%) and terbinafine (25.33%) were the most prescribed for systemic treatment and, as preferred topical medication, Ciclopirox olamine was chosen in 36% of cases (Table 3). As for patient follow-up, after starting treatment, 77.33% attended follow-up appointments, 75% of them for 10 months or less, while approximately 10% for over 20 months (Fig. 1).

Table 2 Clinical characteristics of patients with dermatophytosis treated at a referral service, Belém–Pará, 2016–2020 

Clinical features n % p-value
Type of dermatophytosis/agent*
Onychomycosis 37 49.33 Chi-square
Tinea capitis 18 24.00 < 0.0001*
Tinea corporis 15 20.00
Tinea cruris 5 6.67
Tinea pedis 9 12.00
Number of lesions
1 21 28.00 Chi-square
2-5 19 25.33 0.0059*
6-10 4 5.33
More than 10 21 28.00
No information 10 13.33
Return inquiry
Yes 58 77,33 Chi-square
No 17 22,67 < 0.0001*
Previous clinical condition
Yes 5 6.67 Chi-square
No 13 17.33 0.0990
No information 57 76.00
Recurrence in less than 1 year
Yes 19 25.33 Chi-square
No 23 30.67 0.6434
No information 33 44.00

*The same patient may have been affected by more than one dermatophytosis/agent.

Table 3 Treatments for dermatophytosis in patients treated at a reference service, 2016–2020 

Treatment n % p-value
Carrying out treatment
Yes 72 96.00 Chi-square
No (other diagnosis) 3 4.00 < 0.0001
Type of treatment
Systemic 7 9.72 Chi-square
Topic 11 15.28 < 0.0001
Combined 54 75.00
Type of systemic treatment*
Fluconazole 17 22.67 Chi-square
Griseofulvin 21 28.00 0.0040
Itraconazole 3 4.00
Topical treatment*
Amorolfine 11 14.67 Chi-square
Butenafine 12 16.00 < 0.0001
Ketoconazole 9 12.00
Ciclopirox olamine 27 36.00
Clotrimazole 1 1.33
Fenticonazole 2 2.67
Piroctone olamine 2 2.67
Selenium sulfide 1 1.33

*The same patient may have used more than one type of systemic/topical treatment.

Figure 1 Treatment duration of dermatophytoses in the 75 patients studied. 

In 57.33% (n = 43) of the patients, a direct mycological examination was performed and 40 patients (93.02%) confirmed the clinical suspicion (Table 4).

Table 4 Laboratory characteristics of patients with dermatophytosis treated at a reference service, 2016–2020 

Laboratory characteristics n % p-value
Mycological examination
Yes 43 57.33 Chi-square
No 31 41.33 0.2010
No information 1 1.33
Direct mycological test result
Yes 40 93.02 Chi-square
Negative/inconclusive 3 6.98 < 0.0001
Culture performed
Yes 2 2.67 Chi-square
No 72 96.00 < 0.0001
No information 1 1.33

Some characteristics correlated with dermatophytoses, such as domestic animals and family members affected by a similar condition. However, most medical records did not report this information. There were only descriptive results of comorbidities, because many categories had a very low number of patients (Table 5).

Table 5 Characteristics associated with the development of dermatophytosis in patients treated at a reference service, 2016–2020 

Associated features n % p-value
Animals at home
Yes 3 2.67 Not applicable
No 2 1.33
No information 70 96.00
Affected family members
Yes 5 4.00 Chi-square
No 3 2.67 < 0.0001
No information 67 93.33
Comorbidities
Yes 20 26.67 Chi-square
No 17 22.67 0.7423
No information 38 50.67
Type of comorbidity*
Asthma 2 2.67 Not applicable
Diabetes mellitus 10 13.33
Dyslipidemia 1 1.33
Viral hepatitis 2 2.67
Arterial hypertension 11 14.67
Heart disease 1 1.33
Lymphoma 1 1.33
Vitiligo 1 1.33
Immune thrombocytopenic purpura 1 1.33

*The same patient may have had more than one comorbidity.

Discussion

Data showed a female predominance. This association is often correlated with women's greater demand for assistance in health services and self-care compared to the male population4,5,10,11.

The mean age of the patients was 49 years (±26.41), similar to studies carried out in another Brazilian state and in Valparaíso2. According to literature data, the most affected age group varies in relation to the type of dermatophytosis. For example, Tinea capitis is more common in children, especially in prepubertal children12, and onychomycosis, the most prevalent dermatophytosis in this study, is more prevalent in adults13. Hormonal changes during puberty that perpetuate during adulthood, such as the greater secretion of acids by the sebaceous glands and their type prevent the growth of species that cause tinea in the scalp, explaining the lower occurrence of Tinea capitis in adult and elderly patients14.

The expressive number of onychomycosis in this series is due to several reasons. The major factors associated are the age group, characteristically more affected by this location; presence of comorbidities, local components (trauma, inadequate nail care, use of closed shoes), sports activities and dermatological changes15,16. In a recent Brazilian systematic review involving 24 studies, Bodman and Krishnamurthy13 also observed that onychomycosis was the most prevalent dermatophytosis.

Topical and systemic drugs are treatment options for dermatophytosis. Most dermatophyte infections require only topical agents, whereas oral systemic treatment is recommended in extensive, refractory and/or relapsing cases and in infections with extension to follicles (e.g., Tinea capitis) and nails, as in onychomycosis1,17. In our study, 75% of the patients underwent topical and systemic treatment in combination, possibly because onychomycosis and Tinea capitis were the most prevalent, in agreement with the literature17.

Approximately 25% of the patients received treatment with terbinafine, which along with itraconazole, are drugs approved by the Food and Drug Association in the treatment of onychomycosis. Systemic drugs are a feasible treatment of onychomycosis because of their accessibility, lower cost and high efficacy18. A recent Cochrane review of oral antifungal agents in the treatment of onychomycosis showed terbinafine was more effective than azoles in achieving clinical cure with no difference in adverse effects or recurrence rates19.

The most frequently prescribed topical treatment in our study was ciclopirox olamine (36%), which is widely used in nail varnish preparations for onychomycosis, in combination with systemic treatment. Recurrence rate is higher in monotherapy. However, it is also possible to use monotherapy in cases of minimal (distal and lateral) subungual onychomycosis (less than 50% of the total nail area involved) and/or when the patient is not a suitable candidate for oral antifungal therapy20.

The second most prevalent dermatophytosis in the series was Tinea capitis. In these cases, oral antifungal agents such as terbinafine and griseofulvin are the first line of treatment. The duration of treatment ranges from 4 to 6 weeks or even 12 weeks for griseofulvin21. In our casuistic, 83.33% (n = 15) of the patients diagnosed with Tinea capitis underwent treatment with griseofulvin and all cases had clinical cure confirmed by direct mycological examination. Besides systemic treatment, in many medical records, ketoconazole or topical selenium sulfide shampoo, was prescribed to prevent the spread of the fungus22.

Regarding treatment of Tinea capitis, it is essential to identify potential sources of infection at home or in pets. Transmission between members of the same family is the most common route, mainly through contaminated fomites. In addition, zoophilic species such as Microsporum canis can cause infection after contact with infected domestic dogs and cats. Zoophilic species are more often associated with more severe and difficult-to-treat forms, such as kerion celsi21,23. In the analyzed sample, 96% (n = 70) and 93.3% (n = 67) of the medical records did not present information on the presence of affected domestic animals or family members, respectively.

Regarding follow-up, 77.33% of the patients attended successive consultations, which is essential for an effective treatment, especially in cases of onychomycosis, whose therapy is long, occasionally needs monitoring with laboratory tests and permanent cure may be difficult, as highlighted by Bentine24. Treatment duration varies according to the clinical response, type, location and extent of dermatophytosis. Another factor is the appropriate use of the drug, which can last from two weeks to several months, as in the case of onychomycosis (generally, 12 months in toenails)16. In the present study, more than half of the patients completed treatment and follow-up in less than 10 months.

The correct identification of the etiological agent by culture may be an important step as it can influence the prognosis15; however, in the present study, only 2 patients (2.67%) had fungi cultures.

Several predisposing factors facilitate the infection and spreading rate by dermatophytes, such as gender, local trauma, peripheral circulation changes, immunosuppression, occupation, hormonal changes, and even local weather25. A classic example is type 2 diabetes mellitus, because of microangiopathy, poor healing, and sensory neuropathy19,24. We identified only 26.67% (n = 20) of the patients with comorbidities, half of them (n = 10) had type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Conclusion

The present study provided demographic data, characterization of clinical aspects, and treatment regimens used in medical practice at a reference center in northern Brazil. Analyzed data emphasize the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of dermatophytosis, especially in the most fragile age groups (pediatric and elderly) and reflects how onychomycosis is most frequent in adults and Tinea capitis in children.

REFERENCES

1. Azulay RD, Azulay DR, Azulay-Abulafia L. Dermatologia, 7th ed. Rio de Janeiro:Guanabara Koogan;2017. [ Links ]

2. Bouer FJ, Logullo L, Heins EM, Dinato SLM. Epidemiology and evaluation of diagnostic methods in superficial mycoses in the dermatology service of a Public Hospital in Santos, Brazil. J Port Soc Dermatol Venereol. 2021;79(4):345–50. [ Links ]

3. Barroso LC. Dermatofitoses em pessoas atendidas em um serviço público de micologia de Manaus/AM:Epidemiologia e possíveis fontes de infecção [Dissertação]. Manaus/AM:Fundação Oswaldo Cruz;2017. [ Links ]

4. Sanguino TC, Jarros IC, Negri M. Occurrence of dermatophytoses in patients from the Sistema Único de Saúde. An Bras Dermatol. 2019;94(3):293–7. [ Links ]

5. Pires CA, Cruz NF, Lobato AM, Sousa PO, Carneiro FR, Mendes AM. Clinical, epidemiological, and therapeutic profile of dermatophytosis. An Bras Dermatol. 2014;89(2):259–64. [ Links ]

6. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do SUL. Telecondutas - Dermatofitoses [internet];2017. Acesso em 12 de agosto de 2021. Disponível em https://www.ufrgs.br/telessauders/documentos/telecondutas/tc_tinea.pdf. [ Links ]

7. Lana DFD, Batista BG, Alves SH, Fuentefria AM. Dermatofitoses:agentes etiológicos, formas clínicas, terapêutica e novas perspectivas de tratamento. Clin Biomed Res. 2017;36(4):230–41. [ Links ]

8. Goldstein AO, Goldstein BG, Dellavalle RP, Levy ML, Rosen T, Ofori AO. Dermatophyte (tinea) infections. In:Lee S (Ed). UpToDate. Retrieved September 15, 2019, from https://www.uptodate.com/contents/dermatophyte-tinea-infections. [ Links ]

9. Verma S, Vasani R, Reszke R, Matusiak Ł, Szepietowski JC. Prevalence and clinical characteristics of itch in epidemic-like scenario of dermatophytoses in India:a cross-sectional study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(1):180–3. [ Links ]

10. Pereira FO, Gomes SM, Silva SL, Teixeira APC, Lima IO. The prevalence of dermatophytoses in Brazil:a systematic review. J Med Microbiol. 2021;70(3). [ Links ]

11. Rocha J, Duarte ML, Oliveira P, Brito C. Dermatofitias no distrito de Braga - estudo retrospectivo dos últimos 11 anos (1999–2009). J Port Soc Dermatol Venereol. 2011;69(1):69-78. [ Links ]

12. Al Aboud AM, Crane JS. Tinea Capitis. [Updated 2022 May 8]. In:StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL):StatPearls Publishing;2022 Jan-. Available from:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK536909/Links ]

13. Bodman MA, Krishnamurthy K. Onychomycosis. [Updated 2022 May 1]. In:StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL):StatPearls Publishing;2022 Jan-. Available from:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441853/Links ]

14. Petrucelli MF, Abreu MH, Cantelli BAM, Segura GG, Nishimura FG, Bitencourt TA, et al. Epidemiology and diagnostic perspectives of dermatophytoses. J Fungi (Basel). 2020;6(4):310. [ Links ]

15. Pereira, HS, Silva PMF, Araújo JSM, Pereira IF. Caracterização das dermatofitoses de pacientes atendidos em um laboratório de análises clínicas na cidade de Campina Grande-PB. In:Anais do VII Congresso Internacional de Envelhecimento Humano, 2021;Editora realize;2021. p. 1401-17. [ Links ]

16. Kovitwanichkanont T, Chong AH. Superficial fungal infections. Aust J Gen Pract. 2019;48(10):706–11. [ Links ]

17. Rato M, Costin A, Furtado C, Sousa C, Toscano C, Veríssimo C, et al. Epidemiologia das infeções fúngicas superficiais em Portugal:revisão de 3 anos (2014–2016). J Port Soc Dermatol Venereol. 2016;76(3):269-78. [ Links ]

18. Lipner SR, Scher RK. Onychomycosis:treatment and prevention of recurrence. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(4):853–67. [ Links ]

19. Kreijkamp-Kaspers S, Hawke K, Guo L, Kerin G, Bell-Syer SE, Magin P, et al. Oral antifungal medication for toenail onychomycosis Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;7(7):CD010031. [ Links ]

20. Dalla Lana DF. Desenvolvimento de Novas Entidades Químicas e Formulações Para o Tratamento de Dermatomicoses. (Tese de Doutorado). Porto Alegre/RS:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul;2019. [ Links ]

21. Leung AKC, Hon KL, Leong KF, Barankin B, Lam JM. Tinea capitis:an updated review. Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov. 2020;14(1):58–68. [ Links ]

22. Hay RJ. Tinea capitis:current status. Mycopathologia. 2017;182(1-2):87–93. [ Links ]

23. John AM, Schwartz RA, Janniger CK. The kerion:an angry Tinea capitis. Int J Dermatol. 2018;57(1):3–9. [ Links ]

24. Bentine LLM. Dermatófitos Como Agentes de Onicomicoses em População Adulta de Serviço Ambulatorial do Hospital de Aeronáutica de São Paulo, na Cidade de São Paulo, Brasil [Dissertação]. São Paulo:Secretaria de Saúde do estado de São Paulo;2017. [ Links ]

25. Gupta AK, Versteeg SG, Shear NH. Onychomycosis in the 21st century:an update on diagnosis, epidemiology, and treatment. J Cut Med Surg. 2017;21(6):525–39. [ Links ]

FundingNone.

Ethical disclosures

Protection of human and animal subjects. The authors declare that the procedures followed were in accordance with the regulations of the relevant clinical research ethics committee and with those of the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki).

Confidentiality of data. The authors declare that they have followed the protocols of their work center on the publication of patient data.

Right to privacy and informed consent. Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors have obtained approval from the Ethics Committee for analysis and publication of routinely acquired clinical data and informed consent was not required for this retrospective observational study.

Received: February 01, 2022; Accepted: May 22, 2022

*Corresponding author: Amanda Gabay Moreira E-mail: gabayamanda@gmail.com

Conflicts of interest

None.

Creative Commons License Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology. Published by Permanyer. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license