SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.45 issue4Restoration of mine tailings with organic amendments and plant species: Impact on the physical properties of the soilEffects of climate change in soil organic matter molecular structure in a Mediterranean savanna author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista de Ciências Agrárias

Print version ISSN 0871-018XOn-line version ISSN 2183-041X

Rev. de Ciências Agrárias vol.45 no.4 Lisboa Dec. 2022  Epub Dec 01, 2022

https://doi.org/10.19084/rca.28746 

Artigo

Remediation of a chlorpyrifos contaminated soil using novel bacterial strains and cyclodextrin: evaluation of its effectiveness by ecotoxicity studies

Recuperación de un suelo contaminado con clorpirifós usando nuevas cepas bacterianas y ciclodextrina: evaluación de su efectividad a través de estudios de ecotoxicidad

Alba Lara-Moreno1  2 

Esmeralda Morillo1 

Francisco Merchán2 

Fernando Madrid1 

Jaime Villaverde1 

1 Department of Agrochemistry, Environmental Microbiology and Soil Conservation, Institute of Natural Resources and Agrobiology of Seville, Spanish National Research Council (IRNAS-CSIC), Seville, Spain

2 Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Seville, Seville, Spain


Abstract

Chlorpyrifos (CLP) is one of the most widely used insecticides in the world. However, it is highly toxic for living organisms and persistent in the environment. Biological treatment is considered as a good option to remediate polluted environmental areas. Two bacterial strains, Bacillus megaterium CCLP1 and Bacillus safensis CCLP2 were isolated from two selected agricultural soils (R and LL), using enrichment technique in presence of CLP as only carbon and energy source. These strains were able to remove in solution up to 99.1 and 98.9% of CLP after 60 d (initial concentration: 10 mg L-1). Several treatments were performed in a soil artificially contaminated with CLP to enhance its remediation: 1. biostimulation, adding micro- and macronutrients; 2. bioaugmentation, inoculating B. megaterium CCLP1 or B. safensis CCLP2; 3. Addition of randomly methylated β-cyclodextrin (RAMEB), as bioavailability enhancement; 4. bioaugmentation + RAMEB. The best CLP biodegradation results were achieved when bioaugmentation and RAMEB were jointly applied. After biodegradation treatment, an ecotoxicological test was carried out to verify the effectiveness of the bioremediation strategy in soil. Results pointed out that bacteria individually inoculated into the soil were able to decrease the toxicity to undetectable levels.

Keywords: Chlorpyrifos; bioremediation; soil; Bacillus; cyclodextrin

Resumen

Clorpirifos (CLP) es uno de los insecticidas más usados en el mundo. Sin embargo, es altamente tóxico para los organismos vivos y persistente en el medio ambiente. El tratamiento biológico es considerado como una buena opción para recuperar áreas contaminadas. Dos cepas bacterianas, Bacillus megaterium CCLP1 y Bacillus safensis CCLP2 fueron aisladas a partir de dos suelos agrícolas a través de cultivos de enriquecimientos en presencia de CLP como única fuente de carbono y energía. Estas cepas fueron capaces de eliminar un 99.1 y 98.9% de CLP en solución tras 60 d de ensayo (concentración inicial: 10 mg L-1). Varios tratamientos fueron aplicados en un suelo artificialmente contaminado con CLPpara su biorrecuperación: 1. bioestímulo, adicionando macro- y micronutrientes; 2. bioaumento, inoculando B. megaterium CCLP1 o B. safensis CCLP2; 3. Adición de β-ciclodextrina aleatoriamente metilada (RAMEB), como potenciador de la biodisponibilidad; 4. bioaumento + RAMEB. Los mejores resultados de biodegradación de CLP fueron obtenidos cuando bioaumento y RAMEB fueron aplicados conjuntamente. Tras el tratamiento de biodegradación, un ensayo ecotoxicológico fue realizado para verificar la efectividad de la estrategia de biorrecuperación en el suelo. Los resultados mostraron que las bacterias inoculadas individualmente en el suelo fueron capaces de reducir la toxicidad a niveles indetectables.

Palabras claves: Clorpirifos; biorecuperación; suelo; Bacillus; ciclodextrina

INTRODUCTION

Chlorpyrifos (CLP) [O, O-diethyl O-(3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyl) phosphorothioate] is an organophosphorus insecticide. Currently, its use is banned throughout the European Union, but it is still used in South America and Asian countries, and with some restrictions in China and USA. It has been one of the most widely applied pesticides due to its low-cost and its high efficiency (Bose et al., 2021). CLP involves a serious risk for humans, since it is an acetyl cholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor, causing neurotoxic disorders. Nowadays its presence remains in water samples and soils even in those countries where CLP had been banned. Its continued application leads to its accumulation in soils, affecting their properties and productivity (Bose et al., 2021).

Microbial biodegradation is one of the best strategies to remove CLP from the environment. Biostimulation and bioaugmentation are used to enhance its bioremediation (Rayu et al., 2017). CLP is highly hydrophobic and persistent in soils, and bioavailability is an essential factor in efficiency of pesticide biodegradation in soils. For this reason, cyclodextrins (CDs) have been recognized as a tool for the elimination of pesticides in soils, since they are able to increase their water solubility, enhancing bioavailability to accelerate its biodegradation (Morillo et al., 2020).

The objective of this work was to bioremediate a soil contaminated with the insecticide CLP in presence of the bacterial strains B. megaterium CCLP1 or B. safensis CCLP2. Both strains were isolated from two agricultural soils treated with CLP for years. Several biodegradation treatments were performed: biostimulation, adding macro-and micronutrients solutions (NS), bioaugmentation, inoculating isolated bacterial strains, and addition of a CD as availability enhancer. Lastly, the feasibility of bioremediation strategy was verified through ecotoxicological studies at the beginning and after the CLP decontamination treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

CLP was provided by Sigma-Aldrich (purity > 98%). Randomly methylated β-cyclodextrin was provide by Cyclolab (Budapest, Hungary). B. megaterium CCLP1 and B. safensis CCLP2 were isolated from agricultural soils by enrichment cultures with CLP. Soil properties of studied soil are show in Table 1.

Table 1 Some properties of the soil used 

Soil pH CO3 -2 (%) OM (%) Sand (%) Silt (%) Clay (%)
ALC 5.1 0.5 13.9 69.1 7.8 23.1
R 7.7 4.0 3.4 77.0 9.5 13.5
LL 7.8 4.0 0.9 79.6 9.3 11.1

Biodegradation experiments were carried out in 25 mL sterilized glass vials in triplicates. Each vial contained: 1 g of contaminated soil sample (50 mg kg-1 CLP) and the required volume of NS to reach 40% of the soil water holding capacity (73.4 ml per 100 g of soil) for biostimulation. Several biodegradation strategies were designed, where contaminated soil was treated with a solution of RAMEB (an amount corresponding to 10 times that of the CLP molar soil concentration initially added) and/or bioaugmented, inoculating the isolated degrading bacteria (108 CFU g-1). Abiotic degradation control tests were also performed by adding 200 mg L-1 of HgCl2. All assays were kept at 30°C under agitation at 180 rpm during 100 d. Samples were taken at different incubation periods to monitor the concentration of CLP. 1 g of soil sample was extracted with 5 mL of acetonitrile:water (90:10). The extraction process was: 1) 1 min under vortex mixer, 2) 10 min in an ultrasound bath, 3) 1 h of shaking at 100 rpm and 20 ± 1°C, and 4) 10 min centrifugation at 8000 rpm. Residual CLP was quantified by GC/MS. The separation was achieved with a 30×0.25 mm I.D. DB-5 MS (J&W Scientific, Agilent Technologies) column, which is covered with phenyl methylpolysiloxane 5%. The analytical method used was based on the method described by Ishag et al. (2016). Biodegradation curves were adjusted to three kinetic models: First Simple Order Kinetics (SFO), Hockey-Stick Model (HS) kinetics or Multicompartmental First Order Model (FOMC), following the indications of the Focus working group.

Microtox® Test System using Vibrio fischeri was employed to measure the toxicity of bioremediated soil. Briefly, 3 mL of NaCl at 2% were added to 2 g of soil. These suspensions were shaken for 10 min, and centrifuged (2 min, 10000 rpm). Samples were serially diluted (1:2) with NaCl at 2% solution. After 15 min of exposure, the bioluminescence was read to calculate EC50 and TU. EC50 indicates the pollutant concentration (% v/v) that produce a reduction of 50% in V. fischeri luminescence, and the toxic units (TU) were calculated according to the equation TU = 100/EC50.

Toxicity was measured at the beginning and at the end of the treatment and was analysed relatively to the control.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

CLP biodegradation in soil

Table 2 shows the different treatments conducted to achieve an effective remediation of the soil contaminated with CLP.

Table 2 Treatments performed in this study 

ALC soil from a Natural Park, was used to carry out biodegradation test. No significant biodegradation was observed in the non-inoculated soil in presence of its endogenous soil microbiota (0.3% after 100 d, Figure 1, T1). However, when NS was added to stimulate soil microbiota, a slight increase in the biodegradation percentage was observed (15.7%, T2), but DT50 value (required time for the pollutant concentration to decline to half of its initial value) was almost 2 years (Table 3). It indicates the high persistence of CLP in this soil. Based on these results, the application of bioremediation techniques such as bioaugmentation and the addition of RAMEB to improve the soil CLP biodegradation rate were considered.

B. megaterium CCLP1 and B. safensis CCLP2 were inoculated individually. After 100 d of inoculation, 60.6% and 64.8% of extent of degradation was reached, respectively (Figure 1, T3, T4). In addition, DT50 was significantly reduced from 696.6 d (only with biostimulation) to 44.6 and 47.1 d (Table 3) in the case of inoculation with B. megaterium CCLP1 and B. safensis CCLP2, respectively.

Figure 1 CLP biodegradation curves in ALC soil after the application of different treatments. 

Table 3 Calculated kinetic parameters for CLP biodegradation in soil 

Treatment Kinetic model DT50 Extent of biodegradation (%)
T1 SFO 0.3
T2 SFO 696.6 15.7
T3 HS 44.6 60.6
T4 HS 47.1 64.6
T5 FOMC 38.9 63.6
T6 HS 14 71.5
T7 HS 7.9 69.6

RAMEB was added to ALC soil (Figure 1, T5), achieving a 63.6% of biodegradation, and a decreasing in DT50 (38.9 d), regarding NS treatment. RAMEB would be provoking an increase of the CLP fraction in the soil solution, which involves an improvement in its extent and rate of biodegradation (Köse et al., 2022). CCLP1 or CCLP2 strains, jointly applied with RAMEB, were the most effective treatments (Figure 1, T6, T7). DT50 was reduced to 14 and 7.9 d, respectively (Table 3).

Toxicity analysis in soil samples

The toxicity of the CLP and their potential formed metabolites remaining in soil were assessed at the end of the bioremediation process. Results were compared according to classification proposed by Persoone et al. (2003) (Table 4). Non-inoculated contaminated soil (T1) showed a value of TU 5.6 (1 < TU < 10, acute toxicity). However, in presence of B. megaterium CCLP1, the toxicity was undetectable after 100 d. When B. safensis CCLP2 was inoculated, the level of toxicity decreased from acute toxicity to non-toxic (TU 0,004, TU < 0.4, non-toxic). These results confirmed its ability to degrade CLP to non-toxic substances. In addition, the effectiveness of bioaugmentation and RAMEB addition (T6 and T7 experiments) was demonstrated since no toxicity was detected in any case (Table 4). It is worth noting that, as far as we know, no study of CLP ecotoxicity in soil has been published previously.

Table 4 Acute toxicity test towards V. fischeri before and after 100 d of incubation 

Treatment EC50 (%) TU Toxicity
T1 17,8 5,6 Acute
T3 - - Non toxic
T4 25363 0,004 Non toxic
T6 - - Non toxic
T7 - - Non toxic

CONCLUSIONS

B. megaterium CCLP1 and B. safensis CCLP2, isolated in our lab from two agricultural soils by enrichment cultures, in presence of CLP as the only carbon source, proved to be able to degrade CLP in soil. RAMEB was used as a bioavailability enhancer of CLP in soil due to its ability to form an inclusion complex. However, the most effective treatment was the joint application of bacterial strains and cyclodextrin. The feasibility of bioremediation strategy was checked using ecotoxicological studies, showing a decline in toxicity parameters in all cases where the selected bacterial strains were used. A complete elimination in the toxicity was achieved, when bioaugmentation and CD treatments were applied, reducing also the time required to remediate the soil to less than 14 d. It is concluded that, biodegradation should be considered as a useful process to degrade CLP, but the soil particular conditions must be adjusted to achieve the most suitable for bioremediation.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness under the research project CMT2017-82472-C2-1-R (AEI/FEDER, UE). Alba, Lara-Moreno University of Seville for her Margarita Salas grant funded by the European Union - NextGenerationEU.

References

Bose, S.; Kumar, P.S. & Vo, D.V.N. (2021) - A review on the microbial degradation of chlorpyrifos and its metabolite TCP. Chemosphere, vol. 283, art. 131447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131447Links ]

Ishag, A.E.S.A.; Abdelbagi, A.O.; Hammad, A.M.A.; Elsheikh, E.A.E.; Elsaid, O.E.; Hur, J.H. & Laing, M.D. (2016) - Biodegradation of chlorpyrifos, malathion, and dimethoate by three strains of bacteria isolated from pesticide-polluted soils in Sudan. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 64, n. 45, p. 8491-8498. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b03334Links ]

Köse, K.; Tüysüz, M.; Aksüt, D. & Uzun, L. (2022) - Modification of cyclodextrin and use in environmental applications. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 29, p. 182-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15005-yLinks ]

Morillo, E.; Madrid, F.; Lara-Moreno, A. & Villaverde, J. (2020) - Soil bioremediation by cyclodextrins. a review. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, vol. 591, art. 119943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119943Links ]

Persoone, G.; Marsalek, B.; Blinova, I.; Törökne, A.; Zarina, D.; Manusadzianas, L.; Nalecz-Jawecki, G.; Tofan, L.; Stepanova, N. & Tothova, L. (2003) - A practical and user-friendly toxicity classification system with microbiotests for natural waters and wastewaters. Environmental Toxicology, vol. 18, n. 6, p. 395-402. https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.10141Links ]

Rayu, S.; Nielsen, U.N.; Nazaries, L. & Singh, B.K. (2017) - Isolation and molecular characterization of novel chlorpyrifos and 3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol-degrading bacteria from sugarcane farm soils. Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 8, art. 518. https://doi.org/10.3389%2Ffmicb.2017.00518Links ]

(*E-mail: alara9@us.es)

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License