SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.39 número3COVID-19 entre a equipe de enfermagem: Cenários e diferenças regionaisBoas práticas no tratamento da disfagia em doentes com AVC: consenso de peritos portugueses índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Portuguese Journal of Public Health

versión impresa ISSN 2504-3137versión On-line ISSN 2504-3145

Resumen

LUCACCIONI, Héloïse et al. Risk of COVID-19 in Health Professionals: A Case-Control Study, Portugal. Port J Public Health [online]. 2021, vol.39, n.3, pp.137-144.  Epub 31-Dic-2021. ISSN 2504-3137.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000519472.

Introduction:

Health professionals face higher occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2. We aimed to estimate the risk of COVID-19 test positivity in health professionals compared to non-health professionals.

Methods:

We conducted a test-negative case-control study using Portuguese national surveillance data (January to May 2020). Cases were suspected cases who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2; controls were suspected cases who tested negative. We used multivariable logistic regression modelling to estimate the odds ratio of a positive COVID-19 test (RT-PCR; primary outcome), comparing health professionals and non-health professionals (primary exposure), and adjusting for the confounding effect of demographic, clinical, and epidemiological characteristics, and the modification effect of the self-reported epidemiological link (i.e., self-reported contact with a COVID-19 case or person with COVID-19-like symptoms).

Results:

Health professionals had a 2-fold higher risk of a positive COVID-19 test result (aOR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.69-2.11). However, this association was strongly modified by the self-report of an epidemiological link such that, among cases who did report an epidemiological link, being a health professional was a protective factor (aOR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.98).

Conclusion:

Our findings suggest that health professionals might be primarily infected by unknown contacts, plausibly in the healthcare setting, but also that their occupational exposure does not systematically translate into a higher risk of transmission. We suggest that this could be interpreted in light of different types and timing of exposure, and variability in risk perception and associated preventive behaviours.

Palabras clave : COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Health professionals; Portugal.

        · resumen en Portugués     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )