30 5 
Home Page  

  • SciELO

  • SciELO


GE-Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology

 ISSN 2341-4545

CORREIA, João et al. Small-Bowel Angioectasias: Are They Responsible for a Real Impact on Survival?. []. , 30, 5, pp.10-16.   01--2023. ISSN 2341-4545.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000524268.

Introduction:

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of small-bowel angioectasia on survival, given the hypothesis that angioectasia might be an independent risk factor of frailty and poor outcomes.

Methods:

In this retrospective cohort study, all patients undergoing small-bowel capsule endoscopy between 2010 and 2013 for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding from a Portuguese tertiary centre were included. Follow-up started after capsule endoscopy and ended upon death or end of the study (November 2020). Survival analysis was performed using a Cox proportional-hazards model, in order to analyse the effect of small-bowel angioectasia on survival as well as potentially confounding factors (age, vascular diseases and chronic kidney disease).

Results:

A total of 176 patients were included in this study (50.6% male), with a median age of 68.5 years (IQR 24). The median follow-up was 7 years (IQR 4), during which 67 (38.1%) patients died. Seventy-three (41.5%) patients had at least one small-bowel angioectasia on capsule endoscopy. On multi-variate Cox regression analysis, only age, peripheral arterial disease, history of previous mesenteric ischaemia and chronic kidney disease were independent risk factors of death. The presence of small-bowel angioectasia did not affect survival in this analysis (HR 1.30; 95% CI 0.75-2.23; p = 0.35).

Conclusion:

In this retrospective cohort study, some comorbidities and age were independent predictors of poor survival. The presence of small-bowel angioectasia per se did not affect survival.

: Angiectasia; Capsule endoscopy; Survival.

        · |     ·     · ( pdf )