SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.44 número2-3Comportamento fisiológico das sementes de Cojoba arborea (L.) Britton & Rose submetidas à secagemBacillus sp. como promotor de crescimento em soja índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista de Ciências Agrárias

versão impressa ISSN 0871-018Xversão On-line ISSN 2183-041X

Rev. de Ciências Agrárias vol.44 no.2-3 Lisboa set. 2021  Epub 07-Maio-2021

https://doi.org/10.19084/rca.20122 

Artigo

Physiological marker of phosphorus nutritional status in potato

Marcador fisiológico do estado nutricional do fósforo em batata

Darlene Sausen1 

Franciele Antônia Neis1 

Suzi Cerezer Uliana1 

Júlia Gomes Farias1 

Hilda Soriani Hidebrand1 

Ritieli Baptista Mambrin2 

Gessieli Possebom1 

Camila Peligrinotti Tarouco1 

Ivan Ricardo Carvalho3 

Francine Lautenchleger4 

Fernando Teixeira Nicoloso1 

1 Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Brasil

2 Centro de Ensino Superior Riograndense (CESURG), Brasil

3 Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (UNIJUÍ), Brasil

4 Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste (Unicentro), Brasil


Abstract

The development of more efficient plants in the use of nutrients will be fundamental for agriculture in the coming years. The objective of this work was to define a physiological marker of the nutritional status of P for potato clones cultivated soilless and in vitro, in order to facilitate the selection process of more efficient clones in the use of P. For this, two experiments were carried out with seven potato clones (SMIC 148-A, Dakota Rose, SMINIA 793101-3, SMIB 106-7, SMIF 212-3, SMIJ 319-1 and P 150) grown at two levels of P (low and high) in the culture systems in vitro (1.935 and 19.346mg P L-1) and in soilless (2.32 and 23.2mg P L-1) using sand as substrate. The inorganic P content and the total accumulation of P in shoot and roots seem to be good indicators of the nutritional status of P in potato plants, both in soilless and in vitro cultivation. The activity of the acidic phosphatase enzymes (APases) in the tissues of the potato depends very much on the culture system, the clone and the organ of the analyzed plant, making it difficult to choose it as a physiological marker for restriction of P in potatoes. The dry mass of the potato plant may be a good indicator of the nutritional status of P in clones grown soilless.

Keywords: acid phosphatases; in vitro cultivation; mineral nutrition; soilless cultivation; Solanum tuberosum L

Resumo

O desenvolvimento de plantas mais eficientes no uso de nutrientes será fundamental para a agricultura nos próximos anos. O objetivo deste trabalho foi definir um marcador fisiológico do status nutricional do P para clones de batata cultivados fora do solo e in vitro, visando facilitar o processo de seleção de clones mais eficientes no uso de P. Para tanto, foram realizados dois experimentos com sete clones de batata (SMIC 148-A, Dakota Rose, SMINIA 793101-3, SMIB 106-7, SMIF 212-3, SMIJ 319-1 e P 150) cultivados em dois níveis de P (baixo e alto) no sistema de cultivo in vitro (1,935 e 19,346mg P L-1) e no cultivo fora do solo (2,32 e 23,2mg P L-1) usando areia como substrato. O teor de P inorgânico e a acumulação total de P na parte aérea e nas raízes parecem ser bons indicadores da condição nutricional de P em plantas de batata, tanto no cultivo fora do solo quanto no in vitro. A atividade das enzimas fosfatases ácidas (APases) nos tecidos da batata depende muito do sistema de cultivo, do clone e do órgão da planta analisado, dificultando a escolha deste como um marcador fisiológico para restrição de P em batata. A massa seca da planta de batata pode ser um bom indicador do status nutricional do P em clones cultivados fora do solo.

Palavras-chave: cultivo fora do solo; cultivo in vitro; fosfatases ácidas; nutrição mineral; Solanum tuberosum L

INTRODUCTION

Potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) is one of the main commodities produced in Brazil. 100,000 hectares of potatoes are grown annually, which are destined for the fresh market (65%), the chip industry (15%), the pre-fried industry (12%) and seed potatoes (8%) (Abba, 2021). For the ideal growth of the potato plant and for high tuber productivity to be achieved, P must be available in the soil and the plant must be able to absorb and use this element (Fernandes and Sorotto, 2012).

Under conditions of limited phosphorus (P) availability, plants may promote: (i) morphological and architectural changes in the root system, such as reduction of main root extension, increase in number and extension of secondary, tertiary and root hair, aiming to increase the acquisition of P, associated with mycorrhizal fungi to increase the absorption of P; and/or (ii) biochemical and biological alterations such as increased synthesis of Pi transporters, exudation of organic acids and acid phosphatases (APases), which modify the chemistry of the rhizosphere, as well as (Lynch and Brown, 2008; Brown et al., 2013).

The increase in activity (Duff et al., 1994) and the expression (Ma et al., 2009) of APases is an adaptive response of plants, known to be induced in response to stress in the restriction condition of phosphorus (P). These proteins are important in the production, transport and recycling of soluble inorganic P (Pi). Thus, APases may have different metabolic functions and be found in the cell wall and / or be secreted by the roots in the rhizosphere, as well as in the intracellular environment, especially in the vacuole (Tran et al., 2010). Intracellular APases usually control internal Pi homeostasis, whereas secreted APases control the external acquisition of Pi (Duff et al., 1994). Thus, APases play an important role in the supply and metabolism of Pi for the maintenance of cellular metabolism (Tejera García et al., 2004; Tabaldi et al., 2007).

The production of dry matter and the accumulation of P distributed between roots and shoot of a plant have been studied and considered as factors in determining the efficiency of absorption and utilization of P (Machado et al., 2001). The nutritional limitation causes a greater reduction in shoot than in root growth (Hermans et al., 2006). This fact demonstrates that roots become preferential drains of photoassimilates, as observed in several species cultivated in soil and in nutrient solution (Vance et al., 2003). Thus, in order to select genotypes that are most efficient in the uptake and / or utilization of P, this work aimed to define a physiological marker of the nutritional status of P for clones of potatoes cultivated soilless and in vitro, in order to facilitate the selection process of potato clones that are more efficient in the use of P.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The potato clones used in the experiments were from the Potato Genetics and Breeding Program of the Federal University of Santa Maria: SMIC 148-A, Dakota Rose, SMINIA 793101-3, SMIB 106-7, SMIF 212-3, SMIJ 319- 1 and P 150 and were derived from micropropagated seedlings in standard Murashige - Skoog (MS) culture medium (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) supplemented with 30 g L-1 sucrose, 0.1 g L-1 myo-inositol and 6 g L-1 agar and maintained in a growth room under ideal conditions of growth (Sausen et al., 2020a), for 14 days.

In the first experiment, nodal segments of 1.0 cm long seedlings were innoculated in MS medium where they received P treatments consisting of 5 and 50% of the standard P concentration of the MS medium, called in this work of below (1,935 mg P L-1) and high (19.35 mg P L-1) levels of P, the source of P being KH2PO4, and to maintain the potassium (K) concentration, KCl was used. Thus, the concentrations of other nutrients were kept the same for both treatments. The experimental unit consisted of ten test tubes, each containing 10.0 mL of culture medium and three nodal segments with one gem and leaf (called explants), and four replicates were used in a completely randomized design (seven clones and two P levels). In other words, the average of 30 plants (experimental unit) in each repetition was evaluated, with four repetitions per treatment (120 plants), in each of the 14 treatments tested. The test tubes containing the explants were kept in a growth room with a temperature of 25 ± 2°C and photoperiod of 16 h (Sausen et al., 2020a). The plants were analyzed at 40 days after innoculated. At the end of the cultivation time, plant material was collected to analyze the soluble Pi concentration and the activity of the APases, as well as the total P concentration of the tissues and the dry mass of shoots and roots were evaluated. The material used to determine the dry mass was dried in an oven at 65°C until it reached constant weight and then the dry mass was determined.

In order to simulate a closer cultivation condition to that found in a potato crop, second experiment was conducted in a greenhouse in the city of Santa Maria in the state of Rio Grande do Sul - Brazil (29º 42 ’56’’S, 53º 43’ 13’’W and 95 m altitude), during the spring. In the period of the experiment, the average air temperature was 18.1oC, the relative humidity 74.1% and the average wind speed 2.6 m.s-1. Pre-micropropagated seedlings were acclimatized for 14 days in a soilless culture system, where the roots of the plants receive a nutrient solution containing all the nutrients essential for their growth and development, without waste (Sausen et al., 2020b), kept under shade cloth (60% light extinction) for 5 days. Afterwards, the plants were transplanted to a culture system composed of polyethylene and sand trays as substrate (Bandinelli et al., 2013), in which three irrigations were carried out with nutrient solution during the day, with a duration of 15 min each, with the aid of a digital programmer and a low - flow pump, so that the entire substrate was saturated with solution, maintaining the P of the treatment the plants. The excess solution was drained through a hole in the bottom of the tray, stored in a reservoir to return to the system at the next irrigation. Each tray had twelve plants spaced 10 by 10 cm apart. The treatments of P consisted of 5 and 50% of the standard concentration of P in the nutrient solution for the cultivation of soilless potatoes described by Bisognin et al. (2015), referred to in this work as low (2.32 mg P L-1) and high (23.2 mg P L-1) levels of P. To maintain the K concentration of the standard solution, KCl was used (Sausen et al., 2021). The electrical conductivity (EC) was maintained at 2 dS m-1 (water was used to reduce EC when necessary) and pH at 5.7 was adjusted every two days by the addition of HCl. The experiment was conducted in a two - factor scheme (seven clones and two P levels) in the randomized block design, using six replicates, the experimental unit consisted of the average of three plants. In other words, the average of 3 plants (experimental unit) in each repetition was evaluated, with six repetitions per treatment (18 plants), in each of the 14 treatments tested. At 40 days after planting (DAP), the activity of the APases and the concentration of Pi were analyzed. At 62 DAP, some clones showed visible signs of senescence beginning when cultivated at the low P level, and the evaluation of the total P concentration in leaves and roots tissues and the production of dry mass of leaves, stems, tubers and roots were carried out, after reaching constant weight in an oven at 65°C.

For the determination of APase activity in both experiments, the roots and leaves were frozen in liquid N2, macerated and homogenized in 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and 0.1% albumin in a ratio of 1:3 and then centrifuged at 20,000 g for 30 min. The supernatant resulting from the centrifugation was used for the enzymatic assay. The acid phosphatase activity was determined according to Tabaldi et al. (2007) in a reaction medium containing 3.5 mM sodium azide, 2.5 mM calcium chloride, 100 mM citrate buffering, and pH 5.5 to a final volume of 200 μL. A 20 μL aliquot of the enzyme preparation was added to the reaction mixture, except for the control, and preincubated for 10 min at 35°C. The reaction was started by addition of substrate (3 mM PPi) and terminated by the addition of 200 μl of 10% TCA. The mean value of protein used in the calculations to determine APase activity was approximately 0.30 mg g -1 of fresh mass, because, after previous testing, there was no variation in protein concentration in the tissues between the doses of P tested. The concentration of total protein was quantified by the method of Bradford (1976).

The same material used in the APase assay was used to quantify the Pi concentration, using a standard curve constructed with KH2PO4. An aliquot of the diluted sample (800 mL) was incubated at 45 °C for 45 min in medium containing 2.5 N sulfuric acid, 4.8 mM ammonium molybdate and 35 mM ascorbic acid in a total volume of 1 mL. After cooling, the samples were read at 650 nm in a SF325NM spectrophotometer (Bel Engineering, Italy).

For the determination of total phosphorus concentration, three samples dry mass of shoots (in vitro cultivation), leaves (soilless cultivation) and roots of each treatment, of the two cultivation systems were macerate and subjected to acid digestion procedure in an open system with digestion block (Velp Scientifica, Model DK, Italy). Samples were preweighed and transferred to the decomposition vials. In each vial containing the samples were added 5mL of HNO3 14 mol L-1. The vials were capped and held at 140 °C for 2 h. After the digestion step, the samples were transferred to polypropylene vials and vented at 25 mL. The determination of P was performed by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) on a Perkin Elmer spectrometer (Optima 4300 DV, USA) equipped with Gencone® nebulizer, cyclone type nebulizer chamber and quartz torch with injector of alumina with 2.0 mm of internal diameter.

The data of the two experiments was submitted to analysis of variance using the software Sisvar 5.3 (Ferreira, 2011). The means between clones and between levels of P were compared by the Scott - Knott test (Scott e Knott, 1974) at 5% probability.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The variation of the soluble phosphorus concentration (Pi) in the tissues of the plant can express the nutritional status of the plant, considering that an extra accumulation would occur only when the requirements for growth have been reached. In in vitro and soilless cultivations, all potato clones presented a reduction in the concentration of Pi present in roots and shoots under low P levels, except for clone SMIC 148-A, which shows an increase of Pi in roots in in vitro culture (Table 1). When changes occur in the supply of P to plants, the concentration of Pi in the cytoplasm is regulated by its content in the vacuole (Bieleski and Ferguson, 1983). Vacuolar Pi has a reserve function, and if the amount of absorbed P is less than its demand for the cell it returns to the cytoplasm, taking into account the metabolic requirement of the cell. On the other hand, if there is less growth or development of cells and the supply of P in the external environment is abundant, the excess P uptake will be stored in the vacuole. Apparently, there is coordination in the mobilization of P between the different tissues in order to synchronize the growth and development of the plants and to avoid that these processes are paralyzed (Lin et al., 2009).

Among the clones, the concentration of Pi in the shoot, independent of the P level, was higher for the clone P 150 (2.8 μmol Pi g tissue-1) in the in vitro culture (Table 1) and for the clone SMINIA 793101-3 (2.8 μmol Pi g tissue-1) in soilless cultivation (Table 2). In the roots, the concentration of Pi in the in vitro culture under low P levels was higher for the Dakota Rose clone without differing from the SMIC 148-A (1.25 μmol Pi g tissue-1), and for the high level of P the highest Pi was determined in SMIB 106-7 (4.7 μmol Pi g tissue-1) (Table 1). While in the soilless cultivation at high P, SMIC 148-A was the clone that concentrated more Pi in the roots (5.6 μmol Pi g tissue-1), but at the low P level, it was not possible to differentiate clones (Table 2). In spite of this, the concentration of Pi in shoot and root appears to be a good indicator of the nutritional status of P in potato plants in both soilless and in vitro cultivation and can probably used to distinguish clones efficient in the use of P.

Table 1 Effects of P levels on the inorganic P concentration in the shoot (Pi Shoot) and in the roots (Pi Root), in the APase activity in the shoot (APase Shoot) and in the roots (APase Root), in the total concentration of P in shoot dry mass (T Conc. S) and in root dry mass (T Conc. R), in the shoot dry mass (SDM) and root dry mass (RDM), of the potato clones evaluated at 40 days after inoculation in the in vitro culture with low (1.935 mg P L-1) and high (19.346mg P L-1) P in the culture medium 

Pi Shoot (μmol Pi g tissue-1) Pi Root (μmol Pi g tissue-1)
P levels Low High Means Low High Means
SMIC 148-A 0.506 bB 1.502 dA 1.004 1.182 aA 0.502 fB 0.842
Dakota Rose 0.230 cB 2.146 bA 1.188 1.304 aB 2.620 bA 1.962
SMINIA 793103-3 0.645 bB 1.775 cA 1.210 0.425 cB 1.562 dA 0.994
SMIB 106-7 0.404 bB 2.156 bA 1.280 0.859 bB 4.702 aA 2.781
SMIF 212-3 0.423 bB 1.841 cA 1.132 0.268 cB 0.951 eA 0.610
SMIJ 319-1 0.480 bB 1.970 bA 1.225 0.431 cB 2.342 cA 1.387
P 150 1.565 aB 2.776 aA 2.171 0.566 cB 2.324 cA 1.445
Means 0.608 2.024 0.719 2.143
APase Shoot (U.mg-1 protein) APase Root (U.mg-1 protein)
SMIC 148-A 663.01 cA 489.74 cB 576.4 853.75 aA 55.46 dB 454.61
Dakota Rose 587.28 dA 477.15 cB 532.2 217.45 cB 400.06 bA 308.76
SMINIA 793103-3 681.31 cA 530.11 cB 605.7 208.49 cB 574.13 aA 391.31
SMIB 106-7 836.43 bA 377.30 dB 606.9 589.14 bA 379.05 bB 484.10
SMIF 212-3 897.04 aA 636.52 aB 766.8 120.91 dB 252.37 cA 186.64
SMIJ 319-1 786.92 bA 587.36 bB 687.1 802.10 aA 285.10 cB 543.60
P 150 448.03 eB 648.95 aA 548.5 191.37 cB 381.22 bA 286.30
Means 700.00 535.30 426.17 332.48
T Conc. S (mg P SDM-1) T Conc. R (mg P RDM-1)
SMIC 148-A 2.02 bB 4.33 cA 3.17 2.34 aB 3.18 dA 2.76
Dakota Rose 1.94 bB 4.44 cA 3.19 2.41 aB 3.85 bA 3.13
SMINIA 793103-3 2.15 bB 4.60 cA 3.38 0.98 dB 3.50 cA 2.24
SMIB 106-7 1.98 bB 5.27 aA 3.63 2.06 bB 3.65 aA 2.86
SMIF 212-3 3.43 aB 4.95 bA 3.44 2.05 bB 3.83 bA 2.94
SMIJ 319-1 2.19 bB 4.29 cA 3.24 1.65 cB 3.55 cA 2.60
P 150 2.17 bB 4.98 bA 3.57 2.51 aB 4.05 aA 3.28
Means 2.27 4.69 2.00 3.66
Shoot Dry Mass (mg pl-1) Root Dry Mass (mg pl-1)
SMIC 148-A 3.73 aB 7.29 aA 5.51 1.54 aA 2.36 aA 1.95
Dakota Rose 1.79 aA 2.99 bA 2.39 1.02 aB 2.30 aA 1.66
SMINIA 793103-3 3.03 aB 6.13 aA 4.58 0.63 aB 1.73 aA 1.18
SMIB 106-7 2.87 aA 3.35 bA 3.11 0.49 aB 1.62 aA 1.06
SMIF 212-3 2.53 aB 5.77 aA 4.05 1.15 aA 1.85 aA 1.50
SMIJ 319-1 3.28 aB 5.31 aA 4.30 1.05 aA 1.49 aA 1.27
P 150 3.32 aA 4.18 bA 3.75 0.44 aA 1.13 aA 0.79
Means 2.93 4.97 1.56 1.13

Table 2 Effects of P levels on the inorganic P concentration in the shoot (Pi Shoot) and in the roots (Pi Root), in the activity of the APases in the leaves (APase Leaf) and in the roots (APase Root), in the total concentration of P in the leaves dry mass (T. Conc. Leaf) and in the root dry mass (T. Conc. Root), in the dry mass of leaves (DM Leaf), stems (DM Stem), roots (DM Root), and tubers (DM Tuber), of the potato clones evaluated at 62 days after planting in the soilless cultivation with low (2.32 mg P L-1) and high (23.2 mg P L-1) P in the nutrient solution. 

Pi Shoot (μmol Pi g tissue-1) Pi Root (μmol Pi g tissue-1)
P Levels Low High Means Low High Means
SMIC 148- A 1.34 bB 2.37 bA 1.855 0.28 aB 5.59 aA 2.935
Dakota Rose 1.06 cB 1.99 cA 1.525 0.52 aB 4.38 bA 2.450
SMINIA 793103-3 1.60 aB 2.79 aA 2.195 0.60 aB 2.52 cA 1.560
SMIB 106-7 0.95 cB 2.30 bA 1.625 0.42 aB 4.77 bA 2.595
SMIF 212-3 1.03 cB 2.28 bA 1.655 0.38 aB 4.28 bA 2.330
SMIJ 319-1 1.41 bB 2.16 cA 1.785 0.32 aB 2.80 cA 1.560
P 150 1.27 bB 2.14 cA 1.705 0.25 aB 2.08 cA 1.165
Means 1.23 2.29 0.22 3.77
APase Leaf (U.mg-1protein) APase Root (U.mg-1 protein)
SMIC 148- A 127.74 cA 116.97 cA 122.4 584.99 aB 656.28 aA 620.6
Dakota Rose 192.57 bB 289.08 aA 240.8 379.67 cA 424.07 bA 401.9
SMINIA 793103-3 168.10 bA 153.64 cA 160.9 333.66 cA 339.42 cA 336.5
SMIB 106-7 165.04 bA 116.48 cB 140.8 524.94 aA 483.49 bA 504.2
SMIF 212-3 149.00 cA 138.64 cA 143.8 456.98 bA 417.47 bA 437.2
SMIJ 319-1 251.27 aA 122.37 cB 186.8 474.31 bA 404.16 bB 439.2
P 150 128.99 cB 197.28 bA 163.1 340.52 cB 444.41 bA 392.5
Means 168.96 162.07 442.15 452.86
T. Conc. Leaf (mg P g LDM-1) T. Conc. Root (mg P g RDM-1)
SMIC 148- A 6.72 aB 90.57 bA 48.64 0.21 cB 1.90 bA 1.05
Dakota Rose 18.50 aB 51.98 cA 35.24 0.50 cB 1.58 bA 1.04
SMINIA 793103-3 7.21 aB 29.43 dA 18.32 0.22 cB 0.72 cA 0.47
SMIB 106-7 4.20 aB 47.69 cA 25.94 0.21 cB 1.10 cA 0.65
SMIF 212-3 3.13 aB 23.10 dA 13.11 0.11 cA 0.21 cA 0.16
SMIJ 319-1 11.36 aB 116.24 aA 63.80 3.71 aA 3.16 aB 3.43
P 150 5.02 aB 78.87 bA 41.94 1.88 bA 1.95 bA 1.91
Means 8.02 62.55 0.97 1.52
DM Leaf (g pl-1) DM Stem (g pl-1)
SMIC 148- A 7.39 cB 23.77 bA 15.58 1.19 cB 4.56 bA 2.87
Dakota Rose 9.44 bB 14.06 dA 11.75 1.72 bB 3.04 cA 2.38
SMINIA 793103-3 4.67 cB 9.38 eA 07.02 0.63 cA 1.28 dA 0.95
SMIB 106-7 4.80 cB 17.12 cA 10.96 0.78 cB 3.02 cA 1.90
SMIF 212-3 3.23 cB 7.17 eA 05.20 0.59 cA 1.07 dA 0.83
SMIJ 319-1 14.04 aB 40.88 aA 27.46 2.71 aB 14.55 aA 8.63
P 150 7.19 cB 22.25 bA 14.72 0.94 cB 4.25 bA 2.59
Means 7.25 19.23 1.22 4.54
DM Root (g pl-1) DM Tuber (g pl-1)
SMIC 148- A 0.30 dB 0.71 bA 0.505 5.02 bB 12.20 aA 08.61
Dakota Rose 0.76 bA 0.52 bB 0.640 9.03 aB 13.59 aA 11.31
SMINIA 793103-3 0.35 dA 0.25 cA 0.300 3.77 bB 8.02 bA 05.89
SMIB 106-7 0.30 dB 0.55 bA 0.425 5.25 bB 12.48 aA 08.86
SMIF 212-3 0.20 dA 0.31 cA 0.255 5.32 bA 6.54 bA 05.93
SMIJ 319-1 1.10aB 1.51 aA 1.305 10.28 aB 15.11 aA 12.69
P 150 0.51 cA 0.67 bA 0.590 6.83 bB 16.67 aA 11.75
Means 0.46 0.65 6.50 12.09

aFor each variable, means followed by the same lowercase letter in the column do not differ significantly from each other by the Scott-Knott test, and means followed by the same capital letter in the line within each variable do not differ significantly from each other by the F-test at 5% probability.

In conditions of restriction of P, the plants develop several biochemical and morphological adaptations. One of these adaptations is the increase in the synthesis or activity of the acidic phosphatase enzymes (APases), which aid in the release of Pi for plant metabolism (Tejera García et al., 2004). In vitro culture, the clones showed an increase in the activity of the APases in the shoots when cultivated in low P levels, except for the clone P 150 that had the highest activity of the enzyme in high level of P (Table 1). However, when the activity of APases in roots was analyzed, only the clones SMIC 148-A and SMIJ 319-1 maintained the greatest activity of the APases in the low level of P. Therefore, only for these clones the activity of APases is linked to a Pi remobilization strategy to maintain normal plant growth. In the soilless cultivation, the highest APase activity in leaves at low P levels occurred for SMIJ 319-1 clone, while at the high level of P, the Dakota Rose clone showed the highest APases activity in the leaves (Table 2).

Assuming the mean effect of P-rates, the APase activity in the in vitro culture was higher in shoot than in roots (Table 1), but in the soilless cultivation the opposite was observed (Table 2). This divergence may have occurred because P in soilless cultivation was less available for plants, compared to in vitro cultivation, in which there are no solid particles to support the roots, which demanding a greater action of APases in the roots to try to uptake more phosphorus from the substrate in soilless cultivation. Both extracellular and intracellular APases are regulated by the presence of P in the medium and the level of APases activity increases the greater the P deficiency (Ciereszko et al., 2017). In the in vitro culture, APases activity may be higher in the shoot than in the roots due to the remobilization processes of P internally, between cells and tissues of older sources for the younger (Zebrowska et al., 2012; Ciereszko et al., 2017).

The total P concentration was lower at the low P level, independent of the part of the plant and the culture system analyzed (Tables 1 and 2). This reduction varied in leaves from 31 to 62% in in vitro cultivation and from 64 to 94% in soilless cultivation. In the roots, the total concentration of P ranged from 26 to 72% in in vitro cultivation and from 48 to 89% in soilless cultivation. The exception was clone SMIJ 319-1 that for roots in soilless cultivation increased the total concentration of P by 17% when cultivated at the low P level and P 150 and SMIF 212-3 which did not show a difference between the levels of P. Other authors also observed a reduction of the total P concentration in roots (Soratto et al., 2015), in the leaves (Balemi, 2009; Balemi and Schenk, 2009) and in the shoots (Balemi, 2011; Soratto et al. 2015) of potato plants grown under low P availability due to low P concentration in the substrate.

The reduction of growth due to P deficiency is usually greater in the shoot than in the roots, thus allowing root growth to be maintained in order to explore a larger surface in search of P (Vance et al., 2003). In the in vitro culture, clones SMIC 148-A, SMINIA 793101-3, SMIF 212-3 and SMIJ 319-1 showed reductions of 49, 51, 38 and 54% in shoot dry mass when cultivated at low P when compared to production in the high P (Table 1). However, no clone increased root growth at low P levels, as an adaptive strategy, to expand the exploration area in search of P. In contrast, the Dakota Rose, SMINIA 793101-3 and SMIB 106-7 clones showed reductions of 56, 64 and 70% in dry root mass production at the low P level. In addition, in dry matter partition between shoot and root under low P level, it was not possible to differentiate the clones, which makes it difficult to use this parameter as a physiological marker of the nutritional status to P in potato plants grown in vitro.

In the soilless cultivation, the clones presented an overall reduction in the dry mass of leaves, stems and tubers when cultivated at low P levels, with the exception of SMIF 212-3 clone, which showed no difference between P levels in dry mass production of stem, roots and tuders, and SMINIA 793101-3 in the dry mass of stems and roots (Table 2). Although a reduction of dry mass of leaves, stems and tubers was observed for the Dakota Rose clone, it was the only one that presented increase in root dry mass (46%) as an adaptive modification to the low level of P, strategy observed in plants of various species (Lynch and Brown, 2008). By analyzing the biomass altogether (data not shown), SMIC 148-A, SMIB 106-7, SMIJ 319-1 and P 150 clones showed the highest biomass reductions with the restriction of P. As the clones demonstrated, in general, a reduction in the dry mass of all parts of the plant, can be used as a parameter for a physiological marker of the nutritional status of P in potato plants in soilless cultivation.

CONCLUSION

The concentration of soluble P (Pi) and total P in shoots and roots seem to be good indicators of the nutritional status of P in potato plants. On the other hand, the enzymatic activity in the tissues of the potato plants depends highly on the cultivation system, clone type and plant organ, making difficult to choose it as a physiological marker for restriction of P in potatoes. Meanwhile, the dry mass of the potato plant may be a good indicator of the nutritional status of P in clones of potatoes in soilless cultivation.

REFERENCES

Abba (2021) - Situação Atual da Produção de Batata no Brasil. Associação Brasileira da Batata. <http://www.abbabatatabrasileira.com.br> [ Links ]

Balemi, T. (2009) - Effect of phosphorus nutrition on growth of potato genotypes with contrasting phosphorus efficiency. African Crop Science Journal, vol. 17, n. 4, p. 199-212. https://doi.org/10.4314/acsj.v17i4.54304Links ]

Balemi, T. (2011) - Screening for genotypic variation in potato for phosphorus efficiency. Journal of Plant Science, vol. 2, p. 233-243 [ Links ]

Balemi, T. and Schenk, M.K. (2009) - Genotypic difference of potato in carbon budgeting as a mechanism of phosphorus utilization efficiency. Plant and Soil, vol. 322, p. 91-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-9897-0Links ]

Bandinelli, M.G.; Bisognin, D.A.; Gnocato, F.S.; Mambrin, R.B.; Sausen, D. & Nicoloso, F.T. (2013) - Concentração dos sais e da sacarose do meio MS na multiplicação in vitro e na aclimatização de batata. Horticultura Brasileira, vol. 31, n. 2, p. 242-247. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-05362013000200011Links ]

Bieleski, R.L and Ferguson, I.B. (1983) - Physiology and metabolism of phosphate and its compounds. In: Lauchli, A. & Bieleski, R.L. (Eds.) - Enciclopedia of plant physiology: Inorganic plant nutrition. Berlin, Springer-Verlag. p. 422-429 [ Links ]

Bisognin, D.A.; Bandinelli, M.G.; Kielse, P. & Fisher, H. (2015) - Rooting Potential of Mini-Cuttings for the Production of Potato Plantlets. American Journal of Plant Sciences, vol. 6, n. 2, p. 366-371. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2015.62042Links ]

Bradford, M.M. (1976) - A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantity of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 72, n. 1-2, p. 248-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3Links ]

Brown, L.K.; George, T.S.; Dupuy, L.X. & White, P.J. (2013) - A conceptual model of root hair ideotypes for future agricultural environments: what combination of traits should be targeted to cope with limited P availability? Annals of Botany, vol. 112, n. 2, p. 317-330. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcs231Links ]

Ciereszko, I.; Balwicka, H. and Zebrowska, E. (2017) - Acid phosphatases activity and growth of barley, oat, rye and wheat plants as affected by Pi deficiency. The Open Plant Science Journal, vol. 10, p. 110-122. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874294701710010110Links ]

Duff, S.M.G.; Sarath, G. and Plaxton, W.C. (1994) - The role of acid phosphatase in plant phosphorus metabolism. Physiology Plantarum, vol. 90, n. 4, p. 791-800. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1994.tb02539.xLinks ]

Fernandes, A.M. and Soratto, R.P. (2012) - Nutrição mineral, calagem e adubação da batateira. Botucatu: FEPAF. [ Links ]

Ferreira, D.F. (2011) - Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciência e Agrotecnologia, vol. 35, n. 6, p. 1039-1042. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542011000600001Links ]

Hermans, C.; Hammond, J.P.; White, P.J. & Verbruggen, N. (2006) - How do plants respond to nutrient shortage by biomass allocation? Trends in Plant Science, vol. 11, p. 610-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2006.10.007Links ]

Lin, W.-Y.; Lin, S. and Chiou, T. (2009) - Molecular regulators of phosphate homeostasis in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 60, n. 5, p. 427-1438. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern303Links ]

Lynch, J.P. and Brown, K.M. (2008) - Root strategies for phosphorus acquisition. In: White, P.J. & Hammond, J.P. (Eds.) - The Ecophysiology of Plant-Phosphorus Interactions. Plant Ecophysiology, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8435-5_5Links ]

Ma, X.-F.; Wright, E.; Ge, Y.; Bell, J.; Xim Y.; Bouton, J.H. & Wang, Z.-Y. (2009) - Improving phosphorus acquisition of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) by transgenic expression of plant-derived phytase and acid phosphatase genes. Plant Science, vol. 176, n. 4, p. 479-488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.01.001Links ]

Machado, C.T.T.; Furlani, A.C. and Machado, A.T. (2001) - Índices de eficiência de variedades locais de melhoradas de milho ao fósforo. Bragantia, vol. 60, n. 3, p. 225-238. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052001000300010Links ]

Murashige, T. and Skoog, F.A. (1962) - A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 15, n. 3, p. 473-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.xLinks ]

Sausen, D.; Carvalho, I.R.; Farias, J.G.; Dorneles, A.O.S.; Pereira, A.S.; Mambrin, R.N.; Lautenschleger, F. & Nicoloso, F.T. (2020a) - Use and response to phosphorus by potato clones in two cropping systems. Bioscience, vol. 36, n. 6, p. 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v36n6a2020-48194Links ]

Sausen, D.; Ferreira, C.R.L.; Lopes, S.C.D.; Marques, L.P.; Souza, A.J.M.; Alves, E.C.G.A.; Patrocínio, E.S.A. & Cordeiro, K.A.S. (2020b) - Soilless cultivation: an alternative for marginal areas. Brazilian Journal of Development, vol. 6, n. 3, p. 14888-14903. http://dx.doi.org/10.34117/bjdv6n3-381Links ]

Sausen, D.; Carvalho, I.R.; Tavares, M.S.; Schorr, M.R.W.; Mambrin, R.B.; Alves, J.S.; Tarouco, C.P.; Lucio, A.D.C.; Lautenschleger, F. & Nicoloso, F.T. (2021) - Efficiency of phosphorus use in potato clones in two contrasting growing seasons. Australian Journal of Crop Science, vol. 15, n. 1, p. 93-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.21.15.01.2818Links ]

Scott, A.J. and Knott, M. A. (1974) - Cluster analysis method for grouping means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics, vol. 30, n. 3, p. 507-512. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529204Links ]

Soratto, R.P.; Pion, C.; Fernandes, A.M. & Moreno, L.A. (2015) - Phosphorus uptake, use efficiency, and response of potato cultivars to phosphorus levels. Potato Research, vol. 58, p. 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-015-9290-8Links ]

Tabaldi, L.A.; Nicoloso, F.T.; Castro, G.Y.; Cargnelutti, D.; Gonçalves, J.F.; Rauber, R.; Skresbsky, E.C.; Schetinger, M.R.C.; Morsch, V.M. & Bisognin, D.A. (2007) - Physiological and oxidative stress responses of four potato clones to aluminum in nutrient solution. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology, vol. 19, n. 3, p. 211-222. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-04202007000300005Links ]

Tejera García, G.N.A.; Olivera, M.; Iribarne, C. & Lluch, C. (2004) - Partial purification and characterization of a non-specific acid phosphatase in leaves and root nodules of Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 42, n. 7-8, p. 585-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2004.04.004Links ]

Tran, H.T.; Hurley, B.A. and Plaxton, W.C. (2010) - Feeding hungry plants: the role of purple acid phosphatases in phosphate nutrition. Plant Science, vol. 179, n. 1-2, p. 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.04.005Links ]

Vance, C.P.; Uhde-Stone, C. and Allan, D. (2003) - Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants securing a nonrenewable resource. New Phytologist, vol. 157, n. 3, p. 423-457. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00695.xLinks ]

Zebrowska, E.; Bujnowska, E. and Ciereszko, I. (2012) - Differential responses of oat cultivars to phosphate deprivation: plant growth and acid phosphatase activities. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, vol. 34, p. 1251-1260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11738-011-0918-2Links ]

Received: May 21, 2020; Accepted: May 07, 2021

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License