SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.31 número3Gestão da Hipercalemia em Contexto de Urgência: Recomendações de Boas Práticas Geradas por Metodologia de ConsensoUm Caso Raro de Trombocitopenia Trombótica Induzida pela Vacina Após uma Vacina de mRNA COVID índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Medicina Interna

versão impressa ISSN 0872-671X

Medicina Interna vol.31 no.3 Lisboa set. 2024  Epub 26-Set-2024

https://doi.org/10.24950/rspmi.2520 

CASOS CLÍNICOS / CASE REPORTS

A Rare Case of Dapagliflozin-Induced Hepatic Toxicity

Um Caso Raro de Toxicidade Hepática Induzida por Dapagliflozina

Catarina Borges Fernandes1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0125-4147

Paulo Torres Ramalho1 

1Serviço de Medicina Interna, Hospital CUF Porto, Porto, Portugal.


Abstract

Drug-induced liver injury is a challenging clinical condition in terms of both diagnosis and treatment. It presents a wide range of clinical manifestations, and identification of the implicated substance is crucial. Several adverse effects have been described in association with dapagliflozin, but not liver enzyme elevation. The authors present the case of a 71-year-old diabetic woman who developed gastrointestinal symptoms one month after increasing the dose of dapagliflozin. Liver en-zyme elevation was observed, without evidence of obstructive causes on imaging exams. Other causes of liver disease were excluded, and liver biopsy favored a toxic/drug etiology. Liver enzyme normalization was observed after discontinuation of dapagliflozin. Liver injury associated with sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors is very rare, and the authors aim to raise awareness about the potential hepatotoxic effects of dapagliflozin, highlighting the importance of early diagnosis and appropriate treatment.

Keywords: Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Dapagliflozin; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors/adverse effects.

Resumo

A lesão hepática induzida por fármacos é uma situação clínica desafiadora no que respeita quer ao diagnóstico, quer ao tratamento. Apresenta um amplo espetro de manifestações clínicas e a identificação da substância implicada é fundamental. Vários efeitos adversos foram associados à dapaglifozina, mas não o aumento das enzimas hepáticas. Os autores apresentam o caso de uma mulher de 71 anos, diabética, que desenvolveu náuseas e dor abdominal um mês após aumentar a dose de dapaglifozina. Verificou-se elevação das enzimas hepáticas, sem evidência de causa obstrutiva nos exames de imagem. Foram excluídas outras causas de doença hepática e a biópsia hepática favoreceu a etiologia tóxica/medicamentosa. Verificou-se normalização das enzimas hepáticas após a suspensão da dapaglifozina. A lesão hepática associada aos inibidores da proteína transportadora sódio--glicose 2 é muito rara e os autores pretendem aumentar a consciencialização sobre os potenciais efeitos hepatotóxicos da dapagliflozina, alertando para um diagnóstico precoce e tratamento adequado.

Palavras-chave: Dapagliflozina; Inibidores da Proteína Transportadora Sódio-Glicose 2/efeitos adversos; Lesão Hepática Induzida por Fármacos.

Introduction

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2 inhibitors) prevent the reabsorption of glucose in the proximal renal tubule, resulting in renal excretion of glucose and subsequent reduction in serum levels. They have demonstrated evidence in decreasing cardiovascular complications, mortality, and the risk of developing end-stage renal disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).1-3Several adverse effects have been described, but none of these agents have been associated with liver enzyme elevation, and since their approval, there have only been rare and inconclusive reports of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) associated with this class.2,4The authors present a rare case of a diabetic patient who developed DILI after increasing the dose of dapagliflozin.

Case Report

A 71-year-old woman presented with asthenia, anorexia, nausea, and abdominal pain for approximately 1 month. She had a history of T2DM and was taking metformin/dapagliflozin 1000/5 mg twice daily for at least 3 years (increased to three times daily two months prior), indapamide 1.5 mg/day, olmesartan 20 mg/day, amlodipine 5 mg/day for hypertension, and atorvastatin 20 mg/day for dyslipidemia. The patient denied alcohol, drug, or toxic substance consumption. On physical examination, she had jaundice and tenderness on abdominal palpation, without other noteworthy findings. Laboratory tests showed elevated markers of hepatocellular injury and cholestasis (aminotransferases >10 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), alkaline phosphatase and gamma-glutamyl transferase >8 and 46 times the ULN, respectively, and total bilirubin of 4.30 mg/dL, predominantly direct bilirubin). Inflammatory parameters were not elevated. Liver enzymes were normal before the increase in dapagliflozin dose, and the other medications had been part of her regular therapy for a long time. Thoracoabdominopelvic computed tomography revealed hepatic steatosis without other abnormalities. The patient was admitted with acute hepatitis, and all medications, including dapagliflozin, were discontinued.

Blood cultures and serologies for hepatotropic pathogens were negative (Table 1). Autoimmune hepatitis was excluded, and no other relevant immunological alterations were identified (Table 2). There was no evidence of excess copper or iron. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography did not reveal any abnormalities, including biliary obstruction. Based on the findings, DILI secondary to dapagliflozin became the most likely hypothesis. Liver biopsy showed trabecular architecture with portal fibrosis (moderate) and hepatitis lesions (mild), which, although nonspecific, could indicate a toxic/drug etiology (Fig. 1). Given the temporal relationship with the increase in dapagliflozin dose, the toxicity was attributed to this medication. The patient had a favorable outcome during hospitalization (Table 3; Fig. 2). One month after discharge, she was asymptomatic with normalization of liver enzymes (Table 3; Fig. 2) and had resumed her previous medications (corresponding to D47 in Table 3), except for dapagliflozin, which was replaced with another class of antidiabetic agents (semaglutide and metformin), maintaining normal liver enzymes for over 2 months after reintroducing all medication (corresponding to D119 in Table 3). The RUCAM (Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method), which is a well-established tool in common use to quantitatively assess causality in cases of suspected DILI,5was applied and the obtained result (total score of 8 points) suggests a probable degree of causality for the drug in question.

Table 1: Blood serologies (hepatotropic virus and bacteria). 

IgG - immunoglobulin G; IgM - immunoglobulin M; HBsAg - hepatitis B surface antigen; HBsAb - hepatitis B surface antibody; HBcAb - hepatitis B core anti-body; Ag- antigen; Ab - antibody.

Figure 1: Liver parenchyma with Intralobular necro-inflammatory focus (arrow) and focal lesions of steatosis (stars). 

Table 2: Immunology tests results. 

Table 3: Liver enzymes evolving pattern. 

AST - aspartate aminotransferase. ALT - alanine aminotransferase. GGT - gamma - glutamyl transferase, FA - alkaline phosphatase, BT - total bilirubin, BD - direct bilirubin.

Figure 2: Liver enzymes evolving pattern: progressive normalization of liver enzymes during the hospitalization (13 days); after discharge (D47 - one month after discharge there was a complete normalization of the hepatic alterations) and 2 months after reintroducting all medication (D119), liver enzymes remain normal. 

Discussion

DILI is a challenging clinical condition in terms of both diagnosis and treatment, and it is the most common cause of acute liver failure in developed countries.6,7It presents a wide range of clinical manifestations, and identification of the implicated substance is crucial.4 Since DILI can be induced by many medications and dietary supplements, it can represent a diagnostic challenge, particularly in polymedicated patients, and is mainly based on the exclusion of other causes.1,6In several large randomized clinical trials, dapagliflozin was not associated with liver enzyme elevation during treatment.2 In fact, retrospective studies have shown that treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors was associated with a decrease in alanine aminotransferase levels, likely due to concomitant improvement in hepatic steatosis resulting from optimized glycemic control or weight loss, or both.2 Since its approval and wider use, at least three reports of liver injury possibly associated with an SGLT2 inhibitor have been published, two of which were in patients with pre-established chronic liver disease.1,2,8 The pathogenesis of DILI secondary to dapagliflozin may be related to an idiosyncratic reaction triggered by dysregulated immune response, alteration of dapagliflozin metabolic pathways, or both.8 There is no specific biomarker capable of associating with SGLT2 toxicity.8 However, when a temporal relationship is observed between drug administration and the onset of hepatic alterations, the diagnosis becomes more evident, and the resolution of these alterations upon drug discontinuation favors the diagnosis of DILI.6 However, this diagnosis is not always evident, especially when it involves a substance for which there is no clear evidence of its association with liver injury.1 Liver biopsy can support the diagnosis of DILI through the histological pattern, which, along with the clinical history, laboratory data, and imaging exams, can corroborate the diagnosis after other causes have been excluded.1,6However, it is necessary to consider that in polymedicated patients, concomitant drugs can affect susceptibility to DILI through drug interactions, either by modulating the metabolism of other drugs through induction, inhibition, or substrate competition, particularly in cytochrome reactions.8 This interaction can result in the hepatotoxic potential of a drug that, on its own, would not cause clinically relevant DILI.8 In this case, among the concomitant drugs that the patient was taking, statin seems to have the highest potential for modulating DILI.8 However, previous studies have shown a protective effect of statins against the progression to acute liver failure.8Therefore, it is difficult to determine the true modulating role of concomitant drugs, but it is important to always consider their possible interaction. Confirmation of the DILI diagnosis requires patient follow-up and evaluation of clinical and laboratory evolution over time after drug withdrawal,1 despite this, it cannot be fully established, and there is always some degree of doubt regarding the causality link, even if no other cause has been found. However, re-exposure for confirmation would not be ethically acceptable.

Conclusion

DILI associated with SGLT2 inhibitors is very rare, and although it has never been associated with acute liver failure or chronic hepatitis,2 the authors aim to raise awareness about the potential hepatotoxic effects of dapagliflozin, emphasizing the importance of early diagnosis and appropriate treatment, including immediate discontinuation of the drug.

Acknowledgements

To Professor Fátima Carneiro, for providing and contributing to the anatomopathological study of the liver biopsy.

REFERENCES

1. Nunes AL, Santos D, Figueiredo C, Ferreira DM, Lima J, Santos A. Um raro caso de hepatotoxicidade induzida pela empagliflozina. Med Interna. 2021;28:357-61. doi: 10.24950/rspmi.cc.131.4.2021. [ Links ]

2. LiverTox: Clinical and Research Information on Drug-Induced Liver Injury [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2012-. Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors. [Updated 2023 Feb 10]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/books/NBK548289/ [ Links ]

3. Ptaszynska A, Johnsson KM, Parikh SJ, de Bruin TW, Apanovitch AM, List JF. Safety profile of dapagliflozin for type 2 diabetes: pooled analysis of cli-nical studies for overall safety and rare events. Drug Saf. 2014;37:815-29. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0213-4. [ Links ]

4. Levine JA, Ann Lo A, Wallia A, Rogers M, VanWagner LB. Dapagliflozin-Induced Acute-on-Chronic Liver Injury. ACG Case Rep J. 2016;3:e169. doi: 10.14309/crj.2016.142. [ Links ]

5. Danan G, Teschke R. RUCAM in Drug and Herb Induced Liver Injury: The Update. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;17:14. doi: 10.3390/ijms17010014. [ Links ]

6. Hoofnagle JH, Björnsson ES. Drug-Induced Liver Injury - Types and Phenotypes. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:264-73. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1816149. [ Links ]

7. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Drug-induced liver injury. J Hepatol. 2019;70:1222-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2019.02.014. [ Links ]

8. Famularo G, Sajeva MR, Marino G, Granato C. Acute hepatitis caused by empagliflozin in a nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patient. Ann Pharmacother. 2017;51:1142-3. doi: 10.1177/1060028017728522. [ Links ]

Declaração de Contribuição CBF, PTR - Desenho, Elaboração, análise e redação do manuscrito Todos os autores aprovaram a versão final a ser publicada. Contributorship Statement CBF, PTR - Designing, drafting, analysing and writing the manuscript All authors approved the final version to be published.

Conflitos de Interesse: Os autores declaram a inexistência de conflitos de interesse na realização do presente trabalho

Fontes de Financiamento: Não existiram fontes externas de financiamento para a realização deste artigo.

Confidencialidade dos Dados: Os autores declaram ter seguido os protocolos da sua instituição acerca da publicação dos dados de doentes.

Consentimento: Consentimento do doente para publicação obtido.

Proveniência e Revisão por Pares: Não comissionado; revisão externa por pares.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Financing Support: This work has not received any contribution, grant or scholarship

Confidentiality of Data: The authors declare that they have followed the protocols of their work center on the publication of data from patients.

Patient Consent: Consent for publication was obtained.

Provenance and Peer Review: Not commissioned; externally peer re-viewed.

© Autor (es) (ou seu (s) empregador (es)) e Revista SPMI 2024. Reuti-lização permitida de acordo com CC BY-NC 4.0. Nenhuma reutilização comercial. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) and SPMI Journal 2024. Reuse permit-ted under CC BY-NC 4.0. No commercial reuse.

Received: December 06, 2023; Accepted: February 08, 2024

Correspondence / Correspondência: Catarina Fernandes - catarinaborgesfernandes@gmail.com Serviço de Medicina Interna, Hospital CUF Porto, Porto, Portugal Estrada da Circunvalação 14341, 4100-180 Porto

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License