A investigação sobre os modelos de ensino dos jogos desportivos

 

Amândio Graça 

Isabel Mesquita

Faculdade de Desporto, Universidade do Porto, Portugal

 

 

Resumo

O objectivo deste artigo é o de fazer uma revisão da literatura relativa aos dois modelos mais marcantes na actualidade no que respeita ao ensino dos jogos desportivos, o Teaching Games for Understanding e o Sport Education Model, considerando os contributos percebidos como mais significativos no que diz respeito à origem dos modelos; às reflexões teórica e apreciações críticas dos modelos, às propostas de revisão e tendências de evolução dos modelos, à literatura de carácter didáctico associada aos modelos; à evolução da investigação empírica directamente associada aos modelos; e, finalmente ao diálogo entre os modelos e os desafios colocados por novas abordagens ao ensino dos jogos desportivos.

Palavras-chave: modelos de ensino, jogos desportivos, TGfU, modelo de educação desportiva

 

 

Abstract

Research on models for teaching games

The main goal of this paper is to review the literature related to the Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) and the Sport Education Model (SE), which are presently the most influential models addressing the teaching of sport games. The scope of the review comprehends the contributions perceived to be relevant for examining the roots of the models; the theoretical essays and critical appraisals of the models; the proposals of revision and evolution trends for the models; the didactical literature associated to the models; the evolution of the empirical research directly focused on the models; and finally, the dialogue between the models and the challenges coming from new approaches to the teaching of games.

Key-words: teaching models; team sports, games, TGfU, sport education model

 

 

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text only available in PDF format.

 

 

Referências

 1. Alexander K, Luckman J (2001). Australian teachers' perceptions and uses of the sport education curriculum model. European Physical Education Review 7:243        [ Links ]

2. Alexander K, Penney D (2005). Teaching under the influence: feeding Games for Understanding into the Sport Education development-refinement cycle. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 10:287-301

3. Alexander K, Taggart A, Luckman J (1998). Pilgrims progress. JOPERD: The Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance 69:21

4. Alexander K, Taggart A, Medland A (1993). Sport education in physical education: try before you buy. ACHPER National Journal 40:16-23

5. Alexander K, Taggart A, Thorpe S (1996). A Spring in their Steps? Possibilities for Professional Renewal through Sport Education in Australian Schools. In:Routledge, p 23 - 46

6. Andreou N, Tsangaridou N (2001). The procedure and the knowledge from the application of the sport education model in elementary school. Athlitiki Psychologia 12:49-59

7. Barrett KR, Collie S (1996). Children learning lacrosse from teachers learning to teach it: the discovery of pedagogical content knowledge by observing children's movement. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 67:297-309

8. Barrett KR, Turner AP (2000). Sandy's Challenge: New Game; New Paradigm. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 19:162-181

9. Belka DE (1998). Strategies for teaching tag games. JOPERD 69:40-43

10. Bell C (1998). Sport education in the elementary school. JOPERD 69:36-39; 48

11. Bennett G, Hastie P (1997). A sport education curriculum model for a collegiate physical activity course. JOPERD 68:39-44

12. Berkowitz RJ (1996). A practitioner's journey: from skill to tactics. JOPERD 67:44-45

13. Blomqvist M, Luhtanen P, Laakso L (1998). Validation of a notational analysis system in badminton. Journal of Human Movement Studies 35:137-150

14. Blomqvist M, Vänttinen T, Luhtanen P (2005). Assessment of secondary school students' decision-making and game-play ability in soccer. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy 10: 107-119

15. Blomqvist MT, Luhtanen P, Laakso L, Keskinen E (2000). Validation of a video-based game-understanding test procedure in badminton. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 19:325-337

16. Brooker R, Kirk D, Braiuka S, Bransgrove A (2000). Implementing a game sense approach to teaching junior high school basketball in a naturalistic setting. European Physical Education Review 6:7-25

17. Browne T (2003). Teaching games through sport education and games sense: an extended case study of high school physical education. (Abstract). In: In 2^nd International conference: teaching sport and physical education for understanding, Melbourne, Vic., University of Melbourne, 2003, p.33., Australia

18. Bunker D, Thorpe R (1982). A Model for the Teaching of Games in Secondary Schools. In: Bulletin of Physical Education. p 5-8

19. Butler J (1997). How would Socrates teach games? A constructivist approach. JOPERD 68:42-47

20. Butler J (2005). TGfU pet-agogy: old dogs, new tricks and puppy school. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 10:225 - 240

21. Butler J, Griffin L, Lombardo B, Nastasi R (eds). (2003). Teaching Games for Understanding in Physical Education and Sport. National Association for Sport and Physical Education, Reston; VA

22. Butler J, McCahan BJ (2005). Teaching games for understanding as a curriculum model. In: Griffin LL, Butler J (eds) Teaching Games for Understanding : theory, research, and practice. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, p 33-54

23. Carlson TB (1995). We hate gym: Student alienation from physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 14:467-477

24. Carlson TB, Hastie P (1997). The student social system within Sport Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 16:176-195

25. Castro A, Mesquita I, Pereira F (2007). Análise do jogo 1x1 e 2x2 no contexto escolar. In: Actas do 1º congresso Internacional de Jogos Desportivos - Olhares e contextos da performance. Da iniciação ao Rendimento (CD-ROM). Centro de estudos de jogos desportivos, Faculdade de Desporto, Universidade do Porto, Porto

26. Chandler T (1996). Teaching games for understanding: reflections and further questions. JOPERD 67:49-51

27. Chandler T, Mitchell S (1990). Reflections on models of games education. JOPERD   Journal of physical Education Recreation and Dance 61:19-21

28. Chow JY, Davids K, Button C, Shuttleworth R, Renshaw I, Araujo D (2007). The role of Nonlinear pedagogy in physical education. Review of Educational Research 77:251-278

29. Clarke G, Quill M (2003). Researching sport education in action: a case study. European Physical Education Review 9:253-266

30. Connolly M (1991). Teaching games from a movement education perspective. In: In, Bell, F.I. and Van Gyn, G.H. (eds.), Proceedings for the 10th Commonwealth & International Scientific Congress: access to active living, 10-14 August 1994, University of Victoria, Victoria, B.C., Victoria, University of Victoria, 1994, p. 487-488., Canada

31. Corbin CS (2002). Physical activity for everyone: What every physical educator should know about promoting lifelong physical activity. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 21:128-144

32. Curnow J, Macdonald D (1995). Can sport education be gender inclusive? A case study in upper primary school. The ACHPER Healthy Lifestyles Journal 42:9-11

33. Curry C, Light R (2007). Addressing the NSW quality teaching framework in physical education: Is Game Sense the answer? In: Light R (ed) Proceedings for the Asia Pacific Conference on Teaching Sport and Physical Education for Understanding. The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, p 7-19

34. Curtner-Smith MD (1996). Teaching for understanding: using games invention with elementary children. JOPERD 67:33-37

35. Curtner-Smith MD (2004). A Hybrid Sport Education-Games for Understanding Striking/Fielding Unit for Upper Elementary Pupils. Teaching Elementary Physical Education 15:7

36. Davids K, Chow JY, Shuttleworth R (2005). A Constraints-based Framework for Nonlinear Pedagogy in Physical Education Journal of Physical Education New Zealand 38:17-29

37. Doolittle S (1995). Teaching net games to skilled students: A teaching for understanding approach. JOPERD The Journal of Physical Education Recreation & Dance 66:18-23

38. Dyson B (2005). Integrating cooperative learning and tactical games models: Focusing on social interactions and decision making. In: Griffin LL, Butler J (eds) Teaching Games for Understanding : theory, research, and practice. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, p 149-168

39. Dyson B, Griffin LL, Hastie P (2004). Sport Education,Tactical Games, and Cooperative Learning: Theoretical and Pedagogical Considerations. Quest (Human Kinetics) 56:226-240

40. Ellis M (1983). Similarities and differences in games: a system for classification. In: International AIESEP Congress, Teaching Team Sports. Rome

41. French K, Werner P, Rink J, Taylor K, Hussey K (1996). The Effects of a 3 - Week Unit of Tactical;  Skill; or Combined Tactical and Skill Instruction on Badminton Performance of Ninth- Grade Students. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 15:418-438

42. French K, Werner P, Taylor K, Hussey K, Jones J (1996). The Effects of a 6 - Week Unit of Tactical;  Skill; or Combined Tactical and Skill Instruction on Badminton Performance of Ninth- Grade Students. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 15:439-463

43. Gabriele TE, Maxwell T (1995). Direct versus indirect methods of squash instruction. Abstract. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 66 (Suppl.):A-63

44. Gallagher JD, French KE, Thomas KT, Thomas JR (1996). Expertise in youth sport: relations between knowledge and skill. In: F.L. S, R.E. S (eds) Children and youth sport: a biopsychosocial perspective. Brown & Benchmark, Madison; Wis., p 338-358

45. Garganta J (1995). Para uma teoria dos jogos desportivos colectivos. In: Graça A, Oliveira J (eds) O ensino dos Jogos Desportivos. CEJD/FCDEF-UP, Porto, Portugal, p 11-25

46. Garganta J (2006). Ideias e competências para pilotar o jogo de futebol. In: Tani G, Bento JO, Petersen RS (eds) Pedagogia do desporto. Guanabara Koogan, Rio de Janeiro, p 313-326

47. Graça A (2001). Concepções didácticas do ensino do jogo. In: I Congreso Ibérico de Baloncesto. Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte de la Universidad de Extremadura, Caceres; Espanha

48. Graça A (2002). Concepções didácticas sobre o ensino do jogo. In: Ibañez-Godoy S, Macías-García M (eds) Novos horizontes para o treino do basquetebol. Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Cruz Quebrada, p 21-36

49. Graça A, Mesquita I (2003). Physical Education teachers' conceptions about teaching TGfU in portuguese schools. In: Butler J, Griffin L, Lombardo B, Nastasi R (eds) Teaching Games for Understanding in Physical Education and Sport. National Association for Sport and Physical Education, Reston; VA, p 87-97

50. Graça A, Oliveira J (eds) (1994). O ensino dos jogos desportivos. Centro de Estudos dos Jogos Desportivos, Faculdade de Ciências do Desporto e de Educação Física da Universidade do Porto, Porto

51. Graça A, Oliveira J (eds) (1995). O ensino dos jogos desportivos. Centro de Estudos dos Jogos Desportivos, Faculdade de Ciências do Desporto e de Educação Física da Universidade do Porto, Porto

52. Graça A, Oliveira J (eds) (1997). La ensenanza de los juegos deportivos. Paidotribo, Barcelona

53. Graça A, Oliveira J (eds) (1998). O ensino dos jogos desportivos. Centro de Estudos dos Jogos Desportivos, Faculdade de Ciências do Desporto e de Educação Física da Universidade do Porto, Porto

54. Graça A, Pinto D (2005). Modelo de competência nos jogos de invasão aplicado ao ensino do basquetebol. In: Martinez de Santos R (ed) Libro de actas do III Congreso Ibérico de Baloncesto: modelos para un baloncesto de calidad. Avafiep-Fiepzaleak Vitoria, p 154

55. Graça A, Pinto D, Mertens B, Multael M, Musch E, Timmers E, Meertens T, Taborsky F, Remy C, Vonderlynck V, De Clercq D (2006). Modelo de competência nos jogos de invasão: Uma ferramenta didáctica para o ensino do basquetebol. Estudos CEJD 6:7-28

56. Graça A, Ricardo V, Pinto D (2006). O ensino do basquetebol: aplicar o modelo de competência nos jogos de invasão criando um contexto desportivo autêntico. In: Tani G, Bento JO, Petersen RS (eds) Pedagogia do desporto. Guanabara Koogan, Rio de Janeiro, p 299-312

57. Grant BC (1992). Integrating sport into the physical education curriculum in New Zealand secondary schools. Quest (00336297) 44:304-316

58. Greco PJ (2004). Cogni(a)ção: caracterização e avaliação dos processos cognitivos subjacentes à tomada de decisão nos jogos esportivos coletivos. Bulletin FIEP Foz Iguaçu

59. Greco PJ (2006). Conhecimento técnico-tático: o modelo pendular do comportamento e da ação tática nos esportes coletivos Revista Brasileira de Psicologia do Esporte e do Exercício 0:107-129

60. Greco PJ (2007). Tomada de decisão nos jogos esportivos coletivos: O conhecimento tático-técnico como eixo de um modelo de pêndulo. In: 1º Congresso Internacional de Jogos Desportivos: Olhares e contextos da performance - da iniciação ao alto rendimento. Faculdade de Desporto, Universidade do Porto, Porto

61. Gréhaigne J-F, Godbout P (1995). Tactical Knowledge in Team Sports from a Constructivist and Cognitivist Perspective. Quest 47:490-505

62. Gréhaigne J-F, Godbout P (1998). Formative Assessment in Team Sports in a Tactical Approach Context. JOPERD 69:46-51

63. Gréhaigne J-F, Godbout P, Bouthier D (1997). Performance assessment in team sports. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 16:500-516

64. Gréhaigne JF, Wallian N, Godbout P (2005). Tactical-decision learning model and students' practices. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 10:255 - 269

65. Griffin L (1996). Tactical Approaches to Teaching Games: Improving Net/Wall Game Performance. JOPERD 67:34- 37

66. Griffin LL, Brooker R, Patton K (2005). Working towards legitimacy: two decades of teaching games for understanding. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 10:213-223

67. Griffin LL, Butler J (2005). Teaching Games for Understanding : theory, research, and practice. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics

68. Griffin LL, Dodds P, Placek JH, Tremino F (2001). Middle school students' conceptions of soccer: their solutions to tactical problems. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 20:324-340

69. Griffin LL, Mitchell SA, Oslin JL (1997). Teaching sport concepts and skills : a tactical games approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics

70. Griffin LL, Oslin JL, Mitchell SA (1995). An analysis of two instructional approaches to teaching net games (abstract). Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 66:A-64

71. Griffin LL, Patton K (2005). Two decades of Teaching Games for Understanding: looking at the past, present, and future. In: Griffin LL, Butler J (eds) Teaching Games for Understanding : theory, research, and practice. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, p 1-17

72. Harvey S (2006). Effects of Teaching Games for Understanding on game performance and understanding in middle school physical education. In:Oregon State University, Oregon, p 285

73. Hastie P (1996). Research on sport education: current findings and future possibilities. In: In Naul, R. (ed.), International Council of Sport Science and Physical Education (ICSSPE), Physical activity and active lifestyle of children and youth, Schorndorf, Verlag Karl Hofmann, 1998, p.147-151., Germany, Federal Republic of

74. Hastie P (1996). Student role involvement during a unit of sport education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 16:88-103

75. Hastie P (1998). The participation and perceptions of girls within a unit of sport education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 17:157-171

76. Hastie P (1998). Skill and tactical development during a sport education season. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 69:368-379

77. Hastie P (2000). An ecological analysis of a sport education season. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 19:355-373

78. Hastie P, Buchanan A (2000). Teaching Responsability Through Sport Education: Prospects of a Coalition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 71:25-35

79. Hastie P, Buchanan AM (2000). Teaching responsibility through sport education: prospects of a coalition. Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport 71:25-35

80. Hastie P, Curtner-Smith M (2006). Influence of a hybrid Sport Education - Teaching Games for Understanding unit on one teacher and his students. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 11:1-27

81. Hastie P, Sinelinikov OA (2006). Russian students' participation in and perceptions of a season of Sport Education. European Physical Education Review 12:131-150

82. Holt NL, Strean WB, Bengoechea EG (2002). Expanding the teaching games for understanding model: New avenues for future research and practice. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 21:162-176

83. Hopper T (2002). Teaching Games for Understanding: The importance of student emphasis over content emphasis. JOPERD

84. Hopper T, Bell R (2001). Games classification system: Teaching strategic understanding and tactical awareness. CAHPERD 66:14-19

85. Jackson S (1986). Teaching for understanding in games: A working curriculum 11-16. Bulletin of Physical Education 2:27-30

86. Jewett AE, Bain LL (1985). The curriculum process in physical education. Dubuque, Iowa: W.C. Brown

87. Jones D, Ward P (1998). Changing the face of secondary physical education through sport education. JOPERD 69:40-45

88. Ka Lun C, Cruz A (2006). The Effect of Sport Education on Secondary Six Students' Learning Interest and Collaboration in Football Lessons. Journal of Physical Education & Recreation (10287418) 12

89. Kinchin G, O'Sullivan M (1999). Making Physical Education Meaningful for High School Students. JOPERD 70:40-44

90. Kirk D (2005). Future prospects for Teaching Games for Understanding. In: Griffin LL, Butler J (eds) Teaching Games for Understanding : theory, research, and practice. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, p 213-227

91. Kirk D, Brooker R, Braiuka S (2000). Teaching Games for Understanding: A Situated Perspective on Student Learning. In: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA, p 12

92. Kirk D, Kinchin G (2003). Situated learning as a theoretical framework for sport education. European Physical Education Review 9:221-235

93. Kirk D, MacPhail A (2002). Teaching games for understanding and situated learning: Rethinking the Bunker-Thorpe model. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 21:177-192

94. Kretchmar RS (2005). Teaching Games for Understanding and the delights of human activity In: Griffin LL, Butler J (eds) Teaching Games for Understanding : theory, research, and practice. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, p 199-212

95. Kroger C, Roth K (2005). Escola da bola São Paulo. Brasil: Phorte Editora

96. Launder AG (2001). Play practice : the games approach to teaching and coaching sports. Champaign, IL ; Leeds: Human Kinetics

97. Laursen P (1996). A Case-Study of Games for Understanding in PETE. In: AIESEP International Seminar. Lisboa

98. Lawton J (1989). Comparison of two teaching methods in games. Bulletin of Physical Education 25:35–38

99. Light R (2000). Making Sense of Games through the Manipulation of Space and Time. In: Science Teachers' Association of Victoria; celebrating National science Week public lecture night;. Shelford Anglican Girls School; Melbourne

100. Light R (2003). Knowing the Game: Integrating Speech and Action in Games Teaching Through TGfU. QUEST 55

101. Light R (2005). Introduction. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy 10:211-212

102. Light R, Butler J (2005). A personal journey: TGfU teacher development in Australia and the USA. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 10:241 - 254

103. Light R, Tan S (2006). Culture, embodied experience and teachers' development of TGfU in Australia and Singapore. European Physical Education Review 12:99

104. Locke L (1981). Teaching and Learning Processes in Physical Activity: The Central Problem of Sport Pedagogy. In: Haag H (ed) XXII ICHPER World Congress. Schorndorf, Verlag Karl Hoffmann, Kiel, p 140-154

105. Luhtanen P, Blomqvist M, Keskinen E, Brown E, Valovirta E (2004). Development and validation of a video based game understanding test in youth soccer. Journal of Human Movement Studies 47:47-60

106. Mangas C, Garganta J, Fonseca A (2002). Estudo comparativo do conhecimento declarativo de jovens praticantes de Futebol, em função do seu nível competitivo. In: Garganta J, Suarez AA, Peñas CL (eds) A investigação em Futebol. Estudos Ibéricos. Universidade do Porto: Faculdade de Ciências do Desporto e de Educação Física, Porto, Portugal, p 179-187

107. Mangas C, Garganta J, Fonseca A (2007). Construção, validação e aplicação de um protocolo de conhecimento declarativo no futebol. In: 1º Congresso Internacional de Jogos Desportivos: Olhares e contextos da performance - da iniciação ao alto rendimento. Faculdade de Desporto - Universidade do Porto, Porto

108. McMorris T (1998). Teaching Games for Understanding: Its contribution to the knowledge of skill acquisition from a motor learning perspective. In:Routledge, p 65 - 74

109. McNeill, Fry, Wright, Tan, Tan, Schempp (2004). 'In the local context': Singaporean challenges to teaching games on practicum. Sport, Education and Society 9:3-32

110. Memmert D, Roth K (2007). The effects of non-specific and specific concepts on tactical creativity in team ball sports. In:Routledge, p 1423 - 1432

111. Mesquita I (2006). Ensinar bem para aprender melhor o jogo de Voleibol. In: Tani G, Bento J, Petersen R (eds) Pedagogia do Desporto. Guanabara Koogan, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, p 327-343

112. Mesquita I, Graça A (2006). Modelos de ensino dos jogos desportivos. In: Tani G, Bento JO, Petersen RS (eds) Pedagogia do desporto. Guanabara Koogan, Rio de Janeiro, p 269-283

113. Mesquita I, Pinheiro M (2006). Estruturação da competição no treino infanto-juvenil: Avaliação do desempenho no ataque, no jogo 2X2, no âmbito do projecto Gira-Volei em Portugal. In: Garcia E, Lemos K (eds) Temas atuais XI - Educação Física e Esportes. Casa da Educação Física, Belo Horizonte, Brasil, p 27-44

114. Metzler MW (2000). Instructional models for physical education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon

115. Metzler MW (2005). Implications of models-based instruction for research on teaching : a focus on Teaching Games for Understanding. In: Griffin LL, Butler J (eds) Teaching Games for Understanding : theory, research, and practice. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, p 183-197

116. Mitchell S (1996). Tactical Approaches to Teaching Games: Improving Invasion Game Performance. JOPERD 67:30-33

117. Mitchell S (2000). A Framework and Sample Games for Go Through-Go To Games. Teaching Elementary Physical Education 11:8

118. Mitchell SA, Griffin LL, Oslin JL (1995). The effects of two instructional approaches on game performance. Pedagogy in Practice: Teaching and Coaching in  Physical Education and Sports 1:36-48

119. Mitchell SA, Oslin JL (1998). An Investigation of Tactical Transfer in Net Games. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy 4:162-172

120. Mitchell SA, Oslin JL, Griffin LL (2003). Sport foundations for elementary physical education: a tactical games approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics

121. Mortágua L, Peñas CL (2007). A avaliação do rendimento individual em desportos de invasão na educação física. A participação dos alunos do ensino básico numa perspectiva de coavaliação. In: 1º Congresso Internacional de Jogos Desportivos. Faculdade de Desporto, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal

122. Musch E, Mertens B, Timmers E, Mertens T, Graça A, Taborsky F, Remy C, De Clercq D, Multael M, Vonderlynck V (2002). An innovative didactical invasion games model to teach basketball and handball, presented on cd. In: 7th Annual Congress of the European College of Sport Science. Athens. Greece

123. Nevett M, Rovegno I, Babiarz M (2001). Fourth-grade children's knowledge of cutting; passing and tactics in invasion games after a 12-lesson unit of instruction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 20:389-401

124. Nevett M, Rovegno I, Babiarz M, McCaughtry N (2001). Changes in basic tactics and motor skills in an invasion-type game after a 12-lesson unit of instruction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 20:352-369

125. Ormond TC, DeMarco GM, Smith RM, Fischer KA (1995). Comparison of the sport education and traditional approaches to teaching secondary school basketball (abstract). Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport 66:A-66

126. Oslin JL (1996). Tactical approaches to teaching games. JOPERD 67:27

127. Oslin JL, Mitchell S, Griffin L (1998). The Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI): Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 17:231-243

128. Pinto D, Graça A (2004). GPAI - um instrumento de avaliação da participação do aluno no jogo. In: Ferreira AP, Ferreira V, Peixoto C, Volossovitch A (eds) Gostar de basquetebol: Ensinar a jogar e aprender jogando. Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Cruz Quebrada, p 81-91

129. Placek J (1983). Conceptions of success in teaching: Busy, happy and good? In: Templin TJ, Olson JK (eds) Teaching in Physical Education. Human Kinetics, Champaign, Illinois, p 46-56

130. Pope CC (2005). Once more with feeling: affect and playing with the TGfU model. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy 10:271 - 286

131. Pope CC, Grant BC (1996). Student experiences in sport education. Waikato Journal of Education 2:103–118

132. Rauschenbach J (1996). Charge and catch coop: two games for teaching game play strategy. JOPERD 67:22-24

133. Ricardo V (2005). Novas Estratégias de Ensino para os Jogos Desportivos: Um estudo experimental na modalidade de basquetebol em alunos do 9º ano de escolaridade. In: Faculdade de Ciências do Desporto e de Educação Física, Universidade do Porto, Porto

134. Ricardo V, Graça A (2007). Novas Estratégias de Ensino do Jogo de Basquetebol: estudo experimental em alunos do 9º ano de escolaridade. In: 1º Congresso Internacional de Jogos Desportivos: Olhares e contextos da performance - da iniciação ao alto rendimento. Faculdade de Desporto, Universidade do Porto, Porto

135. Richard J-F (1998). La mesure et l'evaluation de la performance en jeux et sports collectifs: La participation des eleves du primaire dans une perspective d'evaluation authentique. In:Universite Laval Laval, Canada

136. Richard J-F, Godbout P, Tousignant M, Gréhaigne J-F (1999). The Try-Out of a Team Sport Performance Assessment Procedure in Elementary and Junior High School Physical Education Classes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 18:336-356

137. Richard JF, Godbout P, Gréhaigne J-F (2000). Students' precision and interobserver reliabiity of performance assessment in team sports. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 71:85-91

138. Richard JF, Wallian N (2005). Emphasizing student engagement in the construction of game performance. In: Griffin LL, Butler J (eds) Teaching Games for Understanding : theory, research, and practice. Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, p 19-32

139. Rink J (1993). Teaching physical education for learning. St. Louis: Mosby

140. Rink J (1996). Tactical and Skill Approaches to Teaching Sport and Games: Introduction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 15:397-398

141. Roth K, Kroeger C, Memmert D (2002). Ballschule Rueckschlagspiele. Schorndorf; Germany: Hofmann

142. Rovegno I (1991). A Participant-Observation Study of Knowledge Restructuring in a Field-Based Physical Education Methods Course. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 62:205-212

143. Rovegno I (1992). Learning a new curricular approach: mechanisms of knowledge acquisition in preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education 8:253-264

144. Rovegno I (1992). Learning to teach in a field-based methods course; the development of pedagogical content knowledge. Teacher and Teacher Education 8:69-82

145. Rovegno I (1993). Content Knowledge Acquisition during Undergraduate Teacher Education: Overcoming Cultural Templates and Learning through Practice. American Educational Research Journal 30:611-642

146. Rovegno I (1993). The development of curricular knowledge: a case of problematic pedagogical content knowledge during advanced knowledge acquisition. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 64:56-68

147. Rovegno I (1995). Theoretical Perspectives on Knowledge and Learning and a Student Teacher's Pedagogical Knowledge of Dividing and Sequencing Subject Matter. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 14:284-304

148. Rovegno I (1998). The Development of In-Service Teachers' Knowledge of a Constructivist Approach to Physical Education: Teaching Beyond Activities. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 69:147-162

149. Rovegno I, Bandhauer D (1994). Child-designed games: experience changes teachers' conceptions. JOPERD 65:60-63

150. Rovegno I, Bandhauer D (1997). Psychological Dispositions That Facilitated and Sustained the Development of Knowledge of a Constructivist Approach to Physical Education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 16:136-154

151. Rovegno I, Nevett M, Babiarz M (2001). Learning and teaching invasion-game tactics in 4th grade: Introduction and theoretical perspective. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 20:341-351

152. Rovegno I, Nevett M, Brock S, Babiarz M (2001). Teaching and learning basic invasion-game tactics in 4th grade: A descriptive study from situated and constraints theoretical perspectives. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 20:370-388

153. Siedentop D (1987). The theory and practice of sport education. In: G.Barrette, Feingold R, Rees C, Piéron M (eds) Myths; models and methods in sport pedagogy. Human Kinetics, Champaign; IL, p 79-85

154. Siedentop D (1988). An ecological model for understanding teaching/learning in Physical Education. In: Proceedings of the 1988 Seoul Olympic Scientific Congress. Seoul Olympic Scientific Congress Organizing Committee, Seoul, Korea, p 111-124

155. Siedentop D (1994). Sport education: Quality PE trhough positive sport experiences. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics

156. Siedentop D (1996). Physical education and educational reform: The case of sport education. In: Silverman S, Ennis C (eds) Student learning in physical education. Human Kinetics, Champaign, Ill., p 247-267

157. Siedentop D (1998). What is sport education and how does it work? JOPERD 69:18

158. Siedentop D (2002). Sport education: A retrospective. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 21:409-418

159. Siedentop D, Hastie P, Mars HVD (2004). Complete guide to Sport Education. Champaign IL: Human Kinetics

160. Siedentop D, Mand C, Taggart A (1986). Physical education: Teaching and curriculum strategies for grades 5-12. Palo Alto: Mayfield Publishing Company

161. Strikwerda-Brown J, Taggart A (2001). No longer voiceless and exhausted: sport education and the primary generalist teacher. ACHPER Healthy Lifestyles Journal 48:14-17

162. Tallir I, Lenoir M, Valcke M (2004). Assessment of game play in basketball. In: Light R, Swabey K, Brooker R (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference: Teaching Sport and Physical Education For Understanding, 11 - 14 December 2003. University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, p 99-107

163. Tallir I, Musch E, De Bourdheaudhuij I, Lenoir M, Mertens B (2002). Tactical Game Performance in Basketball : A coding instrument for the individual off-the-ball decisions in 3 on 3 game play. In: AIESEP Congress. A Coruña; Spain.

164. Tallir I, Musch E, Lanoo K, Van de Voorde J (2004). Validation of video-based instruments for the assessment ofgame performance in handball and soccer. In: Light R, Swabey K, Brooker R (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference: Teaching Sport and Physical Education For Understanding, 11 - 14 December 2003. University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, p 108-113

165. Tallir IB, Musch E, Valcke M, Enoir M (2005). Effects of Two Instructional Approaches for Basketball on Decision-making and Recognition Ability. Int. J. Sport Psychol. 36:107

166. Tavares F, Greco P, Garganta J (2006). Perceber, conhecer e agir nos jogos desportivos colectivos. In: Tani G, Bento JO, Petersen RS (eds) Pedagogia do desporto. Guanabara Koogan, Rio de Janeiro, p 284-298

167. Thorpe R, Bunker D (1985). Un nuovo approccio dell'insegnamento dei giochi nell'ambito del programma di educazione fisica. / A new approach to the teaching of games in the physical education curriculum. In: In, L'insegnamento dei giochi sportivi, Rome, CONI, Scuola dello Sport, 1985, p. 217-225., Italy

168. Thorpe R, Bunker D (1989). A Changing focus in games teaching. In: Almond L (ed) The place of physical education in schools. Kogan/Page, London, p 42-71

169. Thorpe R, Bunker D, Almond L (1984). A Change in focus for the teaching of games. In: Piéron M, Graham G (eds) Sport Pedagogy: Olympic Scientific Congress. Human Kinetics, Champaign; IL, p 163-169

170. Thorpe R, Bunker D, Almond L (eds) (1986). Rethinking Games Teaching. Dept. of Physical Education and Sports Science, University of Technology, Loughborough, England

171. Tjeerdsma B, Rink J, Graham K (1996). Students Perceptions; Values; and Beliefs to; During; and After Badminton Instruction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 15:464-476

172. Turner A (1996). Teaching for understanding: Myth or reality? JOPERD 67:46-48/55

173. Turner A, Martinek T (1992). A comparative analysis of two models for teaching games (Technique approach and game centered (tactical focus approach). International journal of physical education (Schorndorf, FRG) 29(4), 4th Quarter 1992, 15 31 Refs:35

174. Turner A, Martinek T (1999). An investigation into teaching games for understanding : effects on skill; knowledge; and game play. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 70:286-296

175. Wallhead T, O'Sullivan M (2005). Sport Education: physical education for the new millennium? Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy 10

176. Wallhead TL, Deglau D (2004). Effect of a Tactical Games Approach on Student Motivation in Physical Education. In: 2004 AAHPERD National Convention and Exposition. New Orleans, LA

177. Waring M, Almond L (1995). Game-centred games: a revolutionary or evolutionary alternative for games teaching. European Physical Education Review 1:55-66

178. Werner P, Thorpe R, Bunker D (1996). Teaching games for understanding: Evolution of a model. JOPERD 67:28-33

 

 

 

Correspondência

Amândio Graça

Gabinete de Pedagogia do Desporto

Faculdade de Desporto, Universidade do Porto

Rua Dr. Plácido Costa, 91

4200-450 Porto, Portugal

e-mail: agraca@fade.up.pt