SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.14 número3Plataformas de online dating: dinâmicas de incorporação e integração numa lógica de domesticaçãoLos marcos del compromiso: Framing y Engagement digital en la campaña electoral de España de 2015 índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Observatorio (OBS*)

versão On-line ISSN 1646-5954

OBS* vol.14 no.3 Lisboa set. 2020  Epub 15-Fev-2022

https://doi.org/10.15847/obsobs14320201643 

Artigos Originais

Citizen Facebook: The Strategic Communication of Local Power in Social Media

iUniversidade Nova de Lisboa (UNL-FCSH), Lisboa


Abstract

Local power requires a differentiated communicational analysis with strategies appropriate to its context in the immediate scenario which social networks impose on those who engage in proximity governance. In this sense, this exploratory case study arises from an interest in communication as a tool for strategic and political operationalization, at the level of the preliminary diagnosis on digital communication within the Lisbon local government between November 2017 and May 2019. The objective has been to analyse digital data taken from the official Facebook pages of the 24 Local Councils and cross-referencing them with voter turnout data and, in a descriptive analysis of the information gathered, to arrive at an initial interpretation of the evolution of the performance and degree of involvement of electors and voters in digital municipal communication in Lisbon.

Keywords: Strategic Communication; Political Communication; Local Government; Digital Politics; Social Media.

Introduction

Politics, as a human activity linked to obtaining and maintaining the resources necessary for the exercise of power over man (Bobbio, 2000), has in the creation of local power, a conception of democracy as a continuous process1 and close to the citizen, accompanying him in everyday life. The themes that local government is concerned with - garbage collection, street lighting, markets, works - are not fascinating. If resolved, they are of no interest to anyone; fail, and our lives become hell. Only when the pipes burst, the traffic exceeds the tolerable limit, the request for works remains in the drawer, does local power gain importance (Mónica, 1993).

Designed to play a central role in the tasks of development and democratic living (Ruivo and Francisco, 1999) between rulers and the governed, the Local Councils in Lisbon are in a political process of decentralization vis-à-vis the central power. A process that implies a simultaneous transition phase in the communication practice between stakeholders (politicians, journalists and citizens) involved in public governance policies. In this mediation of public visibility of public policies for local institutions, the communicative-relational interaction represents a vital need. Through the territorial strategic plan, which stands out as the backbone of proximity public policies, different lines of social, political and economic management are developed that should be translated into public communication messages through flexible and dynamic systematization.

The correct application of the processes, as well as the unity and coherence in the management of communicative and relational actions, ensures a precise orientation towards the objectives set by the municipal organizations (Campillo, 2010). This process of social reconstruction of governments, media and local communities, based on democratizing processes, triggering new effective and socially emerging forms of involvement and participation (Schmidt, Seixas and Baixinho, 2014), is undergoing a reconfiguration in which social media (Facebook) has played a role that is not yet widely studied in the digital public sphere of local government in Portugal.

This research arises from the interest in the study of strategic communication as a tool of political operationalization, in terms of the diagnosis of the territory and theoretical construction on digital communication in the local power of Lisbon. We start by reviewing the existing scientific production on strategic and political communication to identify, interpret and relate the structures and practices of political and strategic communication between politicians and citizens and the correlation with online involvement through the Facebook social network in the 24 Local Councils of our field of research.

As an academic contribution within the strategic communication applied to public institutions and their growing need for professionalization and improvement of communication strategies and production routines, we intend, based on the field research that will be carried out in this work, to map the communication in the local government, which may be a antechamber for other studies such as studies of reception of communication and participation of Lisbon residents, the local news scheduling in the media and the electoral and political legitimation through communication. A set of studies that can be replicated in other Portuguese municipalities, in a macro view of Portuguese municipal communication, similarly to Spain and the United States.

Local Power communication and the redefinition of the digital public sphere

In the dual exercise of communicating local government public policies, news happens in conjunction with events and texts. “While the event creates the news, the news creates the event” (Traquina, 1988), the role played by the primary definers is crucial. A group of which are the official spokesmen of power who, in a media-determined hierarchy of credibility, are recruited by journalists in the early stages where matters are structured (Hall et al, (1973; 1993). For this process of building the media agenda, with inputs and outputs from the political system (Wolfe, Jones and Baumgartner, 2013), there are promoters, producers and consumers of news (Molocht and Lester, ([1978] 1993) in an orderly continuity of power. A continuity of power that is going through a period of disruption by which citizens increasingly challenge the legitimacy of institutionalized politics and traditional media institutions, such as increasing voter abstention and the rise of cynicism and mistrust from the public.

Citizens are moving away from “high” politics and are increasingly organizing social and political meaning around their values and the personal narratives that express them (Graham, 2011) in alternative democratic strategies of media (Calhoun, 1992) in which citizen groups can influence the mass media, or they can establish alternative public spheres (Idem, 1992). Peter Dahlgren (2005) proposed the modern definition of the 'public sphere', describing it as a constellation of communicative spaces in society that allow the circulation of information, ideas, debates - ideally unrestrictedly - and also the formation of political will (that is, public opinion).

Starting from the public sphere2 as a place where private people come together as a public for the purpose of using argumentation for knowledge and critical discussion leading to political change (Habermas, 1989), the state tends to exercise control of this spontaneous flow of uncontrolled communication that is not motivated for decision making but for discovery and problem solving, and in this sense is not organized (Habermas, 1992). These processes of democratic formation of opinion and will (Idem, 1992) have undergone processes of public power intervention in the social sphere by publicly securing basic needs previously met by the family (Idem, 1989) and by controlling social duty: associations, clubs, communities and societies (Idem, 1989) and an insufficient vindication of this dispersed sovereignty of the people (Idem, 1992) by the media, caught between the contradictory effects of political influence and the weaknesses of economic survival (Idem, 1989).

For an evolution of the concept of public sphere of Jürgen Habermas, namely during the last decade of the last century, globalization contributed as a generalization of modernity (Giddens, 1991) and the existence of discursive arenas that overflow the bounds of both nations and states (Fraser , 2007), made possible through communication mediated by the internet and social networks that had a constitutive role in the development of global communication networks for individuals, organizations and movements (Slavko, 2010).

The national public sphere is transformed by a new dialectical relationship between supra and sub-national political contexts (Volkmer, 2003) and, as Fraser proposes, it is necessary to rethink public sphere theory in a transnational frame, whether the issue is global warming or immigration , women's rights or the terms of trade, unemployment or 'the war against terrorism', current mobilizations of public opinion seldom stop at the borders of territorial states (2007: 14).

As a result of globalization processes, in which the decisive locus of public affairs has shifted beyond the state to the world economy, world institutions, and a world polity (Sparks, 2004), with a dispersion of authority that explores the changing boundary between the state and civil society (Idem, 2010), we witnessed a reconfiguration of the sharing, among States, of many key governance functions with international institutions, intergovernmental networks and nongovernmental organizations (Idem, 2007).

The influence of digital communication in the reformulation of the Habermasian concept of the public sphere, through the denationalization of the communicative structure (Fraser, 2007), was felt in a simultaneous process of erosion of the power and influence of the state-based media on the one hand, and a parallel strengthening of both the local and the global media (Sparks, 2004).

However, Sparks argues, that talk of the erosion of the state-based public sphere from above by forces of globalization is at least premature and, at the present, quite mistaken. The old, imperfect, state-based public spheres are being eroded and new, albeit possibly even more imperfect, global and local public spheres are emerging, particularly around the new forms of the local (2004: 143). Among these new forms, we can find local power and its digital communication as means that can breathe civic engagement into an anaemic public sphere now dominated by official state actors, expert elites, and mass media, and thus strengthen its fourth and most vital component - civil society (Slavko, 2010: 37).

At a time when local government is being strengthened in its administrative and financial competences, and as its communication enters a process of reconstruction of the digital public sphere, we believe we are in the midst of a perfect storm for the professionalization of municipal communication consolidation of participatory democracy and full citizenship because only through effective public policy and best practice can we ensure that digital technology strengthens democratic institutions without undermining their fundamental objectives (Chester and Montgomery, 2017).

Local government manages life in society in its most varied dimensions of citizenship. Its existence was constitutionally established in 19763, and it wielded his power in the first municipal elections on December 12 of that same year. In the last five years, local government in Portugal, particularly in Lisbon4, has observed an evolution in its competences, having been granted a greater autonomy for the municipalities in the administrative governance of their territory.

In a logic of proximity, the closest political-administrative entity to the citizen is the Local Council5 and according to data from the Directorate-General of Local Authorities, Portugal has 3091 Locales, 24 of which are part of the municipality of Lisbon (Ajuda, Alcântara, Alvalade, Areeiro, Arroios, Avenidas Novas, Beato, Belém, Benfica, Campo de Ourique, Campolide, Carnide, Estrela, Lumiar, Marvila, Misericórdia, Olivais, Parque das Nations, Penha de França, Santa Clara, Santa Maria Maior, Santo António, São Domingos de Benfica and São Vicente), where more than 500 thousand inhabitants6 are concentrated with whom the Local Councils have daily to interact through analogue and increasingly digital channels in a dialogical communication (Kent and Taylor, 1998) which are constantly updated.

This continuous updating of the relationship between the state and citizens results from the possibilities offered by Web 2.07 and the intensification of civic participation through social media8 of which Facebook is the most relevant in Portugal. It had 6, 2 million users in 20189, and it has been used by local authorities to overcome communication barriers encountered in the public sector (Hofman et al., 2013).

Local Power: Strategic and Policy Configuration in Communication

Since the 1970s, municipal communication (Pérez, 1988; Camilo, 1999; Canel, 2010; Campillo, 2011) encompasses a set of activities, verbal or nonverbal, carried out by the municipality that aims to legitimize its values, activities and goals establishing a link between the municipality and the citizens (Camilo, 1999). It provides a connection in which communication is used as a form of municipal legitimation and justification that is not unrelated to the political dimension, since, similarly to municipal information, political communication also has an exclusively local scope, aiming at the legitimation of political criteria underlying the administrative options of the municipalities or the activities implemented by the mayors (Idem, 1999) and other social actors such as other politicians, communication managers, journalists and citizens.

This dialogue results in an exchange of messages that articulate in political decision making and its application within the community (Canel, 2006) in a circular and interactive relationship that occurs between the different actors involved (Idem, 2006) in various strategic actions that must be connected with political moments, serving to direct the power of planned, controlled and persuasive communication (Pérez, 2001; Hallahan et al., 2007) and fulfilling the mission that the political mandate requires through positive interaction with the public (Sung & Kim, 2014).

In the nature of strategic communication (Cornelissen, 2014; Hallahan et al., 2007; Argenti, 2005; Pérez, 2001), defined as the intentional use of communication by an organization to fulfill its mission, it is essential to determine that the institution's activities. In this case, those of a Local Council, they are strategic, not random or unintended communications - although the unintended consequences of communications may negatively affect an organization's ability to achieve its strategic objectives (Hallahan et al., 2007).

In these governance structures, communication is a management function that provides a structure and vocabulary for effective coordination of all media with the general purpose of establishing and maintaining favourable reputations with stakeholder groups on which the organization depends (Cornelissen, 2004) and with which it articulates strategically. This articulation is all the more significant if communication is defined as the constitutive activity of the social, economic and political administration (Hallahan et al., 2007) from a general set of communication objectives and programmes chosen to legitimize public policies and achieve their strategic positioning (Argenti, 2005) in the configuration of local power as a social and political market.

In this market, communication programmes must be strategically managed if the goal is to build long-term relationships (Grunig & Repper, 1992), relationships where the formation of attitudes precedes the behavioural intentions (Barreto, 2013) of the electorate, the preferred stakeholder, in a permanent campaign (Blumenthal, 1980) of conquest and maintenance of power. At this political dimension of the strategy (Lakoff, 2008), both public relations, and by extension, communication play a decisive role in identifying and diagnosing problems within organizations, managing external representation roles and the interrelationships between stakeholders, as well as the capabilities and competencies of the organization (Cutlip et al., 1994).

In this context, the organization is public, and its capacities and competences are in a restructuring mode that the Internet, as the fifth state (Dutton, 2009), allows in a kaleidoscope of globally expansive and temporally synchronous communicative networks, expanding the opportunities of connection between dispersed social actors (Blumer, 2013) in an exercise of citizenship for a digital democracy. Digital tools, such as social networks, are enabling other ways of engaging citizens in the life of their street, their city and turning them into active agents, reporting problems, identifying opportunities, proposing solutions for public intervention with the institutions of the city. This enables local power, combining interactivity from the properties of media technologies, with participation from social media protocols and practices (Jenkins, 2006), to achieve associative work made possible by interaction with entities in the public and private spheres from the comfort of home (Hjarvard, 2008).

The last few years have seen the power of the internet as a liberalizing, even destabilizing force, in the public manifestation of political communication (McNair, 2011) even in local government in Portugal. Over the course of three decades (1976-2006), local political realities, such as power, influence, authority, control or negotiation, have been exerted in a unidirectional and linear communicative sense until the end of the third era of political communication (Blumler and Kavanagh, 1999). These realities are now influenced by the effects of digitization of the public sphere in the fourth era of political communication (Aagaard, 2016; Blumer, 2013).

Political Communication in a social media environment

The mediatization of politics and the progressive digitization of the public sphere has resulted in the institutions creating a channel of direct and permanent communication with their public, especially with citizens. The institutions can provide the public with information while receiving their comments and opinions, all in a straightforward way, without the need for intermediaries (Castillo-Esparcia & Martínez, 2014) where the development of social networks as networked information services designed to support in-depth social interaction allows for greater proximity between representatives of local authority, particularly on social networks like Youtube, Instagram, Twitter, Facebook and more recently, TikTok10.

According to Stier et al. (2018), each Internet application has specific affordances and politicians demonstrate a strategic awareness of various communication arenas. In this case study, the Local Councils, in addition to Facebook, which is the digital social network chosen as the object of analysis, only resort to two other options: YouTube and Instagram. The presence on Twitter is almost residual, unlike local governments in Spain, and, for now, absent on TikTok, a social network that has international political communication11.

However, in the scope of our investigation, we consider Facebook to be the most politically relevant digital social network at the level of national local government, given the choice made by the Local Councils as well as the large number of residents who use the platform. However, the use of social media is dynamic, and its users migrate from one platform to another, in simultaneous consumption, or abandoning some as others become more popular. Given the simultaneous presence of most of the Local Councils on Facebook,

YouTube and Instagram12, one of the following lines of investigation may move towards a comparison

between the different degree of involvement seen in these social networks, seeking to reveal more refined resources in the metrics of care, such as the number of views or followers on various platforms (Nielsen & Vaccari, 2013). These specific mediation effects, both on YouTube and Instagram, need this analysis to be considered in the political communication models, currently developed in the local government. This underscores the need to argue with the utmost caution when trying to infer findings from one platform to “social media” as a whole, as it has often been done (Stier et al., 2018).(figure 1)

Figure 1: Graph from data collected from Os portugueses e as redes sociais, Marktest13, 2018; The global state of digital in 2018, Hootsuite, 2019 and Digital Report Reuters14, 2019  

The Facebook Effect on the Reconfiguration of Local Power Communication

In Portugal, the option for Facebook is overwhelming with 6.2 million users in 2018, a trend that follows the rest of Europe15. Among these 60, 9%, 53% use this platform for reading, 29% for commenting and 49% for news sharing (Digital News Report, 2019), with an average involvement of around 3.1%.

Using Facebook16 as a communication strategy implies a daily use of the tools provided by the social network, accompanying the online community as a key factor in interacting with governments. In different ways, depending on the political instinct and professional experience of each media professional, everyone agrees on the benefits of social networking17. These are easier mass distribution of official website content, allowing users redistribute this content through their own blogs or social networks; and open corporate dialogue so that citizens have the opportunity to publish their own views on information distributed by local governments (Guillamón, M.-D.; Ríos, A.-M.; Gesuele, B. & Metallo, C., 2016).

The interactivity that disseminates information within the network through the likes, the share and comment options, which allow the user to attach a comment to the original post, as well as adding an image, video or link to another site, inside or outside the social network environment. Another attribute is political discussion through the exchange of ideas, attitudes, and arguments about governing choices and the performance of the elected, which encourages participants' action and motivation to express their personal political point of view, establishing relationships with people who are also interested in a particular subject and in the dissemination of information on this subject (Conroy et al., 2012).

Community monitoring following the page should also consider both the form and content of what is shared given the fact that it is difficult to ascertain whether citizens find the information useful without applying reception studies and categorizing the different interpretative strategies of citizens, the submission or opposition to information or a synthesis of contents made from their own interpretation (Hall, 1980). Benkler (2006) points out options for creating content that generates interactivity making it useful, entertaining readers, and reacting quickly.

Analyzing publicly available content on SNS such as Facebook has become an increasingly popular method for studying socio-political issues. Such public- contributed content, primarily available as Wall posts and corresponding comments on Facebook pages or Facebook groups, let people express their opinions and sentiments on a given topic, news or persons, while allowing social and political scientists to conduct analyses of political discourse (Stieglitz & Dang-Xuan, 2013).

The digital presence on the social network Facebook and its potential communicative effectiveness (McNair, 2011), as well as interaction with the users of the page, allows us to understand how Facebook can offer an opportunity to facilitate communication and interaction between government and society (Haro-De-Rosario; Sáez-Martín & Galvez-Rodríguez, 2017). This is in synergy with the content available on the institutional website, in line with studies carried out in other European countries, noting that in recent years, many municipalities have started using various social networks to communicate with citizens as an additional form of online communication (Idem, 2016).

Apart from the ubiquity of Facebook as the leading social network in online communication of these institutions, given the possibility of its being present in various networks, the adoption of one or more by a local government is a discretionary issue. Local governments should, therefore, consider the differences in citizen involvement found in each type of social network. If local government managers know which type of social network is most likely to achieve this citizen involvement, it will enable them to improve their communication strategies for social networks (Haro-de-Rosario; Sáez-Martín & Caba-Pérez, 2018), betting on the network that has the most return with its target audience and not being present in all networks. (figure 2)

Figure 2: Facebook Use in Europe in 2018 (source: statista.com)  

Data Collection Methodology and Procedure

The main objective of this paper has been to document the evolution of the official Facebook pages of the Local Councils of Lisbon over the first 14 months of the political mandates legitimized by the municipal elections of October 2017. Having been selected the 24 that are part of the county, it was not possible to collect data from the Local Council of Campo de Ourique that deactivated its page in the social network and, for now, does not want its reactivation.

The combination of digital methodology (Rogers, 2009), used for measurement of dimensions, components and indicators in the use of social network made by followers aims to achieve the objectives of the work and the need to understand the current reality, working for the validity of the construction from the collected digital traces (Russell, 2013) providing new theoretical contributions to the object of analysis. We, thus, analyzed a universe of 23 pages using the FanPageKarma18 tool that, after presenting some problems in determining the percentage of the total performance of eight pages (Olivais, Parque das Nações, Penha de França, Santa Clara, Santa Maria Maior, Santo António, São Domingos de Benfica and São Vicente) led us to take another approach, through another tool used in the analysis of Facebook pages: Likealyzer19, maintaining and comparing the data from both. The documentary analysis of Facebook pages through selective archive and snapshots (Lomborg, 2014) allowed us to analyze expressions of the phenomenon without resorting to the intervention of the participants.

The construction of the digital map that we present, results from a longitudinal study of the performance of the Facebook page of each Local Council between November 2017 and May 2019. This performance (quantified by the number of views, likes, comments and shares) determines the degree of general involvement of the online community that follows each page. For the calculation of this involvement20, the interaction of the followers, calculated as the sum of tastes, sharing of comments and reactions to publications, contributes. As an evaluation tool for digital social networks, FanPageKarma enabled a detailed analysis of the metrics of each page, such as the growth of followers, the type and number of publications per day, the average duration of each of these publications, as well as the audience involvement. This average value of involvement21 is calculated by adding the total number of reactions to the total number of comments, divided by three, a result to which we add the total number of shares, multiplied by five and divided by the number of people who liked the page, during the time interval under analysis.

On the other hand, we use another tool to analyze digital social networks to complement and compare results. From the url of each page, LikeAlyzer allowed us to analyze and monitor the number of daily publications, the variation in formats (photo, text or video), the average size (for example, publications with less than 100 characters are considered better) regarding the reader's attention economy) or the native videos (inserted directly on the page, without an external link) as competing factors for the daily exercise of providing content. This collection of information on the response and digital interaction of the public on each page, enabled a final report to evaluate the key performance indicators.

In the sample collected, we decided to compare the performance and overall ranking data as well as the degree of involvement expressed by the two tools for the same page (Table 1). Comparison was also possible in the metric of the number of daily publications of each page (table 2), as well as the percentage categorization of the type of post (photo, text or video only) in Likealyzer only.

Finally, we decided to make a comparison between registered voters, effective voters in the 2017 local councils and the number of followers of each Local Council's official Facebook page to understand the influence of the social network on a potential practice of democratic citizenship through digital communication. The internet, and specifically the social network Facebook, has added a new layer to political discussion and this implies understanding traditional political participation metrics such as voter participation (Ward & Gibson, 2010) in view of the social ubiquity of online participation, and its effects on the civic space and on the functioning of democracy (Dahlgren, 2015) in the physical and digital territory of Lisbon Local Councils.

Results Discussion: Performance, Performance and Engagement

The Marvila Local Council's Facebook page is arguably a success story, with an overall rating of 75 points and an 8.9% (FanPageKarma) and 25% (Likealyzer) involvement of 10,211 followers. Defining the political executive as a brand, the usefulness of the page lies in the possibility of interaction between the brand and its followers, which can lead to engagement (Barreto, 2013) that needs commitment to genuine and honest dialogue (Kent & Taylor, 2002) to go from the lowest hierarchical level of involvement (the click on Like) to the highest that implies defending the purchase of the product (Paine, 2011) which here is the vote of the voter who conquers and ensures the maintenance of power.

At the opposite end of the collected data, was the Lumiar Local Council Facebook page, with the lowest performance (14% according to FanPageKarma) and among the lowest ratings (65% according to Likealyzer) in the overall assessment within the universe of 23. These values are also frankly residual in the field of involvement (0.21% in FanPageKarma and 2% in Likealyzer) failing to mobilize its 9,884 followers. Another case that deserves special consideration is the Campolide Local Council Facebook page with very satisfactory performances with the highest level of performance (87% on FanPageKarma) and one of the highest overall page rankings (72% on Likealyzer), reaching optimal levels of engagement (3% in FanPageKarma and 10% in Likealyzer).

Table 1: Local councils from lisbon municipality | November 2017 - May 2019 

Source: Constructed from data collected (01.11.17 | 31.05.19) in FanPage Karma and Likealyzer applications.

It is also noted that it is the only page among the 23 analysed that offers its 8,787 followers the possibility of direct interaction with the president, André Couto, through Lives, fulfilling principles such as mutuality, proximity, empathy, risk and commitment (Kent & Taylor, 2002) in the dialogue between the citizen and the politician. In 2016, Fernando Medina was the first politician in local government to use this symmetrical communication resource between rulers and the governed, aiming at transparency of information and accountability in the situation of Carris (Lisbon transportation company) and its transition to the management of the Lisbon City Council22.

With regard to this communicational device used by both politicians, we must consider expressions of two general processes, which act together, but which are based on principles of different natures, persuasion and seduction. Persuasion to gain the conviction of the audience through rational arguments, namely through the detailed presentation of the candidate's programme, and seduction, which operates in an artificially created spectacle scenario, where the politician is the protagonist (Ferreira, 2016: 58).

A logic of conversation and participation that, in our view, should be followed by the other pages and confirms that social networks are not about technology, but about people (Barreto, 2013) who, as participants, are encouraged for learning, considering and expressing their political and personal point of view (Conroy et al., 2012).

Discussion of Results: Number and Categorization of Publications

In a brief and essentially exploratory case study, we also want to measure the daily averages of government publications and the way they are used according to the categories of photography, video or just text, as the analysis of publications and the properties of those publications convey an approximate image of how local governments interact with their citizens on their Facebook pages (Hofmann et al., 2013).

In the field of daily publications, we return to Marvila which leads with 6.4 publications (FanPageKarma) and 4.2 (Likealyzer) in both analysis tools used. And, finally, we also found Lumiar's Facebook page that barely reaches a daily average of publication (0.5 on FanPageKarma and 0.9 on Likealyzer), which confirms an obvious urgency in the strategic repositioning of this Local Council's digital communication. A potential risk may lie in the disruption of the political cycle where 'informal opinion formation generates' influence'. Influence is transformed into 'communicative power' through political election channels and communicative power is again transformed into 'administrative power' by law” (Habermas, 1996).

On the Facebook pages we reviewed, visual category publications using photography dominate with values above 90% in Alcântara, Areeiro, Olivais, Parque das Nações and Santa Clara while in Beato the lowest value (15%) is opposed by a massive use of video (82%), a possibility completely rejected by the pages of Santa Clara and Lumiar. The case of Lumiar offers a new angle of analysis, i.e. not making videos available, betting significantly on photography (86%), which in itself does not translate into satisfactory results, as we saw earlier. It is important not only that governments communicate with citizens, but how they communicate is also important and, in particular, how citizens perceive such communication (Bruns & Bahnisch, 2009)23.

Table 2: Local councils from lisbon municipality | November 2017 - May 2019 Registered and Effective Municipal Voters 2017 | Number of Followers Facebook Page 2019 

Source: Constructed from data collected on eleicoes.mai.gov.pt (2017) and on the Facebook pages of each institution (2019).

Discussion of Results: Registered Voters, Effective Voters and Followers

In the municipality of Lisbon, where more than half a million inhabitants are concentrated, more than 240 thousand did not vote in the last municipal election in 201724, which led us to compare data from registered voters and effective voters with the number of followers on official Facebook pages of each of the Local Councils to gauge the degree of integration of the citizens in the political process, by joining the Local Council page to where it exercises the vote.

The number of followers, more importantly than the number of people who just like the page, is an essential value in a page's success metric. The more people who follow a local government's Facebook profile, the greater the opportunity it has to build relationships with the population (Haro-De-Rosario; Sáez-Martín & Galvez-Rodríguez, 2017) so that, after the elections are over, there is no disruption in communication that can be interpreted as inactivity by public authorities (Moreno, 2012) until the next election cycle in 2021. This is an interpretation that may disturb the perception of the message during the political term and influence electoral participation and full exercise of citizenship.

Among the Local Councils with more citizens following the local government's Facebook page than citizens who exercised their voting rights, we find Benfica (26,694 followers to 17,749 voters in an electoral territory with 33,460 registered) who leads a group where Ajuda, Alcântara, Carnide and Campolide have more followers than voters in municipal elections.

The highest voting level in 2017 was reached in the Local of Lumiar, with the participation of 21,261 voters out of 38,683 who could have done so. As we saw earlier, Facebook page analytics results are far below average for all Locales in terms of the performance and engagement of their 9,884 followers. We empirically believe that, in a Local with such low abstention, the level of politicization is high, which makes the work of diagnosing and restructuring the social networking page even more urgent strategically to reach over 10,000 potential followers ( looking at the voters) or over 20,000 (looking at the registered voters) and recruiting them to join the group. Conroy et al. (2012) found that political groups on Facebook increase political participation outside their members, making groups the ideal tool for increasing and strengthening public involvement in government development - the fundamental principle of democratic government.

Conclusions

Governmental communication in local government and its strategic conception, in the media ecosystem of the new forms of relationship provided by social networks, is a structural element in the process of conquering and maintaining the governance and democratic legitimacy conferred by the electoral mandate.

In order to achieve results in the political narrative that the chronology of a mandate presupposes, in fact, digital communication is crucial, demonstrating its importance at every moment when citizens face everyday problems where the rapidity of the Facebook social network can help to simplify the chain of procedures until a possible solution to the question raised by the citizen is found.

In the specific case of each local government's official Facebook page, a strategic approach is vital through a system of monitoring and reviewing social and political objectives, along with a systematic collection of data (either through the internal tools available on the social network). External ones (like the ones we use) that can lead the process of prioritization and consequent decision making (Bilhim, 2004) of the content and the most efficient and appropriate categories to make them available to the consumer of your social network.

Online communication, specifically the use of Facebook in communication between the Local Council and the citizen, still has a long way to go to fill in new forms of political participation, the continuity of the traditional public sphere in the online environment and the building of a democracy in a proposal that looks at technology head-on, taking on its political character unambiguously, and which in particular identifies on the Internet as an important potential for deliberative political communication capable of generating new forms of democratic life (Esteves, 2011), besides the Facebook citizen who does not extend his citizenship from mobile phone and computer to the voting booth.

“Digitally equipped, monitoring and voyeuristic, motivated and apathetic, the liquid citizen flows in a fragmented continuum, but does not anchor” (Papacharissi, 2010) which may imply a peculiar paralysis of civil society (Habermas, 2006) meanwhile fought by a media culture that try to anchor the citizen in discursive spaces in social networks.

Facebook as one of the contemporary mirrors of politics and politics, which we intend to analyse in our doctoral thesis in the period until the 2021 election cycle, can realize a digital public sphere that also needs the solidary spirit of cultural traditions and standards (Habermas, 1992) to achieve and promote a more transparent, rigorous and efficient democracy with real input from all.

References

Aagaard, P. (2016). The Fourth Age of Political Communication: Democratic decay or the rise of phronetic political communication? Nordicum-Mediterraneum Online, 11(3). [ Links ]

Amaral, D. F. (2015). Curso de Direito Administrativo. Manuais Universitários. Coimbra: Almedina. [ Links ]

Argenti, P., Howells, R.A. & Beck, K.A. (2005). The Strategic Communication Imperative. MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(3), 83-89. [ Links ]

Barreto, A. M. (2013). Does brand's participation on Facebook affect its brand equity? PhD Thesis in Communication Sciences in the Communication and Strategy variant. Lisboa: FCSH-UNL. [ Links ]

Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. [ Links ]

Bilhim, J. (2004). Governação nas Autarquias Locais. Porto: Edições SPI. [ Links ]

Blumenthal, S. (1980). The Permanent Campaign. New York: Simon & Schuster. [ Links ]

Blumler, J.G. & Kavanagh, D. (1999). “The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features”. Political Communication, 16(3), 210-230. [ Links ]

Blumer, J. G. (2013). The Fourth Age of Political Communication . Keynote address delivered at a Workshop on Political Communication Online. Berlin: Free University of Berlin. [ Links ]

Bobbio, N. (2000) Teoria Geral da Política: A Filosofia Política e as Lições dos Clássicos. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Campus. [ Links ]

Calhoun, C. J. (1992). Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [ Links ]

Conroy, M.; Feezell, J. T. & Guerrero, M. (2012). Facebook and political engagement: A study of online political group membership and offline political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1535-1546. [ Links ]

Camilo, E. (1999). Estratégias de Comunicação Municipal: Uma reflexão sobre as modalidades de comunicação nos municípios. Covilhã: Universidade da Beira Interior. [ Links ]

Campillo-Alhama, C. (2010). Comunicación pública y administración municipal. Una propuesta de modelo estructural”. Pensar la Publicidad, IV (1), 45-62. [ Links ]

Canel, M. J. (2006). Comunicacíon Política - Una Guía para su Estudio y Prática. Madrid: Tecnos. [ Links ]

Canel, M. J. (2010). Comunicación de las Instituiciones Públicas. Madrid: Tecnos . [ Links ]

Castillo-Esparcia, A. & Martínez, A.A (2014). Estudio del uso que los diputados españoles hacen de las TIC en sus relaciones con la ciudadanía. Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicácion, 126, 22-30. [ Links ]

Chester, J. & Montgomery, K. C. (2017). The role of digital marketing in political campaigns. Internet Policy Review, 6(4), 1-20. [ Links ]

Cornelissen, J. (2004). Corporate Communications Theory and Practice. London: SAGE Publications. [ Links ]

Cutlip, S.; Center, A. & Broom, G. (1994). Effective Public Relations. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. [ Links ]

Dahlgren, P. (2005) The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation. Political Communication , 22(2), 147-162. [ Links ]

Dahlgren, P. (2015). Web-Based Political Participation: Engagement, Emotion, Expression, Efficacy. In Flores, T. M. & Torres da Silva, M. (Org.). Revista Media & Jornalismo Cidadania e Democracia na Era Digital - Número especial. Lisboa: Mariposa Azual, pp.21-42. [ Links ]

Dutton, W. H. (2009). Through the network of networks - The Fifth Estate. Prometheus, 27(1), 1-15. [ Links ]

Ellison, N. B. & Boyd, D. (2013). Sociality through Social Network Sites. In Dutton, W. H. (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies (pp. 151-172). Oxford: Oxford University Press. [ Links ]

Ellison, N. B. & Boyd, D. (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. [ Links ]

Esteves, J. P. (2011). Novos media e deliberação: sobre redes, tecnologia, informação e comunicação. In Esteves, J. P. (Org.). Revista Media & Jornalismo Digital Divides/Fracturas Digitais, 10(1), 31-45. [ Links ]

Fraser, N. (2007). Transnationalizing the Public Sphere: On the Legitimacy and Efficacy of Public Opinion in a Post-Westphalian World. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(4), 7-30. [ Links ]

Fuchs, C. (2014). Social Media and the Public Sphere. TripleC Communication, capitalism e critique, 12(1), 57-101. [ Links ]

Giddens, A. (1991). The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press. [ Links ]

Graham, T. (2011). What’s Reality Television Got to Do with it? Talking Politics in the Net-Based Public Sphere. In Brants, K. & Voltmer, K. (editors). Political communication in postmodern democracy: challenging the primacy of politics (pp. 248-264). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. [ Links ]

Guillamón, M. D., Ríos, A. M., Gesuele, B. & Metallo, C. (2016). Factors influencing social media use in local governments: The case of Italy and Spain. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 460-471. [ Links ]

Grunig, J. E. & Repper, F. C. (1992). Strategic management, publics and issues. In Grunig, J. E. (ed.), Excellence in Public Relations and Communications Management (pp. 117-157). London: Routledge. [ Links ]

Habermas, J. (1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Boston: MIT Press. [ Links ]

Habermas, Jürgen (1992). Further Reflections on the Public Sphere. In Craig Calhoun (ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere (pp. 421-461). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press. [ Links ]

Habermas, J. (1996). Three Normative Models of Democracy. In S. Benhabib (ed.) Democracy and Difference (pp. 21-30). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. [ Links ]

Habermas, J. (2006). Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research. Communication Theory, 16 (4), 411-426. [ Links ]

Hall, S. et al. ([1973] 1993). A produção social das notícias: o mugging nos media. In Traquina, N. (Org.) Jornalismo: Questões, Teorias e “Estórias” (pp. 224-248). Lisboa: Vega. [ Links ]

Haro-De-Rosario, A., Sáez-Martín, A. & Galvez, M. M. (2017). Facebook as a Dialogic Strategic Tool for European Local Governments. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 13, 73-89. [ Links ]

Haro-de-Rosario, A., Sáez-Martín, A., & del Carmen Caba-Pérez, M. (2018). Using social media to enhance citizen engagement with local government: Twitter or Facebook? New Media & Society, 20(1), 29-49. [ Links ]

Hjarvard, S. (2008). The Mediatization of Society A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change. Nordicom Review, 29, 2, 105-134. [ Links ]

Hofmann, S.; Beverungen, D.; Rackers, M., & Becker, J. (2013). What makes local governments' online communications successful? Insights from a multi-method analysis of Facebook. Government Information Quarterly , 30, 387-396. [ Links ]

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: NY University Press. [ Links ]

Kent, M. L. & Taylor, M. (1998). Building dialogic relationships through the World Wide Web. Public Relations Review, 24 (3), 321-334. [ Links ]

Kent, M. L., & Taylor, M. (2002). Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review , 28 (1), 21-37. [ Links ]

Hallahan, K.; Holtzhausen, D.; Van Ruler, B.; Verčič, D. & Sriramesh. K. (2007). Defining Strategic Communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1(1), 3-35. [ Links ]

Lakoff, G. (2008). The Political Mind. New York: Penguin Group. [ Links ]

Lomborg, S. (2014). Researching Communication Pratice: Web Archiving in Qualitative Social Media Research. In Bredl, K.; Hunninger, J. & Jensen L. J. (Edt.), Methods for Analyzing Social Media (pp. 219-231). Nova Iorque: Routledge. [ Links ]

McNair, Brian (2011). An Introduction to Political Communication . New York: Routledge. [ Links ]

Medina Serrano, J. C., Papakyriakopoulos, O. & Hegelich, S. (2020). Dancing to the Partisan Beat: A First Analysis of Political Communication on TikTok. 12th ACM Conference on Web Science, July 07-10, 2020, Southampton, UK. [ Links ]

Molocht, H. e Lester, M. ([1978] 1993). As notícias como procedimento intencional: acerca do uso estratégico dos acontecimentos de rotina, acidentes e escândalos. In Traquina, N. (Org.) Jornalismo: Questões, Teorias e “Estórias” (pp. 42-51). Lisboa: Vega . [ Links ]

Moreno, C. (2012). La comunicación de las políticas públicas. Revista Más Poder Local, 10, 14-15. [ Links ]

Mónica, M. F. (1993). Visitas ao Poder. Lisboa: Quetzal Editores. [ Links ]

Nielsen, R. K., & Vaccari, C. (2013). Do people “like” politicians on Facebook? Not really. Large- scale direct candidate-to-voter online communication as an outlier phenomenon. International Journal of Communication, 7, 2333-2356. [ Links ]

O'Reilly, Tim (2007). What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. International Journal of Digital Economics, 65, 17-37. [ Links ]

Papacharissi, Z. (2010). A private sphere: democracy in a digital age. Cambridge: Polity Press. [ Links ]

Paine, K. (2011). Measure what matters online tools for understanding customers, social media, engagement and key relationships. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. [ Links ]

Pérez, R. A. (2001). Estrategias de comunicación. Barcelona: Editorial Ariel. [ Links ]

Pérez, R. A. (1988). Un modelo estratégico de comunicación municipal. Madrid: Universidad Complutense. [ Links ]

Rogers, R. (2009). The end of the virtual: Digital methods. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. [ Links ]

Ruivo, F. & Francisco, D. (1999). O poder local entre centro e periferias. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais. 53 (pp. 281-306). Coimbra: Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade de Coimbra. [ Links ]

Russel, M. (2013). Mining the Social Web. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media, Inc. [ Links ]

Traquina, N. ([1988] 1993) As notícias. In Traquina, N. (Org.) Jornalismo: Questões, Teorias e “Estórias” (pp. 167-176). Lisboa: Vega . [ Links ]

Schmidt, L.; Baixinho, A. & Seixas, J. (2014). Governação de Proximidade. Lisboa: INCM - Imprensa Nacional Casa da Moeda. [ Links ]

Slavko, S. (2010). Eclipse of ‘the Public’ From the Public to (Transnational) Public Sphere Conceptual Shifts in the Twentieth Century. In Gripsrud, J. & Moe H. (eds.) The Digital Public Sphere Challenges for Media Policy (pp. 23-38). Gothenburg: Nordicom. [ Links ]

Sparks, C. (2004). The Global, the Local and the Public Sphere. In Allen, R. C. Hill, A. (eds.), Television Studies Reader. New York: Routledge , pp. 139-150. [ Links ]

Sung, K., & Kim, S. (2014). I Want to Be Your Friend: The Effects of Organizations’ Interpersonal Approaches on Social Networking Sites. Journal of Public Relations Research, 26(3), 235-255. [ Links ]

Stieglitz, S., Dang-Xuan, L. (2013). Social media and political communication: a social media analytics framework. Social Network Analysis and Mining. 3, 1277-1291. [ Links ]

Stier, S. et al. (2018). Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians, Audiences, and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter. Political Communication , 35, 50-74. [ Links ]

Volkmer, I. (2003). The Global Network Society and the Global Public Sphere. Development, 46(1), 9-16. [ Links ]

Ward, S.; Gibson, R. (2010). European political organizations and the internet: mobilization, participation, and change. In A. Chadwick & P. N. Howard (Eds.). Handbook of Internet Politics (pp. 25-29). Nova Iorque: Routledge . [ Links ]

Wolfe, M.; Jones, B. M. & Baumgartner, F. R. (2013). A Failure to Communicate: Agenda Setting in Media and Policy Studies. Political Communication , 30(2), 175-192. [ Links ]

1Guerreiro, L. (2003). Manifesto: Crise e Renascimento da Política. Revista 2, Abril (pp. 74-83). Lisboa: Política XXI.

2The concept of the public sphere was introduced in 1962 by Jürgen Habermas in “The Structural Change of the Public Sphere”, referring to the bourgeois public sphere that emerged in French, English and German societies in the 18th century, above all the sphere of private people come together as a public. The target of several criticisms, Habermas made some reformulations to the initial theory, presenting the public sphere as “a domain of our social life where something like public opinion can be formed. Access (...) is in principle open to all citizens. Citizens act as a public when dealing with matters of general interest without being subject to coercion (...) to express and publicize their perspectives” (Habermas, 1997: 105).

3In accordance with the Constitution of the Portuguese Republic, the democratic organization of the state comprises the existence of local authorities, which are territorial legal persons with representative bodies aiming to pursue their own interests (Article 235). On the mainland, the local authorities are the Locales, municipalities and administrative regions (Article 236 (1)), although the latter have not yet been set up (Articles 255 and 256). The representative bodies of the Local are the Local assembly (deliberative body) and the Local council (executive body). The framework of competences and the legal functioning of the Local bodies is contained in Law 75/2013, of 12 September and Law 169/99 of 18 September, with the subsequent amendments, in non-parties repealed by Law 75/2013 (DGAL, 2017).

4The Lisbon administrative organization (Law no. 56/2012 of 8 November as amended by Law no. 85/2015 of 7 August created a new map of the city and is based on a strategy of the modernization of the governance model decentralizing administrative competences for the Local Councils, implicitly is the geographical change of the current Locales from 53 to 24, adding some, delimiting others and even creating a new administrative area of the city - the Parque das Nações. Retrieved 17 May, 2019 from cm-lisboa.pt/municipio/juntas-de-freguesia

5The Locales are the local municipalities that, within the municipal territory, aim to pursue the interests of the resident population in each Local district (Amaral, 2015).

6506,654 thousand inhabitants in 2018 according to PORDATA. Retrieved 2 May, 2019 from https://www.pordata.pt/Municipios

7 O'Reilly, Tim (2007). What Is Web 2.0 Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. Retrieved May 10, 2019 frommpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/4580/

8A social networking site is a networking platform in which participants 1) have uniquely identifiable profiles consisting of user-provided content, content provided by other users and / or data provided by the system; 2) can publicly articulate connections that can be seen and traversed by others; and 3) may consume, produce and / or interact with user generated content streams provided by your site links (Ellison and boyd, 2007).

9Hootsuite (2019). The global state of digital in 2018. Retrieved from 24 May, 2019 from https://hootsuite.com/pt/pages/digital-in-2018

10Fanin, Rebecca (2019). “The Strategy Behind TikTok’s Global Rise”. Harvard Business Review Online, September 13. Retrieved May 14, 2020 from https://hbr.org/2019/09/the-strategy-behind-tiktoks-global-rise

11Communication still preserves its decentralized character as on other social media platforms, with users generating, sharing, and diffusing information. However, TikTok users do not just merely circulate content and comment it; they become the content. In contrast to Facebook and Twitter, where users exchange news articles in the form of URLs and articulate their political opinions through comments or feedback posts, TikTok users become active presenters of political information. Every TikTok user is a performer who externalizes personal political opinion via an audiovisual act, with political communication becoming a far more interactive experience than on YouTube or Instagram. Since every user seeks increased popularity to disseminate their messages more widely, they create short political spectacles resulting in the realization of politics as entertainment. Unlike television media where news anchors and political pundits are the showmen and women, everybody on TikTok is one. It is not a coincidence, therefore, that this intensive audiovisual universe attracts young users who actually "play" their politics on the platform. The duet function is one of the main reasons why political communication is so interactive on TikTok (Medina Serrano, J. C., Papakyriakopoulos, O. & Hegelich, S., 2020: 8).

12In 2020, all the Local Councils of Lisbon are present both on YouTube (with the exception of Ajuda) and on Instagram. The exceptions for these networks are Belém and Campo de Ourique, the latter also having the Facebook page disabled.

13Marktest (2018). Os portugueses e as redes sociais. Lisboa: Marktest. Retrieved 20 May, 2019 from https://www.marktest.com/wap/a/n/id~2429.aspx

14Reuters (2019). Reuters Digital News Report 2019. Retrieved 19 June, 2019 from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2019-06/DNR_2019_FINAL_0.pdf

15Retrieved 17 June, 2019 from https://www.statista.com/topics/4106/social-media-usage-in-europe/

16A Facebook profile contains a1) personal data, a2) communicative data, a3) social network data and community data regarding b1) private roles (friend, lover, relative, father, mother, child, etc.) b2) civic roles (sociocultural roles as members of the sports fan community, members of the residents' association, etc.), b3) public roles (socioeconomic and socio-political roles as activists and advocates), b4) systemic roles (in politics: voter, citizen, customer, politician, bureaucrat, etc., in the economy: worker, manager, owner, buyer / consumer, etc.) (Fuchs, 2014: 77).

17Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S. & Flores, F. (2012). Local e-government 2.0: Social media and corporate transparency in municipalities. Retrieved 2 October, 2018 from http://aeca1.org/pub/on_line/comunicaciones_xvicongresoaeca/cd/18f.pdf

18Retrieved November 1, 2017 until May 31, 2019 from https://www.fanpagekarma.com

19Retrieved November 1 until May 31, 2019 from https://likealyzer.com/

20Social Bakers (2020). Engagement rate: A metric you can count on. Retrieved 24 June, 2020 from https://www.socialbakers.com/solution/measurement-and-reporting

21Unmetric. (2020). Engagement score revised. Retrieved 7 June, 2020 from https://unmetric.com/engagement

22“Medina em directo no Facebook para responder aos lisboetas”. Magazine “SÁBADO”. Retrieved June 14, 2019 from medina-em-directo-no-facebook-para-responder-aos-lisboetas

23Bruns, A. & Bahnisch, M. (2009). Social media: tools for user-generated content social drivers behind growing con-sumer participation in user-led content generation. QUT e-prints. Vol. 1: state of the art. Smart Services CRC. Retrieved 20 May, 2019 from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/21206/

24With an abstention of 48.84%, the number of non-voters reached 241,038 thousand inhabitants. Retrieved June 6, 2019 from eleicoes/autarquicas/2017/distrito-lisboa/concelho-lisboa/eleicao-CM/110600

Received: January 20, 2020; Accepted: May 10, 2020

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License