SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 número1TEVAR for primary aortic mural thrombus: when and how? índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular

versão impressa ISSN 1646-706Xversão On-line ISSN 2183-0096

Angiol Cir Vasc vol.21 no.1 Lisboa mar. 2025  Epub 30-Ago-2025

https://doi.org/10.48750/acv619 

Review article

What is hidden behind persistent Inferior vena cava thrombosis?

1 Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo António, Portugal.


Abstract

Background:

Primary tumors of the inferior vena cava (IVC) are rare. They most commonly arise from the smooth muscle of the IVC walls, known as leiomyomas.

Case report:

A 49-year-old male patient presented to the emergency department with right leg swelling. He had undergone varicose vein extraction surgery one month before presentation. Doppler ultrasound revealed thrombosis of the right iliac and femoral veins. Permeability of the IVC was presumed, since symptoms were unilateral. The patient was discharged with anticoagulation therapy, rivaroxaban 15mg bid.

During follow-up, complaints of right leg swelling and discomfort persisted, raising the suspicion of post-thrombotic syndrome. A computed tomography angiography scan revealed a 12 cm-long thrombus in the infrarenal IVC. Despite ongoing anticoagulation, symptoms persisted with intermittent improvements and worsening. Consequently, additional investigation with phlebography, magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography (PET) scan was performed, which raised a high suspicion of a leiomyoma of the IVC. An endovascular biopsy with a Cordis ® biopsy catheter confirmed the diagnosis of an IVC leiomyoma.

Open surgical resection of the tumor was proposed and accepted by the patient.

After the operation, the patient spent three days in intensive care and was discharged from the hospital after one week. At the one-month follow-up appointment, the patient remained asymptomatic.

Conclusions:

While rare, it is crucial to keep in mind the existence of IVC leiomyomas, which often occur with nonspecific symptoms. In this clinical case, the sole symptom was thrombosis of the femoral, iliac, and inferior vena cava, refractory to anticoagulation therapy. To confirm the diagnosis, biopsy is mandatory, with endovascular biopsy being an efficient and safe method.

Keywords: Inferior vena cava; thrombosis; biopsy; leiomyoma

Background

Tumours of the Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) are rare. These may be classified as primary or secondary tumours. Less than 500 cases are described in the literature as primary tumours, mostly leiomyosarcomas.1 Leiomyomas are even rarer and originate in the smooth muscle of the IVC walls. The most frequent secondary tumours are intravenous leiomyomatosis, which is only present in women, arising from the uterus and propagating through the blood to the IVC walls.2,3 Symptoms typically manifest late over the course of the disease and are often nonspecific. The only definitive treatment is surgery. The authors present a case of a leiomyoma of the IVC, initially diagnosed as a deep venous thrombosis.

Case Report

A 49-year-old male patient, with a history of varicose vein surgery one month prior, presents to the emergency department with right leg swelling. The surgery had been performed in another institution, and further information could not be retrieved. Doppler ultrasound revealed thrombosis of the right iliac and femoral vein, with presumed permeability of the IVC, given the symptoms were unilateral. These findings were confirmed by computed tomography angiography (CTA), which also revealed pulmonary thromboembolism. The patient remained in the hospital for one week and was discharged on anticoagulation therapy, with rivaroxaban 15mg bid, and prescribed class 2 elastic compression stockings.

After one year, the complaints of right leg swelling and discomfort persisted, raising the suspicion of post-thrombotic syndrome. A CTA revealed a 12 cm thrombus in the infrarenal IVC, Figure 1. Despite ongoing anticoagulation, symptoms persisted with intermittent improvements and worsening. The diagnostic workup and the proposal for surgery were delayed due to circumstances caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Figure 1 Computed tomography angiography - coronal (top) and axial (bottom) views.Evolution over time is noted from left (2021) to right (2023). 

Consequently, a phlebography, a magnetic resonance, and a positron emission tomography (PET) scan were performed to clarify the etiology, which raised the suspicion of a leiomyoma of the IVC. The PET scan was conducted to determine whether the lesion exhibited high proliferation, which could indicate a malignant neoplasm. Nevertheless, the mass was identified as a low-proliferation lesion. The phlebography confirmed an occlusion of the inferior vena cava with repermeabilization above the known lesion, with slow progression of contrast. Subsequently, an endovascular biopsy, performed with a Cordis® biopsy catheter, confirmed the suspicion of a IVC leiomyoma. A left femoral access was obtained with a 9Fr introducer, the biopsy catheter was then advanced to the IVC wall, and a mass sample was collected, Figure 2 and 3. The biopsy was successful, with the histopathological examination reporting a myxoid leiomyoma.

Figure 2 Phlebography revealing occlusion of the IVC and extensive collateralization. 

Figure 3 Intra-procedural fluoroscopy image. The endovascular biopsy catheter is shown collecting IVC samples. 

Surgical tumour resection and IVC reconstruction, if needed, were proposed and accepted by the patient, given the risk of distal progression of the leiomyoma with possible compromise of the renal veins. A xiphopubic incision was completed to facilitate visualization of the IVC. A meticulous dissection was carried out, confirming the presence of the neoplastic lesion, which was subsequently resected. IVC reconstruction was deemed unnecessary, since the patient already had a well-developed collateral circulation, Figure 4. The operation was performed under general anesthesia with a duration of 3h30, no intraoperative heparin was administered and estimated blood losses were 300 cc.

Figure 4 Intra-operative images of the IVC tumor ressection 

On the left, exposure of the IVC and renal veins; on the center, tumor resection; on the right, surgical specimen.

The postoperative period was uneventful. The patient was anticoagulated with low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) and underwent intermittent pneumatic compression, with no complications. The patient spent three days in intensive care and was discharged from the hospital after a week, with rivaroxaban 15mg bid and compression socks. At the one-month follow-up, the patient remained asymptomatic.

Discussion

IVC leiomyomas often manifest with nonspecific symptoms, such as abdominal discomfort, back pain, weight loss, and recurrent thrombosis. Given its nonspecific symptoms and insidious evolution, IVC leiomyomas are usually diagnosed late in their evolution.1,4 In this clinical case, the patient's sole symptom was thrombosis of the femoral, iliac, and inferior vena cava, which proved refractory to anticoagulation therapy. The diagnostic workup usually involves an ultrasound, CTA and magnetic resonance. However, a biopsy of the tumour is required to confirm the diagnosis.5 Given the location of the IVC, the performance of a percutaneous biopsy can be challenging. Endovascular biopsy, a relatively novel technique that has increasingly been used, was first described to diagnose vascular tumours in 1972 in the United States, where gastroscopic biopsy forceps were used to obtain the biopsy material.6 Since then, several devices have been used to perform the biopsy, and this technique is now safe and effective, reducing the risk of major haemorrhage and the pain related to the biopsy.7,8 In this patient, we performed an off-label endovascular biopsy with a Cordis® biopsy catheter designed to perform endomyocardial biopsies. The IVC biopsy proved to be effective and safe, with no complications associated with the procedure. The resection of the IVC was performed to prevent the proximal propagation of the IVC leiomyoma, which could potentially extend and lead to thrombosis of the renal veins. After IVC resection, IVC reconstruction was not considered, given the poor condition of the iliac vein walls and the extensive collateralization. This proved to be adequate for venous drainage, likely attributable to the extended duration of the pathology.9,10 Reconstruction would also likely result in increased haemorrhagic risk and a higher chance of iatrogenesis, with minimal benefit to the patient.

Conclusions

IVC leiomyomas are exceptionally rare and often manifest with nonspecific symptoms, such as abdominal discomfort, back pain, weight loss and recurrent thrombosis leading to a delayed diagnosis. Given the unspecific symptoms and insidious evolution, IVC leiomyomas require a high level of suspicion to be diagnosed.

Acknowledgements

None

Conflicts of interest

None

Funding

None

Data availability

By request to authors

Ethics Approval

Not applicable

Informed Consent

No written informed consent was required due to the study design

Declaration of Generative AI and AI-Assisted Technologies in the Writing Process

No generative AI or AI-assisted technologies were used in the writing process.

References

1. Wang MX, Menias CO, Elsherif SB, Segaran N, Ganeshan D. Current update on IVC leiomyosarcoma. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021;46:5284-96. [ Links ]

2. Gao B, Zhou D, Qian X, Zhang W, Ying L, Wang W. Primary leiomyoma of the inferior vena cava mimicking a cystic neoplasm of the pancreas: a case report. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2020;46:107097. [ Links ]

3. Wang S, Li Y, Yang Q, Zhang X, Cheng Y, Li Z, Wang J, Zeng Q. Surgery Treatment of Primary Tumors of the Inferior Vena Cava. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:770967. [ Links ]

4. Juszkat R, Piekarek A, Zabicki B, Sosnowski P. Inferior vena cava tumors - diagnostic difficulties. Pol J Radiol, 2008;73:36-9 [ Links ]

5. Robins JM, Bookstein JJ. Percutaneous transcaval biopsy technique in the evaluation of inferior vena cava occlusion. Radiology. 1972;105:451-2. [ Links ]

6. MacDowell CJ, Berezovsky D, Kumar P, Kim V, Livshits I, Kang F. Transvenous biopsy of inferior vena cava leiomyosarcoma: two case reports. Radiol Case Rep. 2023;19:1128-35. [ Links ]

7. Mohammed SR, Maharaj D, Dindyal S, Ali K. Endovascular Biopsy of an Inferior Vena Cava Mass: A Case Report. Cureus. 2023;15:e37546. [ Links ]

8. Sherk WM, Khaja MS, Majdalany BS, Saad WE, Udager AM, Cooper KJ, Williams DM. Transvenous Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Intravascular or Perivascular Neoplasm: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis of 36 Patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30:54-60. [ Links ]

9. Borghi A, Scotto DI Uccio A, Gronchi A. Primary malignancy of the inferior vena cava, a review of surgical treatments and outcomes. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2022;63:649-63. [ Links ]

10. Nooromid M, De Martino R, Squizzato F, Benedetto F, De Caridi G, Chou EL, et al. Vascular Low Frequency Disease Consortium. Surgical resection and graft replacement for primary inferior vena cava leiomyosarcoma: A multicenter experience. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2022;10:617-25. [ Links ]

Received: May 14, 2024; Revised: September 09, 2024; Accepted: March 22, 2025

Corresponding Author: João Marcelo Cabral | jmacabral@gmail.com Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo António Largo do Prof. Abel Salazar, 4099-001 Porto

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License