SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.35 número3Caso Clínico ARP nº 29: Qual o seu diagnóstico?Ruptura Esplénica Atraumática Induzida por Cocaína índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Acta Radiológica Portuguesa

versão impressa ISSN 2183-1351

Acta Radiol Port vol.35 no.3 Lisboa dez. 2023  Epub 29-Dez-2023

https://doi.org/10.25748/arp.27110 

Casos Clínicos

Diffuse Idiopathic Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Cell Hyperplasia: A Differential Diagnosis to Consider in the Oncology Context

Hiperplasia Difusa Idiopática de Células Neuroendócrinas do Pulmão: Um Diagnóstico Diferencial a Considerar no Contexto Oncológico

1Serviço de Imagiologia, Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil, Porto, Portugal


Abstract

Diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia (DIPNECH) is an extremely rare disorder with strong female predominance. It is characterized by proliferation of neuroendocrine cells in the bronchial wall and is part of the spectrum of pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors. It is considered a preinvasive condition for lung carcinoid tumors. Patients are either asymptomatic or present with non-specific symptoms, such as long-standing dyspnea or cough. In this review, we describe a case of DIPNECH in a 67-year-old female, non-smoker, with progressive dyspnea and history of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. High resolution chest computed tomography revealed diffuse mosaic attenuation pattern with air-trapping and multiple peribronchovascular solid nodules suspected of metastatic disease. The largest nodule was submitted to core-needle biopsy, which was compatible with neuroendocrine cells hyperplasia. After 4 years of follow-up, the same lung nodule grew and was again submitted to core-needle biopsy, which depicted findings consistent with typical carcinoid tumor.

Keywords: Neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia; Carcinoid tumor; Computed Tomography; Lung disease.

Resumo

A hiperplasia difusa idiopática de células neuroendócrinas do pulmão (DIPNECH) é uma doença rara, com maior incidência nas mulheres. É caracterizada pela proliferação de células neuroendócrinas na parede do brônquio, sendo parte do espetro de tumores neuroendócrinos do pulmão. É considerada uma lesão pré-invasiva para tumores carcinóides. Os pacientes podem ser assintomáticos ou apresentar-se com sintomas inespecíficos, tais como dispneia ou tosse crónica. Descreve-se um caso de DIPNECH numa mulher de 67 anos, não fumadora, que se apresenta com dispneia progressiva e história pessoal de carcinoma micropapilar da tiróide. A tomografia computorizada do tórax mostrou a presença de padrão de atenuação em mosaico com múltiplos nódulos peribroncovasculares, suspeitos de disseminação metastática. O maior nódulo foi submetido a biópsia histológica, sendo compatível com hiperplasia de células neuroendócrinas. Após 4 anos de seguimento, observou-se crescimento dimensional desse mesmo nódulo, cujo resultado histológico foi compatível com tumor carcinóide típico.

Palavras-chave: Hiperplasia de células neuroendócrinas; Tumor carcinóide; Doença pulmonar; Tomografia computorizada.

Case Description

A 67-year-old non-smoker woman with a long-standing dyspnea was referred to our center due to multiple solid lung nodules suspected of metastatic disease on a computed tomography (CT). She had history of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma. No other relevant past medical or drug use history, and her physical examination was unremarkable.

CT showed multiple small (<5mm) bronchocentric and endobronchial solid nodules, diffusely distributed but predominating in the lower lobes and peripheral zones, suggestive of metastatic dissemination (Figure 1). Mosaic attenuation was also observed in the affected areas in relation to air-trapping (Figure 2). A lower left lung nodule was subject to a core-needle biopsy and was positive for Cd56 and chromogranin, findings which were consistent with neuroendocrine cells proliferation (tumorlets). Characteristic CT findings, clinical symptoms and histology results suggested the diagnosis of diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia (DIPNECH). Spirometry showed a nonspecific ventilatory abnormality, with decreased forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) - 67.4% and 60.2% respectively, associated with severe small airway obstruction (maximal expiratory flow 75/25, 22.4% of predicted flow), without significant improvement after bronchodilation.

Figure 1: Coronal maximum intensity projection (MIP) image demonstrates numerous bilateral small nodules (<5mm) corresponding to tumorlets. MIP reformation is useful for the detection of nodules. 

Figure 2: Coronal and axial minimum intensity projection (MinIP) reformations’ images demonstrate an extensive mosaic attenuation pattern with sharply defined lobular areas of low attenuation due to small airway obstruction. The usefulness of MinIP reformations for the detection of subtle mosaic perfusion must be emphasized. 

Long-term surveillance was recommended. After 4 years of follow-up, the nodules remained stable, except for the previously biopsied nodule in the lower left lobe which showed an increase in size (Figure 3). This nodule was again submitted to core-needle biopsy which depicted findings compatible with typical carcinoid tumor.

Figure 3: (a) On the axial CT image, a 4 mm peripheral nodule is demonstrated in the left lower lobe, with smooth margins and solid attenuation, suggestive of a tumorlet (b) After 4 years of follow-up, this nodule showed an increase in size and was compatible with typical lung carcinoids at core biopsy. The distinction between these two is the size. 

Discussion

Pulmonary neuroendocrine cells (PNECs) are epithelial cells of the bronchial wall found from the trachea to the terminal bronchioles.1 Sometimes these cells proliferate with a spectrum ranging from neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia to tumorlets to carcinoid tumors. Hyperplasia of PNECs can be idiopathic or occur secondarily to chronic hypoxia or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.2,3 Hyperplasic PNECs and peribronchiolar fibrosis can lead to constrictive bronchiolitis, which is responsible for mosaic attenuation seen in CT.4,5

DIPNECH is a rare and under-recognized disorder characterized by peribronchiolar proliferation of pulmonary neuroendocrine cells that do not extend beyond the basement membrane.3,6 It is a recognized preneoplastic condition, according to the World Health Organization, and it is more frequently associated with carcinoid tumors development than other forms of PNEC proliferation.7

When proliferation of PNECs extend beyond the basement membrane, nodular proliferation is termed tumorlets (smaller than 5mm) or carcinoid tumors (5 mm and larger).8 DIPNECH-related carcinoid tumors are usually multiple with a dominant/larger lesion almost invariably located at the lung periphery and almost always of low grade. These differ from non-related DIPNECH carcinoid tumors which in most cases are centrally located.2,9

DIPNECH affects predominantly non-smoking middle-aged women without predisposing conditions.7,9 Patients frequently present with nonspecific and progressive respiratory symptoms, such as chronic cough, asthma-like symptoms, and dyspnea.4,6,10 DIPNECH is rarely associated with systemic symptoms.5,10Diagnosis is difficult in asymptomatic patients and DIPNECH is sometimes incidentally discovered during clinical investigations for other diseases.2,3,9

DIPNECH is a potential cause of obstructive lung disease in older women, and it is frequently misdiagnosed as asthma, which leads to substantial delays until the correct diagnosis is established. Progressive functional limitation can occur, and severe cases have required a lung transplant.4,6,7,10

Pulmonary function tests (PFT) usually show an irreparable obstructive syndrome in most cases, but normal pulmonary function tests are also seen.4,11,12PFTs showed statistically significant correlations with imaging findings. The number of nodules measuring at least 5 mm showed strong inverse correlation with the percentage predicted for both FVC and FEV1 and moderate inverse correlation with total lung capacity (TLC) predicted. Mosaic attenuation showed an inverse correlation with TLC, FVC and FEV1 of predicted.6

CT findings are nonspecific for DIPNECH and are related to airway obstruction. The presence of numerous small-airway-centered nodules adjacent to centrilobular bronchioles, with a mid-lower zone predominance, associated with bronchial wall thickening and mosaic attenuation are suggestive. Lesions are almost always bilateral.6,10Mosaic attenuation is the most important and suggestive finding. Expiratory CT can help detection by demonstrating air-trapping, which may be an indirect sign of small airway obstruction.2,6,13 Extensive pulmonary fibrosis, diffuse ground-glass opacities, pleural effusions and lymphadenopathy are very unusual findings in DIPNECH.4,10

DIPNECH nodules in most cases demonstrate solid attenuation, well-defined borders, round shape and seldom calcify. Little et al found that nodules had a predominantly centrilobular distribution, often at the center of lobular air trapping.6 Nodules with spiculated margins, and cystic or cavitary components favor other etiologies.5,10Peribronchial distribution of the nodules appears to be the CT feature most predictive of DIPNECH, when associated with mosaic attenuation.5 Lung masses are rarely present in DIPNECH.4 Nodules associated with DIPNECH should not be confused with pulmonary metastatic dissemination of an extra-pulmonary neoplasm although multiple pulmonary nodules in a patient with history of cancer should be considered metastatic until proven otherwise.9,10 The peribronchiolar predominance of small nodules and air trapping in DIPNECH diverges from the usual random pattern of nodules in hematogenous metastatic disease.6 Distinction between DIPNECH and pulmonary metastases based on chest CT may not be possible and comparison with previous imaging to assess the temporal evolution of the nodules over time is necessary.5

DIPNECH has an indolent course, a rapid increase of nodules, in number and size, and is more consistent with another etiology. In the study by Little et al 67% of the patients demonstrated slow increase in size of the largest nodule after 3 years or longer of follow-up.6

A definitive diagnosis of DIPNECH always requires histopathological confirmation of diffuse neuroendocrine cell proliferation.7 Surgical lung biopsy or resection is the reference standard because it allows obtaining a larger sample, which is necessary for the correct diagnosis, although it has been suggested that a transbronchial biopsy showing PNEC proliferation could be sufficient if clinical and imaging scenarios are suggestive.10,11,12

The prognosis doesn’t seem to depend on carcinoid development but rather on the severity and progression of respiratory symptoms, which can lead to respiratory failure.7,14 Even at a metastatic stage, DIPNECH-related carcinoid tumors are not associated with poor outcome.10 Treatment of airflow obstruction related symptoms is the main objective in DIPNECH management, but response to currently employed pharmacological therapies is very limited.2,3,11

In most patients, DIPNECH remains stable over many years or progresses very slowly but can result in severe airflow limitation and respiratory failure.7 The nodules usually increase very slowly in size but close follow-up by CT of patients is essential to detect nodules that meet criteria to be classified as carcinoid tumors and routine CT surveillance every 12 to 24 months is recommended.15,16

Finally, knowledge of typical DIPNECH clinical and imaging features help to diagnose this condition and to distinguish it from other airways diseases. Radiologists may be the first to suggest a correct diagnosis and a strong imaging-based suspicion of DIPNECH can prevent an incorrect diagnosis such as metastatic dissemination which has significant negative implications for these patients. CT findings are insufficient to establish a definite diagnosis. However, mosaic attenuation pattern associated with multiple centrilobular lung nodules in a middle-aged woman referred for chronic cough or asthma-like symptoms should be a clue for DIPNECH. The diagnosis of DIPNECH is often delayed because of limited awareness of this condition and lack of familiarity with its imaging appearance which emphasizes the importance of early suspicion of DIPNECH at imaging to minimize delays and even inaccuracy in clinical diagnosis.

References

1. Aguayo SM, Miller YE, Waldron JrJA, et al. Brief report: idiopathic diffuse hyperplasia of pulmonary neuroendocrine cells and airways disease. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:1285-8. doi: 10.1056/nejm199210293271806 [ Links ]

2. Chassagnon G, Favelle O, Marchand-Adam S et al. DIPNECH: when to suggest this diagnosis on CT. Clinical Radiology. 2014;70:317-25. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2014.10.012 [ Links ]

3. Gosney JR, Travis WD. Diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia. In: Travis WD, Brambilla E, Muller-Hermelink HK, et al; Editors. Pathology and genetics: tumors of the lung, pleura, thymus and heart. Lyon: IARC Press; 2004. p. 77-8. [ Links ]

4. Samhouri B, Azadeh N, Halfdanarson TR, Yi ES, Ryu JH. Constrictive bronchiolitis in diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia. ERJ Open Res Eur Respir Soc. 2020;6:00527-2020. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00527-2020 [ Links ]

5. Samhouri B, Koo CW, Yi E, Ryu J. Is the combination of bilateral pulmonary nodules and mosaic attenuation on chest CT specific for DIPNECH? Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases. 2021;16:490. doi: 10.1186/s13023-021-02103-w [ Links ]

6. Little B, Junn J, Zheng K et al. Diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia: imaging and clinical features of a frequently delayed diagnosis. AJR. 2020;215:1312-20. [ Links ]

7. Brambilla E, Travis WD, Colby TV, et al. The new world health organization classification of lung tumours. Eur Respir J. 2001;18:1059-68. doi: 10.2214/ajr.19.22628 [ Links ]

8. Mengoli MC, Rossi G, Cavazza A, et al. Diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia (DIPNECH) syndrome and carcinoid tumors with/without NECH: a clinicopathologic, radiologic, and immunomolecular comparison study. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42:646-55. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001033 [ Links ]

9. Churg AM, Warnock ML. So-called “minute pulmonary chemodectoma”: a tumor not related to paragangliomas. Cancer. 1976;37:1759-69. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197604)37:4 [ Links ]

10. Gorshtein A, Gross DJ, Barak D, et al. Diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia and the associated lung neuroendocrine tumors: clinical experience with a rare entity. Cancer . 2012;118:612-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26200 [ Links ]

11. Carr LL, Chung JH, Duarte Achcar R, et al. The clinical course of diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia. Chest. 2015;147:415-22. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0711 [ Links ]

12. Nassar AA, Jaroszewski DE, Helmers RA, et al. Diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia: a systematic overview. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184:8-16. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201010-1685pp [ Links ]

13. Ge Y, Eltorky MA, Ernst RD, et al. Diffuse idiopathic pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2007;11:122-6. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2005.12.008 [ Links ]

14. Lee JS, Brown KK, Cool C, et al. Diffuse pulmonary neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia: radiologic and clinical features. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002;26:180-4. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200203000-00003 [ Links ]

15. Benson RE, Rosado-de-Christenson ML, Martínez-Jimenez S, et al. Spectrum of pulmonary neuroendocrine proliferations and neoplasms. RadioGraphics. 2013;33:1631-49. doi: 10.1148/rg.336135506 [ Links ]

16. Ramirez RA, Cass AS, et al. A multidisciplinary approach to the work up and management of pulmonary carcinoid tumors and DIPNECH: a narrative review. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2022;11:2567-87. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-22-415 [ Links ]

Ethical Disclosures

Financing Support: This work has not received any contribution, grant or scholarship.

Received: May 03, 2022; Accepted: November 02, 2023

Address Susana L. Rodrigues, Serviço de Imagiologia, Instituto Português de Oncologia Francisco Gentil Porto, R. Dr. António Bernardino de Almeida 865, 4200-072 Porto, e-mail: sulopes1234@gmail.com

Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Confidentiality of data: The authors declare that they have followed the protocols of their work center on the publication of data from patients.

Protection of human and animal subjects: The authors declare that the procedures followed were in accordance with the regulations of the relevant clinical research ethics committee and with those of the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki).

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) and ARP 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License