SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.27 número2Caracterização clinicopatológica dos doentes com neoplasias gástricas superficiais e fatores de risco para lesões múltiplas após dissecção endoscópica da submucosa num país ocidental índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


GE-Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology

versão impressa ISSN 2341-4545

GE Port J Gastroenterol vol.27 no.2 Lisboa abr. 2020

https://doi.org/10.1159/000502983 

EDITORIAL

 

The New Era and Challenges after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Superficial Gastric Cancers

Novos tempos, novos desafios após a disseção endoscópica pela submucosa de lesões gástricas superficiais

 

Mónica Garridoa, Ricardo Marcos-Pintoa–c

aDepartment of Gastroenterology, Porto University Hospital Centre, Porto, Portugal; bInstitute of Biomedical Sciences of Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; cCenter for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems (CINTESIS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal

* Corresponding author.

 

Keywords: Stomach neoplasms, Multiple primary neoplasms, Second primary neoplasms, Endoscopic submucosal dissection

Palavras-Chave: Neoplasias gástricas, Neoplasias primárias múltiplas, Segundas neoplasias primárias, Disseção endoscópica pela submucosa

 

Gastric adenocarcinoma remains a public health problem representing the fifth most common malignancy worldwide, with the highest incidence rates in Eastern Asia [1]. In Portugal, a country with a moderate/high incidence of gastric cancer [2], incidence rates are almost twice as high compared with the Europe region, approaching Eastern Asia numbers [1], along with the high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection rates [2]. Although gastric cancer mortality has been decreasing, it still represents the third leading cause of cancer death worldwide and in our country [1], mainly a consequence of the advanced stages at diagnosis [2].

However, with the increasing availability of diagnostic endoscopic exams and associated technologies, early diagnosis of gastric cancer is easier than ever, turning minimally invasive endoscopic techniques, such as endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), not only possible, but also the recommended treatment for gastric superficial neoplasms in selected patients [3], with high rates of curative resection and a good safety profile [4]. It should be noted, though, that after this stomach-preserving endoscopic treatment (as opposed to surgical treatment that removes the organ), new challenges arrive, since patients remain at risk for developing synchronous or metachronous gastric neoplastic lesions (SGLs or MGLs), demanding endoscopic surveillance thereafter. How to identify the risk factors and the magnitude of the risk for the development of multiple gastric lesions are still unanswered questions in the management of these patients.

According to the current European guidelines on endoscopic submucosal dissection [3], a high-quality endoscopy with contrast or digital chromoendoscopy, by an experienced endoscopist, is recommended before ESD to establish the feasibility of resection; after curative endoscopic resection, follow-up endoscopy should start within 3–6 months and then annually. Surprisingly, these recommendations are based mostly upon Eastern population studies. Whether they are representative of the Western reality is arguable, since there are significant differences in the epidemiology and biological characteristics of gastric cancers between the East and the West, as well as different management approaches with regard to screening and treatment strategies [5].

In this issue of GE – Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology, Brito-Gonçalves et al. [6] assess clinicopathological characteristics of patients with early gastric neoplasms submitted to endoscopic submucosal resection in a tertiary oncologic center, in Portugal. Most importantly, risk factors for multiple gastric lesions, including SGLs, MGLs or both, were all evaluated for the first time in a Western cohort. In this retrospective, single-center cohort, 230 patients were included during a 6-year period from January 2012 until December of 2017, with a median follow-up time of 33 months. The study has several strengths such as the high number of patients, the long-term follow-up, the use of OLGA and OLGIM pathologic staging systems as well as the recently described endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia (EGGIM) staging.

Regarding the baseline characteristics of the patients, two major discrepancies were found compared to Eastern data. First, H. pylori infection was found only in 27.2% of the patients at the time of gastric neoplasia diagnosis, a lower frequency than previously reported [2]. Some pitfalls may explain these results since (1) previous H. pylori eradication was not assessed; (2) H. pylori status was evaluated by Giemsa stain at histopathologic specimens; and (3) most patients presented extensive atrophy which limits this evaluation [7, 8]. Second, this study population had no gender preponderance, unlike Eastern countries, where male gender prevails. Also interesting, a significant proportion of the patients had only mild gastric atrophy or focal intestinal metaplasia (32.6% OLGA I/II, 44.1% OLGIM I/II, and 29.6% EGGIM 1–4). These results suggest that early gastric lesions in the Western population may appear equally in both sexes and in all stages of gastritis, supporting the recent European guideline on the management of epithelial precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach [9] that recommends surveillance of some patients with only focal metaplasia, given they present an additional risk factor for gastric cancer (e.g., family history of gastric cancer, incomplete IM or persistent H. pylori gastritis).

SGLs were detected in 14.3% of the patients, not only previously to the ESD procedure (63.6%) but also at the first follow-up endoscopy (33.3%). Although the authors do not mention the type of gastroscopes used in this evaluation, these results highlight, firstly, the importance of a high-quality endoscopy at both the diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopies for superficial lesions and, secondly, the rationale for an early first endoscopic follow-up (at 3–6 months) [3]. Also, the authors suggest that this evaluation should be even more careful in patients over 60 years, current/former smokers or with advanced stages of gastritis (OLGIM III/IV), since all these were identified as independent risk factors for SGLs.

During the follow-up period, 8.6% of patients developed MGLs (3 of them adenocarcinomas) with a mean annual incidence of 3.1 per 100 patient-year. Despite a relatively short follow-up, this finding supports the European recommendations of long-term annual endoscopic follow-up [3].

Also EGGIM, which takes advantage of high-resolution endoscopy with narrow-band imaging to evaluate the extent of intestinal metaplasia across the stomach, was shown for the first time to correlate with the risk of having multiple neoplastic lesions, with a more significant association than histologic staging. In the future, this validated method [10] will probably fit in all endoscopic reports since, as it attempts to quantify metaplasia in all gastric mucosa and not only in small biopsy fragments, it may be a more reliable indicator of gastritis stage in experts’ hands. We should note, though, that in this study EGGIM score started to be assessed only from 2014 onwards [11], thus, the first patients in this cohort had the EGGIM calculated only at follow-up endoscopies, which may have limited the conclusions regarding this finding.

In conclusion, despite a few differences in the baseline population (i.e., gender, H. pylori infection), this study

reports similar results to those in Eastern countries regarding primary gastric lesion characteristics, as well as similar SGL and MGL identification rates, characteristics and associated risk factors. These data approach the East and the West and reinforce the current European recommendations on the diagnosis and follow-up of superficial gastric lesions.

 

References

1 Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394–424.

2 Morais S, Ferro A, Bastos A, Castro C, Lunet N, Peleteiro B:Trends in gastric cancer mortality and in the prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in Portugal. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2016 Jul;25(4):275-81.         [ Links ]

3 Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Ponchon T, Repici A, Vieth M, De Ceglie A, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2015 Sep;47(9):829–54.

4 Libânio D, Pimentel-Nunes P, Afonso LP, Henrique R, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Long-Term Outcomes of Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: Focus on Metachronous and Non-Curative Resection Management. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan;24(1):31–9.

5 Chan WL, Lam KO, Lee VH, Davidson M, So TH, Li JS, et al. Gastric Cancer - From Aetiology to Management: Differences Between the East and the West. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2019 Aug;31(8):570–7.

6 Brito-Gonçalves GB, Libanio D, Marcos P, Pita I, Castro R, Sá I, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics of patients with gastric superficial neoplasia and risk factors for multiple lesions after endoscopic submucosal dissection in a Western country. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2019. DOI: 10.1159/000501939.         [ Links ]

7 Kokkola A, Rautelin H, Puolakkainen P, Sipponen P, Färkkilä M, Haapiainen R, et al.; A. Kokkola, H. Rautelin, P. Puolakk. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with atrophic gastritis: comparison of histology, 13C-urea breath test, and serology. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000 Feb;35(2):138–41.

8 Lee JY, Kim N. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori by invasive test: histology. Ann Transl Med. 2015 Jan;3(1):10.         [ Links ]

9 Pimentel-Nunes P, Libânio D, Marcos-Pinto R, Areia M, Leja M, Esposito G, et al. Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS II): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED) guideline update 2019. Endoscopy. 2019 Apr;51(4):365–88.

10 Esposito G, Pimentel-Nunes P, Angeletti S, Castro R, Libânio D, Galli G, et al. Endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia (EGGIM): a multicenter validation study. Endoscopy. 2019 Jun;51(6):515–21.

11 Pimentel-Nunes P, Libânio D, Lage J, Abrantes D, Coimbra M, Esposito G, et al. A multicenter prospective study of the realtime use of narrow-band imaging in the diagnosis of premalignant gastric conditions and lesions. Endoscopy. 2016 Aug;48(8):723–30.

 

Disclosure Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

 

* Corresponding author.

Ricardo Marcos-Pinto

Department of Gastroenterology, Porto University Hospital Centre

Largo do Prof. Abel Salazar

PT–4099-001 Porto (Portugal)

E-Mail ricardomarcospinto@sapo.pt

 

Received: July 31, 2019; Accepted: August 27, 2019

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons