SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 número2Validação e aplicação de modelos preditivos para preparação intestinal inadequada numa população de um hospital terciárioObliteração transvenosa na abordagem da hemorragia de varizes periestoma: relato de caso índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


GE-Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology

versão impressa ISSN 2341-4545

GE Port J Gastroenterol vol.30 no.2 Lisboa abr. 2023  Epub 01-Ago-2023

https://doi.org/10.1159/000520906 

Clinical Case Study

Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma in a Patient with Crohn’s Disease: The Role of Balloon-Assisted Enteroscopy

Adenocarcinoma do intestino delgado num doente com doença de Crohn: o papel da enteroscopia assistida por balão

Emanuel Dias1 

Miguel Mascarenhas Saraiva1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0340-0830

Francisco Moreira2 

Hélder Cardoso1 

Guilherme Macedo1 

1Gastroenterology Department, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto, Portugal

2Pathology Department, Centro Hospitalar de São João, Porto, Portugal


Abstract

Introduction:

Small bowel adenocarcinoma is a rare but well-known complication of Crohn’s disease. Diagnosis can be challenging, as clinical presentation may mimic an exacerbation of Crohn’s disease and imaging findings may be indistinguishable from benign strictures. The result is that the majority of cases are diagnosed at the time of operation or postoperatively at an advanced stage.

Case Presentation:

A 48-year-old male with a previous 20-year history of ileal stenosing Crohn’s disease presented with iron deficiency anemia. The patient reported melena approximately 1 month earlier but was currently asymptomatic. There were no other laboratory abnormalities. Anemia was refractory to intravenous iron replacement. The patient underwent computerized tomography enterography, which revealed multiple ileal strictures with features suggesting underlying inflammation and an area of sacculation with circumferential thickening of adjacent bowel loops. Therefore, the patient underwent retrograde balloon-assisted small bowel enteroscopy, where an area of irregular mucosa and ulceration was found at the region of ileoileal anastomosis. Biopsies were performed and histopathological examination revealed tubular adenocarcinoma infiltrating the muscularis mucosae. The patient underwent right hemicolectomy plus segmental enterectomy of the anastomotic region where the neoplasia was located. After 2 months, he is asymptomatic and there is no evidence of recurrence.

Discussion:

This case demonstrates that small bowel adenocarcinoma may have a subtle clinical presentation and that computed tomography enterography may not be accurate enough to distinguish benign from malignant strictures. Clinicians must, therefore, maintain a high index of suspicion for this complication in patients with long-standing small bowel Crohn’s disease. In this setting, balloon-assisted enteroscopy may be a useful tool when there is raised concern for malignancy, and it is expected that its more widespread use could contribute to an earlier diagnosis of this severe complication.

Keywords: Crohn’s disease; Inflammatory bowel disease; Small bowel adenocarcinoma; Enteroscopy

Resumo

Introdução:

O adenocarcinoma do intestino delgado é uma complicação rara mas bem estabelecida da doença de Crohn. O seu diagnóstico pode ser desafiante, na medida em que a apresentação clínica pode mimetizar uma agudização da doença de Crohn e os achados ima-giológicos podem ser indistinguíveis de estenoses benignas. Em consequência, a maioria dos casos são diagnosticados durante ou após a cirurgia em estadio avançado.

Descrição do caso:

Um homem de 48 anos com antecedentes de doença de Crohn ileal estenosante, com 20 anos de evolução, apresentou-se com anemia ferropénica. O doente referia melenas aproximadamente um mês antes, mas encontrava-se atualmente assintomático. Não apresentava outras alterações laboratoriais de relevo. A anemia era refratária a suplementação com ferro endovenoso. Foi submetido a enterografia por tomografia computorizada, que revelou múltiplas estenoses ileais com caraterísticas sugestivas de atividade inflamatória e uma área de saculação com espessamento circunferencial das ansas de intestino delgado adjacentes. Assim, foi submetido a enteroscopia assistida por balão, onde se identificou uma área de mucosa irregular e ulceração na região da anastomose ileo-ileal. Biópsias desta área revelaram a presença de adenocarcinoma tubular com infiltração até à muscularis mucosae. O doente foi submetido a hemicolectomia direita com enterectomia segmentar da região da anastomose onde a neoplasia se encontrava localizada. Ao fim de 2 meses, o doente encontra-se assintomático e sem evidência de recorrência.

Discussão:

Este caso demonstra que o adenocarcinoma do intestino delga-do pode ter uma apresentação clínica subtil e que a enterografia por tomografia computorizada pode não ter precisão suficiente para distinguir estenoses benignas de neoplasias malignas. Os clínicos devem, portanto, manter um elevado índice de suspeição diagnóstica para esta complicação em doentes com doença de Crohn ileal de longa duração. Neste contexto, a enteroscopia assistida por balão pode ser uma ferramenta útil em casos de suspeita de neoplasia maligna, esperando-se que possa contribuir para um diagnóstico mais precoce desta complicação severa.

Palavras Chave: Doença de Crohn; Doença inflamatória intestinal; Adenocarcinoma do intestino delgado; Enteroscopia

Introduction

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare malignancy accounting for less than 5% of gastrointestinal cancers, with an incidence rate of 0.2-0.3/100,000 person-years in the general population [1]. Although Crohn’s disease (CD) is associated with a 22-fold increased risk of SBA, this is an unusual complication that develops during the course of CD in approximately 0.2% of patients [2] at an incidence rate of 0.3/1,000 person-years [3] and usually appears at a much younger age than in the general population [4].

Diagnosis of SBA associated with CD can be quite challenging. Obstruction is the most common presenting manifestation, whereas less common clinical presentations include hemorrhage, fistula, or perforation. Unfortunately, all of these symptoms are hard to distinguish from those of a CD exacerbation. Besides, these malignancies are often radiologically indistinguishable from long-standing CD and imaging techniques may miss small lesions. The result is that the majority of cases are diagnosed at the time of operation or postoperatively at an advanced stage [4]. The prognosis of SBA in CD is usually unfavorable with a 5-year survival of 20-30% [5].

We report a case that illustrates diagnostic difficulties associated with SBA in patients with CD and that aims to increase clinicians’ awareness of this rare but severe complication and to demonstrate that balloon-assisted enteroscopy may play an important role in achieving an early diagnosis.

Case Presentation

A 48-year-old male with a previous medical history of CD presented with iron deficiency anemia. His hemoglobin level was 10.7 g/dL, with mild microcytosis (86.2 fL) and low levels of both serum iron (33 mg/dL) and transferrin saturation (9%). The patient reported melena approximately 1 month earlier but was currently asymptomatic. He denied abdominal pain, diarrhea, or weight loss. There were no other laboratory abnormalities associated with underlying disease activity, including leukocyte and platelet count and C-reactive protein levels, which were normal. Stool calprotectin level was also normal. His last ileocolonoscopy, performed 5 months earlier, was also normal with no signs of inflammatory activity along colon and terminal ileum. CD had been diagnosed 20 years earlier and was characterized by ileal involvement and stenosing behavior, with associated perianal fistulizing disease (Montreal classification: A2L1B2p). There was a history of segmental enterectomy for ileal stenosis and anal fistulectomy performed 4 and 6 years after initial diagnosis, respectively. His current medications included azathioprine and infliximab (5 mg/kg every 8 weeks), which he had started 16 and 10 years earlier, respectively. The last acute exacerbation of CD requiring induction therapy with intravenous corticosteroids had occurred 8 years before and CD appeared to be in clinical and endoscopic remission since then.

Intravenous iron replacement with weekly injections of 200 mg of iron oxide was started. However, after 8 weeks, hemoglobin level had decreased to 9.2 g/dL despite correction of iron deficiency. The patient remained asymptomatic and laboratory studies once again did not reveal leukocytosis, thrombocytosis, or elevated C-reactive protein levels. Computerized tomography (CT) enterography revealed multiple ileal strictures with wall thickening, vasa recta engorgement, and prominent mesenteric lymph nodes, suggestive of inflammatory strictures. In addition, a sacculation with circumferential thickening of proximal and distal bowel loops extending for 47 and 31 mm, respectively, was found at the region of ileo-ileal anastomosis, as shown in Figure 1. Therefore, the patient underwent double balloon-assisted retrograde enteroscopy which revealed several ileal strictures, easily traversed with the enteroscope, and an area of infiltrative appearance at the region of ileo-ileal anastomosis, with a polypoid component (as shown in Fig. 2a) and ulceration (as shown in Fig. 2b), producing a stenosis (as shown in Fig. 2c) that could not be traversed by the enteroscope. Biopsies of this area were performed. Remarkably, histopathological examination revealed tubular adenocarcinoma infiltrating the muscularis mucosae, as shown in Figure 3.

CT scan of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis did not reveal secondary involvement of lymph nodes, lungs, liver, or other organs. The patient underwent right hemicolectomy plus segmental enterectomy of the anastomotic region where the neoplasia was located. Histopathological examination of the surgical specimen confirmed a diagnosis of mucinous SBA with infiltration of muscularis propria and lymphatic and vascular invasion (postresection stage: pT3NxM0). Immunohistochemical analysis revealed expression of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2. After surgery, the patient started adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and fluorouracil. After 2 months, he is asymptomatic and follow-up CT reveals no evidence of recurrence.

Fig. 1 Computed tomography enterography. A sacculated small bowel loop may be seen at the region of ileo-ileal anastomosis (asterisk) associated with circumferential and irregular thickening of the afferent and efferent small bowel loops (arrowhead). 

Fig. 2 Double balloon enteroscopy revealed an area of infiltrative appearance at the anastomotic region with features of polypoid component (a), ulceration (b), and stenosis (c) that could not be traversed with the entero-scope. 

Fig. 3 Histopathological examination of biopsies performed at the region of small bowel ulceration. a Invasive adenocarcinoma with an enteric-type mucosa (HE, ×40). b An area of stromal infiltration by malignant cells is highlighted (HE, ×200). c The neoplasia demonstrates a high mitotic index (HE, ×400). 

Discussion

Over the past several decades, it has become increasingly recognized that SBA is a rare but well-known complication of CD. A recent meta-analysis that included 7,344 patients reported that, although the relative risk of SBA in patients with CD was increased 22-fold compared to the general population, the absolute cumulative risk was only 0.23% during a median follow-up of 12.55 years [2]. However, this cumulative risk is directly proportional to the disease duration, and other studies suggest that it increases to approximately 2.2% after 25 years of ileal CD and that SBA accounts for 25% and 45% of the risk of gastrointestinal carcinoma after 10 and 25 years of CD, respectively [6]. Similarly, a prospective observational study demonstrated that the incidence rate of SBA in patients with CD increases from 0.235/1,000 patient-years to 0.464/1,000 patient-years when only patients with >8 years of disease are considered [7].

Risk factors for SBA in patients with CD include ex-tended duration of disease, distal jejunal and ileal location, stenosing or chronic fistulizing behavior, male gender, young age at diagnosis, and the presence of a by-passed small bowel segment [5, 8, 9]. In contrast, a case-control study suggests that small bowel resection and prolonged salicylate use may be protective against development of SBA in patients with CD [10]. Interestingly, the risk of SBA appears to be much higher in patients with isolated ileal involvement than in ileocolonic CD [11]. The risk also appears to be influenced by geographical factors, with a higher relative risk of developing SBA compared to the general population in North America, the United Kingdom, and Scandinavia [11].

Unfortunately, diagnosis of SBA in patients with CD can be quite challenging as clinical symptoms may mimic an acute exacerbation of the disease and imaging findings can be indistinguishable from benign strictures. As a result, most cases are found incidentally after surgical resection for benign indications, and it is diagnosed preop-eratively in only 5% of patients [6]. In a recent retrospective study involving 22 patients with SBA associated with CD, only 2 had a preoperative diagnosis; even for the remaining, where cancer was unsuspected on preoperative assessment, only 25% were diagnosed intraoperatively, whereas 75% were unexpectedly diagnosed postoperatively on final pathology [12].

The most common clinical presentation is with ob-structive symptoms, including nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. Less common clinical presentations include hemorrhage, fistula, or perforation [4]. Two important clinical indicators of malignancy include recrudescent symptoms after long periods of relative qui-escence and small bowel obstruction that is refractory to medical therapy [13]. SBA associated with CD usually occurs after a median time of 15 years of CD and is usually diagnosed at a younger age than de novo SBA (median age 47 vs. 68 years, respectively). It is typically found within areas of inflammation of the ileum and jejunum, whereas de novo SBA is distributed all along the small intestine [6].

In general, imaging techniques may miss small lesions and may not be able to differentiate areas of SBA from those of severe CD [4]. Four imaging patterns in CT enterography were distinguished, including small bowel mass, long stenosis with heterogeneous submucosal layer, short and severe stenosis with proximal small bowel dilation or sacculated small bowel loop with irregular and asymmetric circumferential thickening. These findings are nonspecific and may be completely indistinguishable from a benign fibrotic or an acute inflammatory stricture [14]. Magnetic resonance enterography has the advantage of not exposing patients to ionizing radiation and appears to be a useful imaging test for the detection of SBA in patients with CD [15] and a cost-effective approach in patients younger than 50 years old [16].

Nevertheless, cross-sectional imaging does not allow direct visualization or tissue sampling. The small bowel has always been an organ difficult to access by endoscopic procedures. However, in recent years, there has been much development in endoscopic techniques like video capsule endoscopy or balloon/spiral-assisted enterosco-py, which has allowed significant improvement in both the detection and treatment of small bowel lesions [17].

The usefulness of video capsule endoscopy in this setting may be challenged by the stenosing nature of CD (both malignant and nonmalignant strictures) that may result in capsule retention and the inability to obtain tissue samples [18].

Therefore, balloon-assisted enteroscopy appears to be of great value in the evaluation of imaging abnormalities that raise concern for malignancy in small bowel CD. Although balloon-assisted enteroscopy may be limited by invasiveness and incomplete visualization of the small bowel, it presents the advantages of allowing direct visualization and tissue sampling at a low rate of adverse events [19]. In our case, refractory iron deficiency anemia and abnormal imaging findings on CT enterography prompted balloon-assisted enteroscopy, where SBA was discovered. There is another similar previously published case where a 48-year-old man with a 21-year history of CD had SBA diagnosed by PET/CT and double-balloon enteroscopy performed during diagnostic workup for liver metastasis [20], which suggests that more widespread use of balloon-assisted enteroscopy could lead to a more frequent diagnosis of SBA in earlier stages among patients with CD.

There are no formal recommendations on endoscopic screening for SBA in CD patients. In this regard, an exploratory multi-center prospective study involving a cohort of high-risk CD patients defined as long-term small bowel disease without bowel resection was performed and the prevalence of dysplasia and SBA was 4% [21]. Because of its low sensitivity, endoscopic screening cannot be currently recommended. Further studies defining subsets of CD patients at higher risk of SBA that could ben-efit from screening strategies are needed.

Although previous studies suggested that SBA associated with CD was associated with worse survival than de novo SBA [4], this is controversial. A recent retrospective study involving 2,668 patients with SBA did not find significant differences in overall survival between patients with and without CD [22]. These results are supported by another study involving 2,123 patients with SBA, where those associated with CD actually presented at an earlier stage and were more likely to undergo surgery than those with de novo SBA, although no significant differences in overall or cancer-specific survival were found [23]. In contrast, a study that compared SBA associated with celiac disease to SBA associated with CD found a significantly better overall survival in the former group [24]. Prognosis is closely related to disease stage as demonstrated in a retrospective study involving 29 patients with SBA associated with CD, where significant differences in the 2-year survival for node-negative versus node-positive carcinomas (79.3% vs. 49%) and for localized versus metastatic disease (92.3% vs. 33.3%) were reported, as ex-pected [13].

The first-line treatment is wide resection of the small bowel segment harboring the cancer as well as resection of the corresponding mesentery and lymph nodes with right colectomy for lesions of the distal ileum [5]. When surgery is not feasible because of metastatic disease, combination chemotherapy consisting of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan with or without gemcitabine may result in prolonged survival, downstaging, and successful secondary complete resection with durable remission [25].

Conclusion

SBA is a rare complication of CD that poses diagnostic challenges. This case demonstrates that clinical presentation may be nonspecific and CT enterography may not be accurate enough to distinguish benign from malignant strictures. Clinicians must, therefore, maintain a high index of suspicion for this complication in patients with long-standing CD with ileal involvement. It is also important to emphasize the role of balloon-assisted enteroscopy, which allowed an early diagnosis. Since early diagnosis has been difficult, a low threshold to perform enteroscopy in high-risk patients, especially those with long-standing ileal CD with refractory or unexplained strictures, may be expected to result in improved diagnostic accuracy, increased detection rates at an earlier stage, and better overall survival.

References

1. Aparicio T, Zaanan A, Mary F, Afchain P, Manfredi S, Evans TR. Small bowel adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2016; 45(3): 447-57. [ Links ]

2. Uchino M, Ikeuchi H, Hata K, Minagawa T, Horio Y, Kuwahara R, et al. Intestinal cancer in patients with Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021; 36(2): 329-36. [ Links ]

3. Laukoetter MG, Mennigen R, Hannig CM, Osada N, Rijcken E, Vowinkel T, et al. Intestinal cancer risk in Crohn's disease: a metaanalysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011; 15(4): 576-83. [ Links ]

4. Cahill C, Gordon PH, Petrucci A, Boutros M. Small bowel adenocarcinoma and Crohn's disease: any further ahead than 50 years ago? World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(33): 11486-95. [ Links ]

5. Feldstein RC, Sood S, Katz S. Small bowel adenocarcinoma in Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2008; 14(8): 1154-7. [ Links ]

6. Palascak-Juif V, Bouvier AM, Cosnes J, Flourié B, Bouché O, Cadiot G, et al. Small bowel adenocarcinoma in patients with Crohn's disease compared with small bowel adenocarcinoma de novo. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2005; 11(9): 828-32. [ Links ]

7. Elriz K, Carrat F, Carbonnel F, Marthey L, Bouvier AM, Beaugerie L. Incidence, presentation, and prognosis of small bowel adenocarcinoma in patients with small bowel Crohn's disease: a prospective observational study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2013; 19(9): 1823-6. [ Links ]

8. Dossett LA, White LM, Welch DC, Herline AJ, Muldoon RL, Schwartz DA, et al. Small bowel adenocarcinoma complicating Crohn's disease: case series and review of the literature. Am Surg. 2007; 73(11): 1181-7. [ Links ]

9. Lashner BA. Risk factors for small bowel cancer in Crohn's disease. Dig Dis Sci. 1992; 37(8): 1179-84. [ Links ]

10. Piton G, Cosnes J, Monnet E, Beaugerie L, Seksik P, Savoye G, et al. Risk factors associated with small bowel adenocarcinoma in Crohn's disease: a case-control study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 103(7): 1730-6. [ Links ]

11. von Roon AC, Reese G, Teare J, Constantinides V, Darzi AW, Tekkis PP. The risk of cancer in patients with Crohn's disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007; 50(6): 839-55. [ Links ]

12. Hussain T, Jeganathan NA, Karagkounis G, Stocchi L, Shawki S, Holubar SD, et al. Small bowel adenocarcinoma in Crohn's disease: a rare but devastating complication. Tech Coloproctol. 2020; 24(10): 1055-62. [ Links ]

13. Widmar M, Greenstein AJ, Sachar DB, Harpaz N, Bauer JJ, Greenstein AJ. Small bowel adenocarcinoma in Crohn's disease. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011; 15(5): 797-802. [ Links ]

14. Soyer P, Hristova L, Boudghène F, Hoeffel C, Dray X, Laurent V, et al. Small bowel adenocarcinoma in Crohn disease: CT-enterography features with pathological correlation. Abdom Imaging. 2012; 37(3): 338-49. [ Links ]

15. Placé V, Hristova L, Dray X, Lavergne-Slove A, Boudiaf M, Soyer P. Ileal adenocarcinoma in Crohn's disease: magnetic resonance enterography features. Clin Imaging. 2012; 36(1): 24-8. [ Links ]

16. Cipriano LE, Levesque BG, Zaric GS, Loftus EV Jr, Sandborn WJ. Cost-effectiveness of imaging strategies to reduce radiation-induced cancer risk in Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012; 18(7): 1240-8. [ Links ]

17. Cardoso H, Rodrigues JT, Marques M, Ribeiro A, Vilas-Boas F, Santos-Antunes J, et al. Malignant small bowel tumors: diagnosis, management and prognosis. Acta Med Port. 2015; 28(4): 448-56. [ Links ]

18. Stier MW, Paramsothy S, Dalal S. Ten-year retained video capsule with Crohn's-associated small-bowel adenocarcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 15(10): PA29-30. [ Links ]

19. Marques M, Santos-Antunes J, Coelho R, Cardoso H, Vilas Boas F, Ribeiro A, et al. Single-balloon enteroscopy efficacy and degree of concordance with noninvasive evaluation of small bowel. Endosc Int Open. 2017; 5(2): E96-102. [ Links ]

20. Kodaira C, Osawa S, Mochizuki C, Sato Y, Nishino M, Yamada T, et al. A case of small bowel adenocarcinoma in a patient with Crohn's disease detected by PET/CT and double-balloon enteroscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2009; 15(14): 1774-8. [ Links ]

21. Simon M, Cosnes J, Gornet JM, Seksik P, Stefanescu C, Blain A, et al. Endoscopic detection of small bowel dysplasia and adenocarcinoma in Crohn's disease: a prospective cohortstudy in high-risk patients. J Crohns Colitis. 2017; 11(1): 47-52. [ Links ]

22. Fields AC, Hu FY, Lu P, Irani J, Bleday R, Goldberg JE, et al. Small bowel adenocarcinoma: is there a difference in survival for Crohn's versus sporadic cases? J Crohns Colitis. 2020; 14(3): 303-8. [ Links ]

23. Wieghard N, Mongoue-Tchokote S, Young JI, Sheppard BC, Tsikitis VL. Prognosis of small bowel adenocarcinoma in Crohn's disease compares favourably with de novo small bowel adenocarcinoma. Colorectal Dis. 2017; 19(5): 446-55. [ Links ]

24. Vanoli A, Di Sabatino A, Furlan D, Klersy C, Grillo F, Fiocca R, et al. Small bowel carcinomas in coeliac or Crohn's disease: clinicopathological, molecular, and prognostic features. A study from the small bowel cancer Italian Consortium. J Crohns Colitis. 2017; 11(8): 942-53. [ Links ]

25. Bruckner HW, Hrehorovich VR, Sawhney HS, Meeus SI, Coopeman AM. Chemotherapeutic management of small bowel adenocarcinoma associated with Crohn's disease. J Chemother. 2006; 18(5): 545-8. [ Links ]

Statement of Ethics Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of the case and related iconography.

Funding Sources The authors have no funding sources to declare.

Received: August 09, 2021; Accepted: October 13, 2021

Correspondence to: Emanuel Dias, diasj0310@gmail.com

Conflict of Interest Statement The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author Contributions E.D., M.M.-S., H.C., and F.M. were involved in the diagnostic workup and conception and design of the work; E.D. and M.M.S. wrote the manuscript; H.C., F.M., and G.M. performed a critical revision of the manuscript; F.M. followed the patient in gastroen-terology consultation; H.C. performed double balloon enteroscopy; all authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License