Introduction
In Brazil, cancer is currently the second most frequent cause of death, surpassed only by cardiovascular diseases1-3. Skin cancer can be divided into two types: melanoma or non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC)1,2.
NMSC is the most common type of cancer in humans1,2. In Brazil, it accounts for about 30% of all registered malignant tumors1,3. But, despite its high incidence, it has high rates of cure, especially if detected and treated early2,4. Skin cancer is more common in people over 40 years of age, and is rare in children and black people, except for those who already have some skin diseases, like long-term or severe skin inflammation or injury, xeroderma pigmentosum, albinism, and basal cell nevus syndrome1,2. However, with the constant exposure of young people to sunlight, the average age of patients has been decreasing1,2,4.
Among non-melanoma skin cancers, basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma are the main ones. Despite their clinical and histopathological differences, both have a low rate of metastasis and lethality2-4. People with fair skin, sensitive to the action of the sun, with a personal or family history of skin cancer or with previous skin diseases are the most affected4. Among the main risk factors related to non-melanoma subtypes, prolonged and repeated exposure to ultraviolet rays, especially in childhood and adolescence, is one of the most important; other risk factors include having light skin and eyes, with red or blond hair, or being albino; the presence of a family or personal history of skin cancer; individuals with deficient immune system and exposure to artificial radiation4,5.
Melanoma, on the other hand, has a lower incidence and high lethality. According to national epidemiological data, melanoma is estimated to represent only 3% of malignant neoplasms. It affects all age groups and has a high potential for dissemination with a poor prognosis when there are already metastases2,5. Up to one-fifth of patients develop metastatic disease, highlighting the importance of preventive measures and early diagnosis1.
Melanoma is 20 times more common in Caucasians than in black people. Overall, the risk of melanoma is about 2.6% in whites, 0.1% in blacks, and 0.6% in Hispanics3. This cancer is more common among men, but before the age of 50 rates are higher among women1. The risk of melanoma increases with age, with the current average diagnosis being 65 years1,3,4.
The main primary prevention of skin cancer is photoprotection. The use of sunscreen prevents the formation of actinic keratoses (precursor lesion of squamous cell carcinoma), squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma, although data are still somewhat controversial in the latter case. There are insufficient scientific data to prove its efficacy alone in the prevention of basal cell carcinoma, the most common skin cancer4. Secondary prevention occurs through early diagnosis and clinical and histopathological examination. Dermoscopy and confocal microscopy are tools that assist in the diagnosis2,4,6.
In view of the great European miscegenation and great sun exposure in Brazil, it is of great value to study the epidemiology of skin cancers, to determine the magnitude of this disease in society, with a view to implementing primary and secondary prevention policies.
Objectives
To determine skin cancer indicators in Brazil, by place of residence, in the federal units and regions of Brazil, between 2015 and 2021.
Materials and methods
This is an observational, cross-sectional, and descriptive epidemiological study. Incidence estimates data from the José Alencar Gomes da Silva National Cancer Institute (INCA), the Mortality Information Systems (SIM), the Outpatient Information System (SIA), and the Hospital Information System (SIH) were used.
The SUS (Unified Health System) is the model adopted by Brazil for planning and executing actions and services aimed at promoting, protecting, and recovering health. It was created by the Federal Constitution of 19887,8.
INCA is the auxiliary agency of the Ministry of Health in the development and coordination of integrated actions for the prevention and control of cancer in Brazil. Such actions include medical and hospital care, provided directly and free of charge to cancer patients as part of the services offered by the Unified Health System, and acting in strategic areas, such as prevention and early detection, training of specialized professionals, development of research and generation of epidemiological information9.
SIM, developed by the Ministry of Health in 1975, was used to collect data on mortality in the country. It allows, based on the cause of death attested by the physician, to build indicators and process epidemiological analyzes that contribute to the efficiency of health management. Therefore, it is considered an important management tool in the health area that supports decision-making in various areas of health care. It helps in the formulation of epidemiological indicators as strategic instruments to support the planning of actions, activities, and programs aimed at health management10.
SIH provides information that can be used for the objective subsidiary analysis of the health situation, based on evidence-based decision-making and health program preparation. The data obtained are metrics used in the construction of health indicators, which translate into relevant information for the quantification and evaluation of health information. Although the primary function of the SIH is to operationalize the payment of service providers registered in the Unified Health System (SUS) network, this system provides, in addition to other variables, the causes that motivated each of the hospitalizations carried out in the SUS, being one of the few sources of systematic registration of hospital statistics11.
Incidence, hospital morbidity, and mortality are control measures for epidemiological surveillance that allow analyzing the occurrence, distribution, and evolution of diseases. Knowing information about the profile of different types of cancer and characterizing possible changes in the scenario over time are guiding elements for cancer surveillance actions–a strategic component for the efficient and effective planning of cancer prevention and control programs.
Results
Between 2015 and 2021, 231,700 cases of skin cancer were notified in Brazil. 2019 had the highest number of cases (82,572 cases–35.63%), followed by 2020 (63,751 cases–27.51%) and 2018 (37,064 cases–15.99%). In this period, the highest number of notified cases occurred in São Paulo (59,537 cases–25,69%), followed by Rio Grande do Sul (32,529 cases–14,03%) and Paraná (29,323 cases–12,65%). Amapá (31 cases), Acre (46 cases) and Roraima (109 cases), states from the northern region of Brazil, had the lowest number of cases (Table 1).
Brazilian State | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 4,202 | 4,154 | 4,039 | 37,064 | 82,572 | 63,751 | 35,918 | 231,700 |
Rondônia | 50 | 35 | 26 | 71 | 1,155 | 654 | 258 | 2,249 |
Acre | 4 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 8 | 12 | 6 | 46 |
Amazonas | 10 | 14 | 12 | 148 | 371 | 556 | 288 | 1,399 |
Roraima | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 46 | 45 | 10 | 109 |
Pará | 107 | 90 | 81 | 212 | 753 | 768 | 291 | 2,302 |
Amapá | 4 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 7 | 31 |
Tocantins | 3 | 11 | 15 | 25 | 127 | 128 | 67 | 376 |
Maranhão | 38 | 29 | 32 | 596 | 775 | 534 | 222 | 2,226 |
Piauí | 48 | 46 | 52 | 555 | 720 | 202 | 93 | 1,716 |
Ceará | 263 | 260 | 270 | 1,238 | 2,189 | 1,718 | 1,021 | 6,959 |
Rio Grande do Norte | 57 | 61 | 64 | 1,074 | 2,039 | 1,488 | 881 | 5,664 |
Paraíba | 85 | 91 | 86 | 574 | 1.093 | 558 | 369 | 2,856 |
Pernambuco | 153 | 153 | 126 | 763 | 972 | 772 | 638 | 3,577 |
Alagoas | 41 | 55 | 46 | 226 | 559 | 448 | 225 | 1,600 |
Sergipe | 27 | 14 | 23 | 52 | 113 | 209 | 179 | 617 |
Bahia | 133 | 144 | 133 | 1,359 | 2,077 | 1,281 | 997 | 6,124 |
Minas Gerais | 409 | 426 | 397 | 3,719 | 8,785 | 7,290 | 3,964 | 24,990 |
Espírito Santo | 84 | 81 | 107 | 572 | 1,642 | 1,299 | 1,199 | 4,984 |
Rio de Janeiro | 146 | 135 | 142 | 317 | 2,371 | 1,774 | 1,280 | 6,165 |
São Paulo | 846 | 855 | 822 | 11,131 | 21,152 | 16,303 | 8,428 | 59,537 |
Paraná | 742 | 696 | 702 | 5,743 | 9,923 | 7,376 | 4,141 | 29,323 |
Santa Catarina | 328 | 301 | 297 | 2,406 | 7,423 | 6,227 | 3,829 | 20,811 |
Rio Grande do Sul | 389 | 419 | 402 | 3,779 | 12,303 | 9,895 | 5,342 | 32,529 |
Mato Grosso do Sul | 79 | 63 | 49 | 1,151 | 2.290 | 1,313 | 445 | 5,390 |
Mato Grosso | 42 | 58 | 46 | 304 | 1,115 | 671 | 403 | 2,639 |
Goiás | 98 | 99 | 90 | 1,010 | 2.382 | 1,977 | 1,170 | 6,826 |
Distrito Federal | 14 | 11 | 13 | 23 | 185 | 244 | 165 | 655 |
Of all notified cases, 90.64% (210,032 cases) were NMSC. For melanoma, São Paulo (4,852 cases–22.39%), Rio Grande do Sul (3,642 cases–16.80%) and Paraná (3,103–14.32%) had the highest numbers (Table 2). This data can be explained by the high number of inhabitants in São Paulo–the most populous state in the country. Furthermore, Rio Grande do Sul and Paraná are in the region where most of the population has European ancestry, which is predisposed to the occurrence of this neoplasm due to phenotypic characteristics such as blue eyes, light hair, and skin of phototypes I and II (according to the Fitzpatrick classification)5.Clique ou toque aqui para inserir o texto.
Brazilian State | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 1,366 | 1,350 | 1,302 | 3.800 | 6,258 | 5,208 | 2,384 | 21,668 |
Rondônia | 5 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 17 | 23 | 11 | 77 |
Acre | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 13 |
Amazonas | 6 | 5 | 6 | 16 | 18 | 36 | 6 | 93 |
Roraima | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 11 |
Pará | 9 | 15 | 12 | 35 | 48 | 31 | 18 | 168 |
Amapá | 4 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 18 |
Tocantins | 2 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 35 |
Maranhão | 19 | 11 | 13 | 26 | 26 | 28 | 8 | 131 |
Piauí | 15 | 16 | 17 | 19 | 40 | 27 | 11 | 145 |
Ceará | 55 | 44 | 50 | 76 | 145 | 125 | 54 | 549 |
Rio Grande do Norte | 26 | 30 | 20 | 39 | 64 | 85 | 45 | 309 |
Paraíba | 31 | 22 | 27 | 112 | 112 | 21 | 7 | 332 |
Pernambuco | 42 | 47 | 47 | 126 | 122 | 94 | 73 | 551 |
Alagoas | 17 | 26 | 14 | 27 | 70 | 44 | 29 | 227 |
Sergipe | 13 | 3 | 12 | 15 | 11 | 22 | 14 | 90 |
Bahia | 31 | 43 | 40 | 136 | 181 | 133 | 86 | 650 |
Minas Gerais | 128 | 135 | 130 | 410 | 681 | 563 | 213 | 2,260 |
Espírito Santo | 27 | 25 | 33 | 73 | 177 | 84 | 50 | 469 |
Rio de Janeiro | 62 | 63 | 52 | 68 | 174 | 200 | 89 | 708 |
São Paulo | 276 | 269 | 242 | 874 | 1,402 | 1,194 | 595 | 4,852 |
Paraná | 195 | 189 | 189 | 597 | 776 | 806 | 351 | 3,103 |
Santa Catarina | 120 | 113 | 116 | 348 | 511 | 403 | 219 | 1,830 |
Rio Grande do Sul | 196 | 187 | 201 | 598 | 1,182 | 940 | 338 | 3,642 |
Mato Grosso do Sul | 19 | 24 | 10 | 38 | 66 | 51 | 19 | 227 |
Mato Grosso | 14 | 21 | 21 | 60 | 65 | 58 | 40 | 279 |
Goiás | 38 | 34 | 28 | 76 | 346 | 195 | 81 | 798 |
Distrito Federal | 13 | 9 | 6 | 13 | 10 | 31 | 19 | 101 |
About the number of deaths from skin cancer, the year with the highest mortality rate was 2021 (8,88/100,000 inhabitants), with Paraíba as the main contributor to this value (22,64/100,000 inhabitants). The year with the lowest mortality rate was 2015 (6,77/100,000 inhabitants) (Table 3). The region of Brazil with the lowest absolute number of deaths, in this period, was the northern region (114 deaths), the second least inhabited region of Brazil (18,430,980 habitants–which equals 8.77% of the Brazilian population). The southeast region was the one with the highest absolute number of deaths (1,659 deaths), followed by the south (1,201 deaths) and the northeast (556 deaths). The Brazilian state which had the highest number of deaths was São Paulo (882 deaths), followed by Santa Catarina (415 deaths) and Rio Grande do Sul (402 deaths) (Table 4).
Region/Brazilian State | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 6.77 | 7.04 | 6.9 | 6.91 | 7.62 | 8.43 | 8.88 | 7.45 |
North | 10.53 | 11.31 | 11.18 | 9.59 | 12.99 | 13,24 | 11.02 | 11.43 |
Rondônia | 13.04 | 11.76 | 16.67 | 13.33 | 3.03 | 14,81 | 12.5 | 11.86 |
Acre | – | 10 | 12.5 | – | – | – | 8.33 | 5.77 |
Amazonas | 9.52 | 18.18 | 9.09 | 21.43 | 25 | 26.67 | 11.11 | 17.59 |
Roraima | 20 | 20 | 15.38 | 16.67 | 27.27 | – | 20 | 17.65 |
Pará | 12 | 5.41 | 12.5 | 8.06 | 19.61 | 22.86 | 13.33 | 13.24 |
Amapá | 16.67 | 44.44 | 28.57 | – | 33.33 | – | – | 18.18 |
Tocantins | 6.67 | 5.88 | 3.92 | 7.69 | 2.86 | 4.88 | 7.14 | 5.36 |
Northeast | 4.37 | 5.21 | 4.44 | 4.08 | 6.07 | 7.97 | 9.85 | 5.57 |
Maranhão | 24.39 | 30 | 8.33 | 15.38 | 9.09 | 17.02 | 22 | 17.31 |
Piauí | 17.95 | 10.26 | 5 | 2.5 | 3.03 | 12.5 | 19.35 | 9.66 |
Ceará | 3.23 | 4.21 | 5.95 | 6.82 | 5.56 | 7.92 | 7.83 | 5.76 |
Rio Grande do Norte | 1.27 | 4.9 | 5 | 7.55 | 5.97 | 3.92 | 8.33 | 4.69 |
Paraíba | 5.43 | 6.19 | 8.27 | 1.33 | 4.46 | 16.22 | 22.64 | 6.89 |
Pernambuco | 2.18 | 2.56 | 1.45 | 2.52 | 4.18 | 4.12 | 6.56 | 2.78 |
Alagoas | 5.36 | 13.33 | 10.81 | 6.33 | 11.97 | 9.46 | 3.08 | 8.95 |
Sergipe | 12.5 | 5.56 | 10.53 | 20 | 33.33 | 8.33 | 18.18 | 15.2 |
Bahia | 10.37 | 13.68 | 15.53 | 6.91 | 6.93 | 12.44 | 9.83 | 10.09 |
Southeast | 6.9 | 7.42 | 8.44 | 8.71 | 8.69 | 9.77 | 9.53 | 8.44 |
Minas Gerais | 5.46 | 5.09 | 6.77 | 6.91 | 7.09 | 7.11 | 7.21 | 6.48 |
Espírito Santo | 1.11 | 6.71 | 5.17 | 10.29 | 6.15 | 8.9 | 17.65 | 6.75 |
Rio de Janeiro | 12.4 | 12.84 | 15.67 | 13.67 | 14.63 | 20 | 14.19 | 14.61 |
São Paulo | 6.84 | 7.5 | 7.94 | 8.1 | 8.03 | 8.89 | 8.91 | 7.99 |
South | 8.12 | 7.11 | 6.62 | 6.54 | 6.75 | 7.31 | 7.36 | 7.08 |
Paraná | 6.63 | 6.89 | 5.82 | 6.51 | 4.17 | 5.82 | 6.13 | 6 |
Santa Catarina | 11.49 | 10.77 | 9.13 | 7.46 | 10.56 | 11.17 | 8.01 | 9,72 |
Rio Grande do Sul | 7.56 | 5.02 | 5.82 | 5.89 | 6.42 | 6.32 | 8.26 | 6,39 |
West-Center | 6.87 | 8.94 | 7.05 | 9.19 | 8.07 | 5.92 | 9.77 | 8.04 |
Mato Grosso do Sul | 10.34 | 17.86 | 5.13 | 12 | 8.33 | 8.96 | 5.41 | 8.93 |
Mato Grosso | 4.57 | 5.45 | 1.61 | 6.5 | 9.78 | 1.52 | 11.96 | 5.75 |
Goiás | 7.32 | 6.12 | 12.61 | 6.82 | 4.03 | 5.59 | 9.18 | 6.95 |
Distrito Federal | 10.81 | 14.29 | 10.71 | 18.52 | 22.03 | 9.3 | 15.28 | 14.85 |
Region/Brazilian State | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | 485 | 523 | 543 | 534 | 574 | 537 | 559 | 3,755 |
North | 12 | 19 | 17 | 14 | 20 | 18 | 14 | 114 |
Rondônia | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 23 |
Acre | – | 1 | 1 | – | – | – | 1 | 3 |
Amazonas | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 19 |
Roraima | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | – | 1 | 9 |
Pará | 3 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 38 |
Amapá | 1 | 4 | 2 | – | 1 | – | – | 8 |
Tocantins | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 14 |
Northeast | 68 | 78 | 80 | 76 | 81 | 76 | 97 | 556 |
Maranhão | 10 | 9 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 54 |
Piauí | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 23 |
Ceará | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 44 |
Rio Grande do Norte | 2 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 35 |
Paraíba | 7 | 6 | 11 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 12 | 49 |
Pernambuco | 18 | 23 | 16 | 28 | 23 | 15 | 21 | 144 |
Alagoas | 3 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 14 | 7 | 2 | 47 |
Sergipe | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 19 |
Bahia | 14 | 16 | 25 | 19 | 19 | 25 | 23 | 141 |
Southeast | 204 | 217 | 245 | 242 | 263 | 245 | 243 | 1,659 |
Minas Gerais | 38 | 40 | 46 | 49 | 50 | 45 | 47 | 315 |
Espírito Santo | 2 | 11 | 9 | 21 | 12 | 13 | 6 | 74 |
Rio de Janeiro | 48 | 43 | 55 | 51 | 67 | 60 | 64 | 388 |
São Paulo | 116 | 123 | 135 | 121 | 134 | 127 | 126 | 882 |
South | 174 | 176 | 175 | 169 | 171 | 177 | 159 | 1,201 |
Paraná | 54 | 65 | 59 | 63 | 37 | 54 | 52 | 384 |
Santa Catarina | 57 | 64 | 58 | 51 | 72 | 66 | 47 | 415 |
Rio Grande do Sul | 63 | 47 | 58 | 55 | 62 | 57 | 60 | 402 |
West-Center | 27 | 33 | 26 | 33 | 39 | 21 | 46 | 225 |
Mato Grosso do Sul | 6 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 45 |
Mato Grosso | 8 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 9 | 1 | 11 | 45 |
Goiás | 9 | 9 | 14 | 9 | 10 | 10 | 18 | 79 |
Distrito Federal | 4 | 8 | 6 | 10 | 13 | 4 | 11 | 56 |
During this 7-year period, there was a total of 3,755 skin cancer deaths in the whole country of Brazil, mostly male (58.72%). Regarding ethnicity, 62.84% of deaths occurred in Caucasians, followed by mixed ethnicities (23.35%), blacks (2.34%), and Asians (0.69%). Only 1 case was reported in Indians. In 403 cases there was no information on the ethnicity. About the age, the highest percentage of deaths occurred in patients between 60 and 79 years old (43.22%), followed by those between 40 and 59 years old (33.02%) and those over 80 years of age (14.22%).
During this period, there was a 145.01% increase in the notification of skin cancer cases per year in the whole country of Brazil, with no state reporting a decrease in the number of cases. There was also a rise in mortality from skin cancer, with an increase of 4.72% in the mortality rate. Unfortunately, SIM does not differentiate deaths from NMSC from melanoma, making a more adequate analysis of deaths impossible.
Discussion
In a tropical country, such as Brazil, cultural changes regarding tanned skin, outdoor recreational activities, and exposure to occupational solar radiation have been responsible for an excessive exposure to ultraviolet solar radiation in recent decades, especially among the young population1,3.
According to data, in the most populated and developed areas from the cultural, social, and economic point of view, there is a higher number of doctors per inhabitant and this leads to a higher number of diagnosis and, consequently, more official notifications. This fact may not occur in less developed areas with a fewer number of doctors per inhabitant, justifying the increase in the number of deaths in more populated regions.
In Brazil, most people who die because of skin cancer are elderly individuals who very probably were observed only with advanced disease3. Other patients more likely to die from skin cancer are those with immunosuppression, although these cases are not evaluated separately in our study. However, the exact number of people who develop or die either from basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer annually is unknown1,4.
The southeastern state with the highest number of deaths was São Paulo, which may be associated with being the most populous state in Brazil. It was noted that populated areas have a higher mortality compared to less populated areas. This occurs probably due to the subdiagnosis and subnotificated cases in remote areas. Brazil, as already mentioned, is a country with vast social, cultural, and economic differences and this interferes in the concentration of doctors per inhabitants.
The increase in the number of deaths probably occurs because of the late diagnosis and late treatment of the disease, justified by the difficulty in accessing adequate health care and the poor distribution of specialists in dermatology throughout the Brazilian territory5,12`, increasing the rate of disability and lethality. According to data from the Medical Demography of 2018, there are 8,317 specialists in the country, the vast majority concentrated in the South and Southeast regions (74.5%), with no experience in performing dermatological surgical procedures, and working predominantly in an urban setting and private care12.
From 1999, the Brazilian Society of Dermatology (SBD) started the National Campaign for the Prevention of Skin Cancer in the main Brazilian cities. This form of secondary prevention has resulted in an increase in the early detection of skin cancer and implies a reduction in mortality from this cause8.
Conclusion
The values evaluated above allow us to conclude that skin cancer is still a disease that causes significant morbidity in Brazil, despite the primary and secondary prevention measures established. In addition, the inequality observed in its control is notorious. In the same period, while some regions showed a reduction in the number of deaths, other regions an increasing trend remained, as observed in the southeast region.
Due to the vast territorial extension and the remarkable sociodemographic, epidemiological and cultural diversity, significant differences are noted in the incidence and mortality rates in the different Brazilian macro-regions, thus inferring great complexity in dealing with this disease by the responsible healthcare agents and sectors.
These data demonstrate how late diagnosis of skin cancer can impact population morbidity and mortality. The increase in the number of deaths from skin cancer reflects the need to improve primary and secondary prevention practices.