SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue220Economics education: literacy or mind framing?: Evidence from a survey on the social building of trust in PortugalThe grammars of action in solidary economy and justification of practices of consumption author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Análise Social

Print version ISSN 0003-2573

Abstract

ZAFRILLA, Pedro Jesús Pérez. Is Deliberative Democracy an adaptive political theory? A critical analysis of Hugo Mercier’s Argumentative Theory of Reasoning. Anál. Social [online]. 2016, n.220, pp.544-564. ISSN 0003-2573.

Moral psychology has devalued the role of reasoning in moral life. Nevertheless, the Argumentative Theory of Reasoning (ATR) is a proposal of evolutionary psychology that vindicates the effectiveness of reasoning in communicative processes. This theory even defends its convergence with deliberative democracy. And yet, we hold that the ATR is unsuccessful when supplying a psychological basis for deliberative democracy. The ATR does not adequately explain the epistemic value of deliberation in a way that is congruous with deliberative democracy. To conclude, we will present other shortcomings of the ATR in its concept of reasoning.

Keywords : argumentative theory of reasoning; Hugo Mercier; deliberative democracy; epistemic democracy; reasoning.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License