SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.32 número2A distribuição da responsabilidade por decisões em saúde ao abrigo do Affordable Care Act americanoMedicina personalizada ou saúde pública? Bioética, direitos humanos e escolha índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Pública

versión impresa ISSN 0870-9025

Resumen

NEWDICK, Christopher. Health care rights and NHS rationing: Turning theory into practice. Rev. Port. Sau. Pub. [online]. 2014, vol.32, n.2, pp.151-157. ISSN 0870-9025.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpsp.2014.07.001.

How should we understand the nature of patients’ right in public health care systems? Are health care rights different to rights under a private contract for car insurance? This article distinguishes between public and private rights and the relevance of community interests and notions of social solidarity. It discusses the distinction between political and civil rights, and social and economic rights and the inherently political and redistributive nature of the latter. Nevertheless, social and economic rights certainly give rise to “rights” enforceable by the courts. In the UK (as in many other jurisdictions), the courts have favoured a “procedural” approach to the question, in which the courts closely scrutinise decisions and demand high standards of rationality from decision-makers. However, although this is the general rule, the article also discusses a number of exceptional cases where “substantive” remedies are available which guarantee patients access to the care they need.

Palabras clave : Public rights; Procedural remedies; Substantive remedies.

        · resumen en Portugués     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )