SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue79The solidary economy in the fight to reverse povertyChildcare between Angola and Portugal: parenthood in transnational families author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas

Print version ISSN 0873-6529

Abstract

NEIVA, Pedro. Revisiting the methodological Achilles' heel of social sciences in Brazil. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas [online]. 2015, n.79, pp.65-83. ISSN 0873-6529.  https://doi.org/10.7458/SPP2015794725.

In this article I assess the use of quantitative data and methods in Brazilian social science reviews between 1997 and 2012. I find that there was a significant increase in the use of “advanced” statistical techniques. However, the general picture did not change substantially: “quantitativist” authors remain in a clear minority vis-à-vis “non-quantitativists”. Factors that seem to influence the choice of a quantitative approach include: field of education; institution of origin; level of sophistication of the review; whether the article has co-authors; and the author’s participation in specific courses. For its part, the author’s gender does not seem to be associated with this methodological option.

Keywords : methods; quantitative methodology; social sciences; Brazil.

        · abstract in Portuguese | French | Spanish     · text in Portuguese     · Portuguese ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License