SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.22 issue3Birthing matters in Portugal: introductionReconcilable differences?: Portuguese obstetricians’ and midwives’ contrasting perspectives on childbirth, and women’s birthing experiences author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Etnográfica

Print version ISSN 0873-6561

Abstract

DE LUCA, Francesca. “God was the first anaesthetist”: obstetrics and pain in Lisbon at the turn of the 20th century. Etnográfica [online]. 2018, vol.22, n.3, pp.619-642. ISSN 0873-6561.  https://doi.org/10.4000/etnografica.5989.

In this article, I analyse the historical emergence of pain management in obstetric literature and practice and how it affected the constitution of a new epistemology of obstetrics in Portugal. The text draws largely on archival research on biomedical articles and theses from mid-19th up to early-20th-century Lisbon, revealing an emerging and shifting biomedical understanding of pain and the labouring body, the agency of the obstetrician, and the political role of obstetrics. The research is part of a longitudinal anthropological study of childbirth pain approached as a locus where affectivities, shifting ontologies and biopolitics merge. Rather than considering childbirth pain as a taken-for-granted physical phenomenon, its materialization within the specific biomedical and historical context of Portugal at the turn of the 20th century is analysed.

Keywords : pain; childbirth labour; Portuguese obstetrics; anaesthesia; chloroform.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License