SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.64 issue4Sociodemographic and oral profile of people with disabilities at the clinic of the Faculty of Dental Medicine of the University of LisbonCommunication between dentists and dental technicians in Lisbon for the construction of removable partial dentures’ metal frameworks author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentária e Cirurgia Maxilofacial

Print version ISSN 1646-2890On-line version ISSN 1647-6700

Abstract

SANTOS, Marcelo Oldack Silva dos et al. Thickness of the nasolacrimal duct and the adjacente maxillary bone in different skeletal patterns using MSCT: A retrospective study. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent Cir Maxilofac [online]. 2023, vol.64, n.4, pp.155-161.  Epub Dec 30, 2023. ISSN 1646-2890.  https://doi.org/10.24873/j.rpemd.2023.12.1206.

Objectives:

To evaluate the anatomy of the nasolacrimal duct and the adjacent maxillary bone thickness using multislice computed tomography.

Methods:

Tomographic images of 92 individuals (184 sides) were analyzed according to sex, side, and sagittal (Class I, II, and III) and vertical (mesocephalic, brachycephalic, and dolichocephalic) skeletal patterns. The largest diameters of the nasolacrimal duct and the thickness of the adjacent maxillary bone were measured when the lacrimomaxillary suture was completely visible. In addition, the measurements were performed 2 mm above and below the midpoint. The maxillary bone and nasolacrimal duct measurements were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post-hoc test.

Results:

Females had a significantly narrower lacrimal duct at the midpoint (p=0.026) and 2 mm above it (p=0.025). Maxillary bone thickness was greater in Class II individuals compared to Class I at the midpoint (p=0.012) and 2 mm above it (p=0.027). The dolichocephalic group had greater maxillary bone thickness at the midpoint (p=0.014) and 2 mm below it (p=0.005) compared to the brachycephalic group. Maxillary bone thickness was greater in mesocephalic individuals compared to dolichocephalic individuals (p=0.04).

Conclusions:

Brachycephalic Class I individuals have lower maxillary bone thickness adjacente to the nasolacrimal duct, which increases the risk of injury during the bone fixation process.

Keywords : Anatomy; Dacryocystitis; Nasolacrimal duct.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in English     · English ( pdf )