SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.10 issue4Prensa y democratización en México. Tres miradas: Excélsior, La Jornada y ReformaAs ONG como fontes de informação nos media - um olhar sobre o discurso jornalístico não governamental na RTP, TSF, Público e agência Lusa author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Observatorio (OBS*)

On-line version ISSN 1646-5954

Abstract

TORRES, Eduardo Cintra. Broadcast television flow scheduling and the viewers' zapping: conflicting practices. OBS* [online]. 2016, vol.10, n.4, pp.97lpage=115-. ISSN 1646-5954.

Broadcast television and its audiences live a paradoxical situation: on the one hand, channels still schedule according to the concept of flow; on the other hand, viewers' zapping counters it. This paper wishes to ascertain the audiences' practices regarding their fidelity to flow. The research tries to answer these questions: how many viewers watch the same channel during a long consecutive period? How many viewers watch a complete programme? Are there significant differences in zapping versus flow faithfulness according to sex, age, socio-demographic class and cable TV access? Is “companionship television” still a viewers' consume practice? The research verifies the effectiveness of flow scheduling, which, while being an ideology and a scheduling and self-promotion practice, is not a practice of most viewers. The results show that flow faithfulness flow is a minority behaviour mainly of older people, women, lower classes and viewers without occupation.

Keywords : Scheduling; zapping; ratings; flow; audience; television.

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License