SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.13 número4Rotura de aneurisma da aorta abdominal na era do tratamento endovascular: validação unicêntrica de 2 algoritmos de previsão de riscoExclusão endovascular de aneurisma toracoabdominal com “octopus endograft” índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular

versão impressa ISSN 1646-706X

Resumo

FERREIRA, Rita Soares et al. Planning, evar and followup without contrast in chronic kidney disease. Angiol Cir Vasc [online]. 2017, vol.13, n.4, pp.22-27. ISSN 1646-706X.

Introduction: Up to 30% of patients undergoing elective EVAR have prior Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). The contrast-in- duced nephropathy is a complication of EVAR. It is possible to perform EVAR without contrast or minimize its amount during the procedure, using intraoperative angiography with CO2 and/or IVUS instead of conventional angiography. However, these techniques are not available in most hospitals, unlike Dupplex ultrasound (DUS). In patients with favorable biotype and performed by an experienced professional, DUS allows the detection of endoleaks and confirms patency of the renal and hypogastric arteries during EVAR. Objectives: show the feasibility of planning, execution and follow-up of EVAR without contrast through the presenta- tion of the technique used in a clinical case. Case Report: A 70-year-old man with a history of CKD due to IgA nephropathy, presented in our hospital with a 57mm asymptomatic infrarenal aortic aneurysm diagnosed on a non-contrast CT. As the patient had risk factors for contrast induced nephropathy, a favorable anatomy and a good biotype for abdominal DUS, he was proposed for EVAR. Planning was performed using centre-lumen line reconstruction and outer-to-outer measurements on non-contrast CT. Proxi- mal neck thrombus, lumen diameter and iliac patency were evaluated by DUS. During surgery the left (lowermost) renal artery was cannulated under fluoroscopy and confirmed by DUS, and a hydrophilic guidewire was left as reference. The main body (Gore Excluder®) was advanced and subsequently deployed under DUS monitoring. Afterwards, both hypogas- tric arteries were cannulated and used as reference for bilateral extension. A final DUS excluded type 1 or 3 endoleaks. Before discharge he underwent DUS and non-contrast CT which demonstrated the adequate positioning of the endo- prosthesis just below the lowermost renal artery, and renal and hypogastric artery permeability. There was no change in renal function during hospitalization. Conclusion: The planning, execution and and follow-up of EVAR are feasible without contrast. This technique is justified in cases with high risk for contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with a favorable biotype for abdominal ultrasound and a favorable anatomy for EVAR.

Palavras-chave : EVAR; contrast; chronic kidney disease; contrast induced nephropathy.

        · resumo em Português     · texto em Português     · Português ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons