SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.14 issue2Nutcracker syndrome: a rare and underdiagnosed pathology? Our experience, review of the literature and proposal of a new anatomical classification of nutcracker syndromeNew concepts in adipose tissue and abdominal aortic pathology author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular

Print version ISSN 1646-706X

Abstract

CORDEIRO, Filipa; OLIVEIRA-PINTO, José  and  MANSILHA, Armando. Endovascular aneurysm repair: current status on device specifications and outcomes. Angiol Cir Vasc [online]. 2018, vol.14, n.2, pp.36-47. ISSN 1646-706X.

Introduction: Since its first introduction in 1991, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) became the preferred modality for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) repair. Several devices have been launched over the years addressing progressively more complex anatomies. The aim of this review is to provide an update on current endografts and compare their results. Methods: MEDLINE databases were searched for endografts features and respective outcomes. Results: Currently, a significant variety of grafts is approved for clinical use, targeting different anatomic properties. There are presently six CE and FDA approved devices: Zenith®, AFX®, C3 EXCLUDER®, Endurant® II, Ovation® and Aorfix™; while six more have only the CE mark: Anaconda™, E-vita ABDOMINAL XT®, E-tegra®, Incraft®, TREOVANCE® and Altura™. Also, there are four fenestrated and branched endografts available for treating thoracoabdominal aneurysms: Zenith® Fenestrated, Fenestrated Anaconda™, Zenith® p-Branch® and Zenith® t-Branch®. The Endurant II and Treovance stent grafts can accommodate neck lengths ≥10 mm; Aorfix and Anaconda are more liberal regarding neck angulation, extending of infrarenal neck angulation up to 90º. Finally, Zenith, C3 Excluder, Ovation and Incraft stent grafts can be used with distal fixation length ≥10 mm. Conclusion: New-generation endografts perform better than the older ones, especially in challenging anatomies. Mid-term outcomes between contemporary stent-grafts seem to be similar for most of the outcomes. However, no random­ized controlled trials exist comparing different contemporary stent grafts, making conclusions difficult to accomplish. Long-term follow-up reviews are required to assertively take assumptions about different stent grafts performance.

Keywords : Abdominal aortic aneurysm; Endovascular Aneurysm Repair; Endograft.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in English     · English ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License