SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.28 issue4COPD in the population under surveillance by the Portuguese Sentinel Practice Network from 2007 to 2009Effectiveness of the influenza vaccine in 2010-2011 in Portugal: results from the EuroEVA project author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar

Print version ISSN 2182-5173

Abstract

SANTOS, Paulo; HESPANHOL, Alberto  and  COUTO, Luciana. Follow-up of patients after routine electrocardiogram testing in primary care. Rev Port Med Geral Fam [online]. 2012, vol.28, n.4, pp.262-270. ISSN 2182-5173.

Background: Electrocardiography (ECG) is commonly used in primary care to study and follow patients with cardiovascular diseases. Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess changes in patient care after performance of an ECG during a primary care office visit. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at S. João Health Center, Oporto of all patients for whom an ECG was requested at primary care office visits over a two-year period, from 1/03/2007. Each time an ECG was requested, doctors recorded the reason for the test, the patient’s symptoms, and past medical history. Electrocardiograms were saved for later analysis. Clinical files were hand searched six months after the ECG to assess changes in patient care. A multinomial logistic regression model was used to test associations between results of the ECG, classified by Novacode, and the indications for the test. Results: We studied 870 ECG, from 817 patients (56,4% females) with a median age of 57 years. The main reason for requesting an ECG was the presence of symptoms (48,5%). Analysis of the results of the ECG showed that 54,5% were interpreted as normal, 35,9% had minor abnormalities, and 9,7% showed major abnormalities. Care of the patient remained unchanged after 67,9% of tests (CI95%: 64,8-70,0%), and referral for hospital care occurred after 5,7% (CI95%: 4,8-7,5%). In multivariate analysis, the decision to change patient care was significantly influenced by ECG results in patients in whom the test was requested for follow-up of known cardiovascular disease but not for those who reported symptoms at office visit. Conclusion: The ECG does not change the care of most patients who have the test done at an office visit. The greatest utility of the test was seen among patients with known cardiovascular risk factors or a past history of cardiovascular disease.

Keywords : Electrocardiography; Family Practice; General Practice; Disease Management; Medical History Taking.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in Portuguese     · Portuguese ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License