SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.28 número4DPOC na população sob vigilância pela Rede Médicos Sentinela de 2007 a 2009Efetividade da vacina antigripal na época 2010-2011 em Portugal: resultados do projeto EuroEVA índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar

versão impressa ISSN 2182-5173

Resumo

SANTOS, Paulo; HESPANHOL, Alberto  e  COUTO, Luciana. Follow-up of patients after routine electrocardiogram testing in primary care. Rev Port Med Geral Fam [online]. 2012, vol.28, n.4, pp.262-270. ISSN 2182-5173.

Background: Electrocardiography (ECG) is commonly used in primary care to study and follow patients with cardiovascular diseases. Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess changes in patient care after performance of an ECG during a primary care office visit. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at S. João Health Center, Oporto of all patients for whom an ECG was requested at primary care office visits over a two-year period, from 1/03/2007. Each time an ECG was requested, doctors recorded the reason for the test, the patient’s symptoms, and past medical history. Electrocardiograms were saved for later analysis. Clinical files were hand searched six months after the ECG to assess changes in patient care. A multinomial logistic regression model was used to test associations between results of the ECG, classified by Novacode, and the indications for the test. Results: We studied 870 ECG, from 817 patients (56,4% females) with a median age of 57 years. The main reason for requesting an ECG was the presence of symptoms (48,5%). Analysis of the results of the ECG showed that 54,5% were interpreted as normal, 35,9% had minor abnormalities, and 9,7% showed major abnormalities. Care of the patient remained unchanged after 67,9% of tests (CI95%: 64,8-70,0%), and referral for hospital care occurred after 5,7% (CI95%: 4,8-7,5%). In multivariate analysis, the decision to change patient care was significantly influenced by ECG results in patients in whom the test was requested for follow-up of known cardiovascular disease but not for those who reported symptoms at office visit. Conclusion: The ECG does not change the care of most patients who have the test done at an office visit. The greatest utility of the test was seen among patients with known cardiovascular risk factors or a past history of cardiovascular disease.

Palavras-chave : Electrocardiography; Family Practice; General Practice; Disease Management; Medical History Taking.

        · resumo em Português     · texto em Português     · Português ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons