SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 número5Aporte de iodo e função tiroideia na gravidez“O coração na barriga”: a propósito de um caso clínico índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar

versão impressa ISSN 2182-5173

Resumo

NUNES, Sara  e  GOUVEIA, Carla. At the end, amputation was not needed!: A case report. Rev Port Med Geral Fam [online]. 2018, vol.34, n.5, pp.307-311. ISSN 2182-5173.  https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v34i5.11834.

Introduction: We present a case report on peripheral arterial disease, in which we highlight the relevance of the role of the family doctor in various moments: management of modifiable risk factors, coordination of the primary care team, and longitudinal evaluation of the patient which, in turn, may be crucial for the diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutic choice, by providing relevant information to secondary care. Case description: An 82- year old woman with dyslipidemia, hypertension and type 2 diabetes, oriented and independent in her daily life activities, developed difficult-to-heal arterial ulcers which became infected. In the context of sepsis, a change in the mental status was detected and the diagnosis of dementia was assumed. Amputation was proposed in the presence of extensive bilateral peripheral arterial insufficiency of the lower limbs. This option was refused by the family and the patient was discharged to a nursing home. Infection control resulted in the recovery of the previous mental status. The patient was reassessed and a successful revascularization was performed. The ulcers healed completely, with recovery of the previous levels of autonomy and quality of life. Evaluating retrospectively the management of vascular risk factors, missed optimization opportunities were detected. For several months, continued nursing care was not adequately coordinated with medical observations, neither in primary nor in secondary care. The diagnosis of dementia during sepsis did not take in account information from the patient’s family, or of her family physician, on her previous mental status. Comment: This case report shows a good ending (maintenance of autonomy and quality of life), stressing the importance of controlling the risk factors for peripheral arterial disease, of the articulation between various health care professionals (between doctors and nurses, and between doctors in primary and secondary care), and the implications of an adequate differential diagnosis of altered mental status in the patient’s prognosis.

Palavras-chave : Ischemia; Quality of life; Dementia; Amputation; Case report.

        · resumo em Português     · texto em Português     · Português ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons