SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.2 número3Direito Transnacional, Diferenciação Funcional e EvoluçãoAuto-regulação administrativa (“direito interno”) e Direito Administrativo Global índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


e-Pública: Revista Eletrónica de Direito Público

versión On-line ISSN 2183-184X

Resumen

BRITO, Miguel Nogueira de. The Sins of Functional Differentiation: A Comment. e-Pública [online]. 2015, vol.2, n.3, pp.84-91. ISSN 2183-184X.

In his paper Gonçalo Vasconcelos Vilaça addresses several critiques concerning the systems theory's answer to the legitimacy problem of transnational law. This answer, according to him, could be summarized by the by the label “let's do nothing” (or “let us leave it to the systems themselves”). The critique I find particularly worth of exploring is the pointing out the social systems theory's allegedly implicit normative claim that functional differentiation and autopoietic systems “ought to be maintained, never short-circuited”. Can we adequately confront global risks and the expansive tendencies of the economic system just by means of such a modest normative claim?

Palabras clave : international and transnational systems of law; functional differentiation; Niklas Luhmann; social systems theory.

        · resumen en Portugués     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )