SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue9THE SPANISH JURY, THE ANGLOSAJON JURY AND THE SCABINAT. INSTRUCTIONS AND VERDICT. BRIEF COMPARATIVE ANALYSISNEOCONSERVING WAVE: A THREAT TO DEMOCRACY author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista Internacional CONSINTER de Direito - Publicação Oficial do Conselho Internacional de Estudos Contemporâneos em Pós-Graduação

Print version ISSN 2183-6396On-line version ISSN 2183-9522

Abstract

CORDEIRO, Carlos José. FREEDOM OF FAMILY PLANNING X CFM RESOLUTION 2.168/2017: MAXIMUM AGE FORECAST FOR SUBMISSION TO ASSISTED REPRODUCTION TECHNIQUES. Revista Internacional CONSINTER de Direito [online]. 2019, n.9, pp.449-462.  Epub Dec 18, 2019. ISSN 2183-6396.  https://doi.org/10.19135/revista.consinter.00009.24.

The objective of the present study is to position itself on the constitutionality or not of the maximum age forecast for women to undergo assisted reproduction procedures, as set out in item I.3, § 1, of the annex of Resolution 2,168/2017, Federal Council of Medicine (CFM), considering that this age limitation may mean a real affront to the fundamental right to free family planning, as enshrined in art. 226, § 7, of the Federal Constitution of 1988. Therefore, the approach method adopted will be essentially the hypothetical deductive method, through the development of theoretical research − doctrinal − and documentary knowledge − legislative and jurisprudential analysis.

Keywords : Family planning; Resolution 2.168/2017 of the CFM; Unconstitutionality.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in Portuguese     · Portuguese ( pdf )