SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.6 issue1Outline for the intervention of the Rehabilitation Nurse - organization of care for healthy and active agingThe impact of gait rehabilitation programs on length of hospital stay - Scoping Review author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista Portuguesa de Enfermagem de Reabilitação

Print version ISSN 2184-965XOn-line version ISSN 2184-3023

Abstract

AZEVEDO, Paulo; SARAIVA, Manuel; OLIVEIRA, Margarida  and  OLIVEIRA, Isabel. Dysphagia screening tools after prolonged intubation: a systematic review of the literature. RPER [online]. 2023, vol.6, n.1, e264.  Epub June 30, 2023. ISSN 2184-965X.  https://doi.org/10.33194/rper.2023.264.

Introduction:

Post-extubation dysphagia affects a significant percentage of patients. However, its screening is not systematically performed, contributing to low awareness of the problem and predisposing to complications. The systematization of the approach to these patients begins with the use of reliable and sensitive screening tools.

Methodology:

Systematic literature review guided by the principles of the Cochrane Screening and Diagnostic Test Methods Group and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. The Medline, Cochrane Library, Scielo, Science Direct and CINAHL databases were consulted. Additionally, a gray literature search was performed. Inclusion criteria included validation studies of screening instruments for patients after prolonged intubation (more than 48 hours).

Results:

7,043 articles were reviewed of which seven were selected for full reading, and only one met the inclusion criteria.

Discussion:

There are several validated dysphagia screening instruments for other clinical populations, but only one was identified for this specific population. The instrument has good inter-rater reliability, however, a sensitivity of 81%, means that part of these patients will not be identified as dysphagic, which will have negative repercussions. This instrument was validated against clinical evaluation, which is a limitation to the interpretation of its results.

Conclusion:

There is no Portuguese version of this instrument, which hinders the development of guidelines that systematize the therapeutic approach for patients after extubation. We advocate its translation and validation for the national context and validation with a reference test.

Keywords : Deglutition disorders; critical care; screening; intratracheal intubation; nursing care; rehabilitation nursing.

        · abstract in Portuguese | Spanish     · text in English | Portuguese     · English ( pdf ) | Portuguese ( pdf )