SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.16“When I Don’t Have Money, I Don’t Eat”: A Critical Hermeneutic Study of Diabetes in LiberiaThe media regarding vaccination in modern times hesitation on childhood vaccination: a narrative review on the information published on social author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


New Trends in Qualitative Research

On-line version ISSN 2184-7770

Abstract

MACHILI, Ifigeneia  and  ANGOURI, Jo. ‘Hope it’s useful’: Negotiating first and second order accounts in discourse-based interviews. NTQR [online]. 2023, vol.16, e775.  Epub Sep 01, 2023. ISSN 2184-7770.  https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.16.2023.e775.

Framework: Although participatory approaches highlight the expertise of the participants and assign them responsibilities over the research process, there is less systematic discussion about the participants’ actual involvement in practice especially in the analysis and interpretation of the data. Despite the claims of equal partnership, the participant is often still perceived as the subject revealing hidden yet simple inside knowledge (first order account) around which the researcher, as a neutral outsider, builds complex theories by drawing on his/her scientific expertise (second order account). Goal and method: Our goal is to investigate how first and second order accounts contribute to a multi-layered analysis of the interview encounter by challenging binary thinking. We also explore the way interactional sociolinguistic methodology can inform participatory research by analyzing the way first and second order accounts are negotiated between interviewer and participant. We present the analysis of a discourse-based interview extract from our ongoing and completed work on the discourse analysis of formality in workplace emails in multinational companies in Greece. Findings: The results illustrate iterative processes of negotiation of meaning in situ and in line with the participants’ temporary and social roles. They highlight the importance of collaborative framing of the interpretation of and theorization from data in which the participants are co-creators. Shifting from static and purely essentialistic or constructivist understandings of the interviewer and participant to a holistic approach, this paper frames the interview encounter as an interactional domain of activity that can better capture the complexity of the lived experience.

Keywords : Constructionism; Interactional sociolinguistics; Participatory research; First and second order accounts; The role of the interviewer..

        · text in English     · English ( pdf )