SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 issue2Cap-Assisted Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Effective OptionImpact of COVID-19 in Pediatric Patients and Young Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


GE-Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology

Print version ISSN 2341-4545

Abstract

MANTA, Raffaele et al. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Subepithelial Tumor Treatment in the Upper Digestive Tract: A Western, Multicenter Study. GE Port J Gastroenterol [online]. 2023, vol.30, n.2, pp.33-38.  Epub Aug 01, 2023. ISSN 2341-4545.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000525993.

Background/Aims:

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been proposed for removal of gastrointestinal sub-epithelial tumors (GI-SETs), but data are still scanty. This study aimed to report a case series from a western country.

Patients and Methods:

Data of patients with upper GI-SETs suitable for ESD removal observed in 4 centers were retro-spectively reviewed. Before endoscopic procedure, the lesion was characterized by endosonographic evaluation, histology, and CT scan. The en bloc resection and the R0 resection rates were calculated, as well as incidence of complications, and the 1-year follow-up was reported.

Results:

Data of 84 patients with esophageal (N = 13), gastric (N = 61), and duodenal (N = 10) GI-SETs were collected. The mean diameter of lesions was 26 mm (range: 12-110 mm). There were 17 gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 12 neuroendocrine tumors, 35 leiomyomas, 18 lipomas, and 2 hamartomas. En bloc and R0 resection were achieved in 83 (98.8%) and in 80 (95.2%) patients, respectively. Overall, a complication occurred in 11 (13.1%) patients, including bleeding (N = 7) and perforation (N = 4). Endoscopic approach was successful in all bleedings, but 1 patient who required radiological embolization, and in 2 perforations, while surgery was performed in the other patients. Overall, a surgical approach was eventually needed in 5 (5.9%), including 3 in whom R0 resection failed and 2 with perforation.

Conclusions:

Our study found that ESD may be an effective and safe alternative to surgical intervention for both benign and localized malignant GI-SETs.

Keywords : Endoscopic submucosal dissection; Subepithelial tumors; Gastrointestinal stromal tumor; Neuroendocrine tumor; Upper GI.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in English     · English ( pdf )