SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 issue3Outcomes and Learning Curve in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Rectal Neoplasms with Severe Fibrosis: Experience of a Western CenterA Rare Case of Ectopic Adrenocorticotropic Hormone Secretion from Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumour Presenting with Cushing Syndrome author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


GE-Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology

Print version ISSN 2341-4545

Abstract

GOMES, Catarina et al. Critical Analysis of the Applicability of Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy Performance Measures among 2 Portuguese Centers with Different Capsule Endoscopy Platforms. GE Port J Gastroenterol [online]. 2023, vol.30, n.3, pp.57-65.  Epub Sep 01, 2023. ISSN 2341-4545.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000523773.

Introduction:

The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) identified the need to benchmark the quality of small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) and produced a set of performance measures (PM). The aim of this study is to critically evaluate the accordance of the PM for SBCE in two Portuguese centers with different SBCE platforms.

Methods:

The authors conducted a cross-sectional analysis of consecutive SBCE performed in an 18-month period in 2 Portuguese centers that used two different SBCE platforms Mirocam® (IntroMedic, Seoul, South Korea) and PillCam® (Medtronic, Yokneam, Israel). A total of 10 PM (6 key, 4 minor) were evaluated and compared between the 2 centers.

Results:

A total of 493 SBCE were included. The minimum standard established by ESGE was reached in 3/6 key PM (complete visualization, lesion detection rate, and capsule retention rate), and none of the 4 minor PM. PM compliance significantly differed between the 2 centers: complete small bowel visualization 95.9 and 90% (p = 0.01), diagnostic yield 50.6 and 63% (p = 0.005), adequate small bowel cleansing level according to Brotz scale 69.54 and 84.6% (p ≤ 0.001), patients with high risk of capsule retention offered a patency capsule 4.2 and 73% (p ≤ 0.001), respectively.

Conclusion:

This study highlights and critically discusses technical and organizational issues that should be considered in defining more realistic PM thresholds, aiming to improve SBCE quality.

Keywords : Performance measures; Small bowel capsule endoscopy; Endoscopic units.

        · abstract in Portuguese     · text in English     · English ( pdf )