SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.41 número1“Apanhados pela pandemia”: Funcionamento social, académico e psicológico de estudantes universitários durante a primeira onda da pandemia por COVID-19Validação da Compassion Fatigue Short Scale em bombeiros portugueses índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Análise Psicológica

versão impressa ISSN 0870-8231versão On-line ISSN 1646-6020

Aná. Psicológica vol.41 no.1 Lisboa jun. 2023  Epub 30-Jun-2023

https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1869 

Geral

Associations between secure base script knowledge in early childhood and perceived quality of attachment in middle childhood

Associações entre o script de base segura no pré-escolar e a perceção da qualidade da vinculação na idade escolar

Carla Fernandes1  , Data collection, Formal analysis, Writing - Original draft, Writing - Review & editing
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8259-6829

Marília Fernandes1  , Data collection, Formal analysis, Writing - Review & editing
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5023-0643

Marta Antunes1  , Data collection, Formal analysis, Writing - Review & editing

António J. Santos1  , Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing - Original draft, Writing - Review & editing
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2451-9352

Brian E. Vaughn2  , Formal analysis, Writing - Review & editing
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0035-2976

Manuela Veríssimo1  , Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing - Original draft, Writing - Review & editing
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4356-5696

1 ISPA - Instituto Universitário, William James Centre for Research, Lisboa, Portugal

2 Auburn University, Auburn, USA


Abstract

Previous studies suggest that mental representations of attachment can show moderate stability across childhood but none of these considered the child’s use of the Secure Base Script (SBS). This study tested the longitudinal stability of attachment representations from early to middle childhood, providing data that will allow us to determine whether the SBS score behaves like other attachment measures for early childhood in this regard. A sample of 70 Portuguese preschool children (36 girls) was assessed regarding their access to and use of the SBS when producing narratives relevant to attachment themes (e.g., separation, fear of ambiguous threat) at age 5 years using the Attachment Story Completion Task. Follow-up assessments were obtained at 8 and 9 years of age using the Kerns Security Scale. Security scores for both parents were obtained from the child in both years. All cross-time correlations were positive and significant. Subsequent tests on correlation magnitudes for mothers vs. fathers were not significant. Finally, correlations for mother/father security scores were significant at both age levels. Our findings indicate that children’s access to and use of the SBS in early childhood does predict their perceived quality of attachment with parents in middle childhood. Overall, our results indicate that access to and use of SBS in young children’s attachment-relevant narratives is a valid and potentially productive measure.

Keywords: Secure Base Script; Preschool children; Midle childhood.

Resumo

Estudos anteriores sugerem que as representações mentais de vinculação podem apresentar estabilidade moderada entre o pré-escolar e a idade escolar, contudo nenhum considerou o uso do Script de Base Segura (SBS). Este estudo testou a estabilidade longitudinal das representações de vinculação, fornecendo dados que nos permitirão determinar se o valor de SBS se comporta como outras medidas de vinculação nestas idades. Uma amostra de 70 pré-escolares portugueses (36 meninas) foi avaliada quanto ao acesso e uso do SBS quando produzem narrativas relevantes para temas de vinculação (e.g., separação, medo de ameaça ambígua) aos 5 anos de idade através do Attachment Story Completion Task. Medidas de follow-up foram obtidas aos 8 e 9 anos de idade através da Kerns Security Scale. Foram derivados valores de segurança para ambos os pais, em ambos os anos. Todas as correlações entre tempos foram positivas e significativas. Testes subsequentes sobre magnitudes de correlação para mães vs. pais não foram significativos. Finalmente, as correlações para os valores de segurança mãe/pai foram significativas em ambas as faixas etárias. Os resultados indicam que o acesso e uso do SBS pelas crianças pré-escolares prediz a qualidade percecionada de vinculação com os pais na idade escolar. De um modo geral, estes resultados sugerem que o acesso e uso do SBS em narrativas relevantes para a vinculação de crianças pequenas é uma medida válida.

Palavras-chave: Script de Base Segura; Pré-escolar; Idade escolar.

For over a decade, attachment researchers have been examining the hypothesis offered by Waters and Waters (2006) that a central element of internal working models (Bowlby, 1973, 1982) is a script about being and using a secure base. A substantial body of research has demonstrated the reliability and validity of secure base script use when narrating attachment-relevant events as a general index of attachment security for adults (e.g., Schoenmaker et al., 2015; Vaughn et al., 2006; Waters et al., 2013, 2017), adolescents (e.g., Dykas et al., 2006; Steele et al., 2014; Vaughn et al., 2016), middle-childhood (e.g., Psouni & Apetroaia, 2014; Waters et al., 2015), and more recently, early childhood (e.g., Posada & Waters, 2018; Vaughn, Posada, & Veríssimo, 2019; Vaughn, Posada, Veríssimo et al., 2019). It is interesting and somewhat ironic to note that while the bulk of studies concerning secure base script use in early childhood appeared considerably later than did studies of script use by adults, the phrase “secure base script” was coined by Waters et al. (1998) in their re-analysis of Attachment Story Completion Test (ASCT) data originally reported by Bretherton et al. (1990).

In part, the later entrance of early childhood can be attributed to the fact that for adults, adolescents, and school-age children, the method of choice for assessing secure base script (SBS) use has been word-prompt lists that present a story “outline” if the columns of words are read from left to right on the page. This method is inappropriate for children under about eight or nine years of age, namely for preschoolers since they have relatively limited vocabularies and (for the most part) cannot read effectively. However, the ASCT elicits narratives that elaborate on attachment relevant themes that are prompted initially by the researcher. For example, the researcher starts by setting the scene of the event by presenting the characters and the general topic (e.g., birthday party), then introduces a challenge (e.g., the child accidentally spills juice), then asks the child, “show me and tell me what happens next.” This story stems elicit stories with a range of thematic content, but for most children, it is possible for a rater to detect the elements of the SBS. Waters et al. (1998) described a method for sorting transcripts of the stories according to the quality and completeness of the SBS using a three-point scale, which was modified by Vaughn, Posada, Veríssimo et al. (2019) in order to assign SBS scores on a seven-point scale similar to the scale used for older children and adults. The validity of this modified scoring for SBS is suggested by its positive and significant associations with other well-validated attachment measures (e.g., the Strange Situation, Attachment Q-sort, and ASCT scales for security and coherence, see Vaughn, Posada, Veríssimo et al., 2019).

The central focus of this study is to examine the stability of children’s attachment representations using the SBS [ASCT protocol; Bretherton et al., 1990, using the Vaughn, Posada, Veríssimo et al. (2019) score criteria] at age 5 years and using the self-reported Kerns Security Scale (KSS; Kerns et al., 1996) at ages 8 and 9 years in a Portuguese sample. Kerns et al. (1996) reported a preliminary analysis demonstrating the convergent and discriminant validity of their scale and Brumariu et al. (2018) published a meta-analysis of 57 studies suggesting that the KSS was a valid indicator of attachment during middle childhood.

There are several earlier studies suggesting that mental representations of attachment can show moderate stability across this range of ages (e.g., Ammaniti et al., 2000; Dubois-Comtois et al., 2011; König et al., 2007) but none of these studies assessed the child’s use of the SBS at either the initial assessment or the follow-up. Data from this study will allow us to determine whether the SBS score behaves like other attachment measures for early childhood in this regard. The König et al. (2007) study included separate attachment scores for mothers and fathers. Because the KSS has separate items for mothers and fathers, we were also able to examine the cross-time prediction of both parents’ scores. Based on the results of a large meta-analysis reported by Pinquart et al. (2013) we expected to find moderate and significant cross-time associations between the earlier assessment and assessments at both 8 and 9 years. We hypothesized that significant associations would be found for both parents (at both age levels).

Method

Participants

Participants were 70 preschool children (36 girls). Children’s age ranged from 51 to 69 months (M=60.54; SD=5.44), at the first data point collection. The range of mothers’ ages was 29-51 years (M=37.44; SD=4.39) and fathers’ ages ranged from 34-62 years (M=38.63; SD=4.82). The children attended private daycare preschools in the suburbs of Lisbon, Portugal. All participating children were European and both parents lived in the household. All families were “middle class” by the standards of the local community. Data for the Kerns Security Scale was collected when the children were 8 and again one year later.

Measures

Attachment Story Completion Task (ASCT; Bretherton et al., 1990). The ASCT was used to assess children’s attachment representations. A series of story-stems were presented to the child to elicit narratives regarding attachment behaviors toward caregivers. Story stems were presented using dolls and household props, including a mother, father, child, sibling, kitchen equipment, living room, and bedroom furniture, etc. The child doll was the same sex as the child being assessed. The assessments took place in a quiet area outside the classroom. The interviewer invited the child to play the story completion game together, the interviewer began each story and then asked the child to freely continue and finish the story, illustrating behaviors, emotions, and interactions between characters. Same non-directive questions were used to facilitate the child’s narrative production such as “Does anything else happen in the story?” or “What are they doing?” The child was first presented with a story stem about a birthday party with a pleasant but non-attachment related theme, this was intended as a warm-up story and was not scored. The child was then presented with five primary attachment-related stories-stems (for this study only 3 - monster, separation, and reunion stories - were used and coded for SBS content).

All stories were rated by two independent trained coders who were blind to any other information about the child. Coders assigned a single score on a 7-point scale for secure base scriptedness based on a modification of Waters and colleagues (1998) coding system, and a global score was given to the three stories (Vaughn, Posada, Veríssimo et al., 2019). As mentioned, these summary scores of the three stories could range from 1 (odd/deviant stories that include failure of the attachment figure to protect the child, and/or failure to recognize the attachment relevance of the events being represented in the narrative) to 7 (complete stories that clearly suggested a secure base for exploration and a haven of safety when needed). Inter-observer reliability was assessed using intraclass correlations and ranged between .79 to .83 across observer pairs.

Kerns Security Scale (KSS; Kerns et al., 1996). The KSS questionnaire measures the degree to which the child sees the mother/father as a responsive and available figure. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale using Harter’s (1982) format “Some kids... but… Other kids”, with higher scores indicating greater security. Specifically, for each question, the child is presented with two different types of children, and then must decide which is more similar to them, e.g., “Some kids wish their dad would help them more with their problems, BUT other kids think their dad helps them enough”. After that, the child specifies whether they are “sort of like” or “really like” the child in the question. Each item is scored from 1 to 4, with a higher score representing greater security. The 15 items were aggregated in a single dimension that measured attachment security to mother/father. The value for the security Cronbach’s alphas was .89 for mother and .91 for father. The KSS was translated from the original English version into Portuguese following the procedures outlined by “Committee Approach” (Brislin, 1980), a methodology for cultural adaptation of psychological questionnaires. A first version was then applied to a small group of children, to ensure that all items were understandable and thus suitable.

Procedures

Participating children were interviewed with the Attachment Story Completion Task (Bretherton et al., 1990) at their child-care facility during the winter academic term (between January and March). For the primary school data collection, data was collected after the permission of the school authorities and after receiving the informed consent of families. All classroom assessments were performed during regular school hours, in class, during a single 45 minutes’ session. A research assistant was present to introduce the study and to answer questions. The instructions given emphasized the confidentiality of the data, the voluntary participation, and the importance of completing the questionnaire individually. All participating children give their informed assent.

Results

First, we present the descriptive results and associations between our variables. Like in previous studies (see Fernandes et al., 2019; van IJzendoorn & Bakermans-Kranenburg, 2010) sex differences were found in this sample [F(1,69)=3.07, p<0.05] for Secure Base Script (SBS) favoring girls (see Table 1).

Table 1 Descriptive values comparing boys and girls 

Note. SBS=Secure Base Script; SM=Secure Mother; SF=Security Father.

No sex differences were found for security to both mother and father at 8 [F(1,69)=0.04, p>.05, and F(1,69)=0.03, p>0.05 respectively] neither at 9 years old [F(1,69)=0.29, p>.05 and F(1,69)=0.04, p>.05, respectively].

The correlations between mother’s and father’s security scores were significant at both 8 (r=.73, p<.001) and 9 years (r=.65, p<.001). Correlations between mothers’ security scores at ages 8 and 9 were significant and this was also true for fathers (r=.44, p<.001 and r=.37, p<.01, respectively).

Secure base script and later attachment representations

Pearson correlations tested associations between attachment representations at age 5 and perceived attachment quality to each parent at ages 8 and 9, controlling for sex. Significant and positive associations between secure attachment representations at age 5 and perceived attachment security to mother and to father at age 8 and 9 were obtained. Specifically, significant associations were found between secure attachment representations at age 5 and perceived attachment security to mother at age 8 (r=.28, p<.05) and age 9 (r=.25, p<.05). Corresponding correlations with fathers were also significant at ages 8 and 9 (r=.42, p<.01; r=.38, p<.01, respectively). Finally, because security to mother and security to father were highly associated, we created a composite using both measures. A significant association was found between secure base script and secure representations at age 8 (r=.43, p<.01) and age 9 (r=.42, p<.01). The magnitudes of correlations for mothers vs. fathers vs. secure composite were not significant (tests on r to Z transformed scores).

Discussion

The primary purpose of this study was to assess the longitudinal stability of attachment representations from early to middle childhood, using a recently described method (Vaughn, Posada, Veríssimo et al., 2019) to evaluate narratives with the ASCT protocol. Consistent with results of previous studies and meta-analyses (e.g., Dubois-Comtois et al., 2011; Pinquart et al., 2013), we found that children with higher secure base script scores (SBS) at age 5 reported feeling more secure with both parents at ages 8 and 9. Cross-age security scores for mothers and fathers were high.

The substantial relation between father and mother security scores suggests that by middle childhood children are beginning to merge their most significant attachment relations into a single model, integrating models across attachment figures, rather than separate models for each major attachment figure (see also van IJzendoorn et al., 1992). However, it is possible that some children have discrepant models for mothers and fathers. It will be important for future research to examine children from families who have experienced major disruptions between early and middle childhood (e.g., by divorce or death of a parent), to determine whether these children show such discrepant characterizations of security with both parents.

Our findings are potentially important for attachment researchers because the use of the script score is now well established for early childhood samples (see Posada & Waters, 2018; Vaughn, Posada, & Veríssimo, 2019), as well as for adult, adolescent, and middle childhood samples. This means that researchers interested in documenting the growth of attachment representations over time now have a method for obtaining narrative data that can be scored for SBS content according to a common set of rules from early childhood to maturity. Of course, there is some difference in the protocols used to elicit these narratives, but the data now available indicates that access to and use of the SBS has the same meaning across a very broad range of ages.

We also identify limitations to the present study. Our sample is small, and participants are all from stable, middle to upper-middle class families attending private institutions. Replications of this study with larger samples and other cultures are necessary to explore the hypothesis that attachment representations are stable from early to middle childhood and start to show convergence across parents. We also recognize that this study would have been stronger if we had been able to use the middle-childhood word lists to obtain SBS information from our participants and eight and/or nine years of age. However, when these data were collected, the middle-childhood word lists and scoring rules had not been validated (Waters et al., 2015). This will be a task for the future. Future research should also expand the study of developmental trajectories and collect more information about the daily lives of participating families (e.g., conflict in the family, other parenting stressors, loss of an attachment figure in either nuclear or extended families, etc.), contrasting children with similar relations with both parents to those whose representations of parents are discrepant.

Overall, our results indicate that access to and use of SBS in young children’s attachment-relevant narratives is a valid and potentially productive measure. Narrative scriptedness not only shows expectable associations with concurrent measures of attachment and social adaptation (Fernandes et al., 2019; Posada & Waters, 2018; Posada et al., 2019; Vaughn, Posada, & Veríssimo, 2019), but also significantly predicts perceived attachment quality to both parents in middle childhood.

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the support of all the colleagues that contributed to data collection.

References

Ammaniti, M., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Speranza, A. M., & Tambelli, R. (2000). Internal working models of attachment during late childhood and early adolescence: An exploration of stability and change. Attachment & Human Development, 2(3) 328-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730010001587 [ Links ]

Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Separation (Vol. 2). Basic Books. [ Links ]

Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss. Attachment (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.,). Basic Books. [Original work published in 1969] [ Links ]

Bretherton, I., Ridgeway, D., & Cassidy, J. (1990). Assessing internal working models of the attachment relationship: An attachment story completion task for 3-year-olds. In M. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti, & E. M. Cummings (Eds.), Attachment in the pre-school years: Theory, research and intervention (pp. 273-308). The University of Chicago Press. [ Links ]

Brislin, R. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In H. C. Triandis & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology: Methodology (pp. 389-444). Allyn & Bacon. [ Links ]

Brumariu, L. E., Madigan, S., Giuseppone, K. R., Abtahi, M. M., & Kerns, K. A. (2018). The security scale as a measure of attachment: Meta-analytic evidence of validity. Attachment & Human Development , 20, 600-625. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2018.1433217 [ Links ]

Dubois-Comtois, K., Cyr, C., & Moss, E. (2011). Attachment behavior and mother-child conversations as predictors of attachment representations in middle childhood: A longitudinal study. Attachment & Human Development , 13, 335-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2011.584455 [ Links ]

Dykas, M. J., Woodhouse, S. S., Cassidy, J., & Waters, H. S. (2006). Narrative assessment of attachment representations: Links between secure base scripts and adolescent attachment. Attachment & Human Development , 8, 221-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730600856099 [ Links ]

Fernandes, M., Veríssimo, M., Santos, A. J., Fernandes, C., Antunes, M., & Vaughn, B. E. (2019). Preschoolers’ secure base script representations predict teachers’ ratings of social competence and externalizing behavior. Attachment & Human Development , 21, 265. https://doi.org/274.10.1080/14616734.2019.1575549 [ Links ]

Harter, S. (1982). Perceived competence scale for children. Child Development, 53, 87-97. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129640 [ Links ]

Kerns, K. A., Klepac, L., & Cole, A. (1996). Peer relationships and preadolescents’ perceptions of security in the child-mother relationship. Developmental Psychology, 32, 457-466. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.3.457 [ Links ]

König, L., Gloger-Tippelt, G., & Zweyer, K. (2007). Bindungsverhalten zu Mutter und Vater undBindungsrepräsentation bei Kindern im Alter von fünf und sieben Jahren. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 56, 445-462. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:3053 [ Links ]

Pinquart, M., Feußner, C., & Anhert, L. (2013). Meta-analytic evidence for stability of attachments from infancy to early adulthood. Attachment & Human Development , 15, 189-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2013.746257 [ Links ]

Posada, G., Vaughn, B., Veríssimo, M., Lu, T., Nichols, O., El-Sheikh, M., Trumbell, J., Anaya, L., & Kaloustian, G. (2019). Preschoolers’ secure base script representations predict teachers’ ratings of social competence in two independent samples. Attachment & Human Development , 21, 238-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2019.1575547 [ Links ]

Posada, G., & Waters, H. S. (Issue Eds.). (2018). Co-constructing a secure base partnership: Mother-child interactions, communication, and script representational processes. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development , 83(4), 1-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/mono.12388 [ Links ]

Psouni, E., & Apetroaia, A. (2014). Measuring scripted attachment-related knowledge in middle childhood: The Secure Base Script Test. Attachment & Human Development , 16, 22-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2013.804329 [ Links ]

Schoenmaker, C., Juffer, F., van IJzendoorn, M. H., Lintinga, M., van der Voorta, A., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2015). From maternal sensitivity in infancy to adult attachment representations: A longitudinal adoption study with secure base scripts. Attachment & Human Development , 17, 241-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2015.1037315 [ Links ]

Steele, R. D., Waters, T. E. A., Bost, K. K., Vaughn, B. E., Truitt, W., Waters, H. S., Booth-LaForce, C., & Roisman, G. I. (2014). Caregiving antecedents of secure base script knowledge: A comparative analysis of young adult attachment representations. Developmental Psychology , 50, 2526-2538. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037992 [ Links ]

van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2010). Invariance of adult attachment across gender, age, culture, and socioeconomic status?. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(2), 200-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509360908 [ Links ]

van IJzendoorn, M. H., Sagi, A., & Lambermon, M. W. E. (1992). The multiple caretaker paradox: Data from Holland and Israel. New Directions in Child Development , 37, 5-24. [ Links ]

Vaughn, B. E., Posada, G., & Veríssimo, M. (2019). Scripted knowledge about attachment and social competence in preschoolers: Overview. Attachment & Human Development , 21, 219-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2019.1575545 [ Links ]

Vaughn, B. E., Posada, G., Veríssimo, M., Lu, T., & Nichols, O. I. (2019). Assessing and quantifying the secure base script from narratives produced by preschool age children: Justification and validation tests. Attachment & Human Development , 21, 225-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2019.1575546 [ Links ]

Vaughn, B. E., Veríssimo, M., Coppola, G., Bost, K. K., Shin, N., McBride, B., Krzysik, L., & Korth, B. (2006). Maternal attachment script representations: Longitudinal stability and associations with stylistic features of maternal narratives. Attachment & Human Development , 8, 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730600856024 [ Links ]

Vaughn, B. E., Waters, T. E. A., Steele, R. D., Roisman, G. I., Bost, K. K., Truitt, W., Waters, H. S., & Booth-LaForce, C. (2016). Multiple domains of parental secure base support during childhood and adolescence contribute to adolescents’ representations of attachment as a Secure Base Script. Attachment & Human Development , 18, 317-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2016.1162180 [ Links ]

Waters, T. E. A., Bosmans, G., Vandevivere, E., Dujardin, A., & Waters, H. S. (2015). Secure base representations in middle childhood across two Western cultures: Associations with parental attachment representations and maternal reports of behavior problems. Developmental Psychology , 51, 1013-1025. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039375 [ Links ]

Waters, T. E. A., Brockmeyer, S. L., & Crowell, J. A. (2013). AAI coherence predicts caregiving and care seeking behavior: Secure base script knowledge helps explain why. Attachment & Human Development , 15(3), 316-331. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2013.782657 [ Links ]

Waters, H. S., Rodrigues, L. M., & Ridgeway, D. (1998). Cognitive underpinnings of narrative attachment assessment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 211-234. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1998.2473 [ Links ]

Waters, T. E. A., Ruiz, S. K., & Roisman, G. I. (2017). Origins of secure base script knowledge and the developmental construction of attachment representations. Child Development , 88, 198-209. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12571 [ Links ]

Waters, H. S., & Waters, E. (2006). The attachment working models concept: Among other things, we build script-like representations of secure base experiences. Attachment & Human Development, 8(3), 185-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730600856016 [ Links ]

2This study was carried in accordance with the commendations of Comité de Ética do Centro de Investigação do ISPA. All families provided written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Data collection and preparation of this article was supported in part by grants from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (UIDB/04810/2020).

Received: February 17, 2022; Accepted: May 19, 2023

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to: Manuela Veríssimo, ISPA - Instituto Universitário, William James Center for Research, Rua Jardim do Tabaco, 34, 1149-041 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: mveriss@ispa.pt

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License