SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.26 número1Monitoreo en Línea de la Corrosión en Tuberías de Flujo Bifásico en el Campo Geotérmico MiravallesModelación de la corrosión atmosférica del cobre en la provincia de Las Palmas. Estudios mediante técnicas clásicas y electroquímicas índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Portugaliae Electrochimica Acta

versión impresa ISSN 0872-1904

Port. Electrochim. Acta v.26 n.1 Coimbra  2008

 

Biosensors for the Polyphenolic Content of Wine Determination

 

 

A.R.S. Júnior, M.J.F. Rebelo*

 

CCMM -Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, C 8, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal

 

Received 29th June 2007; accepted 4th January 2008

 

 

Abstract

Laccase of different lots was used in the construction of biosensors for the determination of polyphenolic content of wine. Laccase was immobilized on modified polyethersulfone membranes and applied to a Universal Sensor electrode base system. Parameters of the biosensors thus prepared were studied with respect to caffeic acid as the model substrate. Sensitivity of 0.102 mA × M-1, RSD of 1.9%, linear range of 5 to 35 × 10-6 M, limit of detection of 8.8 × 10-7M, were determined. 

Different values of the applied potential near 0 V were tested in order to choose that one which gives the best performance of the present biosensors.  Citrate and tartarate buffer solutions at pH 3.5 were used. Polyphenolic content of different red wines was determined at +100 mV vs. Ag/AgCl.

Keywords: polyphenolic, wine, biosensor, laccase, caffeic acid.

 

 

Texto disponível em PDF

Full text only in PDF format

 

 

References

 

1. E.N. Frankel, J. Kanner, J.B. German, E. Parks, J.E. Kinsella, Lancet  341 (1993) 454-457.        [ Links ]

2. E.N. Frankel, A.L. Waterhouse, P.L. Teissedre, J. Agric. FoodChem.43 (1995)890-894.

3. L. Campanella, A. Bonanni, E. Finotti, M. Tomassetti, Bios. Bioelectron. 19(7) (2004) 641-651.

4. M. Gamella, S. Campuzano, A.J. Reviejo, J.M. Pingarrón, J. Agric. Food Chem. 54 (2006) 7960-7967.

5. S.A.S.S. Gomes, J.M.F. Nogueira, M.J.F. Rebelo,Bios. Bioelectr. 20(6) (2004) 1211-1216.

6. V. Carralero Sanz, M.L. Mena, A. González-Cortés, P. Yáñez-Sedeño, J.M. Pingarrón, Anal. Chim. Acta 528 (2005) 1–8.

7. A. Jarosz-Wilkołazka, T. Ruzgas, L. Gorton, Enzyme and Microbial Technology 35 (2004) 238–241.

8. A.I. Yaropolov, A.N. Kharubiu, J. Emnéus, G. Marko-Varga, L. Gorton, Anal. Chim. Acta 308 (1995) 137-144.

9.L. Quintanar, A.E. Palmer, R. Hassett, S. Severance, D.J. Kosman, E.I. Solomon, J.Am. Chem. Soc. 123 (2001)5507-5517.

10. K. Piontek, M. Antorini, T. Choinowski, J. Biol. Chem.277 (40) (2002) 37663–37669.

11. P.P.V. Climent, M.L.M. Serralheiro, M.J.F. Rebelo, Pure Appl. Chem. 73(12) (2001)1993-1999.

12. S. Imabayashi, Y.-T. Kong, M. Watanabe, Electroanalysis 13(5) (2001)  408-412.

13. A. Lupu, D. Compagnone, G. Palleschi, Anal. Chim. Acta 513 (2004) 67–72.

14. F. Xu, Biochemistry35(1996) 7608-7614.

 

 

* Corresponding author. E-mail address: mjrebelo@fc.ul.pt

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons