SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.27 número4Inhibitive and Adsorption Properties of Ethanol Extract of Seeds and Leaves of Azadirachta Indica on the Corrosion of Mild Steel in H2SO4Development of Membrane Electrodes for the Specific Determination of Moexipril Hydrochloride in Dosage Forms and Biological Fluids índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Portugaliae Electrochimica Acta

versão impressa ISSN 0872-1904

Port. Electrochim. Acta v.27 n.4 Coimbra  2009

 

Polyphenolic Biosensors. Application in Red Wines

C. I. S. Fernandes, M. J. F. Rebelo*

CCMM -Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, C 8, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal

 

Received 6 January 2009; accepted 5 May 2009

 

Abstract

New developments in the utilization of a laccase based polyphenolic biosensor were done in order to optimize its application in wines. Laccase was immobilized on polyether sulphone membranes and applied on an Universal Sensors (US) electrode base system containing a platinum working electrode and silver, silver chloride electrode.

Caffeic acid was dissolved either in tartarate standard buffer solution at pH 3.5 or in 12% ethanol tartarate standard buffer solution at pH 3.5. The referred values of pH and ethanol percentage are the average values of table wines.

Wines from different regions of Portugal, namely Grão Vasco (Dão), A P_Cabernet (Setúbal), C P_Castelo de Syrah (Setúbal), Ol (Alentejo), A P (Alentejo) and Quinta dos Poços (Douro), were studied. Grão Vasco was taken as a reference. It was observed that Grão Vasco (Dão) wine presented a caffeic acid equivalent concentration superior to the other studied wines, followed by a Douro wine: Quinta dos Poços (values of 17.00 and 12.18 mg/L, respectively, were found). It was also possible to verify that the two latter referred wines did not inhibit the biosensor, which could be reused after having been dipped in those wines. However, the wines from Setúbal and Alentejo, studied in this work, have a caffeic acid equivalent concentration lower than the other two mentioned before and seemed to inhibit the system, since the biosensor response decreased after being used in them. It was, thus, not possible to do several assays with the same membrane, when those wines were used. Reproducibilities were better for caffeic acid standard solutions, Grão Vasco and Quinta dos Poços wines, than for the other wines. In fact RSDs (Relative standard deviations) of the order of 1.1, 1.4 and 5.0% were obtained for caffeic acid standard solution, Grão Vasco and Quinta dos Poços wines,whereas 20% was found in the Setúbal and Alentejo studied wines. Two particular wines, A P_Cabernet and A P, were studied in more detail. Cyclic voltammograms and biosensor responses of these two wines indicate that A P has more caffeic acid equivalents than the A P_Cabernet.

Keywords : biosensor, wine, caffeic acid, voltammetry

 

Full text only in PDF format

Texto disponível em PDF

 

References

1. L.D. Mello, L.T. Kubota, Talanta 72 (2007) 335-348.

2. S.A.S.S. Gomes and M.J.F. Rebelo, A New Laccase Biosensor for Polyphenols Determination, Sensors 3 (2003) 166-175.        [ Links ]

3. R.S. Júnior and M.J.F. Rebelo, Biosensors for the polyphenolic content of wine determination, Port. Electrochim. Acta 26(1) (2007) 117-124.        [ Links ]

4. A.I. Yaropolov, A.N. Kharubiu, J. Emnéus, G. Marko-Varga, L. Gorton, Anal. Chim. Acta 308 (1995) 137-144).

5. A. Jarosz-Wilkoazka, T. Ruzgas, L. Gorton, Enzyme and Microbial Technology 35 (2004) 238–241.

6. M. Gamella, S. Campuzano, A.J. Reviejo, J.M. Pingarrón, J. Agric. Food Chem. 54 (2006) 7960-7967.

7. V. Carralero Sanz, M.L. Mena, A. González-Cortés, P. Yáñez-Sedeño, J.M.Pingarrón. Anal. Chim. Acta 528 (2005) 1–8,

8. L. Campanella, A. Bonanni, E. Finotti, M. Tomassetti, Bios. Bioelectron. 19(7) (2004) 641-651.

9. C. Giacomelli, K. Ckless, D. Galato, F.S. Miranda and A. Spinelli, J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 13(3) (2002) 332-338.

10. D. De Beer, E. Joubert, W.C.A. Gelderblom and M. Manley, J. Agric. Food Chem. 51 (2003) 902–909.

 

*Corresponding author.: E-mail address: mjrebelo@fc.ul.pt

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons