SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.39 número3Removal of Ni(II), Zn(II) and Co(II) from Aqueous Solutions by Using Different Types of Activated Carbon índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Portugaliae Electrochimica Acta

versão impressa ISSN 0872-1904

Port. Electrochim. Acta vol.39 no.3 Coimbra jun. 2021  Epub 30-Jun-2021

https://doi.org/10.4152/pea.2021390301 

Research Article

Potential of Composite Incorporation on the Mechanical Behavior of Multilayer Coatings

O.O. Joseph1 

O. S. I. Fayomi1  2 

A. O. Inegbenebo1 

A. A. Ayoola3 

1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Covenant University, P.M.B. 1023, Canaanland, Ota, Nigeria

2 Department of Chemical, Metallurgical & Materials Engineering, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa

3 Department of Chemical Engineering, Covenant University, P.M.B. 1023, Canaanland, Ota, Nigeria


Abstract

In this paper, the performance of a composite particle for the deposition of ZnO/Cr2O3 on a zinc electrolyte was examined. Its susceptibility to corrosion in 3.5% NaCl, using linear polarization, was investigated. The developed crystal was characterized by using scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS). The strengthening properties of the coated samples, i.e. the mechanical response, were studied using a high sensitive diamond microhardness indenter and a MTR-300 rigid wear tester. From the results, the effect of the composite coatings interestingly influenced the performance regarding microhardness, durability, corrosion mitigation and wear damage. In general, the micro-hardness value for the Zn-ZnO material was 125.0 HVN, while it was 130.5 HVN for Zn-8ZnO-16Cr2O3 composite coating. For Zn-8ZnO-20Cr2O3, a better hardness performance was noted with 138.0 HVN. From the wear study, Zn-8ZnO shows 0.018 g/min dissociation against the counter body with the best wear performance obtained at 0.005 g/min. The corrosion properties of the developed composite coating also tend towards a more positive region, with a corrosion rate of 0.850 mm/yr. This shows that the role of composite particulates maximally contributes to improve the strengthening characteristics of the developed coating.

Keywords: materials processing; microstructure; manufacturing; co-deposition; wear

Introduction

Components failure due to mechanical and chemical degradation has been a major consideration over the years. These enormous challenges range from industrial to domestic applications (1,2). No doubt, mild steel has been a significant metal, and its industrial usage has been widespread, owing to its physical and mechanical resilience. Efforts by researchers on environmental control and selection of appropriate materials have been made (3,4).

The failure of these materials mainly occurs in areas such as construction, aerospace, automobile, solar cells, ship building, and energy conservation (5). With increasing ways to oppose this catastrophe, promising methods of mitigation have been employed, ranging from vapor deposition to laser coating, cold spray coating, and so on (6,7). Surface enhancement of engineering materials is necessary for preventing service failures and corrosion attack in industry (8).

Electrodeposition technique has proven to give superior advantages, due to its cost effectiveness, processing and special characteristics. Zinc coatings add corrosion resistance to steel in several ways. As a barrier layer, a continuous zinc coating separates steel from the corrosive environment. Zinc properties can be seen in a galvanic series, where its potential is less noble than steel, in most environments, at ambient temperatures. Zinc, like all metals, corrodes when exposed to the atmosphere (9,10). Infringement of particulates into a bath rich in such a zinc-composite has been seen as a promising way of getting better performance, in terms of corrosion protection, wear resistance and other metallurgical properties.

Protection of metallic materials and alloys against corrosion is one major way of reducing the maintenance costs and hazardous environmental impacts. Previous studies on chemical bath compositions and fluxes to improve processes, corrosion resistance and mechanical behavior, revealed that Zn and Zn-based coating composites are good diffusion driving substances (10).

Hence, this paper focuses on the effects of Cr2O3 particulates on the morphology of the composite coatings. The hardness and corrosion resistance of the Zn-ZnO-Cr2O3 coatings were also evaluated.

Experimental procedure

Preparation of substrate

Flat steel specimens of dimensions 30 mm x 20 mm x 1 mm were used, and the substrate and zinc sheets of 40 mm x 30 mm x 2 mm were prepared as anodes. The initial surface preparation was progressively performed using finer grades of emery paper, as described in our earlier publications (2). The samples were properly cleaned with sodium carbonate, pickled and activated with 5% HCl at ambient temperature, for 10 sec, followed by instant rinsing in deionized water. The specimens were obtained from Metal Sample site, Nigeria. The chemical composition of the sectioned samples analyzed on a spectrometer was: C 0.15%, Mn 0.45%, Si 0.18%, P 0.01%, S 0.031%, Al 0.005%, Ni 0.008%, and Fe balance.

Formation of a deposited coating

The steel substrates were prepared by dipping them into a 10% HCl solution for 10 sec, followed by rinsing in distilled water. Analytical grade chemicals and distilled water were used to prepare the plating solution at room temperature. The formulations were stirred for one day, while heated at 40 ºC, to allow for the dissolution of any agglomerates in the bath solution. The bath produced from the formulation, shown in Table 1, was concurrently stirred and heated for several hours before plating, at a temperature of 40 ºC.

Preparation of the coatings

The prepared Zn-ZnO-Cr2O3 composite bath was heated for 2 hrs, and intermittently stirred, to obtain a clear solution, before it was prepared for electrolytic deposition on the steel. The prepared cathode and anodes were connected to the direct current (D.C.) power supply through a rectifier, as described by (3 and 4). Deposition was carried out at varying applied current densities, around 1.0 A/cm2, for 15 min. The distance between the anode and the cathode and the immersion depth was kept constant. Thereafter, the samples were rinsed in water, and then dried. The formulated design plan for the coating is described in Table 1.

Table 1 Formulated designed bath composition of Zn-ZnO-Cr2O3. 

Sample order Matrix sample Time of deposition (min) Current density (A/cm2)
1 Zn-8ZnO 15 1.0
2 Zn-8ZnO-16Cr2O3 15 1.0
3 Zn-8ZnO-20Cr2O3 15 1.0

Structural characterization of the coatings

The structural studies and elemental analysis of the fabricated alloy samples were verified using a high-tech TESCAN scanning electron microscope with an attached energy dispersive spectrometer (SEM/EDS). 1000 magnification was considered when the samples were subjected to microscopic view.

Results and discussion

Surface morphology

Fig. 1a, 1b and 1c show the SEM images of the EDS patterns of Zn-8ZnO, Zn-8ZnO-16Cr2O3 and Zn-8ZnO-20Cr2O3 surfaces’ composite coatings. The EDS pattern of the composite coating confirms the crystalline phase of the film. The nano particulates were found to be agglomerated when analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (Fig. 1a) studies. This is due to the high surface energy of the particles. In general, it can be seen that the coating on the mild steel plate resulted into a good solid crystal.

The nature of the surface morphology and orientation in Fig. 1b and 1c revealed a sequential homogeneous appearance. There are no pores and cracks at the interface, which shows that the interface bonding is firm. In addition, Fig. 1c shows a more compact and better grains distribution. Moreover, the deposition strength may result from possible process parameters. The elemental quantification was done with massive revelation of essential representative elements at the interface (Fig. 2).

Figure 1 SEM images of a) Zn-8ZnO, b) Zn-8ZnO-16Cr2O3, and c) Zn-8ZnO-20Cr2O3 coatings. 

Figure 2 Energy dispersive spectral: a) Zn-8ZnO and b) Zn-8ZnO-20Cr2O3 hybrids. 

Wear and microhardness property

Fig. 3 shows the wear loss of a Zn-ZnO coating and Zn-ZnO-Cr2O3 composite coatings. It is obvious that the wear resistance of the composite coatings with Cr2O3 is higher than that of the Zn -ZnO coating. As it can be seen, Zn-8ZnO-16Cr2O3 and Zn-8ZnO-20Cr2O3 displayed significant optimum wear resistance because of Cr2O3 presence. The improved wear resistance can be attributed to the strengthening effect. The hardness process parameter and microstructural behavior are the parameters which affected the wear resistance, as indicated by (5,9). The wear resistance increased with the increasing hardness of the matrix.

Figure 3 Variation of wear rate with time. 

Figure 4 Variation of hardness property with the coating matrix. 

Fig. 4 shows the microhardness trend for the Zn-ZnO coating and Zn-ZnO-Cr2O3 composite samples. Interestingly, a good increase in the micro hardness value was observed in Zn-ZnO-Cr2O3. As expected, this is not far fetch from the result obtained from wear characteristics. The micro hardness value for the Zn-ZnO material was 125 HVN; the value for Zn-8ZnO-16Cr2O3 composite coating was 130.5 HVN, while Zn-8ZnO-16Cr2O3 had a value of 138 HVN. In summary, one can vividly see the massive role of Cr2O3 as a reinforcement additive.

Polarization measurements

Fig. 5 represents the deterioration and mitigation characteristics of the deposited coatings in 3.65% NaCl, using linear polarization techniques. Corrosion rate (CR) values show that the additive concentration separates the mitigation characteristics of the coatings. In other words, Cr2O3 addition enhances corrosion resistant properties. According to (3), the presence of a nano particulate infringement most often influences passive films characteristics, and reduces corrosion penetration into the coating interfaces (10,12).

Figure 5 Potentiodynamic polarization curves of Zn-ZnO-Cr2O3 composite coating on mild steel in a 3.65%NaCl solution. 

Fig. 6 showed SEM analysis with EDS images for both Zn-ZnO and Zn-ZnO-20Cr2O3 composite coatings, after corrosion. The presence of the pits (Fig. 6a) and cracks (Fig. 6b) reveals the corrosion effects. That is, the fairly compacted morphology, noticed in Figs. 1a and 1c (before corrosion), has been negatively altered after corrosion. However, the presence of key elements could still be confirmed.

Figure 6 SEM images with EDS: a) Zn-8ZnO and b) Zn-8ZnO-20Cr2O3 coatings after corrosion. 

Conclusion

From the research work, it can be concluded that: Zn-ZnO and Zn-ZnO-Cr2O3 coatings were successfully prepared by co-deposition route onto mild steel; good structural modification was obtained with the infringement of nano-sized Cr2O3 particles in to the zinc rich lattices, and the coatings produced good stability, improved microhardness tendency and good resistance to mechanical deformation.

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work financially supported by the National Research Foundation. The authors acknowledge the support from Surface Engineering Research Centre, (SERC) Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa.

References

1. Shukla SK, Singh AK, Quraishi MA. Triazines: Efficient corrosion inhibitors for mild steel in hydrochloric acid solution. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2012;7:3371-3389. [ Links ]

2. Popoola API, Fayomi OSI, Popoola OM. Electrochemical and mechanical properties of mild steel electro-plated with Zn-Al. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2012;7:4898-4917. [ Links ]

3. Rahman MJ, Sen SR, Moniruzzaman M, et al. Morphology and properties of electrodeposited Zn-Ni alloy coatings on mild steel. J Mech Eng. 2009;40:9-14. [ Links ]

4. Fayomi OSI, Tau VR, Popoola API, et al. Influence of plating parameter and surface morphology on mild steel. J Mater Environ Sci. 2011;3:271-280. [ Links ]

5. Praveen BM, Venkatesha TN, Arthoba Naik Y, et al. Corrosion studies of carbon nanotubes-Zn composite coating. Surf and Coat Techn. 2007; 201:5842. [ Links ]

6. Melchers RE, Chernov BB. Corrosion loss of mild steel in high temperature hard freshwater. Corr Sci. 2010;52:449-454. [ Links ]

7. Acharya S, Upadhyay SN. The inhibition of corrosion of mild steel by some fluoroquinolones in sodium chloride solution. Trans Indian Inst Metals. 2004;57:297-306. [ Links ]

8. Chin RJ, Nobe K. Electrodissolution Kinetics of iron in chloride solutions: III. Acidic solutions. J Electrochem Soc.1972;119:1457-1461. [ Links ]

9. Noor EA, Al-Moubaraki AH. Corrosion behavior of mild steel in hydrochloric acid solutions. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2008;3:806-818. [ Links ]

10. Popoola API, Fayomi OS. ZnO as corrosion inhibitor for dissolution of zinc electrodeposited mild steel in varying HCl concentration. Int J Phys Sci. 2011;6:2447-2454. [ Links ]

11. Fayomi OSI, Popoola API, Oloruntoba T, et al. Inhibitive characteristics of cetylpyridinium chloride and potassium chromate addition on type A513 mild steel in acid/chloride media. Cogent Eng. 2017;4:1-9. [ Links ]

12. Fayomi OSI, Popoola API, Ige OO, et al. Study of particle incorporation and performance characteristic of aluminium silicate-zirconia embedded on zinc rich coatings for corrosion and wear performance. Asian J Chem. 2017;29:2575-2581. [ Links ]

Received: December 13, 2016; Accepted: October 30, 2020

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License