SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.39 número6Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy Reveals Anomalous Transfer of Heavy Metal across a Water/1,2-DCE InterfaceCorrosion Inhibition of Mild Steel Using Parinari polyandra Leave Extracts in Diluted Hydrochloric Acids índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Portugaliae Electrochimica Acta

versão impressa ISSN 0872-1904

Port. Electrochim. Acta vol.39 no.6 Coimbra dez. 2021  Epub 31-Dez-2021

https://doi.org/10.4152/pea.2021390604 

Research Article

Iron Determination in Deep Groundwater Wells by Anodic Stripping Voltammetry at an Iodine-Coated Platinum Electrode

Mohammad Amayreh1 

Mohammed K. Hourani2 

Rima Alomari3 

Wafa Hourani4 

1Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Al-Balqa Applied University, P.O. Box 19117, Al-Salt, Jordan

2Department of Chemistry, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan

3Faculty of Pharmacy, Al-Ahliyyah Amman University, Amman, Jordan

4Faculty of Pharmacy, Philadelphia University, Amman, Jordan


Abstract

The presented work was pivoted on iron (II) determination in deep groundwater wells samples by using anodic stripping technique at an iodine-coated platinum electrode. The developed method was based on a preconcentration step for five min., followed by the potential scanning of an iodine-coated platinum electrode between the limit of hydrogen evolution (-0.25 V) and the beginning of iodine desorption from the electrode surface (+0.85 V). The anodic peak of the deposited iron to iron (II) oxidation was clearly centered at ca. 0.74 V. The anodic peak current showed an excellent linear response (R2 = 0.996), within an iron (II) concentration range from 1 to 100 ppm. The obtained limit of detection (LOD) was 0.26 ppm and the limit of quantification (LOQ) was 0.85 ppm. Within the iodine-coated platinum electrode potential window the possible interferences by several ions were evaluated. The developed method was examined by iron (II) concentration determination in deep groundwater wells. The statistical comparisons between the two methods showed the absence of any significant difference between the obtained Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES) values and our voltammetric method results, at P = 0.05.

Keywords: iron (II) determination; deep groundwater; stripping voltammetry and iodine-coated platinum electrode

Introduction

The iron concentration determination in water resources is of great interest. Iron is an essential element for biological processes in living organisms. It is one of the common elements in drinking water resources. Usually, the iron (II) concentration in anaerobic groundwater resources is 0.5-10 ppm [1]. In most countries, the considered iron concentration in drinking water is less than 0.3 ppm [1]. Iron exists in water mainly as iron (II) or iron (III) state. Iron (II) is a water-soluble species and rapidly converts to iron (III) in an oxygen-rich environment [3]. Various analytical methods have been developed for iron determination in an aqueous medium, such as spectrophotometry [3, 4], inductive coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) [5, 6], atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) [7, 8], voltammetry [9-14] and chromatography [15, 16]. Most of these methods are expensive and require complex analytical instruments, while the recent trend in chemical analysis is developing green alternative analytical methods with simple methodologies and instrumentations. Electrochemical analysis methods tune extensively with these principles.

Solid electrodes have been widely applied in electrochemical analysis processes, because of their ease of reproduction, their negligible toxicity [17], and the significant ability to modify their surface [18].

Iodine-coated polycrystalline platinum electrode demonstrated to be a model for the highly reactive platinum electrode surface modification. The adsorbed iodine converts the highly reactive platinum electrode surface into a passive surface [19]. Subsequently, the adsorbed iodine monolayer stays stable, even if the electrode is taken out of the solution or rinsed extensively with an iodine-free aqueous solution [20]. Carbon monoxide generation causes the iodine adatoms elimination from the iodine-coated platinum electrode surface [21]. Also, the scanning beyond the potential window (-0.2 - 0.8 V) in both directions desorbs iodine from the electrode surface [22, 23].

The developed iodine-coated platinum electrode, with and without modification, was used for the quantitative determination of some organic and inorganic species in aqueous solutions [19, 24-27] and in biological tissue [28].

The easiness of modified iodine-coated platinum electrode preparation is combined with electrochemical methods benefits such as simplicity, reduction in chemical reagents needs and rapidity. The aim of this study was utilizing the sensitivity and selectivity of anodic stripping voltammetry to develop an analytical method for iron determination in groundwater resources.

Experimental

Instruments, cell and materials

A PAR potentiostat (model 362, EG & G) interfaced with a computer via GPIB interface (IEEE), for potential control and data acquisition, was used. Locally modified Labview® (IEEE) software was used for data acquisition. A home-made H-shape electrochemical cell with multiple inlet/outlet for gas purging and blanketing was used. All solutions were degassed before every experiment, and the measurements were carried out under a nitrogen atmosphere. Also, the solution delivery to and out of the cell was used for voltammetric applications. This electrochemical cell was composed mainly of two asymmetrical compartments separated by a sintered glass frit to avoid the diffusion of undesirable species towards the working electrode compartment. The working electrode was housed in one compartment, while the reference and the auxiliary electrodes were housed in the other compartment. The working electrode was a 0.5 mm polycrystalline platinum wire purchased from Aldrich (99.99% minimum purity certified reagent). The immersed end of the platinum electrode was curved like a U-shape to give a mark under the solution surface, for achieving a consistent surface area. The reference electrode was a home-made silver/silver chloride in a 1.0 M KCl solution. The auxiliary electrode was a spiral-shaped platinum wire (Aldrich, certified 99.99% minimum purity) inserted in a thin glass tube.

All used reagents were of analytical grade and used as-received from the suppliers, without further purification. Sulfuric acid (95-97%) was purchased from Merck, and potassium iodide (KI) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Iron (II) sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO4.7H2O) was purchased from AppliChem. Hydroxylammonium chloride (NH2OH.HCl) was an AnalaR Normapur® ACS reagent (BDH). The nitrogen gas was of grade 5.0, with 99.999% minimum purity, and it was supplied from The Jordan Gases Company (Amman, Jordan).

Procedures

Every experiment was started by reproducing the platinum electrode cyclic voltammogram. The cyclic voltammogram reproduction of a polycrystalline platinum electrode with the clear hydrogen-oxygen adsorption/desorption features constitutes a real evidence for the electrochemical system cleanliness, including the solution, electrodes and the purging gas.

The platinum electrode coating process was preceded by immersing a part of it in the supporting electrolyte (0.5 M H2SO4 +10-2 M KI) for five min., at a deposition potential of 0.2 V (double layer region), to make iodine ion adsorb at the platinum electrode surface as a neutral iodine atom. The electrode was extensively in situ rinsed with an iodine-free 0.5 M H2SO4 solution. The cyclic voltammogram for the iodine-coated platinum electrode was recorded between its potential window limits, -0.25 V and 0.85 V. The absence of both hydrogen adsorption-desorption and oxide formation/removal voltammetric features, except for the charging current, is attributed to the complete coating of the platinum electrode surface with iodine.

The water samples were supplied from the water laboratories of the Jordanian ministry of water and irrigation. These samples were collected from three different deep pioneer wells in the south of Jordan: Qatraneh, Swaqah and Qastal. The depth of the pioneer wells is between 1000 to 1100 meters. The collected water samples were directly treated with concentrated nitric acid to keep iron ions in the ferrous state. The samples were kept in tightly closed clean plastic bottles until the time of analysis. The collected samples were analyzed for their iron (II) content, in triplicate, using an ICP-OES instrument.

Anodic stripping voltammetric measurements for iron (II) determination were carried out at the deposition potential of -0.15 V (vs. Ag/AgCl/[Cl-] = 1.0 M), for 240 sec. After 60 sec. of solution equilibration, the electrode was scanned between -0.15 V and 0.85 V, at a scan rate of 50 mv/sec.

Once the water samples were started to be analyzed, few crystals of hydroxylamine were added to prevent any iron (II) to iron (III) ions oxidation. Each of the samples was analyzed three times.

Results and discussion

Method results and discussion

A representative reproducible cyclic voltammogram for the clean platinum electrode surface, along with a typical anodic stripping voltammogram of the iodine-coated platinum electrode, are shown in Fig. 1. The modified iodine-coated platinum electrode linear sweep voltammogram demonstrates a complete absence of the hydrogen and oxygen adsorption/desorption features of the platinum electrode surface cyclic voltammogram. The iodine-coated platinum electrode surface is stable at a potential range from -0.25 V to +0.85V.

Figure 1 (A) Cyclic voltammogram of the polycrystalline platinum electrode. (B) Anodic stripping voltammogram of the iodine-coated platinum electrode. Both i-E scans were recorded in iodine-free 0.5 M H2SO4 . Scan rate = 50 mV/s. 

Fig. 2 shows a set of anodic stripping voltammograms for 0.5 M H2SO4 solutions, with a series of iron (II) standard solutions concentrations ranging from 2 to 10 ppm. Under the optimized conditions, the iron oxidation peak current centered ca. 0.72 V.

Figure 2 Anodic stripping voltammograms of an iodine-coated electrode recorded in a 0.5 M H2SO4 solution containing (−−) 2 ppm Fe (II), (― ―) 4 ppm Fe (II), (---) 6 ppm Fe (II) (….) 8 ppm Fe (II) and ()10 ppm Fe (II). Scan rate = 50 mv/sec. 

The calibration curve was constructed by plotting the anodic peak currents extracted from the linear seep voltammograms against the Fe (II) concentration in the solution. The linearity and the linear range were obtained by triplicate analysis of the extended concentration levels, from 1 to 100 ppm, as shown in Fig. 3.

The calibration curve shows excellent linearity with a linear regression value of R2 = 0.996 and the calibration equation (Eq.1) is:

i (μA) =0.511CFe(II)+0.057 (1)

where i is the value of anodic peak current attributed to Fe to Fe (II) oxidation, after the preconcentration period, and C is the Fe (II) standard solutions concentration. The calibration curve extension of indicates no deviation from the linearity, as shown in Fig. 3.

Figure 3 Calibration curve showing the correlation between iron (II) concentration and the anodic peak current obtained from iron (II) voltammogram in 0.5 M H2SO4, at an iodine coated electrode. Scan rate = 50 mv/s. 

The precision of the developed method was evaluated by analyzing the aliquot of a 6 ppm standard solution for ten times. The standard deviation and variation coefficient were 4.23% and 1.28%, respectively.

The lowest limit of detection (LOD) estimation based on S/N = 3 and the limit of detection (LOQ) based on S/N = 10, for the developed analytical method, were 0.26 ppm and 0.85 ppm, respectively.

Potential interferences

Heavy metals, such as Zinc, chromium, cadmium, manganese, copper, cobalt, nickel, molybdenum, silver, mercury, arsenic, bismuth, antimony and lead are common in ground water [29].

The proposed anodic stripping analysis method using an iodine-coated platinum electrode showed a voltammetric response towards copper, silver, bismuth, mercury and antimony, while no response was recorded towards the remaining metal ions (Fig. 4).

Mercury is undetected in ground water, while antimony is found in groundwater in very low concentrations [30]. The silver and bismuth oxidation peaks (Fig. 4) do not interfere with the iron oxidation peak.

Figure 4 Current responses recorded after the injection of 4 ppm of Cu, Ag, Hg, Bi and Sb ions in an experiment performed with an iodine-coated platinum electrode in a 0.5 M H2SO4 supporting electrolyte. Scan rate = 50 mv/sec. 

Analysis of ground water samples

The water samples were analyzed for their iron (II) content using the standard addition method. Table 1 displays the results obtained for iron (II) determination in the tested three water samples analyzed using the anodic stripping method at an iodine-coated electrode.

Table 1 Analysis of deep groundwater samples for iron (II) by the developed anodic striping method at an iodine-coated platinum electrode. 

Sample no. Water sample Nominal conc (in ppm) of water sample as analyzed by ICP-OES instrument* Average determined conc (in ppm) Standard deviation 95% confidence limits 95% confidence interval Relative error Coef of variat (n=3)
1 Qatraneh 6.63 6.38 ±0.42 6.38±1.044 5.336-7.468 -3.77% 6.58%
2 Swaqah 6.32 6.29 ±0.32 6.29±0.795 5.495-7.085 -0.48% 5.09%
3 Qastal 4.04 4.14 ±0.15 4.14±0.373 3.767-4.513 +2.48% 3.62%

*These values are according to the analysis results by water laboratories, ministry of water and irrigation, Jordan.

The estimation of data in Table 1 shows that all nominal values are within the 95% confidence interval, which means the absence of determinate errors in the measurements. The relative error values of the three analyzed water samples were all below 5%, which attests to the accuracy of the developed method. The coefficient of variation values are between 3.62% and 6.58%, which provides an obvious evidence for the precision of the developed analytical method. Thus, as it is presented in Table 1, there is a satisfactory agreement between the results achieved by the optimized anodic stripping method and the reported values by the ICP-OES instrument for the analysis of the same water samples. The paired t-test was applied to examine the significant difference between the values measured by the developed anodic stripping method and the values obtained by the ICP-OES analysis technique. Based on the t-test evaluation, the measured t value is -0.041, while the critical t-value is 4.30, at p = 0.05 [31]. The degree of probability is lower than the conventional level of 5%. This confirms the truth of the null hypothesis, and indicates that there is no difference between the means of the results obtained by the application of the developed voltammetric method and the ICP-OES method. This result attests to the reliability of its application for iron determination in water samples.

Table 2 Analytical parameters of the developed method compared to some common methods for iron analysis in water samples. 

Reference Matrix LOQ LOD Linear range Method
[32] Surface water 0.0024 mg/L 0.0071 mg/L 0.005-0.2 mg/L Inductive coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy
[33] Aqueous solutions - 0.5 µg/L 0.001-100 µg/L Spectrophotometry
[34] Drinking water 7.1 µg/L 2.17 µg/L Atomic absorption spectroscopy
This work Deep ground water 0.85 mg/L 0.26 mg/L 1-100 mg/L Anodic striping voltammetry

The developed green analytical method has the advantages of simplicity in preparation procedure, cost and time-saving. A comparison between some common analytical methods and our developed method for iron analysis is given in Table 2.

Conclusions

In the present work, the use of an optimized anodic stripping method, based on the simply prepared iodine-coated platinum electrode for iron determination in water, was demonstrated. The modified iodine-coated platinum electrode is stable and fit for one day analysis work, unless the electrode potential is scanned beyond the potential window limits, or there is a sudden over current or overpotential.

The linearity was obtained for concentrations ranging from 1 to 100 ppm, with a detection limit of 0.26 ppm. The absence of any possible interference from other metal ions in the water matrix supports the applicability of this method, with some exception for both antimony and mercury metal ions which are found in very low concentrations in deep groundwater resources. The analysis of water samples and the statistical analysis of the results showed the absence of determinate errors, and confirmed the null theory; there was no significant difference between the results and the reported values by the water laboratories of the Ministry of water and irrigation. The advantages of the proposed method include the simplicity of preparation and reproduction of the iodine-coated platinum electrode. Additionally, the green and inexpensive instrumentations recommend this method for trace iron electroanalysis.

Acknowledgement

The financial support by the deanship of scientific research in the University of Jordan is greatly appreciated.

References

1. World Health Organization (WHO). Iron in drinking-water: background document for development of WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality; WHO/SDE/WSH/0.3.04/08. Geneva: Switzerland; 2003. [ Links ]

2. Min L, Neil VR, Alex SK, et al. Determination of iron: electrochemical methods. Electroanalysis. 2012;24:1-10. DOI: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA03019C [ Links ]

3. Attiq-ur-Rehman AW, Yaqoob M. Flow injection spectrophotometric determination of total iron in fresh waters using 1, 10-phenanthroline reagent. J Chem Soc Pak. 2008;30:836-839. [ Links ]

4. Gu X, Zhou T. Determination of iron (II) in water by spectrophotometric method after preconcentration on an organic solvent-soluble membrane filter. Analyt Letter.1996;29:463-476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00032719608000411 [ Links ]

5. Stasys T, Laura S, Rolandas K. Determination of iron in natural and mineral waters by flame atomic absorption spectrometry. J Serb Chem Soc. 2004;69:393-402. [ Links ]

6. Roberta NCSC, Geysa BB, Maria GAK, et al. Multi-element determination of copper, iron, nickel, manganese, lead and zinc in environmental water samples by ICP OES after solid phase extraction with a C18 cartridge loaded with 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphthol. Anal Methods. 2015;7:8714-8719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C5AY01929J [ Links ]

7. Sofikitis AM, Colin JL, Desboeufs KV, et al. Iron analysis in atmospheric water samples by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) in water-methanol. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2004;378:460-464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-2282-6 [ Links ]

8. Sharma B, Tyagi S. Simplification of metal ion analysis in fresh water samples by atomic absorption spectroscopy for laboratory students. J Lab Chem Educ. 2013;1:54-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5923/j.jlce.20130103.04 [ Links ]

9. Croot PL, Johansson M. Determination of iron speciation by cathodic stripping voltammetry in seawater using the competing ligand 2-(2-Thiazolylazo)-p-cresol (TAC). Electroanalysis. 2000;12:565-576. [ Links ]

10. Gledhill M, Van Den Berg MG. Determination of complexation of iron (III) with natural organic complexing ligands in seawater using cathodic stripping voltammetry. Marine Chem. 1994;47:41-54. [ Links ]

11. Aldrich AP, Van Den Berg MG. Determination of iron and its redox speciation in seawater using catalytic cathodic stripping voltammetry. Electroanalysis.1998;10:369-373. [ Links ]

12. Ugo P, Moretto LM, Rudello D, et al. Trace iron determination by cyclic and multiple square-wave voltammetry at nafion coated electrodes. Application to Pore-Water Analysis. Electroanalysis. 2001;13:661-668. [ Links ]

13. Zakharova EA, Elesova EE, Noskova GN, et al. Direct voltammetric determination of total iron with a gold microelectrode ensemble. Electroanalysis. 2012; 24:2061-2069. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201200417 [ Links ]

14. Mikkelsen O, Schroder KH. Voltammetric monitoring of bivalent iron in waters and effluents, using a dental amalgam sensor electrode. Some Preliminary Results. Electroanalysis. 2004;16:386-390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.200302822 [ Links ]

15. Inour H, Ito K. Determination of trace amounts of iron (II,III) in natural water by reversed- phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Microchem J. 1994;49:249-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/mchj.1994.1035 [ Links ]

16. Schnell S, Ratering S, Jansen K-H. Simultaneous detection of iron (III), iron (II), and manganese (II) in environmental samples by ion chromatography. Environ Sci Technol. 1998;32:1530-1537. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/es970861g [ Links ]

17. Barek J, Moreira JC, Zima J. Modern electrochemical methods for monitoring of chemical carcinogens. Sensors. 2005;5:148-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/S5040148 [ Links ]

18. Zosk CG. Handbook of Electrochemistry. Boulevard: UK; 2007. [ Links ]

19. Hourani MK. Determination of silver (I) by cyclic voltammetry at iodine-coated electrodes. Analyst. 1994;119:1975-1978. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/AN9941901975 [ Links ]

20. Felter TE, Hubbard AT. L.e.e.d. and electrochemistry of iodine on Pt (100) and Pt (111) single-crystal surfaces. J Electroanal Chem.1979;100:473-491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0728(79)80179-5 [ Links ]

21. Podlovchenko BI, Kolyadko EA. Adsorption of carbon monoxide on platinized platinum electrode with preadsorbed iodine and iodide anions. Russian J Electrochem. 2003;8:823-827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025129704316 [ Links ]

22. Thomas AE, Wieckowski A. Surface diffusion limited desorption of iodine on a platinum electrode. J Electroanalyt Chem.1995;399:207-212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0728(95)04226-1 [ Links ]

23. Mebrahtu T, Rodriguez JF, Bravo BG, et al. Hydrogenative/cathodic stripping of iodine chemisorbed on smooth polycrystalline platinum electrode. J Electroanal Chem. 1987;219:327-333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0728(87)85050-7 [ Links ]

24. Cox JA, Kulesza PJ. Oxidation and determination of nitrite at modified electrodes. J Electroanal Chem.1984;175:105-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0728(84)80349-6 [ Links ]

25. Hourani M, Jarar M, Arar S. Atmospheric SO2 determination by voltammetric analysis at an iodine-coated platinum electrode. Electroanalysis. 1999;9:637-640. [ Links ]

26. Hourani MK, Esaifan M. Indirect voltammetric method for determination of nitrogen dioxide in the ambient atmosphere. Jordan J Chem. 2009;4:367-375. [ Links ]

27. Hourani MK, Hijaz B. Voltammetric analysis of hydroquinone and catechol at iodine-coated polycrystalline platinum electrode. J Nat and Eng Sci. 2014;8:25-29. [ Links ]

28. Lane RF, Hubbard AT, Fukunaga K, et al. Brain catecholamines: detection in vivo by means of differential pulse voltammetry at surface-modified platinum electrodes. Brain Research.1976;114:346-352. [ Links ]

29. Malassa H, Al-Qutob M, Al-Khatib M, et al. Determination of different trace heavy metals in ground water of south west bank/palestine by ICP/MS. J Environment Protec. 2013;4:818-827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2013.48096 [ Links ]

30. Reiman C, Matschullat J, Birke M, et al. Antimony in the environment: lessons from geochemical mapping. Appl Geochem. 2010;25:175-198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2009.11.011 [ Links ]

31. Miller JN, Miller JC. Statistics and Chemometrics for Analytical Chemistry. London: Pearson Education Limited; 2010. [ Links ]

32. Aneta C, Andrzej B, Zuzana K, et al. ICP-OES Determination of select metals in surface water-a metrological study. Polish J Environ Stud. 2010;19:59-64. [ Links ]

33. Ahmed MJ, Roy UK. A simple spectrophotometric method for the determination of iron(II) aqueous solutions. Turk J Chem. 2009;709-726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3906/kim-0802-9 [ Links ]

34. Gorica P, Trajce S, Katarina C. Determination of iron in drinking water collectors. J Environment Sci and Health, Part A. 2015;50:1385-1392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2015.1064285 [ Links ]

Received: December 20, 2019; Accepted: April 25, 2021

Corresponding author: mohammad.amayreh@bau.edu.jo

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License