SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.29 issue1Nosocomial Infections. COVID-19: A Friend or Foe?Henoch-Schonlein Purpura in Advanced Age: Looking Beyond the Skin author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Medicina Interna

Print version ISSN 0872-671X

Medicina Interna vol.29 no.1 Lisboa Mar. 2022  Epub Apr 01, 2022

https://doi.org/10.24950/rspmi.2022.01.o 

Artigos Originais

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio: The Role of Adding a Biomarker to a Predictive Post-Stroke Pneumonia Score

Relação Neutrófilo-Linfócito: Acrescentando um Biomarcador a uma Escala Preditiva de Pneumonia Pós-Acidente Vascular Cerebral

Diogo Pedro1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4923-2940

Marco Narciso2 

Mariana Alves2 

Teresa Passos Fonseca2 

1Serviço de Doenças Infeciosas, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal.

2Serviço de Medicina III, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal.


Abstract

Introduction:

To assess the association of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with post-stroke pneumonia (PSP) incidence, stroke subtype, severity, and prognosis.

Material and Methods:

Prospective observational study over a 42-month period in a Stroke Unit of a tertiary University Hospital. All patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) were sequentially included. NLR was obtained at admission. Pa-tient characteristics such as stroke subtype, severity and PSP diagnosis were ascertained. Score A2DS2 was used as clinical predictor of PSP.

Results:

521 patients with AIS were identified. The mean age was 76.17 ± 10.16 years years, 46.9% were men. Association was found between NLR and type and severity of stroke (p < 0.01), persisting in stratified analysis after excluding concomitant infection. Patients with higher ratio presented severer neurological deficits at admission, higher mortality, and dependency on discharge (p < 0.01). A logistic regression was performed to ascertain the predictive capacity of NLR (≥3) and A2DS2 (≥6) on the likelihood of developing PSP (p < 0.005). The model explained 17.1% (Nagelkerke R2) of the variance in pneumonia diagnoses, correctly classifying 77.0% of patients with 96.3% specificity. Patients with A2DS2 ≥6 were likelier to develop pneumonia (OR 8.36, p < 0.01). Moreover, patients with NLR ≥3 had higher odds of developing pneumonia (OR 2.35, p < 0.01).

Conclusion:

NLR appears to be related to severity in AIS, possibly as surrogate of neuroimmune mediation. Advances in the understanding of the immunobiological effects of ischemia in the brain may lead to future therapeutic developments. Presently, as a relatively inexpensive biomarker, there may be a potential role for NLR in improving PSP prediction scores.

Keywords: Lymphocytes; Neutrophils; Pneumonia; Stroke/complications.

Resumo

Introdução:

Avaliar a associação da relação neutrófilo-linfócito (NLR) e a incidência de pneumonia pós-acidente vascular cerebral (PSP), subtipo de acidente vascular cerebral (AVC), gravidade e prognóstico.

Material e Métodos:

Foi realizado um estudo prospetivo observacional durante um período de 42 meses numa Unidade de AVC de um hospital terciário. Todos os doentes com AVC isquémico agudo (AIS) foram sequencialmente incluídos. O valor de NLR foi calculado na admissão. As características dos doentes como subtipo de AVC, gravidade e diagnóstico de PSP foram obtidos. A escala A2DS2 foi utilizada como preditor clínico de PSP.

Resultados:

Foram identificados 521 doentes com AIS. A idade média foi 76,17 ± 10,16 anos, 46,9% eram homens. Verificou-se uma associação entre NLR, tipo e gravidade de AVC (p <0,01), persistindo em análise estratificada após exclu-são de infeção concomitante. Doentes com NLR mais elevado apresentavam défice neurológico mais grave na admissão, maior mortalidade e maior grau de dependência na alta (p < 0,01). Foi realizada uma regressão logística para caracterizar a capacidade preditiva da NLR (≥3) e do A2DS2 (≥6) na probabilidade de desenvolver PSP (p < 0,005). O modelo explicou 17,1% (Nagelkerke R2) da variância nos diagnósticos de pneumonia, classificando corretamente 77,0% dos doentes com uma especificidade de 96,3%. Doentes com A2DS2 ≥6 (OR 8,36, p < 0,01) e doentes com NLR ≥3 (OR 2,35, p < 0,01) apresentaram um maior risco de desenvolver pneumonia.

Conclusão:

NLR parece estar relacioando com a gravidade dos AIS, possivelmente como marcador de ativação neuroimune. Avanços na compreensão dos efeitos imunobiológicos da isquemia no cérebro poderão levar a desenvolvimentos terapêuticos futuros. Atualmente, sendo um biomarcador relativamente pouco dispendioso, talvez exista um papel da NLR na melhoria das escalas preditoras de PSP.

Palavras-chave: Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações; Linfócito; Neutrófilo; Pneumonia.

Introduction

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at hospital admis-sion, defined as the quotient between both absolute values in a complete blood count, has been suggested to be a promising marker in cardiovascular ischaemic events, such as coronary artery occlusion.1,2A higher NLR was independently associated with arterial stiffness and coronary calcium score in a large Korean study,3 proposing that NLR might be a useful additional measure of assessing cardiovascular (CV) risk. In fact, a high NLR despite a normal white blood cell (WBC) count is proposed to be predictive of atherosclerosis,4 and a more powerful predictor of CV disease than any leukocyte subtype,5 presumably due to the role of inflammation in the atherogenic process.6 It has also been associated with a poor short-term clinical outcome in patients with acute ischaemic stroke7,8and hemorrhagic stroke,9,10on par with other inflammatory biomarkers.11-13

Post-stroke pneumonia (PSP) is defined as a lower respiratory tract infection complicating the first week after stroke onset,14 the period where pneumonia most frequently occurs in stroke patients.15 This fact probably reflects the period of highest risk in terms of dysphagia, immobility, impaired consciousness, and immunosuppression.16,17It has an estimated incidence of 7% to 38%15,18-27and has been consistently associated with a high attributable risk of early mortality, increased length of stay and medical cost.18,22,28-30As such, prompt identification of patients at high risk for PSP is clinically relevant by promoting an increased monitoring and potential tailored prophylactic or therapeutic measures.31-33

The A2DS2 score - a ten-point score (age ≥75 years=1, atrial fibrillation=1, dysphagia=2, male sex=1, stroke severity, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale NIHSS 0-4=0, 5-15=3, ≥16=5) developed from the Berlin Stroke Registry, is currently the most used tool. It was validated in the independent Northwest Germany Stroke Registry 34, and with external validation 35. A prospective multicentre comparison between A2DS2, ISAN and AIS-APS scores (also commonly used to predict the risk of PSP), suggest that A2DS2 might be the best score in the identification of patients at high risk of PSP, though none with a good positive predictive value. In fact, a A2DS2 score of ≥4 yields a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 57% for the occurrence of PSP, while a A2DS2 score ≥5 has a sensitivity of 83% and specificity of 72%.34

The authors aim to assess the relationship between NLR and stroke severity, subtype, how it relates to mortality, and post-stroke pneumonia incidence.

Material and Methods

A prospective observational study over a 42-month period in a Stroke Unit of a tertiary University Hospital was conducted. All patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke during this period were included. Patients that underwent thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy were not included. Population and event characteristics were collected, namely: time of onset, type of event, Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project - OCSP, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale - NIHSS, mortality, mRankin at discharge and length of stay in days), risk factors such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure or active smoking, presence of respiratory tract infections, A2DS2 and NLR at admission to the emergency department. NLR cut-off was selected based on previous published methodology.36

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS® statistical software version 24. Relevant variables were stratified in cate-gories (A2DS2 < 6, >= 6; NIHSS at admission <6, 6-13, >13; NLR <3, ≥3). When comparing two categorical variables the Pearson’s Chi-square test was used. A binomial logistic re-gression multivariate analysis was also performed. Applicabi-lity conditions were verified. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

Results

A total of 606 patients were admitted to the Stroke Unit during the study’s period. Of these, 521 patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) were identified (Table 1). The remaining 85 patients were excluded due to being hospitalized with ei-ther a haemorrhagic event or a stroke mimic. Of the included 521 patients classified as AIS, 66 had a transient ischaemic attack (TIA).

Table 1: Diagnosis at admission 

Type of Event Frequency
Ischaemic stroke 455
Transient ischaemic attack 66
Haemorrhagic stroke 21
Stroke mimic 64
Total 606

Concerning the included patients, the mean age was 76.17 ± 10.16 years (min. 47; max. 96 years old). Population demographics are summarized on Table 2. Missing data was characterized as unknown.

Table 2: Demographic characteristics of the studied population 

Association was found between NLR and type and seve-rity of stroke according to OSCP classification - lower NLR in lacunar stroke and higher in total anterior circulation infarct (Table 3, p < 0.001).

Table 3: Comparison between low and high NLR and stroke according to OSCP, death and mRankin at discharge. 

A NLR ≥3 was related to more severe neurological deficit as ascertained by the NIHSS scale ≥6 (p < 0.001) and was associated with a higher mortality - from 26 patients that died, 77% had a NLR ≥ 3, vs 52% of those in the survival group (Table 3, p = 0.016). NLR ≥ 3 was also associated with higher disability as ascertained by mRankin score at discharge (Table 3, p < 0.0001). This association persisted after stratified analy-sis excluding infection (PSP).

The relationship between NLR at admission and the deve-lopment of pneumonia is shown in Fig. 1. Patients with NLR ≥ 3 had higher odds of developing pneumonia (OR 2.531, 95%CI 1.654, 3.873). Since a statistically significant relationship between NLR and post-stroke pneumonia was found, a logistic regression was performed to assess the predictive capacity of NLR (≥3) and A2DS2 (≥6) on the likelihood of developing post-stroke pneumonia. The model including both variables explained 17.1% (Nagelkerke R2) of the variance in pneumonia diag-noses, correctly classifying 77.0% of patients and showing a 96.3% specificity and a 25.6% sensibility (p < 0.005), with a better fitness than a model using A2DS2 alone (13.2%, Nagelkerke R2). The specificity and sensibility found in our sample with A2DS2 alone was similar. The positive predicti-ve value was 72.3% and the negative predictive value was 77.4%.

A2DS2 ≥ 6 was 8.36 times more likely to exhibit post-stroke pneumonia than A2DS2 <6 (p < 0.001), while NLR ≥ 3 had 2.349 higher odds (Table 4).

Figure 1: Relationship between NLR at admission and post-stroke pneumonia. Missing.35. p-value < 0.0001. X2 = 18.902. OR 2.531, 95%CI (1.654, 3.873), unadjusted. 

Table 4: Variable analysis for the logistic regression for post-stroke pneumonia on NLR and A2DS2.  

Discussion

There is little doubt that post-stroke inflammation is an important factor in brain injury.17,37-39In fact, leucocytosis has been associated to a poorer clinical outcome in patients with AIS.40-43Nevertheless, this inflammatory response is complex and involves several protagonists and immune pathways.17,38NLR has been suggested as an interesting marker in patients with cardiovascular disease.44,45It has been associated with a poor short-term clinical outcome in patients with acute ischaemic stroke7,8and is also a marker of poor prognosis 3 months after AIS.46 In fact, the immune system might arise as a potential therapeutic target in patients with ischaemic brain lesion.47-49

In our study, there was an association between higher NLR, higher NIHSS and poorer outcome, with increased risk of mortality and a higher mRankin score at discharge. These results persisted after stratified analysis excluding infection.

Post-stroke pneumonia is a frequent but potentially pre-ventable stroke complication, often associated with a significant increase in morbidity and mortality. It has been associated with a 4 times higher fatality rate in the first 30 days, 3 times higher length of stay and a significant increase in medical expenses.16,30Our incidence of 21% falls within what has been reported in the literature.15,18-27 NLR is an established marker for inflammation and infection, having been studied as a predictor in pneumonia and bacterial infections50-53However, its role in PSP is not as well supported. In a cohort of 1317 patients in a 2-center retrospective study, Nam K-W, et al report an association between NLR and an increased risk and severity of PSP.54 We also report an association between higher NLR and an increased risk of developing PSP.

Several clinical risk factors have previously been established for PSP, such as age, admission NIHSS score and stroke severity, presence of nasogastric tube, mechanical ventilation, and atrial fibrillation.55 However, the concomitant use of bio-markers in PSP assessment is, to the best of our knowledge, scarce.27,55,56The PANTHERIS score included the total leukocyte count, but the lack of NIHSS evaluation seems to be a limitation.27 In our study, patients with NLR ≥ 3 were 2.35 times more likely to exhibit post-stroke pneumonia than NLR < 3 (p <0.001) and NLR did appear to increase the fitness of the predictability of A2DS2 in our logistical regression model, even though we did not find an increase in sensitivity or specificity in our sample.

The percentage of “unknown data”, namely in NIHSS, is attributed to logistical constraints in our practice setting: a tertiary centre involving two hospitals. Study inclusion was done at stroke unit admission in a different hospital from the emergency department (ED). When the details from the stroke physician’s evaluation were not charted at the ED, data was classified as unknown/missing.

Post-stroke inflammation is characterized by a rapid ac-tivation of resident cells (mainly microglial cells), followed by the infiltration of circulating inflammatory cells, including gra-nulocytes (neutrophils), T cells, monocyte/macrophages, and other cells in the ischemic brain region.57-59Microglial cell proliferation and proinflammatory mediator production, including IL-1β and TNF-a, has been documented within minutes of ischemia60 and appear to play a role in exacerbating tissue damage but may also protect the brain against ischemic and excitotoxic injury.60,61In contrast, blood-derived leukocytes are recruited to the brain tissue with a delay of hours to a few days. Therefore, the timing of blood collection could affect NLR. NLR evolution during hospitalization was not evaluated due to concern of higher risk of bias due to infection, catheterization, and drugs. The NLR response in a severe cardiovascular event appears to be a surrogate of an immune-mediated response, not necessarily caused by infection but perhaps related to it (higher immune-dysregulation in more severe events).62

This, in our view, supports the current hypothesis of immune-mediated cell injury in stroke. Further studies are needed in determining the immunological mechanism of lesion and the possibility of therapeutic intervention.

Conclusion

NLR ≥3 is associated with a more severe stroke subtype, neurologic deficit, increased morbidity and mortality and higher rates of post-stroke pneumonia, though the relationships described do not seem to be attributable do the infection. NLR appears to be a surrogate of immunological dysregulation. Advances in the knowledge of the immunobiological effects of ischemia in brain may lead to future therapeutic developments. As an inexpensive, fast and widely available tool, NLR may have a role in identifying a subset of patients that may benefit in future immunomodulatory therapy trial.

Declaração de Contribuição / Contributorship Statement:

D. Pedro, M. Narciso - Conceção e design, Análise e recolha de dados, Análise estatística e Interpretação de dados, Escrita do artigo, Pesquisa Bibliográfica, Revisão crítica do artigo, Aprovação final.

M. Alves, T. Fonseca - Conceção do artigo, Pesquisa bibliográfica, Revisão crítica do artigo, Aprovação final.

REFERENCES

1. Arbel Y, Finkelstein A, Halkin A, Birati Y E, Revico M, Zuzut M, et al. Neu-trophil/lymphocyte ratio is related to the severity of coronary artery disease and clinical outcome in patients undergoing angiography. Atherosclerosis. 2012;225:456-60. doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.09.009 [ Links ]

2. Kalay N, Dogdu O, Koc F, et al. Hematologic parameters and angiogra-phic progression of coronary atherosclerosis. Angiology. 2012;63:213-7. doi:10.1177/0003319711412763 [ Links ]

3. Park BJ, Shim JY, Lee HR, Lee JH, Jung DH, Kim HB, et al. Relationship of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio with arterial stiffness and coronary calcium score. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412:925-9. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2011.01.021 [ Links ]

4. Horne BD, Anderson JL, John JM, Weaver A, Bair TL, Jensen KR, et al. Which white blood cell subtypes predict increased cardiovascular risk? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1638-43. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.054 [ Links ]

5. Yu X, Li X, Li Y, Liu T, Wang R. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio is associated with arterial stiffness in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015;61:76-80. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2015.03.011 [ Links ]

6. Mozos I, Malainer C, Horbanczuk J, Gug C, Stoian D, Luca CT, et al. In-flammatory Markers for Arterial Stiffness in Cardiovascular Diseases. Front Immunol. 2017;8:1058. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01058 [ Links ]

7. Yu S, Arima H, Bertmar C, Clarke S, Herkes G, Krause M. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and early clinical outcomes in patients with acute ische-mic stroke. J Neurol Sci. 2018;387:115-8. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2018.02.002 [ Links ]

8. Zhang J, Ren Q, Song Y, He M, Zeng Y, Liu Z, et al. Prognostic role of neu-trophil-lymphocyte ratio in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Medicine. 2017;96:e8624. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000008624 [ Links ]

9. Switonska M, Piekus-Slomka N, Slomka A, Sokal P, Zekanowska E, Lat-tanzi S. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Symptomatic Hemorrhagic Transformation in Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Revascularization. Brain Sci. 2020;10:771. doi:10.3390/brainsci10110771 [ Links ]

10. Lattanzi S, Cagnetti C, Rinaldi C, Angelocola S, Provinciali L, Silvestrini M. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio improves outcome prediction of acute intracerebral hemorrhage. J Neurol Sci. 2018;387:98-102. doi:10.1016/j. jns.2018.01.038 [ Links ]

11. Wang L, Li Y, Wang C, Guo W, Liu M. C-reactive Protein, Infection, and Outcome After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Registry and Systematic Review. Curr Neurovasc Res. 2020;16:405-15. doi:10.2174/15672026166661910 26122011 [ Links ]

12. Mengel A, Ulm L, Hotter B, Harms H, Piper SK, Grittner U, et al. Bioma-rkers of immune capacity, infection and inflammation are associated with poor outcome and mortality after stroke - the PREDICT study. BMC Neurol. 2019;19:148. doi:10.1186/s12883-019-1375-6 [ Links ]

13. Lattanzi S, Di Napoli M, Ricci S, Divani AA. Matrix Metalloproteinases in Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Neurotherapeutics. 2020;17:484-96. doi:10.1007/s13311-020-00839-0 [ Links ]

14. Smith CJ, Kishore AK, Vail A, Chamorro A, Garau J, Hopkins SJ, et al. Diagnosis of Stroke-Associated Pneumonia: Recommendations From the Pneumonia in Stroke Consensus Group. Stroke. 2015;46:2335-40. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009617 [ Links ]

15. Westendorp WF, Nederkoorn PJ, Vermeij JD, Dijkgraaf MG, van de Beek D. Post-stroke infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurol. 2011;11:110. doi:10.1186/1471-2377-11-110 [ Links ]

16. Emsley HCA, Hopkins SJ. Acute ischaemic stroke and infection: recent and emerging concepts. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:341-53. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70061-9 [ Links ]

17. Chamorro Á, Meisel A, Planas AM, Urra X, van de Beek D, Veltkamp R. The immunology of acute stroke. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012;8:401-10. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2012.98 [ Links ]

18. Kammersgaard LP, Jørgensen HS, Reith J, Nakayama H, Houth JG, Weber UJ, et al. Early infection and prognosis after acute stroke: the Copenha-gen Stroke Study. J stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Off J Natl Stroke Assoc.2001;10:217-21. doi:10.1053/jscd.2001.30366 [ Links ]

19. Meisel A, Smith CJ. Stroke: Preventive antibiotics for stroke-associa-ted pneumonia. Nat Rev Neurol. 2015;11:672-3. doi:10.1038/nrneu-rol.2015.220 [ Links ]

20. Vernino S, Brown RD, Sejvar JJ, Sicks JD, Petty GW, O'Fallon WM. Cause-specific mortality after first cerebral infarction: a population-based study. Stroke. 2003;34:1828-32. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000080534.98416.A0 [ Links ]

21. Wang PL, Zhao XQ, Yang ZH, Wang AX, Wang CX, Liu LP, et al. Effect of in-hospital medical complications on case fatality post-acute ische-mic stroke: data from the China National Stroke Registry. Chin Med J.2012;125:2449-54. [ Links ]

22. Kumar S, Selim MH, Caplan LR. Medical complications after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 2010;9:105-18. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70266-2 [ Links ]

23. Vermeij FH, Scholte op Reimer WJ, de Man P, Oostenbrugge R J V, Franke C L, Jong G, et al. Stroke-associated infection is an independent risk factor for poor outcome after acute ischemic stroke: data from the Netherlands Stroke Survey. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27:465-71. doi:10.1159/000210093 [ Links ]

24. Smith CJ, Bray BD, Hoffman A, Meisel A, Heuschmann P U, Wolfe C D A, et al. Can a novel clinical risk score improve pneumonia prediction in acute stroke care? A UK multicenter cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc.2015;4:e001307. doi:10.1161/JAHA.114.001307 [ Links ]

25. Ji R, Shen H, Pan Y, Wang P, Liu G, Wang Y, et al. Novel risk score to predict pneumonia after acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2013;44:1303-09. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000598 [ Links ]

26. Finlayson O, Kapral M, Hall R, Asllani E, Selchen D, Saposnik G. Risk fac-tors, inpatient care, and outcomes of pneumonia after ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2011;77:1338-45. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823152b1 [ Links ]

27. Harms H, Grittner U, Dröge H, Meisel A. Predicting post-stroke pneu-monia: the PANTHERIS score. Acta Neurol Scand. 2013;128:178-84. doi:10.1111/ane.12095 [ Links ]

28. Koennecke H-C, Belz W, Berfelde D, Endres M, Fitzek S, Hamilton F, et al. Factors influencing in-hospital mortality and morbidity in patients treated on a stroke unit. Neurology. 2011;77:965-72. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822dc795 [ Links ]

29. Ingeman A, Andersen G, Hundborg HH, Svendsen ML, Johnsen SP. In- - hospital medical complications, length of stay, and mortality among stroke unit patients. Stroke. 2011;42:3214-8. doi:10.1161/STROKEA-HA.110.610881 [ Links ]

30. Katzan IL, Dawson N V, Thomas CL, Votruba ME, Cebul RD. The cost of pneumonia after acute stroke. Neurology. 2007;68:1938-43. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000263187.08969.45 [ Links ]

31. Kwon HM, Jeong SW, Lee SH, Yoon BW. The pneumonia score: a simple grading scale for prediction of pneumonia after acute stroke. Am J Infect Control. 2006;34:64-8. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2005.06.011 [ Links ]

32. Sellars C, Bowie L, Bagg J, Sweeney M P, Miller H, Tilston J, et al. Risk fac-tors for chest infection in acute stroke: a prospective cohort study. Stroke. 2007;38:2284-91. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.106.478156 [ Links ]

33. Chumbler NR, Williams LS, Wells CK, Lo AC, Nadeau S, Peixoto AJ, et al. De-rivation and validation of a clinical system for predicting pneumonia in acute stroke. Neuroepidemiology. 2010;34:193-9. doi:10.1159/000289350 [ Links ]

34. Hoffmann S, Malzahn U, Harms H, Koennecke H C, Berger K, Kalic M, et al. Development of a clinical score (A2DS2) to predict pneumonia in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2012;43:2617-23. doi:10.1161/STROKEA-HA.112.653055 [ Links ]

35. Zapata-Arriaza E, Moniche F, Blanca PG, Bustamante A, Martínez IE, Uclés O, et al. External Validation of the ISAN, A2DS2, and AIS-APS Scores for Predicting Stroke-Associated Pneumonia. J stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Off J Natl Stroke Assoc. 2018;27:673-6. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovas-dis.2017.09.059 [ Links ]

36. Wang S, Zhang Z, Fang F, Gao X, Sun W, Liu H. The neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio is an independent prognostic indicator in patients with bone metasta-sis. Oncol Lett. 2011;2:735-40. doi:10.3892/ol.2011.304 [ Links ]

37. Schwartz M, Moalem G. Beneficial immune activity after CNS injury: pros-pects for vaccination. J Neuroimmunol. 2001;113:185-92. doi:10.1016/s0165-5728(00)00447-1 [ Links ]

38. Hou D, Wang C, Ye X, Zhong P, Wu D. Persistent inflammation worsens short-term outcomes in massive stroke patients. BMC Neurol. 2021;21:62. doi:10.1186/s12883-021-02097-9 [ Links ]

39. Macrez R, Ali C, Toutirais O, Mauff BL, Defer G, Dirnagl H, et al. Stroke and the immune system: from pathophysiology to new therapeutic strategies. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:471-80. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70066-7 [ Links ]

40. Peng Y, Wang D, Zhang J, Xue X, Wang Z, Tong W, et al. Relationship between white blood cell count at admission and short term outcome in patients with acute cerebral infarction. Clin Invest Med. 2011;34:E249. doi:10.25011/cim.v34i4.15368 [ Links ]

41. Elkind MS V, Cheng J, Rundek T, Boden-Albala B, Sacco RL. Leukocyte count predicts outcome after ischemic stroke: the Northern Manhat-tan Stroke Study. J stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Off J Natl Stroke Assoc.2004;13:220-7. doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2004.07.004 [ Links ]

42. Kazmierski R, Guzik P, Ambrosius W, Ciesielska A, Moskal J, Kozubski W. Predictive value of white blood cell count on admission for in-hospital mortality in acute stroke patients. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2004;107:38-43. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2004.03.003 [ Links ]

43. Nardi K, Milia P, Eusebi P, Paciaroni M, Caso V, Agnelli G. Admission leu-kocytosis in acute cerebral ischemia: influence on early outcome. J stroke Cerebrovasc Dis Off J Natl Stroke Assoc. 2012;21:819-24. doi:10.1016/j. jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.04.015 [ Links ]

44. Tamhane UU, Aneja S, Montgomery D, Rogers E-K, Eagle KA, Gur HS. Association between admission neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102:653-7. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.05.006 [ Links ]

45. Giede-Jeppe A, Bobinger T, Gerner ST, Sembill JA, Sprügel MI, Beuscher VD, et al. Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Is an Independent Predictor for In-Hospital Mortality in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Cerebro-vasc Dis. 2017;44:26-34. doi:10.1159/000468996 [ Links ]

46. Qun S, Tang Y, Sun J, Liu Z, Wu J, Zhang J, et al. Neutrophil-To-Lympho-cyte Ratio Predicts 3-Month Outcome of Acute Ischemic Stroke. Neurotox Res. 2017;31:444-52. doi:10.1007/s12640-017-9707-z [ Links ]

47. Jickling GC, Liu D, Ander BP, Stamova B, Zhan X, Sharp FR. Targeting neutrophils in ischemic stroke: translational insights from experimental stu-dies. J Cereb blood flow Metab Off J Int Soc Cereb Blood Flow Metab.2015;35:888-901. doi:10.1038/jcbfm.2015.45 [ Links ]

48. Jian Z, Liu R, Zhu X, Smerin D, Zhong Y, Gu L, et al. The Involvement and Therapy Target of Immune Cells After Ischemic Stroke. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2167. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.02167 [ Links ]

49. Malone K, Amu S, Moore AC, Waeber C. Immunomodulatory Therapeu-tic Strategies in Stroke. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:630. doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.00630 [ Links ]

50. Liu X, Shen Y, Wang H, Ge Q, Fei A, Pan S. Prognostic Significan-ce of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Sepsis: A Pros-pective Observational Study. Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:8191254. doi:10.1155/2016/8191254 [ Links ]

51. Curbelo J, Luquero Bueno S, Galván-Román JM, Ortega-Gómez M, Rajas O, Fernández-Jiménez G, et al. Inflammation biomarkers in blood as mor-tality predictors in community-acquired pneumonia admitted patients: Importance of comparison with neutrophil count percentage or neutrophillymphocyte ratio. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0173947. doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0173947 [ Links ]

52. de Jager CPC, Wever PC, Gemen EF, Kusters R, van Gageldonk-Lafe-ber AB, van der Poll T, et al. The neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio in pa-tients with community-acquired pneumonia. PLoS One. 2012;7:e46561. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046561 [ Links ]

53. Holub M, Beran O, Kaspríková N, Chalupa P. Neutrophil to lymphocyte count ratio as a biomarker of bacterial infections. Cent Eur J Med. 2012;7:258-61. doi:10.2478/s11536-012-0002-3 [ Links ]

54. Nam K-W, Kim TJ, Lee JS, Kwon HM, Lee YS, Ko SB, et al. High Neutro-phil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Stroke-Associated Pneumonia. Stroke. 2018;49:1886-92. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021228 [ Links ]

55. Huang GQ, Lin YT, Wu YM, Cheng QQ, Cheng HR, Wang Z. Individuali-zed Prediction Of Stroke-Associated Pneumonia For Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke. Clin Interv Aging. 2019;14:1951-62. doi:10.2147/CIA. S225039 [ Links ]

56. Lan Y, Sun W, Chen Y, Miao J, Li G, Qiu X, et al. Nomogram Including Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for the Prediction of Stroke-Associated Infections. Front Neurol. 2020;11:574280. doi:10.3389/fneur.2020.574280 [ Links ]

57. Jin R, Yang G, Li G. Inflammatory mechanisms in ischemic stroke: role of in-flammatory cells. J Leukoc Biol. 2010;87:779-89. doi:10.1189/jlb.1109766 [ Links ]

58. Jin R, Liu L, Zhang S, Nanda A, Li G. Role of Inflammation and Its Media-tors in Acute Ischemic Stroke. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2013;6:834-51. doi:10.1007/s12265-013-9508-6 [ Links ]

59. Lindsberg PJ, Carpe´n O, Paetau A, Karjalainen-Lindsberg ML, Kaste M. Endothelial ICAM-1 Expression Associated With Inflammatory Cell Response in Human Ischemic Stroke. Circulation. 1996;94:939-45. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.94.5.939 [ Links ]

60. Denes A, Vidyasagar R, Feng J, Narvainen J,McColl BW, Kauppinen RA, et al. Proliferating Resident Microglia after Focal Cerebral Ischae-mia in Mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:1941-53. doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600495 [ Links ]

61. Hallenbeck JM. The many faces of tumor necrosis factor in stroke. Nat Med. 2002;8:1363-8. doi:10.1038/nm1202-1363 [ Links ]

62. Döring Y, Drechsler M, Soehnlein O, Weber C. Neutrophils in atheroscle-rosis: from mice to man. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35:288-95. doi:10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.303564 [ Links ]

1Responsabilidades Éticas Conflitos de Interesse: Os autores declaram a inexistência de conflitos de interesse na realização do presente trabalho. Fontes de Financiamento: Não existiram fontes externas de financiamento para a realização deste artigo. Confidencialidade dos Dados: Os autores declaram ter seguido os protocolos da sua instituição acerca da publicação dos dados de doentes. Proteção de Pessoas e Animais: Os autores declaram que os procedimentos seguidos estavam de acordo com os regulamentos estabelecidos pelos responsáveis da Comissão de Investigação Clínica e Ética e de acordo com a Declaração de Helsínquia da Associação Médica Mundial. Proveniência e Revisão por Pares: Não comissionado; revisão externa por pares. Ethical Disclosures Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Financing Support: This work has not received any contribution, grant or scholarship Confidentiality of Data: The authors declare that they have followed the pro-tocols of their work center on the publication of data from patients. Protection of Human and Animal Subjects: The authors declare that the procedures followed were in accordance with the regulations of the rel-evant clinical research ethics committee and with those of the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki). Provenance and Peer Review: Not commissioned; externally peer re-viewed

2© Autor (es) (ou seu (s) empregador (es)) e Revista SPMI 2022. Reutiliza-ção permitida de acordo com CC BY-NC. Nenhuma reutilização comercial. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) and SPMI Journal 2022. Re-use permit-ted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use

Received: November 11, 2021; Accepted: January 12, 2022

Correspondence / Correspondência: Diogo Pedro - diogo.mpedro22@gmail.com Serviço de Doenças Infeciosas, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Norte, Lisboa, Portugal. Av. Prof. Egas Moniz MB, 1649-028 Lisboa

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License