SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 issue1Phenotypes of Diabetes and Heart FailureHypertension and COVID-19: Relation with Complications, Comorbidities and Mortality author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Medicina Interna

Print version ISSN 0872-671X

Medicina Interna vol.30 no.1 Lisboa Mar. 2023  Epub Mar 10, 2023

https://doi.org/10.24950/rspmi.929 

Artigos Originais/ Original Articles

Prevalence of Dysphagia in Patients Admitted to a Department of Internal Medicine and Intensive and Intermediate Care Unit: Results of a Pilot Study

Prevalência de Disfagia em Doentes Internados no Departamento de Medicina Interna e Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos e Intermédios: Resultados de um Estudo Piloto

1Departamento de Medicina, Hospital da Luz - Arrábida, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal


Abstract

Introduction:

Dysphagia is a frequent problem during the course of life, but its prevalence in the population admitted to internal medicine services is unknown.

Material and Methods:

We developed a prospective, single-centre study with the purpose of calculating the prevalence rate of dysphagia in an Internal Medicine service, identifying risk factors and characterizing its main complications.

Results:

In a sample of 79 patients consecutively admitted over a 12-week period (54.4% male, mean age 74.2 years), the prevalence of dysphagia was 34%, and 21.5% of patients had moderate to severe dysphagia.

Conclusion:

The presence of dysphagia was related to gender, age, comorbidity index, functional status and presence of previous dysphagia in this sample. About one in six patients developed complications of dysphagia during hospitalization and their occurrence was related to the severity of dysphagia.

Keywords: Deglutition Disorders/complications; Deglutition Disorders/epidemiology; Hospitalization; Internal Medicine.

Resumo

Introdução:

A disfagia é um problema frequente no decurso da vida, mas a sua prevalência na população internada nos serviços de medicina interna não é conhecida.

Material e Métodos:

Desenvolvemos um estudo prospetivo, unicêntrico, com intuito de calcular a taxa de prevalência de disfagia num serviço de Medicina Interna, identificar os fatores de risco e caracterizar suas principais complicações.

Resultados:

Numa amostra de 79 doentes consecutiva-mente internados num período de 12 semanas (54,4% do sexo masculino, média de idade de 74,2 anos), a prevalência de disfagia foi de 34% e 21,5% dos doentes apresentou disfagia de intensidade moderada a grave.

Conclusão:

A presença da disfagia relacionou-se, nesta amostra, com o género, idade, índice de comorbilidade, estado funcional dos doentes e presença de disfagia prévia. Cerca de um em cada seis doentes desenvolveu complicações da disfagia em internamento e a sua ocorrência relacionou-se com a gravidade da disfagia.

Palavras-chave: Hospitalização; Medicina Interna; Perturbações da Deglutição/epidemiologia; Perturbações da Deglutição/complicações.

Introduction

Dysphagia is a dysfunction of the swallowing process that makes it difficult or prevents oral ingestion of solid, semi-solid and/or liquid foods in a safe, efficient and comfortable way.1 It is a common problem and it is estimated that, during life-time, 1 in 17 individuals develop some form of dysphagia.2 The causes of dysphagia include structural and/or functional changes such as Zenker's diverticulum, laryngectomies, cervical osteophytes, aging or disuse myopathy, and neurological disorders such as stroke, neurodegenerative diseases or dementia.

The loss of swallowing efficiency is a risk factor for dehydration and malnutrition and can compromise the protective mechanism of the airway, leading to respiratory complications such as airway obstruction, aspiration pneumonia, lung abscess, sepsis and death.3,4 Dysphagia is, therefore, considered a factor of poor prognosis in the recovery of patients, contributing to the increase in the use of hospital resources, longer hospitalization and health costs.3,4

There are surprisingly few studies on the prevalence of dysphagia in the hospital population, with some series pointing to values between 12% and 30%,4 but higher values (44%) were found in elderly hospitalized population.5

As it is an underestimated problem, it is often not diagnosed or considered pathology with potential for harmful effects. If well recognized and oriented, it can have a relevant impact on the quality of life and health of patients.

In order to clarify this reality in our population, we developed a prospective hospital-based study, in order to calculate the prevalence of dysphagia in an Internal Medicine inpatient department. It is also intended to identify the factors associa-ted with impaired swallowing in patients admitted to Internal Medicine care and their relationship with complications.

Material and Methods

A prospective, single-site, observational study, eminently non-interventional, was developed. All patients consecutively admitted over a period of 12 weeks to the Internal Medicine Department of Hospital da Luz - Arrábida (Internal Medicine ward and Intermediate and Intensive Care Unit) were included.

The following exclusion criteria were applied: discharged in less than 24 hours, patients without a prescribed oral diet or with a level of consciousness that did not allow safe screening and who refused to enter the study.

After informed consent from the patient or legal representative, demographic data (age, gender), clinical admission main diagnosis (according to a pre-categorized domain), reference to previous dysphagia (reported by the patient or family or recorded in chart) and history of aspiration pneumonia (reported by the patient and/or family and/or recorded in chart) were collected from the clinical records. Comorbid burden was characterized by the Charlson-morbidity Index6 (CCI). We evaluated the presence of criteria for Complex Chronic Patient, using criteria agreed for this purpose and adapted from the international literature7 as the presence of 2 or more of the following: patient above 75 years-old; 3 or more chronic diseases (as defined in the Charslon Comorbidity Index); 3 or more hospitalizations in the last year; 5 or more emergency department admissions in the last year; 5 or more chronic medications. The degree of autonomy was evaluated by the Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living, taking into account the performance in 10 items - food, transfers, personal hygiene (shaving, washing the face, brushing teeth), use of the toilet, bathing, mobility, going up and down stairs, dressing, bowel and urinary control.8

Dysphagia was identified using the GUSS - Gugging Swallowing Screen scale, widely accepted and validated for this purpose and available in European Portuguese.1 It can be applied at the patient's bedside, classifying patients by severity of dysphagia - no dysphagia (total score of 20 points; success in feeding semi-solids, liquids and solids), mild dysphagia (total score between 15 and 19 points; success in feeding semi-solids and liquids but not in solids), moderate dysphagia (total score between 10 and 14 points; successful feeding for semi-solids but unsuccessful for liquids and no indication for feeding test with solids) and severe dysphagia (total score of 0 to 9 points; unsuccessful preliminary assessment or unsuc-cessful semi-solid feeding).1 The scale was applied by three researchers (JRA, IC, RC), with previous training and qualification for its use. The risk of malnutrition was measured by the NSR - Nutritional Score Risk,9 categorizing individuals without risk (scores equal to 0), increased risk (scores between 1 and 2, with a suggestion to consider nutritional intervention and considering referral to a nutritionist) and high risk (scores greater than or equal to 3, with an indication for referral to a nutritionist for assessment, diagnosis, intervention and nutritional monitoring). The score consists of the sum of the three scores for each evaluated scope - patient's age, compromised nutritional status based on body mass index (BMI) value and subjective assessment of general status, weight loss in the last 3 months and reduction in daily intake in the last week and severity of the disease.

We prospectively surveyed the following outcomes: length of stay, documentation of asphyxia or choking, difficulty in feeding, need for medically assisted tube feeding, bronchial aspiration, aspiration pneumonia, and death.

Data were recorded in digital format using the GoogleForms platform and subjected to statistical analysis using SPSS version 27.10 We calculated relative and absolute frequency, means and standard deviation for each variable. Chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to assess the relationship between the presence of dysphagia, defined as a GUSS score < 20, with the different variables analyzed. We assumed a significance level of p < 0.05.

The investigation protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital da Luz - Arrábida and the Learnin-gHealth Data Protection Committee. In case of identification of dysphagia situations, their presence was signaled to the medical team who took the measures they considered necessary, without any additional intervention by the team of researchers.

Results

In the 12-week period, 115 patients were hospitalized. A total of 36 individuals were excluded (26 due to discharge from hospital in less than 24 hours, 6 due to refusal to participate in the study and 4 due to non-compliance with the dysphagia assessment questionnaire).

Of the total of 79 patients, one third of the patients were evaluated in the Intermediate and Intensive Care Unit, while the rest were evaluated in the Internal Medicine ward. Sample characteristics are summarized in table 1.

Table 1 Sample characterization. 

In our sample, 54.4% were male, with a mean age of 74.2 ± 12.73 years. The main diagnoses at admission were cardiocirculatory disease (36.7%), infectious (13.9%), respiratory (10.1%) and neurological disease (8.7%), with an average hospital length of stay of 7.9 ± 4.8 days. The average ICC score is 5.43 ± 3.05. Approximately a quarter of patients (22.8%) had 3 or more chronic diseases and 13.9% were classified as “chronic complex patients”. About a third of patients (36.7%) had moderate to severe functional limitation and 80% were classified as at risk of moderate to severe malnutrition. A history of dysphagia was identified in 20.3% of the sample, but only 1.3% had a history of aspiration pneumonia.

The prevalence of dysphagia in our cohort was 34%. The mean GUSS scale score is 17.68 ± 4.43, with scores indicative of mild dysphagia in 12.7%, moderate in 13.9% and 7.6% of severe dysphagia.

Comparison of the data for the population of patients with and without dysphagia is presented in Table 2. There was a significant relationship between the presence of dysphagia and gender (χ2(1, n = 79) = 9.015; p = 0.003), age (U = 495.500; p = 0.033), Barthel index score at admission (χ2(2, n = 79) = 9.798; p = 0.007), Charlson Comorbidity Index (U = 511.500 ; p = 0.047), presence of 3 or more chronic disease (χ2(1, n = 79) = 7.517; p = 0.006), presence of previous dysphagia (χ2(1, n = 79) = 14.863; p < 0.001). Almost half of the patients diagnosed with dysphagia by the GUSS score, reported previous events of swallowing impairment. Although not statistically significant, there was a trend towards a longer hospital stay in patients with dysphagia. Presence of dysphagia was not related, in the present sample, to admission diagnosis or nutritional risk attributed by NSR2002.

Table 2 Comparison of the data for the population of patients with and without dysphagia. 

During hospitalization, feeding difficulties were identified in 14 patients (17.7%). There was a need for an alternative route in 1 patient, there were 3 episodes of choking and 2 episodes of bronchoaspiration. The presence of complications in hospitalization was related to the presence of dysphagia (χ2(1, n = 79) = 27.259, p < 0.001).

Discussion

The prevalence of dysphagia in patients admitted to the Internal Medicine department of our institution was 34%, being moderate to severe in 21.5%. Older male patients, with greater functional disability, more comorbid burden and with a previous history of swallowing difficulties were more likely to have dysphagia, as detected by GUSS. About one in six patients developed complications of dysphagia in hospital and their occurrence was related to the severity of the swallowing disorder. These data are in agreement with the scarce literature available.2,11-14Although the present study refers to a single center and with a small sample population, the typology of the population hospitalized in national and international Internal Medicine services is consistent with the characteristics of patients at increased risk for dysphagia that we found in our sample: elderly patients, with pluripathology and reduced functional status.15 This fact justifies the conviction that dysphagia is a highly prevalent and frequently overlooked cross-sectional problem in our wards. These results should be confirmed in a larger population, preferably in and multi-center study.

Conclusion

The prevalence of dysphagia in the population hospitalized in an Internal Medicine department was 34%. Gender, age, comorbidity and dependence are risk factors for the presence of dysphagia. About one in six patients developed complications resulting from this pathology. These data, to be confirmed with a larger study, may justify a universal screening of dysphagia in patients hospitalized in internal medicine services.

REFERENCES

1. Ferreira AM, Pierdevara L, Ventura IM, Gracias AM, Marques JM, Reis MG. Gugging Swallowing Screen: contributo para a validação cultural e linguística para o contexto português. Rev Enf Ref. 2018; 16: 85-94. doi.org/10.12707/RIV17090. [ Links ]

2. Malagelada, J, Bazzoli, F, Boeckxstaens, G, DeLooze, D, Fried M, Kahrilas P, et al. Dysphagia. World Gastroenterology Organisation Global Guide-lines, Update September 2014. [accessed in 2021 September]. Available at: https://www.worldgastroenterology.org/UserFiles/file/guidelines/dysphagia-english-2014.pdfLinks ]

3. Altman KW, Yu GP, Schaefer SD. Consequence of dysphagia in the hospita-lized patient: impact on prognosis and hospital resources. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;136:784-9. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.129. [ Links ]

4. Padovani AR, Moraes DP, Sassi FC, Andrade CR. Clinical swallowing as-sessment in intensive care unit. Codas. 2013;25:1-7. doi: 10.1590/s2317-17822013000100002. [ Links ]

5. Clavé Civit P; García Peris P. Justificación y objetivos. In: Guía de diagnóstico y de tratamiento nutricional y reabilitador de la disfagia orofaríngea. Barcelona: Editorial Glosa: 2011. p. 13-7. [ Links ]

6. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classi-fying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and valida-tion. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. [ Links ]

7. Health Care Transformation Task Force: Proactively identifying the high cost population, 2015 [accessed in 2021 September]. Available at: https://hcttf. org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/WhitePaper ProactivelyIdentifyingtheHi-ghCostPopulation.pdfLinks ]

8. Mahoney FI; Barthel DW. Functional Evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965; 14:61-5. [ Links ]

9. Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, Stanga Z, Ad Hoc ESPEN Working Group. Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr. 2003; 22: 321-36. doi:10.1016/s0261-5614(02)00214-5. [ Links ]

10. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 27.0. Armonk: IBM Corp:2020. [ Links ]

11. Spronk PE, Spronk LE, Lut J, Gnacke E, Mijnes D, Munster B, et al. Preva-lence and characterization of dysphagia in hospitalized patients, Neurogas-troenterol Motil. 2020; 32: e13763. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13763 [ Links ]

12. Kertscher B, Speyer R, Fong E, Georgiou AM, Smith M. Prevalence of oro-pharyngeal dysphagia in the Netherlands: a telephone survey. Dysphagia. 2015; 30: 114-20. doi: 10.1007/s00455-014-9584-z [ Links ]

13. Bhattacharyya N. The prevalence of dysphagia among adults in the United States. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014; 151:765-9. doi: 10.1177/0194599814549156. [ Links ]

14. Hayashi M, Yahiro A, Sakuragi Y, Iwamatsu K, Sakamoto H, Kaizuka Y, et al. Impaired swallowing in hospitalized patients. Nurs Res. 2016; 65: 389-96. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000178 [ Links ]

15. Baijens LW, Clave P, Cras P, Ekberg O, Forster A, Kolb G, et al. European Society for swallowing disorders - European Union geriatric medicine society white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia as a geriatric syndrome. Clin Interv Aging. 2016; 11:1403-28. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S107750 [ Links ]

Previous Presentation “Estudo da prevalência de disfagia em doentes internados num Departamento de Medicina Interna” was presented at 27º Congresso Nacional de Medicina Interna as a oral communication, in Centro de Congressos do Algarve.

Fontes de Financiamento: Não existiram fontes externas de financiamento para a realização deste artigo.

6Confidencialidade dos Dados: Os autores declaram ter seguido os protocolos da sua instituição acerca da publicação dos dados de doentes.

7Consentimento: Consentimento do doente para publicação obtido.

8Proveniência e Revisão por Pares: Não comissionado; revisão externa por pares.

Financing Support: This work has not received any contribution, grant or scholarship

11Confidentiality of Data: The authors declare that they have followed the protocols of their work center on the publication of data from patients.

12Patient Consent: Consent for publication was obtained.

13Provenance and Peer Review: Not commissioned; externally peer re-viewed.

14© Autor (es) (ou seu (s) empregador (es)) e Revista SPMI 2023. Reutilização permitida de acordo com CC BY-NC. Nenhuma reutilização comercial. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) and SPMI Journal 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use

Received: October 10, 2022; Accepted: January 11, 2023

Correspondence / Correspondência: Joana Reis Aguiar - joanareisaguiar@gmail.com Departamento de Medicina, Hospital da Luz - Arrábida, Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal Praceta de Henrique Moreira, 150, 4400-346 Vila Nova de Gaia

Declaração de Contribuição JRA, RC, IC, LM - Desenho, recolha de dados, redação e revisão do artigo. AHC - Redação e revisão do artigo Todos os autores aprovaram a versão final a ser submetida.

Contributorship Statement JRA, RC, IC, LM - Design, data collection, article writing and revision. AHC - Drafting and revising the article All authors approved the final draft.

Conflitos de Interesse: Os autores declaram a inexistência de conflitos de interesse na realização do presente trabalho.

Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License