SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.15 número5Avaliação dos níveis plasmáticos de IGF-1, glicose e insulina no pré e pós-operatório de pacientes submetidos à cirurgia de Fobi-CapellaEctasia vascular do antro gástrico como causa de anemia ferropénica crónica: A propósito de um caso clínico índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Jornal Português de Gastrenterologia

versão impressa ISSN 0872-8178

J Port Gastrenterol. v.15 n.5 Lisboa nov. 2008

 

Profilaxia de Úlceras de Stresse numa Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos - Estado da Arte

 

R. Pinho, J. M. Romãozinho(1)

 

Resumo

As lesões da mucosa gastro-duodenal relacionadas com o stresse fisiológico são frequentes nos doentes internados em unidades de cuidados intensivos. Podem condicionar hemorragia digestiva com repercussão hemodinâmica, estando associadas a aumento da  mortalidade. A hipoperfusão esplâncnica tem um papel central na sua fisiopatologia. Foram identificados vários factores de risco para a sua ocorrência, sendo os mais importantes a necessidade de ventilação mecânica e a presença de coagulopatia. A ressuscitação hemodinâmica atempada e a manutenção da nutrição entérica são medidas importantes para prevenir estas lesões. Em doentes com factores de risco deverá ser realizada profilaxia farmacológica. Os medicamentos mais estudados são os anti-ácidos, o sucralfato e os antagonistas H2. Têm surgido recentemente estudos sobre o papel dos inibidores da bomba de protões. A escolha da terapêutica farmacológica deverá ter em conta a via de administração, as vantagens e desvantagens de cada fármaco, incluindo o seu custo comparado e a evidência sobre a sua eficácia.

 

Summary

Stress related mucosal lesions of the gastro-duodenal mucosa are common in the intensive care setting. They may result in clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding with increased mortality. Splanchnic hypoperfusion has a central role in their pathophysiology. Several risk factors were identified, the most important being respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation and coagulopathy. Fluid resuscitation and enteral nutrition are important measures to prevent these lesions. Pharmacologic prophylaxis is indicated in patients with known risk factors. Anti-acids, sucralfate and H2-receptor antagonists are the most extensively studied drugs. Recent studies evaluating the role of proton pump inhibitors were published. The choice of the  prophylactic regimen should be based on the route of administration, possible advantages and disadvantages of the drugs, including their comparative cost and available evidence of their efficacy.

 

Texto Completo disponível apenas em PDF

Full text only available in PDF format

 

Bibliografia

1. Curling TB. On acute ulceration of the duodenum in cases of burn. Medico-Chirurgical Transactions 1842; 25: 260-281.        [ Links ]

2. Cook DJ. Stresse ulcer prophylaxis: gastrointestinal bleeding and nosocomial pneumonia. Best evidence synthesis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1995;210:S48-S52

3. Mutlu GM, Mutlu EA, Factor P. GI complications in patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Chest. 2001; 119:1222-41.

4. Cook DJ, Fuller HD, Guyatt GH et al. Risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:377-81.

5. Martindale RG. Contemporary strategies for the prevention of stresse-related mucosal bleeding. Am J Health-Syst Pharm 2005;62(S2):S11-S17

6. Ritchie Jr WP. Acute gastric mucosal damage induced by bile salts, acid, and ischemia. Gastroenterology 1975;68:699- 707

7. Silen W. The prevention and management of stresse ulcers. Hosp Pract. 1980; 15:93-100.

8. Maynard N, Bihari D, Beale R, et al. Assessment of splanchnic oxygenation by gastric tonometry in patients with acute circulatory failure. JAMA 1993;270:1203 - 10.

9. Maynard ND, Bihari DJ, Dalton RN, et al. Increasing splanchnic blood flow in the critically ill. Chest 1995;108:1648- 54.

10. Stollman N, Metz DC. Pathophysiology and prophylaxis of stresse ulcer in intensive care unit patients. Journal of Critical Care 2005;20:35–45

11. Bowen, JC, Fleming, WH, Thompson, JC. Increased gastrin release following penetration central nervous system injury. Surgery 1974; 75:720.

12. Schindlbeck NE; Lippert M; Heinrich C, et al. Intragastric bile acid concentrations in critically ill, artificially ventilated patients. Am J Gastroenterol 1989 Jun;84(6):624-8

13. Maury E; Tankovic J; Ebel A, et al. An observational study of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in intensive care units: Is Helicobacter pylori the culprit? Crit Care Med 2005 Jul;33(7):1513-8

14. Robertson MS; Cade JF; Clancy RL. Helicobacter pylori infection in intensive care: increased prevalence and a new nosocomial infection. Crit Care Med 1999 Jul;27(7):1276-80.

15. Halm U, Halm F, Thein D, et al. Helicobacter pylori infection: a risk factor for upper gastrointestinal bleeding after cardiac surgery? Crit Care Med 2000;28:110- 3.

16. Cook DJ, Fuller HD, Guyatt GH et al. Risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:377–81.

17. Cook D, Heyland D, Griffith L, Cook R, Marshall J, Pagliarello J, for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group: Risk factors for clinically important upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 1999;27:2812-7.

18. Le Gall JR, Mignon FC, Rapin M et al. Acute gastroduodenal lesions related to severe sepsis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976;142:377–80.

19. Schuster DP, Rowley H, Feinstein S et al. Prospective evaluation of the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding after admission to a medical intensive care unit. Am J Med. 1984; 76:623–30.

20. Cook DJ, Pearl RG, Cook RJ et al. Incidence of clinically important bleeding in mechanically ventilated patients. J Intensive Care Med. 1991; 6:167–74.

21. Ben-Menachem T, Fogel R, Patel RV et al. Prophylaxis for stresse-related gastric hemorrhage in the medical intensive care unit: a randomized, controlled, singleblind study. Ann Intern Med. 1994; 121:568–75.

22. ASHP Therapeutic Guidelines on Stresse Ulcer Prophylaxis, 1999

23. Silen W. The prevention and management of stresse ulcers. Hosp Pract 1980;15:93 - 100.

24. Schmidt H, Martindale R. The gastrointestinal tract in critical illness. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2001; 4:547-51.

25. Raff T, Germann G, Hartmann B. The value of early enteral nutrition in the prophylaxis of stresse ulceration in the severely burned patient. Burns. 1997; 23:313-8.

26. Gurman G, Samri M, Sarov B et al. The rate of gastrointestinal bleeding in a general ICU population: a retrospective study. Intensive Care Med. 1990; 16:44-9.

27. Hastings PR, Skillman JJ, Bushnell LS, et al. Antacid titration in the prevention of acute gastrointestinal bleeding: a controlled, randomized trial in 100 critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 1978; 298:1041- 5.

28. Cook DJ; Reeve BK; Guyatt GH, et al. Stresse ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients. Resolving discordant meta-analyses. JAMA 1996 Jan 24-31;275(4):308-14

29. Rees WD. Mechanisms of gastroduodenal protection by sucralfate. Am J Med 1991 Aug 8;91(2A):58S-63S

30. Prod’hom G, Leuenberger P, Koerfer J et al. Nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients receiving antacid, ranitidine, or sucralfate as prophylaxis for stresse ulcer. A randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1994; 120:653-62.

31. Cook D; Guyatt G; Marshall J, et al. A comparison of sucralfate and ranitidine for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. N Engl J Med 1998 Mar 19;338(12):791-7

32. Messori A; Trippoli S; Vaiani M, et al. Bleeding and pneumonia in intensive care patients given ranitidine and sucralfate for prevention of stresse ulcer: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. MJ 2000 Nov 4;321(7269):1103-6

33. Shuman RB; Schuster DP; Zuckerman GR. Prophylactic therapy for stresse ulcer bleeding: a reappraisal. Ann Intern Med 1987 Apr;106(4):562-7

34. Ostro MJ, Russell JA, Soldin SJ, Mahon WA, Jeejeebhoy KN. Control of gastric pH with cimetidine: boluses versus primed infusions. Gastroenterology 1985;89:532- 7.

35. Pemberton LB; Schaefer N; Goehring L, et al. Oral ranitidine as prophylaxis for gastric stresse ulcers in intensive care unit patients: serum concentrations and cost comparisons. Crit Care Med 1993 Mar;21(3):339-42

36. Martin LF, Booth FV, Karlstadt RG et al. Continuous intravenous cimetidine decreases stresse-related upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage without promoting pneumonia. Crit Care Med. 1993; 21:19-30.

37. Merki HS, Wilder-Smith CH. Do continuous infusions of omeprazole and ranitidine retain their effect with prolonged dosing? Gastroenterology 1994;106:60 - 4.

38. Netzer P, Gaia C, Sandoz M, et al. Effect of repeated injection and continuous infusion of omeprazole and ranitidine on intragastric pH over 72 hours. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:351- 7.

39. Netzer P, Gaia C, Sandoz M, et al: Effect of repeated injection and continuous infusion of omeprazole and ranitidine on intragastric pH over 72 hours. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94:351–357

40. Phillips JO, Metzler MH, Palmieri TL, et al. A prospective study of simplified omeprazole suspension for the prophylaxis of stresse-related mucosal damage. Crit Care Med 1996; 24:1793- 800.

41. Lasky MR, Metzler MH, Phillips JO. A prospective study of omeprazole suspension to prevent clinically significant gastrointestinal bleeding from stresse ulcers in mechanically ventilated trauma patients. J Trauma 1998;44:527 - 33.

42. Levy MJ; Seelig CB; Robinson NJ, et al. Comparison of omeprazole and ranitidine for stresse ulcer prophylaxis. Dig Dis Sci 1997 Jun;42(6):1255-9.

43. Conrad SA; Gabrielli A; Margolis B, et al. Randomized, double-blind comparison of immediate-release omeprazole oral suspension versus intravenous cimetidine for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 2005 Apr;33(4):760-5.

44. Phillips JO, Metzler MH, Huckfeldt RE, Olsen K. A multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial of continuous infusion I.V. ranitidine vs omeprazole suspension in the prophylaxis of stresse ulcers. Crit Care Med 1998;26:A101.

45. Azevedo JR, Soares MG, Silva G, Palacio G. Prevention of stresse ulcer bleeding in high risk patients: comparison of three drugs. Crit Care Med 1999;27:A41.

46. Berardi RR, Welage LS. Proton-pump inhibitors in acid-related diseases. Am J Health Syst Pharm 1998;55:2289- 98.

47. Jung R, MacLaren R: Proton-pump inhibitors for stresse ulcer prophylaxis in critically ill patients. Ann Pharmacother 2002;36: 1929–1937

48. Schupp KN; Schrand LM; Mutnick AH. A cost-effectiveness analysis of stresse ulcer prophylaxis. Ann Pharmacother 2003 May;37(5):631-5.

 

(1) Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos de Gastrenterologia - Serviço de Gastrenterologia  - Hospitais da Universidade de Coimbra

 

Correspondência:

Rolando Taveira Pinho

Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos de Gastrenterologia

Serviço de Gastrenterologia – Hospitais

da Universidade de Coimbra

Av. Bissaya Barreto e Praceta Prof. Mota Pinto

3000-075 – Coimbra

Telef. 00351239400468

e-mail: rolandopinho@portugalmail.pt

 

Recebido para publicação: 25/09/2007

Aceite para publicação: 16/07/2008