SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.15 número3Procriação medicamente assistida com recurso a doação de ovócitos: indicaçõesCarcinoma endometrióide endometrial primário com células em anel de sinete: porquê um caso especial? índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Acta Obstétrica e Ginecológica Portuguesa

versión impresa ISSN 1646-5830

Acta Obstet Ginecol Port vol.15 no.3 Algés set. 2021  Epub 30-Sep-2021

 

Caso clínico/ Case report

Interstitial ectopic pregnancy - two case reports of early diagnosis and conservative management

Gravidez ectópica intersticial - apresentação de dois casos de diagnóstico precoce e terapêutica conservadora

Inês Vermelho Lourenço1 

José Reis1 

Marta Brito1 

Pedro Condeço1 

Carlos Veríssimo1 

1. Hospital Beatriz Ângelo, Loures. Portugal.


Abstract

Interstitial ectopic pregnancy is rare, but can cause severe complications. The diagnosis is challenging and the optimal treatment varies according to each case. The authors present two case reports of early interstitial pregnancies diagnosed in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic women. One was submitted to laparoscopic excision of the ectopic mass without complications. As for the other, she was treated with intramuscular methotrexate. In both cases, human chorionic gonadotropin decreased consistently until it became undetectable 4 weeks after treatment. An early and accurate diagnosis is fundamental to avoid major complications. Conservative treatment is possible and should be recommended in selected cases.

Keywords: Interstitial pregnancy; Ectopic pregnancy; Methotrexate; Laparoscopy; Minimally invasive surgery.

Introduction

Ectopic pregnancy happens when implantation of the blastocyst occurs somewhere other than the uterine endometrial cavity. The most common site of implantation is the ampullary portion of fallopian tubes, which accounts for 70% of ectopic gestations1.

The interstitial implantation is rare, with an incidence between 2-3%1), (2. It occurs when the blastocyst implants in the proximal segment of the fallopian tube, located into the myometrial wall3.

The risk factors for an interstitial pregnancy (IP) are the same as for ectopic pregnancies in general, and include everything that affects the normal tubal anatomy and function, such as previous ectopic pregnancy, surgery, infections, congenital anomalies, smoking and hormonal contraception4), (5. However, an history of ipsilateral salpingectomy is a specific risk factor for development of IP6), (7.

IP has higher risk of bleeding and uterine rupture, even in the early stages of pregnancy, due to the presence of vascular anastomosis between uterine and ovarian arteries3), (8), (9. It can be managed surgically or medically, according to its clinical presentation and serum human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) levels3.

The authors report two cases of IP, one of them managed with a surgical laparoscopic procedure and the other treated conservatively with intramuscular methotrexate (MTX).

Case report 1

A 28-year-old pregnant woman went to a routine antenatal appointment to begin pregnancy surveillance. It was her third gestation. She had a normal delivery 3 years before and an ectopic left tubal pregnancy that was treated with laparoscopic salpingectomy, 2 months before. Other than this, her medical history was irrelevant.

She had 7 weeks and 3 days of menstrual delay and was completely asymptomatic.

We did a transvaginal ultrasound that revealed the presence of a rounded anechoic mass in the interstitial portion of the left tube, with maximum diameter of 1,7 centimeters and peripheral ring vascularization. This mass was delimited by a hyperechoic wall and contained a yolk-sac but no visible embryo, and it was surrounded by a thin myometrial layer. It caused a bulging of the external limit of the uterus and had no communication with the endometrium (Figures 1 and 2). Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound findings were also in line with the previous suspicion of an ectopic pregnancy in the interstitial portion of the left tube (Figures 3 and 4). There was also a decidual reaction in the uterine cavity and an hematometra. No free fluid was detected in the pouch of Douglas.

Figure 1 Ultrasound image: ectopic mass separated from endometrial cavity, surounded by thin myometrium. 

Figure 2 Ultrasound image: ectopic mass with 1,7cm, delimited by a hyperecoic wall, with yolk-sac but no embryo. 

Figure 3 Ultrasound 3D scan: ectopic mass without communication with uterine cavity and causing an external bulging in the uterine wall. 

Figure 4 Ultrasound 3D scan: ectopic mass without communication with uterine cavity and causing an external bulging in the uterine wall. 

Her laboratory results revealed a HCG level of 17,013 UI/L.

She was immediately referred to the emergency department where she was submitted to a laparoscopy, which showed an ectopic pregnancy in the left cornual region of the uterus (Figure 5). We performed a laparoscopic excision of the ectopic mass, using bipolar electrocoagulation and laparoscopic scissors. After removing the mass, intracorporeal knots were used to close the uterine incision and to assure hemostasis (Figure 6). The intraperitoneal pressure was then diminished to 4 mmHg to confirm hemostasis. There were no hemorrhagic points, hence we used an haemostatic knit - Surgicel ® NU-KNIT - to cover the suture in order to prevent further blood loss. The surgery lasted 50 minutes and the amount of blood loss was 50 milliliters.

Figure 5 Laparoscopic image: ectopic pregnancy in the left corneal region of the uterus. 

Figure 6 Laparoscopic image: small incision of the uterus after removing the mass and closing with intracorporeal knots. 

No postoperative complications were reported and the laboratory results showed a significant decrease of the HCG serum concentration to 4651 Ul/L, one day after the surgery. She was discharged in the first postoperative day.

Pathological results confirmed our hypothesis of an interstitial ectopic pregnancy.

Two weeks later, in the postoperative appointment, she was asymptomatic, her gynecological exam was normal and the incisions were healing well.

She underwent weekly monitoring of HCG levels, which were in a descending pattern and became undetectable four weeks after surgery.

Case report 2

A 22-year-old women, 5 weeks and 4 days pregnant, presented to the emergency department of our hospital with complaints of vaginal bleeding and pelvic pain. It was her second pregnancy, as she had an abortion without curettage one year before. Her personal and medical history was irrelevant.

The transvaginal ultrasound identified an eccentric gestational sac in the right cornual region, surrounded by a thin myometrial layer, with maximum diameter of 1,6 centimeters. (Figures 7 and 8) This gestational sac was empty and had a hyperechoic wall and peripheral ring vascularization, as is expected from trophoblastic tissue. (Figure 9) This sac had no communication with the endometrium and caused a bulging of the external limit of the uterus, which was confirmed by the 3D ultrasound images. (Figure 10) There was a decidual reaction in the uterine cavity.

Figure 7 Ultrasound image: eccentric gestational sac in the right cornual region. 

Figure 8 Ultrasound image: empty gestacional sac with 1,6cm. 

Figure 9 Ultrasound image: gestacional sac with hyperecoic wall and peripheral ring vascularization. 

Figure 10 Ultrasound 3D scan: ectopic mass without communication with uterine cavity and causing an external bulging in the uterine wall. 

Moreover, her HCG level was 3,733 UI/L.

Thereon, we proposed her conservative treatment with intramuscular administration of MTX, that she accepted. After confirming normal blood count and liver function, we treated her with 80 mg (50mg/m2) of MTX and she was discharged.

Her HCG levels were closely monitored and the values showed a decrease of 17% between day 4 and day 7, which was in line with a successful treatment.

During the follow-up period she was asymptomatic and her HCG levels continued to descend until became undetectable one month after treatment.

Discussion

IP is a rare condition associated with a high rate of complications as it can lead to uterine rupture with possible life-threatening hemorrhage, usually occurring in the early stages of pregnancy3), (8), (9), (10), (11. However, as the trophoblastic tissue is implanted in the myometrial layer, the pregnancy can also develop and reach advanced gestacional ages without causing any alarm symptom. It is challenging to diagnose IP that may be misdiagnosed as an angular pregnancy - an intrauterine pregnancy that extends into the lateral “angle” of the uterine cavity12. An early diagnosis is essential to prevent complications and to select the proper management strategy3), (13.

In both cases, the women were asymptomatic or had few and unspecific symptoms. This highlight the importance of a high suspicion level, specially in the presence of specific risk factors, like previous ipsilateral salpingectomy, as happened in the first case.

Besides clinical history, laboratory and ultrasound findings are equally important.

An empty uterine cavity and eccentrically located gestational sac surrounded by incomplete myometrium with thickness smaller than 5 mm were described as highly suggestive ultrasound indicators of IP3), (13), (14.

As we can see in the ultrasound images, the gestational sac has an eccentric location and the uterine cavity appears empty, corroborating the diagnosis with a high level of certainty. Additionally, the coronal 3D scans give us a better view of the fundal and cornual regions of the uterus, confirming the absence of communication between the sac and the endometrium and the presence of an external bulging of the uterus induced by the ectopic mass.

As for the treatment, current data supports the most conservative treatment possible, in order to preserve uterine integrity and subsequently improving future fertility and future obstetric outcomes7), (11. There are no published treatment guidelines for IP, so the treatment should be individualized.

Medical treatment with MTX is an option to initial, non-complicated, selected IP15), (16. Intramuscular injection of MTX was administered successfully in the second case. It was an early pregnancy, with relatively low HCG levels and an empty gestational sac. Therefore, we opted for a conservative management that proved to be effective, did not cause any side effects, complications or suspected sequelae in the woman’s reproductive future.

When surgery is required, there has also been a progression towards more conservative techniques, such as laparoscopic cornuostomy or laparoscopic cornual resection.

In a laparoscopic cornuostomy we are able to remove the gestational tissue without removing the surrounding myometrium, so the uterine integrity is better preserved than in a cornual resection7.

Some authors suggest that the size of the ectopic mass should determine the choice between these two techniques, defining that when the mass is over 3,5-4 centimeters a cornual resection is more appropriate17), (18. However, at least equally important is the extent of penetration into the myometrium, that should be accessed during surgery and can preclude a more conservative approach.

In our first case, we chose to perform a cornuostomy to excise the ectopic mass, using bipolar coagulation and cutting, as the mass was located superficially and the surrounding myometrium did not appear too damaged. We were able to remove the mass with a small amount of blood loss and a small incision in the uterus that was then sutured and closed with intracorporeal knots.

It was an effective, minimally invasive surgery, without any peri- or post-operative complications.

Since the ectopic mass had similar dimensions, the choice of medical treatment in one case and surgical treatment in the other was based on the HCG levels, as a high concentration is associated with MTX treatment failure, more marked when inicial HCG is above 5000IU/L19), (20.

Persistent ectopic pregnancy is an important complication of both conservative surgical approach and medical treatment7. Therefore, appropriate selection of cases and close monitoring of HCG levels after treatment are crucial. In both cases we observed a solid decrease of HCG levels, that ensured the treatment was successful as all gestational tissue was removed.

To conclude, more conservative treatment options should be recommended in selected cases, as they proved effectiveness without increased morbidity and few future sequelae.

Both patients signed an informed consent for publication of the case report.

Hospital’s ethics approval

Confirmed.

Conflicts of interest

We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Contributions

All the authors contributed equally to this paper, namely to the conception and design, data collection or analysis, and interpretation of data, writing of the article and review of the intellectual content. Therefore, all authors approved the final version to be published.

References

1. Bouyer J, Coste J, Fernandez H, Pouly JL, Job-Spira N. Sites of ectopic pregnancy: a 10 year population-based study of 1800 cases. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(12):3224. [ Links ]

2. Larraín D, Marengo F, Bourdel N, Jaffeux P, Aublet-Cuvelier B, Pouly JL, et al. Proximal ectopic pregnancy: a descriptive general population-based study and results of different management options in 86 cases. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(3):867. [ Links ]

3. Tizio LD, Spina MR, Gustapane S, D'Antonio F, Liberati M. Interstitial pregnancy: from medical to surgical approach - report of three cases. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 2018: 2815871. [ Links ]

4. Li C, Zhao W., Zhu Q. Cao S,Ping H, Xi X, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a multi-center case-control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 15, 187 (2015). [ Links ]

5. Bouyer J, Coste J, Shojaei T, Pouly JL, Fernandez H, Gerbaud L, et al. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a comprehensive analysis based on a large case-control, population-based study in France. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157(3):185. [ Links ]

6. Tulandi T, Al-Jaroudi D. Interstitial pregnancy: results generated from the Society of Reproductive Surgeons Registry. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103(1):47. [ Links ]

7. Gao MY, Zhu H, Zheng FY. Interstitial Pregnancy after Ipsilateral Salpingectomy: Analysis of 46 cases and a literature review. J Minim Invas Gynec 2019, 27(3):613-617 [ Links ]

8. Alagbe O, Adeniyi T, Abayomi O, Onifade E. Interstitial ectopic pregnancy: A case report. Pan Afr Med J. 2017; 28: 135 [ Links ]

9. Firoozeh A, Fattaneh P, Fariba R, Farnaz A.Interstitial ectopic pregnancy diagnosis by three-dimensional ultrasound and its laparoscopic management: A case report. Int J Reprod Biomed 2019 Dec; 17(12): 945-950 [ Links ]

10. Shiragur S, Gobbur RV, Tehalia JM, Doshi R, Kori S. Ruptured cornual ectopic pregnancy at 8 weeks gestation- successful conservative approach: a case report. Int J Reprod, Contrac, Obstet Gynecol. 2013;2(4):671-673. [ Links ]

11. Sun F, Yang S, Yang M, Liu X, Hong X. Laparoscopic Management of 42 cases of tubal stump pregnancy and postoperative reproductive outcomes. J Minim Invas Gynec Mar-Apr 2020;27(3):618-624 [ Links ]

12. Bollig KJ, Schust DJ. Refining Angular Pregnancy Diagnosis in the First Trimester: A Case Series of Expectant Management. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(1):175. [ Links ]

13. Rastogi R, Meena GL, Rastogi N, Rastogi V Interstitial ectopic pregnancy: A rare and difficult clinicosonographic diagnosis. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2008 Jul-Dec; 1(2): 81-82 [ Links ]

14. Ackerman TE, Levi CS, Dashefsky SM, Holt SC, Lindsay DJ. Interstitial line: sonographic finding in interstitial (cornual) ectopic pregnancy. Radiol 1993;189(1):83. [ Links ]

15. Lau S, Tulandi T. Conservative medical and surgical management of interstitial ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril 1999;72(2):207. [ Links ]

16. Jermy K, Thomas J, Doo A, Bourne T. The conservative management of interstitial pregnancy. BJOG. 2004;111(11):1283. [ Links ]

17. Tulandi T, Vilos G, Gomel V. Laparoscopic treatment of interstitial pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1995 Mar;85(3):465-7 [ Links ]

18. Grobman WA, Milad MP. Conservative laparoscopic management of a large corneal ectopic pregnancy. Hum Reprod 1998 Jul;13(7):2002-4. [ Links ]

19. Menon S, Colins J, Barnhart KT. Establishing a human chorionic gonadotropin cutoff to guide methotrexate treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(3):481. [ Links ]

20. Lipscomb GH, McCord ML, Stovall TG, Huff G, Portera SG, Ling FW. Predictors of success of methotrexate treatment in women with tubal ectopic pregnancies. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(26):1974. [ Links ]

Received: September 25, 2020; Accepted: October 21, 2020

Endereço para correspondência Inês Vermelho Lourenço E-mail: ines.vermelho@sapo.pt

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License