SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.32 issue2Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Liver: a Move Towards Function and QuantificationARP Case Report nº 20: What is your diagnosis? author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Acta Radiológica Portuguesa

Print version ISSN 2183-1351

Acta Radiol Port vol.32 no.2 Lisboa Aug. 2020  Epub July 06, 2021

https://doi.org/10.25748/arp.18889 

Artigos Revisão

Anterior Fibromuscular Band Tumors: from an Unknown Zone to a Potential Common Cancer Location

Banda Fibromuscular Anterior: de uma Zona Desconhecida a uma Localização Potencial de Cancro

Rita Camelo

João Lopes Dias1,21  2 

1Serviço de Radiologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Hospital de São José, Lisboa, Portugal

2Serviço de Radiologia, Hospital Lusíadas, Lisboa, Portugal


Abstract

Prostate cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the eight cause of death by cancer worldwide. In particularly, anterior prostate cancers are frequently missed since they can be neither palpable nor tangible on physical examination. Furthermore, traditional TRUS- guided prostate biopsy accomplishes poorly in their diagnosis because anterior prostate cancers, including anterior fibromuscular stroma cancers, are not normally sampled. Consequently, these tumors are often diagnosed after recurrent negative biopsies, being larger at diagnosis, carrying a higher risk for the patient. The main objective of this paper is to highlight the importance of multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in diagnosis of anterior fibromuscular cancers, describing the normal zonal anatomy and the typical tumors behave patterns at this location.

In conclusion, MRI should perform a significant role in more precise lesion localization, particularly in the diagnosis of anterior prostate cancer. Prebiopsy MRI with an ADC map should be performed to avoid missing clinically significant cancer in the anterior gland, a problem inherent in the use of TRUS-guided biopsy.

Keywords: Prostate MRI; Anterior prostate cancer; Anterior fibromuscular stroma; Diagnosis.

Resumo

O cancro da próstata é o quarto cancro mais comum e a oitava causa de morte em todo o Mundo. Por não serem palpáveis, os tumores da próstata anterior, nomeadamente os tumores da banda fibromuscular anterior, são frequentemente clinicamente sub- diagnosticados. Acresce ainda o facto de que a tradicional biópsia prostática transrectal guiada por ecografia apresenta uma baixa acuidade diagnóstica nestes tumores, uma vez que a próstata anterior não é rotineiramente biopsada. Consequentemente, os tumores da banda fibromuscular são muitas vezes diagnosticados somente após múltiplas biópsias sistematicamente negativas, apresentando dimensões aumentadas aquando do diagnóstico e comportando pior prognóstico.

O principal objectivo deste artigo é realçar a importância da Ressonância Magnética Multiparamétrica no diagnóstico de tumores da banda fibromuscular anterior, sendo descritas as normais características desta zona e o comportamento típico dos tumores que a envolvem.

Em conclusão, a ressonância magnética desempenha um importante papel na localização de lesões prostáticas anteriores, evitando assim o subdiagnóstico destes tumores.

Palavras-Chave: RM prostática; Cancro prostático anterior; Banda fibromuscular anterior; Diagnóstico.

Introduction

Prostate cancer is the fourth most common cancer and the eighth cause of death by cancer worldwide.1,2

The diagnosis of prostate cancer is still centered on three main factors: serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) evaluations, digital rectal examination, and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsy. However, these biopsies typically sample the posterior peripheral parenchyma, thus missing central, transitional and more anterior tumors. Moreover, anterior prostate cancers cannot be easily palpable.3,4 In retrospective analysis of radical prostatectomy specimens pure anterior tumors account for 20% of all prostate cancers; however over 50% of specimens contain at least some tumor in the anterior prostate.5

Consequently, these cancers are frequently larger at diagnosis and carry a higher risk for the patient, and some studies have shown higher risk of positive surgical margins on radical prostatectomy.6,7

Tumors that may be missed in conventional biopsies include not only anterior fibromuscular band tumors, but also anterior horn of the peripheral zone tumors, the most anterior segment of transitional zones. Over 20% of the prostate cancers are missed or undersampled during (TRUS)-guided biopsy.8 This diagnostic uncertainty is a common concern in daily practice, which often results in additional biopsy sessions, as transperineal template biopsy, with varying success rates (range 10-40%).8,9

With the onset of multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI), the incidence in the diagnosis of anterior tumors significantly increased.10

Therefore, the main objective of this paper is to highlight the importance of mpMRI in diagnosis of anterior prostate cancers.

Normal anterior fibromuscular stroma (AFMS)

AFMS comprises a non-glandular gaping volume of stroma, containing a band of fibromuscular tissue, and being a wedge-shaped stromal barrier.

Anatomically, it is located anteriorly to the transition zone (TZ), occupying the anteromedial prostate from the apex through the base, overlying the prostatic urethra anteriorly, sheltering the urethra and the glandular tissue from the contiguous structures, and extending bilaterally near the anterior horns of the peripheral zone. AFMS founds up to nearly one-third of the prostatic tissue (Figures 1 and 2).11

Figure 1: Normal anatomy of the prostate gland and normal appearance of the anterior fibromuscular stroma. Sagittal diagrammatic picture (A) and equivalent T2WI (B) of a normal prostate demonstrates the anterior fibromuscular stroma (*) located anteriorly, being thicker at the base and apex and thin at medium gland; peripheral zone (PZ); AP- anterior prostate. 

Figure 2: Axial diagrammatic representation (A) and corresponding T2-WI (B) of an axial section at the level of the medium gland, demonstrating the anterior fibromuscular stroma (*) anteriorly; the anterior horns of the peripheral zone laterally (AHPZ); the anteromedial transition zone posteriorly (tz); urethra (u); ejaculatory ducts (ed) and peripheral zone (ZP) 

AFMS is variably intertwined with skeletal muscle fibers of the urogenital diaphragm at the apex and fuses with the smooth muscle fibers of the detrusor at the base of the prostate, originating its thicker appearance at the apex and the base.6,11 AFMS differs in its thickness among men, being less protuberant in individuals with increased gland size and age, probably because of the compressive effect of benign prostatic hyperplasia (Figure 3).12

Figure 3: A - T2 sagittal WI demonstrating AFMS with reduced thickness, in this 76 year old patient with HBP (arrows). B - T2 sagittal WI showing normal thickness of AFMS, being thicker at the base (yellow arrow) and apex (red arrow). 

Its relatively symmetric appearance on MRI is also in agreement with the anatomical description of normal AFMS.6,11,13

Since AFMS is formed of fibrous tissue and smooth muscle being a non-glandular gaping volume of stroma, the MR appearance (low T2 signal, low-to-intermediate DWI signal, and delayed enhancement) is similar to the MRI findings of equally composed tissues within the body elsewhere, like the bladder wall, being a result of its histologic structure.14 According to its non-glandular composition, it is rare to find a pure AFMS tumor. It may rises from adjacent parenchyma, namely from the anterior horns of peripheral zone and the contiguous transitional zones. Due to its appearance on MRI, prostate cancers can be obscure. Its distinction from prostate cancer is crucial not only to avoid unnecessary biopsies and surgeries but also to prevent missing clinically relevant anterior prostatic cancers.

The role of MRI

High-quality mpMRI became a central tool in the diagnosis, classification and treatment planning of prostate cancer.15,16,17 The recommended protocol18 includes T2- weighted anatomical images combined with functional imaging methods such as Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI), Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Imaging (DCE) and T1-weighted image from renal hila to pelvic brim. Besides these sequences had demonstrated a restricted accuracy if considered individually, their association has shown a favorable performance in the assessment of prostate cancer.19

A study performed by Shinmoto et al., highlighted the importance of mpMRI in the diagnosis of anterior prostate cancers. The authors found that the sensitivity of combined T2-weighted imaging and ADC map is higher in the detection of anterior prostate cancer when compared to posterior tumors (Figure 4).20

MpMRI is usually performed in patients with either an elevated or rising serum PSA level and with one or more negative 12-core biopsies.10,21 Particularly in patients with pervious negative biopsies, it is more probable to find anterior tumors.

Detecting anterior cancers on mpMRI may also be difficult because of the concomitance of normal anatomical structures that can simulate cancer in this location. Actually,

Figure 4: Axial T2-WI (a), DWI b-1500 (b), ADC map (c) and T1-VIBE after administration of gadolinium (d), revealed anterior fibromuscular band tumor, measuring 16 x 10 mm, ill-defined, hypointense on T2- WI and ADC map (red arrows);with restriction (yellow arrow) and early enhancing after contrast administration (blue arrows). This lesion was categorized as Pi-Rads 5. Histopathologic results revealed anterior prostatic adenocarcinoma. 

AFMB demonstrates low signal ADC sequences, thus mimicking malignant tumors, and adenomas, localized in the contiguous transitional zones, can show restriction to diffusion.

Besides preoperative tissue diagnosis of prostate cancer has been achieved using TRUS-guided biopsy, this technique is imperfect due to its relatively low sensitivity in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.22,23 Anterior prostate cancer, is frequently missed even with typical 10- to 12-core extended systematic biopsies.24,25

MRI-targeted biopsy has been developed over the last years and has demonstrated increased in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer even performing fewer cores.26,27 Particularly in anterior prostate tumors, diagnosing rates, grade, classification and measurement of cancer per core were demonstrated to be value-added with MR-targeted biopsy in comparison with 12-core systematic biopsies.26

Watanabe et al.28,29 demonstrated an elevated positive predictive value for anterior prostate cancer using a targeted biopsy strategy based on an ADC map. Another recent study from Volkin et al.30 reported that MRI- ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy diagnoses considerably more anterior prostate cancers in contrast with TRUS- guided biopsy. With the introduction of MRI-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy and of MRI-guided biopsy, there has been a progressive interest in describing the morphologic and imaging features of anterior prostate tumors.28,29,30

A study comparing mpMRI then targeted biopsy vs standard transrectal biopsy, found that the MRI was superior at limiting the amount of men who needed biopsies and the discovery of more clinically significant anterior prostate cancers.31 Moreover, in patients with persistently elevated PSA and negative TRUS biopsy, mpMRI then targeted biopsy has a significantly better detection in clinically significant cancers, when compared with saturation biopsy (45.5 versus 24.4%).32

Normal AFMS vs anterior prostatic cancer

AFMS carries a significant challenge in the diagnosis of anterior prostate cancers because its T2 and ADC appearance is similar to that of prostate tumors.33

One study performed by Ward et al34 demonstrated that several MP-MRI findings can be helpful in this distinction, emphasizing the enhancement pattern. Normal AFMS revealed late and progressive enhancement, in contrast to anterior cancers which frequently demonstrate early enhancement with delayed washout. This enhancement pattern can be easily acknowledged qualitatively by relating their enhancement to the normal transition zone, being also revealed on the DCE curve types. It is known that 90% of normal AFMS demonstrated a type 1 curve (characterized for progressive enhancement) which is rarely and usually not present in any of the anterior prostatic cancers. Therefore, this study suggested that the existence of a type 1 curve significantly declines the probability of cancer, even in the existence of low signal on T2WI and ADC.

In PI-RADS version 2, DCE is not comprised in the scoring of transition zone lesions and performs only a secondary role in peripheral zone lesions. However, this paper shows that DCE may be a crucial element for assessment of this subgroup of tumors in the anterior prostate (Figure 5).

Figure 5: Axial and sagittal T2-WI (18), DWI b-1500 (c), ADC map (d) and T1-VIBE after administration of gadolinium (e), revealed a tumor localized at anterior fibromuscular band and anterior horn of right PZ (yellow arrows), with a24 x 8 mm, ill-defined, hypointense on T2-WI (red arrows) and ADC map (green arrow); with restriction (yellow arrow) and early enhancing after contrast administration (blue arrow). This lesion was categorized as Pi-Rads 5. Histopathologic results revealed anterior prostatic adenocarcinoma. 

The previous study also highlights the fact that high b-value diffusion-weighted MR images also appear to be helpful in the distinction of normal AFMS from anterior cancer (Figure 6). In the great majority (90%), AFMS was hypointense to the normal peripheral zone, in contrast with anterior prostate cancers, which were hyperintense, which means they are restrictive (81%).34 Moreover, the previous study also concluded that besides the overlying values, both mean and tenth percentile quantitative ADC values were also significantly different among AFMS and cancer. These differences may be useful in consistently discriminating AFMS from anterior cancers.

Figure 6: Axial T2-WI (a); DWI b-1000 (b) and ADC map (c), demonstrating hypersinal on T2WI (yellow arrow) and DWI (red arrow) and hypossinal at ADC map (blue arrows), measuring 25 mm of great diameter. This lesion was classified as Pi-Rads 5. Pathological results revealed anterior prostatic adenocarcinoma. 

In addition, another recent study35 from Panebianco et al., demonstrates that anterior fibromuscular stroma does not frequently demonstrates enhancement on DCE nor significant restriction on DWI, even though low ADC values can be observed occasionally, because of pre- existing low T2-signal areas rather than a true restriction. In contrast, a study performed by Jinxing et al,36 suggested that key factors for detecting normal AFMS are: significant T2 hypointensity, inferior than that characteristically expected for prostate cancer; absence of early enhancement with washout, its symmetrical and midline or near midline location and its anatomically continuity with the remain anterior fibromuscular stroma.

There is variability among studies regarding imaging key clues to distinguish AFMS from anterior prostate cancer. Main differentiating factors of principal studies are described in Table 1.

Therefore, it is recommended35 to access all the available sequences and planes, including coronal and sagittal planes. A supplementary acquisition plan is of utmost importance, as it can confirm the symmetry and continuity of the hypertrophic anterior fibromuscular stroma with the benign tissue. The T2WI morphological evaluation, combined with absence of positive findings at DWI and DCE, is able to exclude the existence of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Table 1: Main points of three different studies in differentiating normal AFMS from anterior prostatic cancer 

Study AFMS Anterior prostatic cancer
Ward et al., 2016 Contrast enhancement pattern Late and progressive Early with washout (more distinguishable factor)
DWI Hypointense ( in contrast with PZ) Hyperintense (in contrast with PZ)
ADC Higher Lower
Panebianco et al., 2018 Contrast enhancement pattern Rarely enhances -
DWI Without significant restriction -
ADC Low ADC values can be observed Hypointense
Jinxing et al., 2017 T2-WI Significant hypointensity Hypointensity, superior than that observed in AFMS
Contrast enhancement pattern Absence of early enhancement with washout Early enhancement with washout
DWI - -
ADC Low ADC values -

Conclusion

The diagnosis of prostate cancer located at the posterior gland is commonly straightforward through the use of high PSA levels and TRUS-guided biopsy results. In contrast, anterior prostate cancer is frequently difficult to diagnose on TRUS-guided biopsy typically because of its location.24,25

Therefore, anterior prostate cancer is often diagnosed only after recurrent negative biopsies. Accordingly, MRI gets a significant role in more precise lesion localization, particularly in the diagnosis of anterior prostate cancer.

Prebiopsy MRI should be performed to avoid missing clinically significant cancer in the anterior gland, a problem inherent in the use of TRUS-guided biopsy.37

References

1. New Global Cancer Data: GLOBOCAN 2018. UICC. 2019. [ Links ]

2. Jemal A, Bray F, M. Center M, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2011. [ Links ]

3. Cole E, Margel D, Greenspan M, et al. Is there a role for anterior zone sampling as part of saturation trans-rectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy? BMC Urol. 2014. [ Links ]

4. Numao N, Kawakami S, Sakura M, et al. Characteristics and clinical significance of prostate cancers missed by initial transrectal 12-core biopsy. BJU Int. 2012; 109:665-71. [ Links ]

5. Koppie T, Bianco FJJ, Kuroiwa K. The clinical features of anterior prostate cancers. BJU Int. 2006;98:1167-71. [ Links ]

6. Al-Ahmadie H, Tickoo S, Olgac S, et al. Anterior-predominant prostatic tumors: zone of origin and pathologic outcomes at radical prostatectomy. Am J Surg Pathol. 2008;32:229-3. [ Links ]

7. Mygatt J, Sesterhenn I, Rosner I, et al. Anterior tumors of the prostate: clinicopathological features and outcomes. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2014;17:75-80. [ Links ]

8. Djavan B, Ravery V, Zlotta A, Dobronski P, Dobrovits M, Fakhari M. Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop? J Urol. 2001;166:1679-83. [ Links ]

9. Wang Y, Wang X, Yu J, Ouyang J, Shen W, Zhou Y. Application of transrectal ultrasound-guided repeat needle biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in Chinese population: a retrospective study. J Res Med Sci. 2016;21:79. [ Links ]

10. Abdelsayed G, Danial T, Kaswick J, Finley D. Tumors of the anterior prostate: implications for diagnosis and treatment. Urology. 2015;85:1224- 8. [ Links ]

11. Fine SW, Al-Ahmadie HA, Gopalan A, et al. Anatomy of the anterior prostate and extraprostatic space: a contemporary surgical pathology analysis. Adv Anat Pathol. 2007;14:401-7. [ Links ]

12. Allen K, Kressel H, Arger P, Pollack H. Age-related changes of the prostate: evaluation by MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989;152:77- 81. [ Links ]

13. Walz J, Burnett A, Costello A, et al. A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2010;57:179-92. [ Links ]

14. Kitzing Y, Prando A, Varol C, et al. Benign conditions that mimic prostate carcinoma: MR imaging features with histopathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2016;36:162-75. [ Links ]

15. Langer D, et al. Prostate cancer detection with multi-parametric MRI: logistic regression analysis of quantitative T2, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30:327-34. [ Links ]

16. Delongchamps N, et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the detection and localization of prostate cancer: combination of T2- weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging. BJU Int. 2011;107:1411-8. [ Links ]

17. Dickinson L, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a european consensus meeting. Eur Urol . 2011;59:477-94. [ Links ]

18. Turkbey B, Rosenkrantz AB, Haider MA, Padhani AR, Villeirs G, Macura KJ, et al. Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1: 2019 update of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2. European Urology. 2019;76:340-51. [ Links ]

19. de Rooij M, et al. Accuracy of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis. Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202:343-51. [ Links ]

20. Shinmoto H, Tamura C, Soga S, Okamura T, Horiguchi A, Asano T, et al. Anterior Prostate Cancer: Diagnostic Performance of T2-Weighted MRI and an Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Map. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2015;205:W185-W192. [ Links ]

21. Radtke J, Boxler S, Kuru T, et al. Improved detection of anterior fibromuscular stroma and transition zone prostate cancer using biparametric and multiparametric MRI with MRI-targeted biopsy and MRI-US fusion guidance. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis . 2015;18:288-96. [ Links ]

22. Hodge K, McNeal J, Terris M, Stamey T. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate. J Urol . 1989;142:71-4. [ Links ]

23. Eskicorapci S, Baydar D, Akbal C, et al. An extended 10-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy protocol improves the detection of prostate cancer. European Urology . 2004;45:444-8. [ Links ]

24. Bott SRJ, Young MPA, Kellet MJ, Parkinson MC. Anterior prostate cancer: is it more difficult to diagnose? BJU International. 2002;89:886-9. [ Links ]

25. Haarer C, Gopalan A, Tickoo S, et al. Prostatic transition zone directed needle biopsies uncommonly sample clinically relevant transition zone tumors. J Urol . 2009;182:1337-41. [ Links ]

26. Ouzzane A, Puech P, Lemaitre L, et al. Combined multiparametric MRI and targeted biopsies improve anterior prostate cancer detection, staging, and grading. Urology . 2011;78:1356-62. [ Links ]

27. Siddiqui M, Rais-Bahrami S, Turkbey B, et al. Comparison of MR/ ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. JAMA. 2015;313:390-97. [ Links ]

28. Watanabe Y, Terai A, Araki T, et al. Detection and localization of prostate cancer with the targeted biopsy strategy based on ADC map: a prospective large-scale cohort study. J Magn Reson Imaging . 2012;35:1414- 21. [ Links ]

29. Watanabe Y, Nagayama M, Araki T, et al. Targeted biopsy based on ADC map in the detection and localization of prostate cancer: a feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging . 2013;37:1168-117. [ Links ]

30. Volkin D, Turkbey B, Hoang A, et al. Multipara-metric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and subsequent MRI/ ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy increase the detection of anteriorly located prostate cancers. BJU Int. 2014;67:43-9. [ Links ]

31. Kasivisvanathan V, Rannikko A, Borghi M, Panebianco V, Mynderse L, Vaarala M. MRI-targeted or standard biopsy for prostate-cancer diagnosis. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1767-77. [ Links ]

32. Sciarra A, Panebianco V, Ciccariello M, Salciccia S, Cattarino S, Lisi D. Value of magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging and dynamic contrast- enhanced imaging for detecting prostate cancer foci in men with prior negative biopsy. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:1875-83. [ Links ]

33. Bouyé S, Potiron E, Puech P, Leroy X, Lemaitre L, Villers A. Transition zone and anterior stromal prostate cancers: zone of origin and intraprostatic patterns of spread at histopathology. Prostate. 2009;69:105- 13. [ Links ]

34. Ward E, Baad M, Peng Y, et al. Multi-parametric MR imaging of the anterior fibromuscular stroma and its differentiation from prostate cancer. Abdominal Radiology. 2016;42:926-34. [ Links ]

35. Panebianco V, Giganti F, Kitzing YX, et al. An update of pitfalls in prostate mpMRI: a practical approach through the lens of PI-RADS v. 2 guidelines. Insights Imaging. 2018;9: 87-101. [ Links ]

36. Yu J, Fulcher A, Winks S. Diagnosis of typical and atypical transition zone prostate cancer and its mimics at multiparametric prostate MRI. Br J Radiol. 2017;90. [ Links ]

37. Brown A, Elbuluk O, Mertan F. Recent advances in image-guided targeted prostate biopsy. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:1788-99. [ Links ]

Ethical disclosures

Financing Support: This work has not received any contribution, grant or scholarship.

Received: November 17, 2019; Accepted: April 29, 2020

Address Rita Camelo Serviço de Radiologia, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Central, Hospital de São José, Rua José António Serrano, 1150-199 Lisboa, Portugal e-mail: ritameiracamelo@gmail.com

Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Confidentiality of data: The authors declare that they have followed the protocols of their work center on the publication of data from patients.

Protection of human and animal subjects: The authors declare that the procedures followed were in accordance with the regulations of the relevant clinical research ethics committee and with those of the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki).

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License