SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.33 número1Síndrome de Lemierre: Um Diagnóstico Esquecido em Doentes Previamente SaudáveisArteriopatia Cerebral Autossómica Dominante com Enfartes Subcorticais e Leucoencefalopatia (CADASIL) Associada a Atrofia Cerebelosa de Múltiplos Sistemas (MSA) índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Acta Radiológica Portuguesa

versão impressa ISSN 2183-1351

Acta Radiol Port vol.33 no.1 Lisboa abr. 2021  Epub 16-Jul-2021

https://doi.org/10.25748/arp.18873 

Imagens de Interesse

Silicone Radial Head Prosthesis Fracture

Fratura da Prótese de Silicone da Cabeça do Rádio

Andrey Cabral Paes1 

Ralff Mallmann1 

Márcio Luís Duarte1  2  
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7874-9332

1WEBIMAGEM Telerradiologia, São Paulo, Brasil.

2Master Degree in Evidence- Based Health, UNIFESP, São Paulo, Brasil.


Abstract

The radial head is an important secondary stabilizer of the elbow and can bear up to 60% of the load transmitted from the forearm. Replacement of the radial head is advised in cases in which the extent of ligamentous injury calls for this secondary stabilizing function and it is not possible to reconstruct the radial head. The inability of a silicone radial head to resist compressive loads or valgus stress is evidence that the implant does not restore normal radiocapitellar load transmission, which is believed to be imperative for normal elbow function. We report a complication of the silicone prosthesis of the radial head diagnosed by computed tomography.

Keywords: Radius; Elbow joint; Replacement arthroplasty; X-Ray computed tomography; Radius fractures.

Resumo

A cabeça radial é um importante estabilizador secundário do cotovelo e pode suportar até 60% da carga transmitida pelo antebraço. A substituição da cabeça radial é recomendada nos casos em que a extensão da lesão ligamentar exige essa função estabilizadora secundária e não é possível reconstruir a cabeça radial. A incapacidade de uma cabeça radial de silicone de resistir às cargas compressivas ou ao estresse em valgo é evidência de que o implante não restaura a transmissão normal da carga radiocapitelar, que se acredita ser um imperativo para a função normal do cotovelo. Relatamos uma complicação da prótese de silicone da cabeça do rádio diagnostica pela tomografia computadorizada.

Palavras-chave: Rádio (anatomia); Articulação do cotovelo; Artroplastia de substituição; Tomografia computadorizada por raios X; Fraturas do rádio.

Case Presentation

A 54-year-old man with left elbow pain 2 months. Denies recent trauma and diseases, referring to being a handyman. He reports fracture of the radial head performing replacement with silicone prosthesis nine years ago, without complications since then. Physical examination shows elbow edema with reduced strength in the affected upper limb, without signals of numbness. No limitation of movement.

The computed tomography scan demonstrates a fracture of the neck of the silicone prosthesis of the radius head, with slight lateral displacement of the prosthesis head), irregularity of the capitellum, and of the radial notch (Figure 1). The patient was referred to the orthopedics department for scheduling surgery.

Discussion

The radial head is an important secondary stabilizer of the elbow and can bear up to 60% of the load transmitted from the forearm.1,2 Replacement of the radial head is advised in cases in which the extent of ligamentous injury calls for this secondary stabilizing function and it is not possible to reconstruct the radial head.1

The goals of treating radial head fractures are to restore stability, preserve motion, and maintain the length of the radius.2 If preservation of the head is not possible, prosthetic replacement has been advocated to preserve the radiocapitellar articulation.2 Many radial head implant materials are possible, including metal, pyrolytic carbon (pyrocarbon), and silicone.2,3 Silicone was introduced by Swanson in 1969.3

Figure 1: CT Scan of the left elbow in coronal section in A and B, and in sagittal section in C, demonstrating fracture of the neck of the silicone prosthesis with slight lateral displacement (white arrow), irregularity of the capitellum (grey arrow) and of the radial notch (black circle). 

A head and neck segment that is made of silicone is embedded after radial head resection.3 Silicone hemiarthroplasty is barely executed because of a huge percentage of loosening, fracture, and silicone synovitis.3 Nevertheless, radiologists, sometimes, encounter patients who received this sort of implant during the 1970s and 1980s.3

The inability of a silicone radial head to resist compressive loads or valgus stress is evidence that the implant does not restore normal radiocapitellar load transmission, which is believed to be imperative for normal elbow function.4 At radiography, it is essential the evaluation for fracture of the silicone and silicone synovitis, which are seen as periprosthetic lucencies and soft-tissue swelling.3 The fractures of silicone radial head implant arthroplasty include prosthetic fracture at the head, stem-head junction, or stem.4

After implant failure, bone resorption has been reported around silicone finger-joint implants and wear particles have been implicated as causing synovitis and subchondral bone cysts.5 An irregular capitellum may cause fraying of the implant surface and release of particulate silicone debris because of shear and abrasive wear, evidenced clinically by the high incidence of squeaking sounds with forearm rotation.4 Silicone prosthesis turned out to be biologically and biomechanically insufficient.5

Conclusion

In summary, the fracture of a radial head prosthesis is a rare complication but, the silicone prosthesis has a higher rate of complications like the fracture reported when compared with other materials.

References

1. Heijink A, Kodde IF, Mulder PG, Veltman ES, Kaas L, van den Bekerom MP, Eygendaal D. Radial head arthroplasty: a systematic review. JBJS Rev. 2016;18;4. [ Links ]

2. Maghen Y, Leo AJ, Hsu JW, Hausman MR. Is a silastic radial head still a reasonable option? Clinical Orthopaedics Related Research. 2011:469:1061-70. [ Links ]

3. Petscavage JM, Ha AS, Chew FS. Radiologic review of total elbow, radial head, and capitellar resurfacing arthroplasty. Radiographics. 2012;32:129- 49. [ Links ]

4. Trepman E, Ewald FC. Early failure of silicone radial head implants in the rheumatoid elbow: a complication of silicone radial head implant arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1991;6:59-65. [ Links ]

5. Vanderwilde RS, Morrey BF, Melberg MW, Vinh TN. Inflammatory arthritis after failure of silicone rubber replacement of the radial head. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76:78-81. [ Links ]

Ethical disclosures

Financing Support: This work has not received any contribution, grant or scholarship.

Received: November 12, 2019; Accepted: December 07, 2020

Address Márcio Luís Duarte WEBIMAGEM, Avenida Marquês de São Vicente 446 São Paulo, Brasil. e-mail: marcioluisduarte@gmail.com

Licence © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) and ARP 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use.

Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Confidentiality of data: The authors declare that they have followed the protocols of their work center on the publication of data from patients.

Protection of human and animal subjects: The authors declare that the procedures followed were in accordance with the regulations of the relevant clinical research ethics committee and with those of the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki).

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License