SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.27 issue5Mucosal Healing in Celiac Disease: A Necessary or Unrealistic Goal?Predictive Factors and Clinical Impact of Deep Remission in Celiac Disease author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


GE-Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology

Print version ISSN 2341-4545

GE Port J Gastroenterol vol.27 no.5 Lisboa Oct. 2020

https://doi.org/10.1159/000507637 

EDITORIAL

 

Endoscopy in Extraesophageal Manifestations Secondary to Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Why Do We Insist?

Endoscopia Nas Manifestações Extra-Esofágicas Secundárias à Doença do Refluxo Gastro-Eesofágico: Porque Razão Insistimos?

 

Cláudia Macedoa, Nuno Almeidaa,b

aDepartment of Gastroenterology, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal; bFaculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

* Corresponding author.

 

Keywords: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, Gastroesophageal reflux disease, Extraesophageal manifestations

Palavras-Chave: Endoscopia digestiva alta, Doença do refluxo gastroesofágico, Manifestações extra-esofágicas

 

The concept of extraesophageal manifestations secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is complex and not always clear. Although several extraesophageal symptoms have been associated with GERD, only asthma, cough, and hoarseness have evidence-based support [1]. The role of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) in GERD is that of screening in certain high-risk groups in particular overweight white males with chronic GERD symptoms and aged > 50 years [2]. In the context of suspected extraesophageal manifestations of GERD, UGIE has a low diagnostic yield and therefore poor predictive value for determination of GERD as the cause of these symptoms [1]. However, despite the foregoing, UGIE is still frequently requested and little is known about endoscopic findings in this context.

In this issue of GE Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology, Zullo et al. [3] present us the first study with data on the prevalence of relevant gastroesophageal lesions in patients with extraesophageal GERD manifestations. The authors concluded that clinically relevant lesions namely Barrett’s esophagus, erosive esophagitis, and hiatal hernia are uncommon among young (< 50 years) patients with only extraesophageal GERD manifestations, and the usefulness of UGIE in these patients is questionable.

One of the major factors that contributes to the controversy of GERD-associated extraesophageal manifestations is that other potential causes have not been adequately evaluated and/or treated before [4]. In Zullo et al. [3], UGIE was prescribed by different specialists and nothing was told about other previous tests done in investigation and its results. Additionally, the specificities about present or past proton pump inhibitors therapy (dosage, duration, response) have not been given. On the other hand, the authors included patients with alarm symptoms who have formal indication for UGIE and a higher pre-test probability of having relevant endoscopic findings. With this in mind, we think that perhaps the endoscopic findings in patients with true extraesophageal GERD manifestations may be even less prevalent. Other study limitations, highlighted by the authors, were the relatively small number of patients with only atypical GERD symptoms and the sample size. Nonetheless, the authors bring us a relevant topic reinforcing the low diagnostic yield and clinical impact of UGIE in patients with only extraesophageal manifestations, especially in the youngest and those without alarm symptoms.

Considering the negative impact that inappropriate UGIEs have on resources utilization as well as the medico- legal issues that are already a concern, we would like to congratulate the authors for the criticism shown regarding the prescription of UGIE in suspected extraesophageal manifestations of GERD, contributing to the creation of evidence which reinforces this position.

 

References

1 Vaezi MF, Katzka D, Zerbib F. Extraesophageal Symptoms and Diseases Attributed to GERD: Where is the Pendulum Swinging Now? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Jul;16(7):1018–29.

2 Katz PO, Gerson LB, Vela MF. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Mar;108(3):308–28.

3 Zullo A, Fiorini G, Bassotti G, Bachetti F, Monica F, Macor D, et al. Upper endoscopy in patients with extra-oesophageal reflux symptoms: a multicenter study. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2020:1–6, DOI: 10.1159/000505581.

4 Vaezi MF, Hagaman DD, Slaughter JC, Tanner SB, Duncavage JA, Allocco CT, et al. Proton pump inhibitor therapy improves symptoms in postnasal drainage. Gastroenterology. 2010 Dec;139(6):1887–1893.e1.

 

Disclosure Statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding Sources

No funding was received.

 

* Corresponding author.

Cláudia Macedo

Department of Gastroenterology

Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra

Praceta Prof. Mota Pinto, PT–3000–075 Coimbra (Portugal)

claudia.macedo.07@hotmail.com

 

Received: March 29, 2020; Accepted: March 30, 2020

 

Author Contributions

Both authors contribute to all stages of editorial composition.

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License