SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.32 número2Vigilância do cancro do cólon em estadios iniciais: padrão de recorrência e o papel da vigilância até aos 5 anosDebaixo do capuz: um método fácil de extração de lesões índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


GE-Portuguese Journal of Gastroenterology

versión impresa ISSN 2341-4545

GE Port J Gastroenterol vol.32 no.2 Lisboa abr. 2025  Epub 15-Mayo-2025

https://doi.org/10.1159/000540698 

Research Article

Real-Time Gastric Juice Analysis in Cirrhotic Patients: Can We Avoid Unrewarding Gastric Biopsies?

Análise do suco gástrico em tempo real em pacientes cirróticos: podemos evitar biópsias gástricas insatisfatórias?

Sergio Peralta1 

Vincenza Calvaruso1 

Francesca Di Giorgio1 

Marco Peralta1 

Vincenzo Di Martino1 

Ada Maria Florena1 

Angelo Zullo2 

1Gastroenterology and Hepatology Section, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy;

2Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, “Nuovo Regina Margherita” Hospital, Rome, Italy


Abstract

Background:

To search for H. pylori infection and gastric precancerous lesions in cirrhotic patients is worthwhile when considering the high incidence of peptic ulcers and gastric cancer in these patients. We tested if gastric juice analysis allows to avoid unrewarding gastric biopsies.

Methods:

This prospective study enrolled consecutive patients with liver cirrhosis who underwent upper endoscopy with standard gastric biopsies. Real-time gastric juice analysis was performed with a specific device (EndoFaster®) that test ammonium concentration for H. pylori diagnosis, and pH values to suspect extensive atrophy/metaplasia involving gastric body mucosa. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value (NPV), the overall accuracy, and the likelihood ratio were calculated for both H. pylori infection and extensive precancerous lesions on gastric mucosa.

Results:

A total of 78 cirrhotic patients (males: 55; mean age: 66 ± 12 years) were enrolled. When considering as positive EndoFaster® results when at least one of two (ammonium and pH levels) tests were positive, the NPVs were as high as 89%and 86%, respectively, to rule out H. pylori and extensive precancerous lesions on gastric mucosa, with an overall accuracy of 83% and 74%.

Conclusions:

This study supports the evidence that real-time gastric juice analysis allows to avoid clinically unrewarding and potentially unsafe gastric biopsies in a definite portion of cirrhotic patients, but more data are needed.

Keywords: Cirrhosis; H. pylori; Gastric precancerous lesions; Gastric juice analysis; Ammonia; pH

Resumo

Introdução/Objetivo:

A pesquisa de infeção H. pylori e lesões pré-malignas gástricas em doentes cirróticos é relevante, considerando a elevada incidência de úlceras pépticas e cancro gástrico nesta população. Avaliámos se a análise do suco gástrico permite evitar biópsias gástricas desnecessárias.

Métodos:

Estudo prospetivo incluindo doentes cirróticos consecutivos submetidos a endoscopia digestiva alta com biópsias gástricas. Foi realizada análise do suco gástrico em tempo real com dispositivo EndoFaster®, que avalia a concentração de amónia para diagnóstico de H. pylori e o pH para avaliação de atrofia/metaplasia extensa da mucosa gástrica. Calculámos a sensibilidade, especificidade, valor preditivo positivo (VPP), valor preditivo negativo (VPN), acuidade global e likelihood ratio para a infeção por H. pylori e lesões gástricas pré-malignas extensas.

Resultados:

Foram incluídos 78 doentes cirróticos (sexo masculino: 55; idade média: 66 ± 12 anos). Considerando resultados positivos do EndoFaster® quando pelo menos um dos dois testes (amónia e pH) apresentava valor positivo, os VPNs atingiram 89% e 86% para exclusão de infeção por H. pylori e lesões pré-malignas extensas na mucosa gástrica, respetivamente, com uma acuidade global de 83% e 74%.

Conclusão:

Este estudo suporta que a análise do suco gástrico em tempo real permite evitar biópsias gástricas clinicamente desnecessárias e potencialmente inseguras numa determinada percentagem de doentes cirróticos. No entanto, são necessários mais dados.

Palavras Chave: Cirrose; H.pylori; Lesões pré-malignas gástricas; Análisedo suco gástrico; Amónia; pH

Introduction

Patients with liver cirrhosis have several alterations on the gastroduodenal mucosa that may impair the repair processes following an injury [1, 2]. Indeed, these patients are at higher risk of developing peptic ulcer, despite H. pylori prevalence - namely the main factor for peptic ulcer development - is similar to that of controls [2, 3]. Some evidences also suggest that the incidence of gastric cancer is increased in cirrhotic patients [4]. In detail, the risk of developing gastric cancer was fund to be increased by 1.7- and 5-fold in patients <60 years and >75 years old, respectively, and by 2.6-fold cumulatively as compared to the general population [4]. In the large majority of cases, gastric cancer is preceded by precancerous lesions, including ex-tensive atrophy or metaplasia involving both antrum and gastric body mucosa [5], and the intestinal metaplasia is frequently detected on gastric mucosa of cirrhotic patients [6]. Therefore, to search for H. pylori infection and pre-cancerous lesions by taking standard biopsies on gastric mucosa during upper endoscopy is worthwhile in these patients. However, clotting impairment due to both platelets and coagulation factors reduction due to liver cirrhosis may potentially increase the risk of bleeding following gastric biopsies [7, 8]. For instance, bleeding complications during percutaneous liver biopsy, central venous cannulation, paracentesis and thoracocentesis procedures, as well as surgical interventions, were reported to occur more frequently in cirrhotic patients than controls [7]. However, taking into account data of 9 studies with 587 cirrhotic patients who underwent gastric biopsies, no major bleeding was observed when platelets count was >45,000/mm3 and prothrombin activity >45% [8]. Therefore, a biopsy-free test able to suspect or rule out H. pylori infection and extensive precancerous lesions in the stomach could be advantageous. By performing a real-time analysis of gastric juice, the current version of EndoFaster® - adevice firstly developed on 2005 [9] - is able to accurately discard the presence of H. pylori infection and extensive precancerous lesions through measure of ammonium concentration and pH levels, respectively [10]. In detail, a systematic review of several studies showed that when the results of EndoFaster® testing are negative, the negative predictive value (NPV) for excluding H. pylori infection and extensive precancerous lesions on gastric mucosa is approaching 100% [10]. In detail, by considering data of 11 studies, the NPV to rule out either H. pylori infection or extensive precancerous in the stomach

was >96% in all, but two studies showing values of 84.3%-85.4% [10]. However, to our knowledge, no data on the use of EndoFaster® in cirrhotic patients are available. Indeed, the modifications of ammonia content in the gastric juice of cirrhotic patients [11], from one side, and the alterations of gastric acid output [12], in the other, may potentially affect the accuracy of gastric juice analysis with such adevice. We therefore designed this study to evaluate the accuracy of gastric juice analysis to rule out H. pylori infection and extensive precancerous lesions in patients with liver cirrhosis, aiming to avoid clinically useless and potentially unsafe gastric biopsies in these patients.

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Patients

In this prospective study, consecutive cirrhotic patients who underwent upper endoscopy for any indication in our endoscopy unit were considered for the enrolment. Inclusion criteria were the presence of a documented liver cirrhosis on the basis of clinical findings, abdominal sonogram, laboratory parameters, or liver biopsy and age >18 years. Patients with marked clotting impairment (platelet counts <50,000/mm3 and/or international normalized ratio (INR) > 1.5) were excluded [8]. Informed consent was obtained for all procedures. In detail, following explanation on the clinical research, patients were informed and signed the consent for both procedures (endoscopy with biopsies and real-time gastric juice analysis) and anonymous use of their data for scientific purposes. The study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Since no experimental drugs were administered, no additional costs or procedures for the patients were required, no identification of patients was allowed, and no funds were received, a formal approval by Investigational Review Boards could be waived.

Endoscopic Procedures

All patients underwent endoscopy and standard biopsy sampling (2 antrum, 1 angulus, and 2 gastric body) of gastric mucosa were performed with standard 5-mm biopsy forceps. After removing the biopsy specimens, we waited for haemostasis to take place. Biopsies were used for histological assessment and to search for H. pylori. The infection was considered present when histological assessment revealed the presence of bacteria together with a feature of chronic active gastritis. Extensive atrophy or intestinal metaplasia were considered present when these histological findings involved both antral and gastric body mucosa, as reported in the RE.GA.IN system and graded according to the OLGA-OLGIM systems [13, 14].

Gastric Juice Analysis

Gastric juice analysis was performed by using EndoFaster® (Manufacturer: NISO Biomed S.r.l, Turin; Italy; Italian distributor: Waldner Tecnologie Medicali, Trento; Italy). The device was provided for 2 months to the endoscopic unit without any adjunctive cost for both hospitals and patients. In detail, the device was interposed between the endoscope and the suction system, so that no adjunctive invasive procedure was required and without any discomfort for the patient [10]. During endoscopy, lumen washing was avoided until the stomach was reached and until 3 mL of gastric juice were aspirated. H. pylori diagnosis was based on the determination of ammonium concentration, as a conse-quence of the urease activity of the bacterium within 60-90 s that is during endoscopy. The device performs in the meantime also H+ concentration. The infection was considered to be present when the ammonium concentration in gastric juice was >62 ppm, whilst extensive atrophy/metaplasia involving gastric body mucosa was suspected when pH values of were >4.5, as reported elsewhere [15, 16].

Statistical Analysis

Frequencies, percentages and means values with standard deviations were calculated for all observations. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), NPV, the overall accuracy, and the likelihood ratios were calculated by considering the histology as gold standard for both H. pylori infection and extensive precancerous lesion on gastric mucosa. To assess the cumulative impact of gastric juice analysis for clinical practice, the accuracy values were also calculated by combining data of both results of testing, by considering eventually missed diagnosis when both tests were negative, but histology revealed at least one of the investigated conditions (H. pylori and/or pre-cancerous lesions).

Results

Demographic and the main clinical characteristic of the 78 cirrhotic patients enrolled in this study are provided in Table 1. Beyond varices and congestive gastropathy, at upper endoscopy 4 (5.1%) patients had erosive oesophagitis, 1 (1.3%) Barrett’soesophagus, 16 (20.5%) erosive gastritis, 4 (5.1%) gastric ulcer, 8 (8.2%) erosive duodenitis, and 1 (1.3%) duodenal ulcer. No case of bleeding following gastric biopsies occurred. At histology, H. pylori infection was diagnosed in 23 (29.5%) patients, whilst extensive atrophy/metaplasia - that is involving antral and gastric body mucosa, irrespective of grade - was present in 23 (29.5%) patients, and a grade III-IV OLGA/OLGIM was overall detected in 5 (6.4%) cases. The values of sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, the overall accuracy, the likelihood ratios positive (LH+) and negative (LH−)forH. pylori infection were 65%, 75%, 52%, 84%, 72%, 3, and 0.5, and that for extensive precancerous lesions were 68%, 60%, 45%, 80%, 63%, 2, and 0.5 (Table 2). In detail, NPVs of 84% and 80% were found, respectively, in ruling out H. pylori infection and extensive atrophy/metaplasia on gastric mucosa. However, by considering as positive EndoFaster® results when at least one of two tests (ammonium and pH levels)werepositive, the NPV sincreased to 89% and 86%, respectively. These values indicate that a missed H. pylori infection occurred in only 8 cases every 100 patients with negative EndoFaster result for ammonium concentration, and a missed extensive precancerous condition in only 9 cases every 100 patients with normal pH values.

Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics 

Table 2. Accuracy of EndoFaster® for either H. pylori infection or extensive precancerous lesions on gastric mucosa 

Discussion

The prevalence of gastric and duodenal ulcers has been reported to be 10-fold higher in cirrhotic patients than in controls [17], accounting for a 7.4-16% rate of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, with a 5-fold increased mortality rate in these patients [2]. Data of a meta-analysis showed that H. pylori infection significantly increases peptic ulcer risk in these patients, with an estimated odds ratio of 2.70 (95% CI = 1.91-3.82) as compared to controls [18]. Moreover, some studies suggested a potential role of H. pylori in causing hepatic encephalopathy by ammonia production in the stomach, although data are largely controversial [19]. On the other hand, the incidence of upper gastrointestinal (oesophageal, gastric, pancreatic) cancers in patients with cirrhosis was reported to be higher as compared to controls [20]. In detail, the incidence of gastric cancer was 2.6-fold increased in these patients as compared to that expected in the general population [4]. Moreover, gastric epithelial cell proliferation is increased in patients with cirrhosis, particularly when congestive gastropathy and H. pylori infection were present [21], and intestinal metaplasia is frequently detected in these patients [6, 22]. In detail, the present study showed a prevalence of extensive precancerous lesions on gastric mucosa as high as 30%, with a stage III-IV OLGA/OLGIM present in 6.4% of cases. The latter value is in agreement data of previous Italian studies showing a frequency ranging from 2.3 to 7.8%in routine endoscopic examinations [16]. These patients deserve scheduled follow-up to detect early neoplastic lesions amenable of endoscopic removal [23]. Some evidences suggest that the endoscopic submucosal dissection is safely performed also in cirrhotic patients, allowing to avoid a more harmful surgical approach [24]. All these observations clearly suggest how it is clinically worthy to exclude the presence of both H. pylori infection and precancerous lesions at endoscopy in cirrhotic patients.

This is first study that evaluated the accuracy of real-time gastric juice analysis by EndoFaster® for ruling out both H. pylori infection and extensive precancerous lesions on gastric mucosa in patients with cirrhosis. Our data found that when the cumulative results of the test were considered, a NPV of 89% and 86% in excluding H. pylori infection and extensive atrophy/metaplasia on gastric mucosa, respectively, were found, indicating an acceptably high precision for these purposes. Indeed, the NPV for H. pylori diagnosis we observed was consistent with the 92.3% reported for the 13C-urea breath testing in these patients [25]. Therefore, gastric juice analysis during endoscopy allows to safely avoid useless biopsies on normal appearing gastric mucosa, a procedure particularly advantageous in cirrhotic patients, when considering their clotting impairment [7, 8]. However, a negative EndoFaster® result decreases the post-test probability of finding both H. pylori infection and extensive precancerous, but in those situations where the bleeding risk is not prohibitive, biopsies should still be performed. On the other hand, a positive EndoFaster® increases the post-test probability and should lead to performing biopsies, when considering that both PPV and positive likelihood ratio values are not enough elevated.

Although satisfactory, the data of this study would suggest that the EndoFaster® performs less well than what observed in patients without liver cirrhosis. Indeed, data of previous studies found NPV values as high as 96% and 97% for H. pylori and precancerous lesions, respectively, in more than 2,000 investigated patients [10]. The reasons of a lower performance of gastric juice analysis in cirrhotic patients remain unclear. The relatively low sample size (N = 78) of cirrhotic patients studied in the present study may have played a role in estimating the EndoFaster® performance. However, the a posteriori calculation of the study’s power with an alfa error of 0.05 was 91.3%, by considering a NPV of 86% we computed and the 96% found in non-cirrhotic patients [10]. On the other hand, the levels of ammonium concentrations in gastric juice - that could potentially impair ammonium testing with EndoFaster® - of patients with liver cirrhosis with or without H. pylori infection were reported to be very similar to that of matched controls [11]. On the other hand, gastric acid output - that could potentially impair pH evaluation with EndoFaster® irrespective of extensive gastric mu-cosa atrophy - has been inconsistently reported to be lower, similar or increased compared to controls [26]. Therefore, the findings of present study should be confirmed in further studies.

Conclusions

This study adds evidence that real-time gastric juice analysis might avoid clinically unrewarding and potentially unsafe gastric biopsies in a definite portion of cirrhotic patients, also reducing the environmental impact [27], but more data are needed.

References

1. Norman K, Pirlich M. Gastrointestinal tract in liver disease:which organ is sick? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2008;11(5):613-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0b013e32830a70bc [ Links ]

2. Zullo A, Hassan C, Morini S. Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with liver cirrhosis: facts and fictions. Dig Liver Dis. 2003;35(3):197-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1590-8658(03)00029-x [ Links ]

3. Santos Lucio A, Rodríguez Tirado I, Aparicio Serrano A, Jurado García J, Barrera Baena P, González Galilea Á, et al. Endoscopic findings unrelated to portal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing a varicose vein screening programme. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;45: 450-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2021.07.010 [ Links ]

4. Zullo A, Romiti A, Tomao S, Hassan C, Rinaldi V, Giustini M, et al. Gastric cancer prevalence in patients with liver cirrhosis. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2003;12(3):179-82. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008469-200306000-00002 [ Links ]

5. Rugge M, Genta RM, Graham DY, Di Mario F, Vaz Coelho LG, Kim N, et al. Chronicles of a cancer foretold: 35 years of gastric cancer risk assessment. Gut. 2016;65(5): 721-5. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310846 [ Links ]

6. Ibrisim D, Cevikbas U, Akyuz F, Poturoglu S, Ahishali E, Güllüoglu M, et al. Intestinal metaplasia in portal hypertensive gastropathy: a frequent pathology. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;20(9):874-80. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0b013e3282fc7380 [ Links ]

7. Ferro D, Angelico F, Caldwell SH, Violi F. Bleeding and thrombosis in cirrhotic patients: what really matters? Dig Liver Dis. 2012;44(4): 275-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2011.10.016 [ Links ]

8. Zullo A, Hassan C, Bruzzese V. Comment to "Bleeding and thrombosis in cirrhotic patients: what really matters? Dig Liver Dis. 2012;44(12):1049-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2012.05.022 [ Links ]

9. Tucci A, Tucci P, Bisceglia M, Marchegiani A, Papadopoli G, Fusaroli P, et al. Real-time detection of Helicobacter pylori infection and atrophic gastritis: comparison between conventional methods and a novel device for gastric juice analysis during endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2005;37(10):966-76. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2005-870373 [ Links ]

10. Zullo A, Annibale B, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Fanchellucci G, Esposito G, Hassan C. Gastric juice analysis in clinical practice: why, how, and when. The experience with EndoFaster. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;36(3):264-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000002704 [ Links ]

11. Chakrabarti P, Zullo A, Hassan C, Pandit A, Chowdhury A, Santra A, et al. Helicobacter pylori, gastric juice, and arterial ammonia levels in patients with cirrhosis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2002;34(5):578-81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004836-200205000-00020 [ Links ]

12. Lo WC, Lin HJ, Wang K, Lee FY, Perng CL, Lin HC, et al. Gastric secretion in Chinese patients with cirrhosis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1996;23(4):256-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004836-199612000-00004 [ Links ]

13. Rugge M, Fassan M, Pizzi M, Farinati F, Sturniolo GC, Plebani M, et al. Operative link for gastritis assessment vs operative link on intestinal metaplasia assessment. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17(41):4596-601. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v17.i41.4596 [ Links ]

14. Rugge M, Genta RM, Malfertheiner P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, El-Serag H, Graham DY, et al. RE.GA.IN.: the real-world gastritis initiative -updating the updates. Gut. 2024;73(3): 407-41. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2023-331164 [ Links ]

15. ZulloA,GermanàB,GallianiE, Iori A, de Pretis G, Manfredi G, et al. Real-time gastric juice analysis with EndoFaster for H. pylori diagnosis: a large, multicentre study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;34(11):1121-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000002429 [ Links ]

16. Zullo A, Germanà B, Galliani E, Iori A, de Pretis G, Manfredi G, et al. Real-time determination of gastric juice pH with EndoFaster(r) for atrophic gastritis assessment. Dig Liver Dis. 2022;54(12):1646-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2022.06.014 [ Links ]

17. Soll A. Gastric, duodenal, and stress ulcer. In: Sleisenger MH, Fordtran JS, editors. Gastrointestinal disease. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1993. p. 580-679. [ Links ]

18. Vergara M, Calvet X, Roque M. Helicobacter pylori is a risk factor for peptic ulcer disease in cirrhotic patients. A meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;14(7):717-22. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042737-200207000-00002 [ Links ]

19. Zullo A, Hassan C, Morini S. Hepatic encephalopathy and Helicobacter pylori: a critical reappraisal. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;37(2):164-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004836-200308000-00014 [ Links ]

20. Patel AH, Li Y, Minacapelli CD, Catalano K, Rustgi V. Reduction in gastrointestinal cancers in cirrhotic patients receiving rifaximin vs lactulose only therapy for hepatic encephalopathy. Cureus. 2023;15(2):e35259. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.35259 [ Links ]

21. Zullo A, Romiti A, Rinaldi V, Vecchione A, Hassan C, Winn S, et al. Gastric epithelial cell proliferation in patients with liver cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci. 2001;46(3):550-4. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005647115304 [ Links ]

22. Ma R, Li Q, Yu G, Wang J, Li Y, Xu X, et al. A multi-omics study to investigate the progression of the Correa pathway in gastric mucosa in the context of cirrhosis. Gut Pathog. 2023;15(1):45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-023-00571-y [ Links ]

23. Pimentel-Nunes P, Libânio D, Marcos-Pinto R, Areia M, Leja M, Esposito G, et al. Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and lesions in the stomach (MAPS II): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG), European Society of Pathology (ESP), and Sociedade Portuguesa de Endoscopia Digestiva (SPED) guideline update 2019. Endoscopy. 2019;51(4): 365-88. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0859-1883 [ Links ]

24. Repici A, Pagano N, Hassan C, Cavenati S, Rando G, Spaggiari P, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric neoplastic lesions in patients with liver cirrhosis: a systematic review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2012;21(3):303-7. [ Links ]

25. Sanchez-Mete L, Zullo A, Hassan C, Rinaldi V, MagnoMS, Festuccia F, et al. Helicobacter pylori diagnosis in patients with liver cirrhosis. Dig Liver Dis. 2003;35(8):566-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1590-8658(03)00273-1 [ Links ]

26. Fraser AG, Pounder RE, Burroughs AK. Gastric secretion and peptic ulceration in cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 1993;19(1):171-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-8278(05)80191-6 [ Links ]

27. Zullo A, Chiovelli F, Esposito E, Hassan C, Casini B. Can gastric juice analysis with Endofaster(r) reduce the environmental impact of upper endoscopy? Healthcare. 2023;11(24):3186. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11243186 [ Links ]

Statement of Ethics Since no identification of patients was allowed, no experimental drugs were administered, no additional costs or procedures for the patients were required, and no funds were received, the Investigational Review Boards of University of Palermo waived formal approval for this cross-sectional study performed in clinical practice. Patients signed informed consent for both procedure and anonymous use of their data for scientific purposes.

Conflict of Interest Statement The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding Sources This study was not supported by any sponsor or funder.

Author Contributions Sergio Peralta and Angelo Zullo conceived the study. Sergio Peralta, Vincenza Calvaruso, Francesca Di Giorgio, Vincenzo Di Martino, and Ada Maria Florena provided data acquisition; Angelo Zullo analysed data and wrote the manuscript providing critical revision. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Data Availability Statement All data are available following reasonable enquiries directed to the first author, Sergio Peralta.

Received: March 11, 2024; Accepted: May 27, 2024

Correspondence to: Angelo Zullo, angelozullo66@yahoo.it

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License