SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.80 número2Dermatofitoses: estudo clínico e terapêutico em centro de referência na Amazônia oriental índice de autoresíndice de assuntosPesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Portuguese Journal of Dermatology and Venereology

versão impressa ISSN 2795-501Xversão On-line ISSN 2795-5001

Port J Dermatol Venereol. vol.80 no.2 Lisboa jun. 2022  Epub 02-Ago-2022

https://doi.org/10.24875/pjd.m22000017 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Epidemiological analysis of skin cancer in Brazil

Análise epidemiológica do cancro de pele no Brasil

Mariana Dultra1  *  https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0510-221X

Stefanie Gallotti1 

José Roberto Pegas1 

1Serviço de Dematologia, Complexo Hospitalar Padre Bento de Guarulhos (CHPBG), Guarulhos, SP, Brazil


Abstract

Background:

Skin cancer is divided into melanoma or non-melanoma skin cancer. Non-melanoma skin cancer is the most common type of cancer in humans. Melanoma, on the other hand, has a low incidence, but high lethality. In view of the great European miscegenation and great sun exposure in Brazil, it is of great value to study the epidemiology of skin cancers, to determine the magnitude of this disease in society.

Objectives and methods:

This study determines skin cancer indicators in Brazil, by place of residence, in the federal units and regions of Brazil, between 2015 and 2021.

Conclusion:

The values evaluated allow us to conclude that skin cancer is still a disease that causes significant morbidity in Brazil, despite the primary and secondary prevention measures established.

Keywords Skin neoplasms; Basal cell carcinoma; Squamous cell carcinoma; Melanoma; Epidemiology; Mortality; Incidence

Resumo

Introdução:

O cancro cutâneo pode ser classificado em melanoma e não melanoma. O cancro cutâneo não-melanoma é o cancro mais comum em humanos. Já o melanoma, tem baixa incidência, mas alta letalidade. Tendo em vista a grande miscigenação europeia e a grande exposição solar no Brasil, é de grande valia estudar a epidemiologia dos cânceres de pele, a fim de determinar a magnitude desta doença na sociedade.

Objetivos e métodos:

Este estudo determina os indicadores de câncer de pele no Brasil, por local de residência, nas unidades federativas e regiões do Brasil, entre 2015 e 2021.

Resultados:

Os valores avaliados permitem concluir que o cancro cutâneo ainda é uma doença que causa morbidade no Brasil, apesar das medidas de prevenção primária e secundária estabelecidas.

Palavras-chave Cancro cutâneo; Carcinoma basocelular; Carcinoma espinocelular; Melanoma; Epidemiologia; Mortalidade; Incidência

Introduction

In Brazil, cancer is currently the second most frequent cause of death, surpassed only by cardiovascular diseases1-3. Skin cancer can be divided into two types: melanoma or non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC)1,2.

NMSC is the most common type of cancer in humans1,2. In Brazil, it accounts for about 30% of all registered malignant tumors1,3. But, despite its high incidence, it has high rates of cure, especially if detected and treated early2,4. Skin cancer is more common in people over 40 years of age, and is rare in children and black people, except for those who already have some skin diseases, like long-term or severe skin inflammation or injury, xeroderma pigmentosum, albinism, and basal cell nevus syndrome1,2. However, with the constant exposure of young people to sunlight, the average age of patients has been decreasing1,2,4.

Among non-melanoma skin cancers, basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma are the main ones. Despite their clinical and histopathological differences, both have a low rate of metastasis and lethality2-4. People with fair skin, sensitive to the action of the sun, with a personal or family history of skin cancer or with previous skin diseases are the most affected4. Among the main risk factors related to non-melanoma subtypes, prolonged and repeated exposure to ultraviolet rays, especially in childhood and adolescence, is one of the most important; other risk factors include having light skin and eyes, with red or blond hair, or being albino; the presence of a family or personal history of skin cancer; individuals with deficient immune system and exposure to artificial radiation4,5.

Melanoma, on the other hand, has a lower incidence and high lethality. According to national epidemiological data, melanoma is estimated to represent only 3% of malignant neoplasms. It affects all age groups and has a high potential for dissemination with a poor prognosis when there are already metastases2,5. Up to one-fifth of patients develop metastatic disease, highlighting the importance of preventive measures and early diagnosis1.

Melanoma is 20 times more common in Caucasians than in black people. Overall, the risk of melanoma is about 2.6% in whites, 0.1% in blacks, and 0.6% in Hispanics3. This cancer is more common among men, but before the age of 50 rates are higher among women1. The risk of melanoma increases with age, with the current average diagnosis being 65 years1,3,4.

The main primary prevention of skin cancer is photoprotection. The use of sunscreen prevents the formation of actinic keratoses (precursor lesion of squamous cell carcinoma), squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma, although data are still somewhat controversial in the latter case. There are insufficient scientific data to prove its efficacy alone in the prevention of basal cell carcinoma, the most common skin cancer4. Secondary prevention occurs through early diagnosis and clinical and histopathological examination. Dermoscopy and confocal microscopy are tools that assist in the diagnosis2,4,6.

In view of the great European miscegenation and great sun exposure in Brazil, it is of great value to study the epidemiology of skin cancers, to determine the magnitude of this disease in society, with a view to implementing primary and secondary prevention policies.

Objectives

To determine skin cancer indicators in Brazil, by place of residence, in the federal units and regions of Brazil, between 2015 and 2021.

Materials and methods

This is an observational, cross-sectional, and descriptive epidemiological study. Incidence estimates data from the José Alencar Gomes da Silva National Cancer Institute (INCA), the Mortality Information Systems (SIM), the Outpatient Information System (SIA), and the Hospital Information System (SIH) were used.

The SUS (Unified Health System) is the model adopted by Brazil for planning and executing actions and services aimed at promoting, protecting, and recovering health. It was created by the Federal Constitution of 19887,8.

INCA is the auxiliary agency of the Ministry of Health in the development and coordination of integrated actions for the prevention and control of cancer in Brazil. Such actions include medical and hospital care, provided directly and free of charge to cancer patients as part of the services offered by the Unified Health System, and acting in strategic areas, such as prevention and early detection, training of specialized professionals, development of research and generation of epidemiological information9.

SIM, developed by the Ministry of Health in 1975, was used to collect data on mortality in the country. It allows, based on the cause of death attested by the physician, to build indicators and process epidemiological analyzes that contribute to the efficiency of health management. Therefore, it is considered an important management tool in the health area that supports decision-making in various areas of health care. It helps in the formulation of epidemiological indicators as strategic instruments to support the planning of actions, activities, and programs aimed at health management10.

SIH provides information that can be used for the objective subsidiary analysis of the health situation, based on evidence-based decision-making and health program preparation. The data obtained are metrics used in the construction of health indicators, which translate into relevant information for the quantification and evaluation of health information. Although the primary function of the SIH is to operationalize the payment of service providers registered in the Unified Health System (SUS) network, this system provides, in addition to other variables, the causes that motivated each of the hospitalizations carried out in the SUS, being one of the few sources of systematic registration of hospital statistics11.

Incidence, hospital morbidity, and mortality are control measures for epidemiological surveillance that allow analyzing the occurrence, distribution, and evolution of diseases. Knowing information about the profile of different types of cancer and characterizing possible changes in the scenario over time are guiding elements for cancer surveillance actions–a strategic component for the efficient and effective planning of cancer prevention and control programs.

Results

Between 2015 and 2021, 231,700 cases of skin cancer were notified in Brazil. 2019 had the highest number of cases (82,572 cases–35.63%), followed by 2020 (63,751 cases–27.51%) and 2018 (37,064 cases–15.99%). In this period, the highest number of notified cases occurred in São Paulo (59,537 cases–25,69%), followed by Rio Grande do Sul (32,529 cases–14,03%) and Paraná (29,323 cases–12,65%). Amapá (31 cases), Acre (46 cases) and Roraima (109 cases), states from the northern region of Brazil, had the lowest number of cases (Table 1).

Table 1 Number of notified cases of skin cancer in each Brazilian state between 2015 and 2021 

Brazilian State 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
Total 4,202 4,154 4,039 37,064 82,572 63,751 35,918 231,700
Rondônia 50 35 26 71 1,155 654 258 2,249
Acre 4 2 3 11 8 12 6 46
Amazonas 10 14 12 148 371 556 288 1,399
Roraima 2 2 2 2 46 45 10 109
Pará 107 90 81 212 753 768 291 2,302
Amapá 4 3 1 3 4 9 7 31
Tocantins 3 11 15 25 127 128 67 376
Maranhão 38 29 32 596 775 534 222 2,226
Piauí 48 46 52 555 720 202 93 1,716
Ceará 263 260 270 1,238 2,189 1,718 1,021 6,959
Rio Grande do Norte 57 61 64 1,074 2,039 1,488 881 5,664
Paraíba 85 91 86 574 1.093 558 369 2,856
Pernambuco 153 153 126 763 972 772 638 3,577
Alagoas 41 55 46 226 559 448 225 1,600
Sergipe 27 14 23 52 113 209 179 617
Bahia 133 144 133 1,359 2,077 1,281 997 6,124
Minas Gerais 409 426 397 3,719 8,785 7,290 3,964 24,990
Espírito Santo 84 81 107 572 1,642 1,299 1,199 4,984
Rio de Janeiro 146 135 142 317 2,371 1,774 1,280 6,165
São Paulo 846 855 822 11,131 21,152 16,303 8,428 59,537
Paraná 742 696 702 5,743 9,923 7,376 4,141 29,323
Santa Catarina 328 301 297 2,406 7,423 6,227 3,829 20,811
Rio Grande do Sul 389 419 402 3,779 12,303 9,895 5,342 32,529
Mato Grosso do Sul 79 63 49 1,151 2.290 1,313 445 5,390
Mato Grosso 42 58 46 304 1,115 671 403 2,639
Goiás 98 99 90 1,010 2.382 1,977 1,170 6,826
Distrito Federal 14 11 13 23 185 244 165 655

Of all notified cases, 90.64% (210,032 cases) were NMSC. For melanoma, São Paulo (4,852 cases–22.39%), Rio Grande do Sul (3,642 cases–16.80%) and Paraná (3,103–14.32%) had the highest numbers (Table 2). This data can be explained by the high number of inhabitants in São Paulo–the most populous state in the country. Furthermore, Rio Grande do Sul and Paraná are in the region where most of the population has European ancestry, which is predisposed to the occurrence of this neoplasm due to phenotypic characteristics such as blue eyes, light hair, and skin of phototypes I and II (according to the Fitzpatrick classification)5.Clique ou toque aqui para inserir o texto.

Table 2 Number of notified cases of melanoma in each Brazilian state between 2015 and 2021 

Brazilian State 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
Total 1,366 1,350 1,302 3.800 6,258 5,208 2,384 21,668
Rondônia 5 8 6 7 17 23 11 77
Acre 2 1 1 3 1 3 2 13
Amazonas 6 5 6 16 18 36 6 93
Roraima 1 0 1 1 5 1 2 11
Pará 9 15 12 35 48 31 18 168
Amapá 4 3 1 2 1 4 3 18
Tocantins 2 7 7 5 7 6 1 35
Maranhão 19 11 13 26 26 28 8 131
Piauí 15 16 17 19 40 27 11 145
Ceará 55 44 50 76 145 125 54 549
Rio Grande do Norte 26 30 20 39 64 85 45 309
Paraíba 31 22 27 112 112 21 7 332
Pernambuco 42 47 47 126 122 94 73 551
Alagoas 17 26 14 27 70 44 29 227
Sergipe 13 3 12 15 11 22 14 90
Bahia 31 43 40 136 181 133 86 650
Minas Gerais 128 135 130 410 681 563 213 2,260
Espírito Santo 27 25 33 73 177 84 50 469
Rio de Janeiro 62 63 52 68 174 200 89 708
São Paulo 276 269 242 874 1,402 1,194 595 4,852
Paraná 195 189 189 597 776 806 351 3,103
Santa Catarina 120 113 116 348 511 403 219 1,830
Rio Grande do Sul 196 187 201 598 1,182 940 338 3,642
Mato Grosso do Sul 19 24 10 38 66 51 19 227
Mato Grosso 14 21 21 60 65 58 40 279
Goiás 38 34 28 76 346 195 81 798
Distrito Federal 13 9 6 13 10 31 19 101

About the number of deaths from skin cancer, the year with the highest mortality rate was 2021 (8,88/100,000 inhabitants), with Paraíba as the main contributor to this value (22,64/100,000 inhabitants). The year with the lowest mortality rate was 2015 (6,77/100,000 inhabitants) (Table 3). The region of Brazil with the lowest absolute number of deaths, in this period, was the northern region (114 deaths), the second least inhabited region of Brazil (18,430,980 habitants–which equals 8.77% of the Brazilian population). The southeast region was the one with the highest absolute number of deaths (1,659 deaths), followed by the south (1,201 deaths) and the northeast (556 deaths). The Brazilian state which had the highest number of deaths was São Paulo (882 deaths), followed by Santa Catarina (415 deaths) and Rio Grande do Sul (402 deaths) (Table 4).

Table 3 Skin cancer mortality rate in each region and Brazilian state between 2015 and 2021 

Region/Brazilian State 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
Total 6.77 7.04 6.9 6.91 7.62 8.43 8.88 7.45
North 10.53 11.31 11.18 9.59 12.99 13,24 11.02 11.43
Rondônia 13.04 11.76 16.67 13.33 3.03 14,81 12.5 11.86
Acre 10 12.5 8.33 5.77
Amazonas 9.52 18.18 9.09 21.43 25 26.67 11.11 17.59
Roraima 20 20 15.38 16.67 27.27 20 17.65
Pará 12 5.41 12.5 8.06 19.61 22.86 13.33 13.24
Amapá 16.67 44.44 28.57 33.33 18.18
Tocantins 6.67 5.88 3.92 7.69 2.86 4.88 7.14 5.36
Northeast 4.37 5.21 4.44 4.08 6.07 7.97 9.85 5.57
Maranhão 24.39 30 8.33 15.38 9.09 17.02 22 17.31
Piauí 17.95 10.26 5 2.5 3.03 12.5 19.35 9.66
Ceará 3.23 4.21 5.95 6.82 5.56 7.92 7.83 5.76
Rio Grande do Norte 1.27 4.9 5 7.55 5.97 3.92 8.33 4.69
Paraíba 5.43 6.19 8.27 1.33 4.46 16.22 22.64 6.89
Pernambuco 2.18 2.56 1.45 2.52 4.18 4.12 6.56 2.78
Alagoas 5.36 13.33 10.81 6.33 11.97 9.46 3.08 8.95
Sergipe 12.5 5.56 10.53 20 33.33 8.33 18.18 15.2
Bahia 10.37 13.68 15.53 6.91 6.93 12.44 9.83 10.09
Southeast 6.9 7.42 8.44 8.71 8.69 9.77 9.53 8.44
Minas Gerais 5.46 5.09 6.77 6.91 7.09 7.11 7.21 6.48
Espírito Santo 1.11 6.71 5.17 10.29 6.15 8.9 17.65 6.75
Rio de Janeiro 12.4 12.84 15.67 13.67 14.63 20 14.19 14.61
São Paulo 6.84 7.5 7.94 8.1 8.03 8.89 8.91 7.99
South 8.12 7.11 6.62 6.54 6.75 7.31 7.36 7.08
Paraná 6.63 6.89 5.82 6.51 4.17 5.82 6.13 6
Santa Catarina 11.49 10.77 9.13 7.46 10.56 11.17 8.01 9,72
Rio Grande do Sul 7.56 5.02 5.82 5.89 6.42 6.32 8.26 6,39
West-Center 6.87 8.94 7.05 9.19 8.07 5.92 9.77 8.04
Mato Grosso do Sul 10.34 17.86 5.13 12 8.33 8.96 5.41 8.93
Mato Grosso 4.57 5.45 1.61 6.5 9.78 1.52 11.96 5.75
Goiás 7.32 6.12 12.61 6.82 4.03 5.59 9.18 6.95
Distrito Federal 10.81 14.29 10.71 18.52 22.03 9.3 15.28 14.85

Table 4 Number of deaths by skin cancer in each region and Brazilian state between 2015 and 2021 

Region/Brazilian State 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total
Total 485 523 543 534 574 537 559 3,755
North 12 19 17 14 20 18 14 114
Rondônia 3 4 5 2 1 4 4 23
Acre 1 1 1 3
Amazonas 2 4 1 3 4 4 1 19
Roraima 1 1 2 1 3 1 9
Pará 3 2 4 5 10 8 6 38
Amapá 1 4 2 1 8
Tocantins 2 3 2 3 1 2 1 14
Northeast 68 78 80 76 81 76 97 556
Maranhão 10 9 4 8 4 8 11 54
Piauí 7 4 2 1 1 2 6 23
Ceará 5 4 5 6 7 8 9 44
Rio Grande do Norte 2 7 7 4 4 4 7 35
Paraíba 7 6 11 2 5 6 12 49
Pernambuco 18 23 16 28 23 15 21 144
Alagoas 3 8 8 5 14 7 2 47
Sergipe 2 1 2 3 4 1 6 19
Bahia 14 16 25 19 19 25 23 141
Southeast 204 217 245 242 263 245 243 1,659
Minas Gerais 38 40 46 49 50 45 47 315
Espírito Santo 2 11 9 21 12 13 6 74
Rio de Janeiro 48 43 55 51 67 60 64 388
São Paulo 116 123 135 121 134 127 126 882
South 174 176 175 169 171 177 159 1,201
Paraná 54 65 59 63 37 54 52 384
Santa Catarina 57 64 58 51 72 66 47 415
Rio Grande do Sul 63 47 58 55 62 57 60 402
West-Center 27 33 26 33 39 21 46 225
Mato Grosso do Sul 6 10 4 6 7 6 6 45
Mato Grosso 8 6 2 8 9 1 11 45
Goiás 9 9 14 9 10 10 18 79
Distrito Federal 4 8 6 10 13 4 11 56

During this 7-year period, there was a total of 3,755 skin cancer deaths in the whole country of Brazil, mostly male (58.72%). Regarding ethnicity, 62.84% of deaths occurred in Caucasians, followed by mixed ethnicities (23.35%), blacks (2.34%), and Asians (0.69%). Only 1 case was reported in Indians. In 403 cases there was no information on the ethnicity. About the age, the highest percentage of deaths occurred in patients between 60 and 79 years old (43.22%), followed by those between 40 and 59 years old (33.02%) and those over 80 years of age (14.22%).

During this period, there was a 145.01% increase in the notification of skin cancer cases per year in the whole country of Brazil, with no state reporting a decrease in the number of cases. There was also a rise in mortality from skin cancer, with an increase of 4.72% in the mortality rate. Unfortunately, SIM does not differentiate deaths from NMSC from melanoma, making a more adequate analysis of deaths impossible.

Discussion

In a tropical country, such as Brazil, cultural changes regarding tanned skin, outdoor recreational activities, and exposure to occupational solar radiation have been responsible for an excessive exposure to ultraviolet solar radiation in recent decades, especially among the young population1,3.

According to data, in the most populated and developed areas from the cultural, social, and economic point of view, there is a higher number of doctors per inhabitant and this leads to a higher number of diagnosis and, consequently, more official notifications. This fact may not occur in less developed areas with a fewer number of doctors per inhabitant, justifying the increase in the number of deaths in more populated regions.

In Brazil, most people who die because of skin cancer are elderly individuals who very probably were observed only with advanced disease3. Other patients more likely to die from skin cancer are those with immunosuppression, although these cases are not evaluated separately in our study. However, the exact number of people who develop or die either from basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer annually is unknown1,4.

The southeastern state with the highest number of deaths was São Paulo, which may be associated with being the most populous state in Brazil. It was noted that populated areas have a higher mortality compared to less populated areas. This occurs probably due to the subdiagnosis and subnotificated cases in remote areas. Brazil, as already mentioned, is a country with vast social, cultural, and economic differences and this interferes in the concentration of doctors per inhabitants.

The increase in the number of deaths probably occurs because of the late diagnosis and late treatment of the disease, justified by the difficulty in accessing adequate health care and the poor distribution of specialists in dermatology throughout the Brazilian territory5,12`, increasing the rate of disability and lethality. According to data from the Medical Demography of 2018, there are 8,317 specialists in the country, the vast majority concentrated in the South and Southeast regions (74.5%), with no experience in performing dermatological surgical procedures, and working predominantly in an urban setting and private care12.

From 1999, the Brazilian Society of Dermatology (SBD) started the National Campaign for the Prevention of Skin Cancer in the main Brazilian cities. This form of secondary prevention has resulted in an increase in the early detection of skin cancer and implies a reduction in mortality from this cause8.

Conclusion

The values evaluated above allow us to conclude that skin cancer is still a disease that causes significant morbidity in Brazil, despite the primary and secondary prevention measures established. In addition, the inequality observed in its control is notorious. In the same period, while some regions showed a reduction in the number of deaths, other regions an increasing trend remained, as observed in the southeast region.

Due to the vast territorial extension and the remarkable sociodemographic, epidemiological and cultural diversity, significant differences are noted in the incidence and mortality rates in the different Brazilian macro-regions, thus inferring great complexity in dealing with this disease by the responsible healthcare agents and sectors.

These data demonstrate how late diagnosis of skin cancer can impact population morbidity and mortality. The increase in the number of deaths from skin cancer reflects the need to improve primary and secondary prevention practices.

REFERENCES

1. Costa CS. Epidemiologia do câncer de pele no Brasil e evidências sobre sua prevenção. Diagn. Trat. 2012;17(4):206–8. [ Links ]

2. Popim RC, Corrente JE, Marino JAG, de Souza CA. Câncer de pele:Uso de medidas preventivas e perfil demográfico de um grupo de risco na cidade de Botucatu. Ciênc. Saúde Colet. 2008;13(4):1331–6. [ Links ]

3. de Oliveira Santos M. Estimativa/2020 –Incidência de Câncer no Brasil. Rev. Bras. Cancerol. [Internet];66(1):e-00927. 20ºde março de 2020 [citado 12ºde março de 2022]. Disponível em:https://rbc.inca.gov.br/index.php/revista/article/view/927. [ Links ]

4. Silva ESD, Tavares R, Paulitsch FDS, Zhang L. Use of sunscreen and risk of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer:a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Dermatol. 2018;28(2):186–201. [ Links ]

5. Miolo N, Rodrigues RF, Silva ER da, Piati PK, Campagnolo OA, Marques LF. Skin cancer incidence in rural workers at a reference hospital in western Paraná. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2019;94(2):157–63. [ Links ]

6. Silveira CEG, Mauad EC. Analysis of a decade of skin cancer prevention using a mobile unit in Brazil. Rural Remote Health. 2019;19(2):4599. [ Links ]

7. Viacava F, Oliveira RAD de, Carvalho C de C, Laguardia J, Bellido JG. SUS:oferta, acesso e utilização de serviços de saúde nos últimos 30 anos. Ciênc. Saúde Colet. 2018;23(6):1751–62. [ Links ]

8. Sanches Junior JA. Participation and responsibility [Editorial] [Internet]. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2019;94(1):8–8. [ Links ]

9 10. Morais RM de, Costa AL. Uma avaliação do Sistema de Informações sobre Mortalidade. Saúde debate. 2017;41(spe):101-17. [ Links ]

10 11. Mendes A da CG, Silva Junior JB da, Medeiros KR, Lyra TM, Melo Filho DA de, SáDA de. Avaliação do sistema de informações hospitalares - SIH/SUS como fonte complementar na vigilância e monitoramento de doenças de notificação compulsória. Inf. Epidemiol. SUS. 2000;9(2):67–86. [ Links ]

11 12. Brown RVS, Hillesheim D, Tomasi YT, Nunes DH. Mortality from malignant skin melanoma in elderly Brazilians:2001 to 2016. An. Bras. Dermatol. 2021;96(1):34–9. [ Links ]

Ethical disclosures

Protection of human and animal subjects. The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.

Confidentiality of data. The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Received: January 12, 2022; Accepted: March 14, 2022

*Corresponding author: Mariana Dultra E-mail: contato@dramarianadultra.com.br

Creative Commons License Portuguese Society of Dermatology and Venereology. Published by Permanyer. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license