<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0003-2573</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Análise Social]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Anál. Social]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0003-2573</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0003-25732016000100008</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Impacto da Crise nas Crianças Portuguesas: Indicadores, Políticas, Representações]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Prata]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Ana]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="AF1">
<institution><![CDATA[,California State University Northridge College of Social & Behavioral Sciences Department of Sociology]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[California ]]></addr-line>
<country>USA</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2016</year>
</pub-date>
<numero>218</numero>
<fpage>193</fpage>
<lpage>196</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0003-25732016000100008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0003-25732016000100008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0003-25732016000100008&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri></article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ 

     <p align="right"><b>RECENSÃO</b></p>

    <p><b>WALL, Karin <i>et</i><i> al</i></b>. </p>

    <p><i> <b>Impacto da
Crise nas Crianças Portuguesas: Indicadores, Políticas, Representações</b></i> , </p>

    <p> Lisboa, Imprensa
de Ciências Sociais, 2015, 218 pp. </p>

    <p> ISBN 9789726713500 </p>

    <p> &nbsp; </p>

    <p><b>Ana Prata</b>*</p>

    <p>*California State University Northridge College of Social
 & Behavioral Sciences Department of Sociology, 18111 Nordhoff Street Northridge, 
 California 91330-8318, USA. E-amil: <a href="mailto:ana.prata@csun.edu">ana.prata@csun.edu</a></p>

    <p>&nbsp; </p>

    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>There is a general acknowledgment that families
and children have suffered the effects of the Portuguese economic crisis, but
that researchers lack scientific and sociological knowledge about the <i>real</i>
experience that Portuguese children have faced throughout the crisis. The book
“<i>Impacto</i><i> da Crise
nas Crianças Portuguesas: Indicadores, Políticas, Representações” </i>fills
this gap by giving visibility to how children make sense of their experiences
and by “listening to the children themselves” (p. 23), thereby recognizing that
children can be discourse producers regarding the economic crisis. The
scope/aim of the book goes beyond this, and also focuses on statistical data
and public policies that affect children and their families. Although the
authors do not specify a time frame for the overall analysis, most of the
statistical data span the period from 2005 to 2013. The public policies cover a
longer period, from 2000 to 2013 (with an emphasis on the last eight years).
The children’s interview data were collected in 2013. </p>

    <p>The
book is divided into four main sections and employs two distinct approaches.
Part 1 addresses the children’s situation in the context of Portuguese society
using several social indicators (poverty, education, housing, etc.), while Part
2 analyzes public policies aimed at children and their families in order to
contextualize the safety net available prior to and during the economic crisis
and also following the implementation of austerity measures. The approach in
this first half of the book is “extensive and institutional” (p. 23), while the
second half, Part 3, uses an “intensive and individual” (p. 24) approach that
focuses on the representations and experiences of children, and is based on
their personal narratives. In particular, it presents the results of a
qualitative study based on 77 interviews with children and teenagers from ages
8 to 17 (a representative national sample) regarding their perceptions of the
impacts of the economic crisis on their daily lives. Finally, Part 4, the
shortest section of the book, summarizes some of the main results presented
throughout and also advances some policy recommendations regarding how to
better protect children in economic crisis situations. </p>

    <p>The
first part of the book provides an overview of several social indicators of
poverty and social exclusion for children and teenagers. It starts by looking
at the “Risk of Poverty and Social Exclusion Indicator” (RPES – <i>Risco</i><i> de Pobreza e Exclusão Social</i>) and a number of ­statistics are
presented on Risk of Income Poverty, Work Intensity, Material Deprivation, and
Unexpected Expenses. Most of the data focus on the situation of children and
teenagers in Portugal, but there are also some comparative data placing
Portugal within the European Union (EU) context. This section is lengthy and
thorough and at times some of its most interesting findings seem to be buried
within the many figures and tables (more than fifty) presented. </p>

    <p>Some
interesting data from this section do reinforce the need to give visibility to
children and teenagers as an especially vulnerable group affected by the
economic crisis. For example, the fact that since the outset of the crisis in
2008, children (0 to 17 years old) are the age group at the highest risk for
poverty and highest material deprivation in Portugal; and also the fact that
single-parent households with three or more children are the ones at the
highest risk of poverty. Furthermore, such risk is also greatly increased by
the unemployment status of parents (p. 30-34). </p>

    <p>The
comparison to EU countries shows that children and teenagers in Portugal are
more at risk of poverty and social exclusion than the EU average. But when
restricting the comparison to Southern European countries only, Portuguese
children and teenagers are less vulnerable to poverty and exclusion than their
counterparts in Spain, Italy, and Greece. </p>

    <p>At the
end of Part 1 the authors focus on Well-Being Indicators such as Health,
Safety, Food Insecurity, Education, Risky Behavior, Housing, Leisure, etc. They
assert that child obesity, the increasing domestic violence reported in the
last few years, and food insecurity (the inability to
provide three meals a day – which is almost twice as high as the EU average)
are among the major concerns threatening the well-being of Portuguese children
throughout the crisis. At times one is left wondering how this section would
have benefited from disaggregating data by region, ethnic minorities, and
gender. Overall, the section feels rather descriptive and has too little
analysis. Although the authors do cover a wide range of indicators, Part 1
would have also benefited from a conclusion that would better integrate and
contextualize all of its rich data findings. </p>

    <p>In Part
2 the authors provide an overview of public policies in the context of the economic
crisis, and evaluate the impact of the welfare state’s retrenchment on
Portuguese families and children. The authors cover a vast array of public
policies in this section, which will be of interest to researchers concerned
with how austerity measures have curtailed the provision of social benefits and
family cash allowances. Interestingly, this section also covers Taxation, a
topic that is not often included in discussions of the welfare state. It is
welcomed here, however, and truly provides a more thorough and nuanced picture
of how tax benefits and taxation are connected to both redistribution and the
economic strains on different types of families. </p>

    <p>At the
end of Part 2 the focus turns to Childcare Services and School Enrichment
Activities (<i>Actividades</i><i> de ­Enriquecimento Escolar</i>). While the coverage of early
childcare services places Portugal above the Barcelona target (33% coverage)
and pre-school enrollment rates (for 5 year olds) are close to universal
coverage (94%) (p. 97), the situation regarding School Enrichment Activities
has been more challenging, and compared to other OECD countries, government
spending (as a percentage of the GDP) is low and fell during the crisis (from
1.7% in 2009 to 1.4% in 2011). For readers interested in local and national
governmental programs for families, there is also a brief section on the topic.
On the whole, Part 2 covers a wide range of public policies, but as a section
it could benefit from a systematization of its main points. </p>

    <p>The
longest and most captivating section of the book, Part 3, focuses on children’s
and teenagers’ interview data, and it is entitled “Children’s voices in times
of crisis”. This section is organized in five sub-sections: (1) Getting to know
the crisis; (2) Impacts of the crisis; (3) The present and the future; (4) How
to overcome the crisis? Strategies and solutions; and (5)
Portraits of children and the crisis. There is an
abundance and richness in the qualitative data presented in this
section, which touch on various interesting topics: how children are aware of
and make sense of the crisis; impacts on health; changes in consumption habits;
and overall fears and hopes. In my opinion, the most striking contribution of
this section is that it succeeds in fulfilling one of the main goals the
authors set out to do: to “voice” and to give more visibility to the children’s
experiences during the economic crisis. Children are heard and what they say
strongly resonates with the reader. As a consequence of that, it will leave
most researchers longing for similar studies applied to other populations or
groups, or even for follow-up studies or comparative work that would look at
the experiences of children in countries like Spain, Italy, Greece, and
Ireland. One of the most interesting analytical tools used in this section, and
one that could have been applied even more extensively, is the distinction
between what most children (across social classes and regions) experienced
throughout the crisis, and the particular experiences of those that are
socio-economically more vulnerable. Fortunately, some of this systematization
is also provided by the authors in the last section of the book. </p>

    <p>Part 4
is a very concise conclusion chapter that despite being very descriptive is a
welcomed and needed section in the book, since none of the other sections had
concluding remarks. Examples of some interesting points highlighted in this
section are how social transfers significantly reduce the number of children at
risk of poverty (from 35.3% to 24.4%); how the number of unemployed couples
registered in employment centers increased 688% from 2010 to 2013; how the
government’s expenditures directed at families with children are still below
the average of most OECD countries; how grandparents are central in the lives
of children; and how children believe that its mostly the adults that are
impacted by the crisis, especially ­regarding ­employment and consumption,
dimensions that gained significance in the children’s discourses about the
economic crisis. The book ends with policy recommendations designed to promote
children’s well-being and rights, with special attention to the most
economically vulnerable. </p>

    ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><i>Impacto</i><i> da Crise
nas Crianças Portuguesas: Indicadores, Políticas, Representações</i> is a
compelling and welcome contribution to our understanding of the economic crisis
and its effect on children and families. It succeeds in giving <i>voice</i> to
a group - children and teenagers, who are often “spoken for”, instead of
“listened to”. It does so not only through the extensive data presented, but
especially through the interview data, its most
important and original feature. The book does suffer from a lack of
systematization and focus stemming from its report-style and absence of
concluding remarks at the end of each section, but that detracts little from
the overall contribution it brings to the field. </p>

    <p>&nbsp; </p>




     ]]></body>
</article>
