<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0254-0223</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Ciência e Técnica Vitivinícola]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Ciência Téc. Vitiv.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0254-0223</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[INIAV - DOIS PORTOS (Ex-Estação Vitivinícola Nacional)]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0254-02232001000100002</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Quantification of Catechins and Proanthocyanidins in Several Portuguese Grapevine Varieties and Red Wines]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="fr"><![CDATA[Quantification des catéchines et des proanthocyanidines dans certains cépages et vins rouges portugais.]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Quantificação das catequinas e proantocianidinas em algumas variedades de videira e vinhos tintos portugueses]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sun]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Baoshan]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Ricardo-da-Silva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A03"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Spranger]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.Isabel]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,MADRP - Ministério da Agricultura, do Desenvolvimento Rural e das Pescas Instituto Nacional dos Recursos Biológicos I. P. (INRB, I.P.) INIA - Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[ ]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,MADRP - Ministério da Agricultura, do Desenvolvimento Rural e das Pescas INIAP - Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e das Pescas EVN - Estação Vitivinícola Nacional]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Dois Portos ]]></addr-line>
<country>Portugal</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A03">
<institution><![CDATA[,UTL - Universidade Técnica de Lisboa ISA - Instituto Superior de Agronomia ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Lisboa ]]></addr-line>
<country>Portugal</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2001</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2001</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<fpage>23</fpage>
<lpage>34</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0254-02232001000100002&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0254-02232001000100002&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0254-02232001000100002&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[Catechins, oligomeric proanthocyanidins (degree of polymerization ranging from 2 to 12-15) and polymeric proanthocyanidins (degree of polymerization > 12-15) in several Portuguese grapevine varieties (Fernão Pires, Castelão, Vital, Vinhão, Espadeiro, Azal Tinto) harvested from the west and the north of Portugal in 1993 and 1994, and in some red wines from several Portuguese regions (Estremadura, Dão and Vinhos Verdes), were quantified using modified vanillin assay. In most grapevine varieties studied, the levels of catechins and proanthocyanidins in seeds in 1993 were roughly equal to those in 1994, although the climatological conditions were different between the two years. However, these values in skins of all tested varieties except Fernão Pires, obtained in 1994, were much smaller than those in 1993. Catechins and proanthocyanidins were located essentially in seeds, being 77,2% of total catechins of grape berry, 80,8% of total oligomeric proanthocyanidins of grape berry and 60,3% of total polymeric proanthocyanidins of grape berry, then in skins, being 19,7% of total catechins of grape berry, 19,0% of total oligomeric proanthocyanidins of grape berry and 38,9% of total polymeric proanthocyanidins of grape berry, and very little in pulp, being 3,1% of total catechins of grape berry, 0,2% of total oligomeric proanthocyanidins of grape berry and 0,8% of total polymeric proanthocyanidins of grape berry (mean values of two years). In seeds, the percentages of catechins, oligomeric and polymeric proanthocyanidins were respectively 4,2%, 29,4% and 66,4%; in skins, on the other hand, these values were respectively 1,8%, 13,0% and 85,2% (mean values of two years). The results also show the differences between the grapevine varieties from the west of Portugal and those from the north of Portugal. For all red wines analyzed, polymeric proanthocyanidins were predominant (averaging 65.5%), followed by oligomeric proanthocyanidins (averaging 27.9%), and catechins were presented in the lowest concentration (averaging 6.6%). Furthermore, the distribution of catechins, oligomeric and polymeric proanthocyanidins in red wines was similar to that in grapes.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="fr"><p><![CDATA[Catéchines, proanthocyanidines oligomères (degré de polymérisation comprenant entre 2 et 1215) et proanthocyanidines polymères (degré de polymérisation > 12-15) de certains cépages portugais (Fernão Pires, Castelão, Vital, Vinhão, Espadeiro, Azal Tinto) récoltés de l’Ouest et du Nord du Portugal en 1993 et 1994 et de quelques vins rouges de différentes régions portugaises (Dão, Estremadura et Vinhos Verdes) ont été quantifiées en utilisant la méthode à la vanilline. Dans la plupart des cépages étudiés, le contenu de catéchines et de proanthocyanidines des pépins était très similaire dans les deux années, malgré les différentes conditions climatiques entre eux. Par contre, les teneurs de ces composés dans les pellicules de toutes les cépages étudiés excepté Fernão Pires, étaient beaucoup plus basses en 1994. En outre, catéchines et proanthocyanidines sont présentes essentiellement dans les pépins, ce qui représente 77,2% de catéchines, 80,8% de proanthocyanidines oligomères et 60,3% de proanthocyanidines polymères du total de la baie. Les valeurs correspondantes dans les pellicules représentent seulement 19,7%, 19,0% et 38,9% du total de la baie et la pulpe est presque dépourvue de ces composés, soit 3,1% de catéchines totales de la baie, 0,2% de proanthocyanidines oligomères totales de la baie et 0,8% de proanthocyanidines polymères totales de la baie. Dans les pépins, la répartition de catéchines, proanthocyanidines oligomères et proanthocyanidines polymères était respectivement 4,2%, 29,4% et 66,4% et dans les pellicules 1,8%, 13,0% et 85,2% (valeur moyenne). Les résultats ont montré aussi la différence entre les cépages de l’Ouest et du Nord du Portugal. Pour tous les vins analysés, proanthocyanidines polymères étaient prédominantes, soit 65,5%, ensuite proanthocyanidines oligomères, soit 27,9%, et les catechines, seulement 6,6% (valeur moyenne). Donc, la distribution de catéchines, proanthocyanidines oligomères et proanthocyanidines polymères dans les vins était semblable à celle dans les raisins.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Neste trabalho, o teor total de catequinas, proantocianidinas oligoméricas (grau de polimerização compreendido entre 2 e 12-15) e proantocianidinas poliméricas (grau de polimerização > 12-15) de uvas de algumas variedades de videira portuguesas (Fernão Pires, Castelão, Vital, Vinhão, Espadeiro, Azal Tinto) colhidas no Oeste e Norte de Portugal em 1993 e 1994, e vinhos de diferentes regiões portuguesas (Dão, Estremadura e Vinhos Verdes), foi determinado utilizando o método de reacção com vanilina. Para a maioria das variedades de videira estudadas, o teor de catequinas, proantocianidinas oligoméricas e proantocianidinas poliméricas nas graínhas das uvas, foi aproximadamente igual nos dois anos de estudo, apesar das diferentes condições climatéricas entre os dois anos. No entanto, na película das uvas de todas as variedades ensaiadas, com excepção de Fernão Pires, os teores determinados foram muito mais baixos na colheita de 1994 do que na de 1993. As catequinas e proantocianidinas localizam-se essencialmente nas graínhas, atingindo em média 77,2% do total de catequinas do bago, 80,8% do total de oligómeros do bago e 60,3% do total de polímeros do bago, enquanto que nas películas as catequinas representam, em média, apenas 19,7%, os oligómeros 19,0% e os polímeros 38,9% do teor total respectivo no bago. A contribuição da polpa para o teor total de catequinas e procianidinas do bago é diminuta (3,1% de catequinas, 0,2% de oligómeros e 0,8% de polímeros). Por outro lado, a distribuição percentual de catequinas, proantocianidinas oligoméricas e proantocianidinas poliméricas nas graínhas, foi respectivamente de 4,2%, 29,4% e 66,4% (valores médios), sendo nas películas de 1,8%, 13,0% e 85,2%. Os resultados mostraram também diferenças entre as variedades das regiões do Oeste e do Norte de Portugal. Em todos os vinhos analisados, as proantocianidinas poliméricas foram predominantes (valor médio 65,5%), seguidas pelas proantocianidinas oligoméricas (valor médio 27,9%) e pelas catequinas, cujo valor médio foi apenas de 6,6%. Além disso, a distribuição de catequinas, proantocianidinas oligoméricas e proantocianidinas poliméricas nos vinhos tintos era semelhante à da uva.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[grapevine varieties]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[wines]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[catechins]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[proanthocyanidins]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Variedades de videira]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[vinhos]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[catequinas]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[proantocianidinas]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="center"><b>Quantification of Catechins and Proanthocyanidins in Several    Portuguese Grapevine Varieties and Red Wines</b></p>      <p>&nbsp;</p>      <p align="center">Baoshan Sun<sup>1</sup>, J.M. Ricardo-da-Silva<sup>2</sup>,    M.Isabel Spranger<sup>1</sup> </p>     <p align="center">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><sup>1</sup>Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária, Estação    Vitivinícola Nacional, 2565-191 Dois Portos, Portugal.</p>     <p align="center">E-mail: <a href="mailto:inia.evn.quim@oninet.pt">inia.evn.quim@oninet.pt</a>  </p>     <p align="center"><sup>2</sup>Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Instituto Superior    de Agronomia, 1399 Lisboa Codex, Portugal.      <p align="center">E-mail:<a href="mailto:jricardosil@isa.utl.pt"> jricardosil@isa.utl.pt    </a></p>     <p align="center"><I>(Manuscrito recebido em 19.04.01. Aceite para publica&ccedil;&atilde;o    em 22.05.01) </I></p>     <p align="center">&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="center">&nbsp; </p>     <p align="center">SUMMARY<b> </b></p>      <p>Catechins, oligomeric proanthocyanidins (degree of polymerization ranging from 2 to 12-15) and polymeric proanthocyanidins (degree of polymerization > 12-15) in several Portuguese grapevine varieties (Fernão  Pires, Castelão, Vital, Vinhão, Espadeiro, Azal Tinto) harvested from the west and the north of Portugal in 1993 and 1994, and in some red wines from several Portuguese regions (Estremadura, Dão and Vinhos Verdes),  were quantified using modified vanillin assay. </p>      <p>In most grapevine varieties studied, the levels of catechins and proanthocyanidins    in seeds in 1993 were roughly equal to those in 1994, although the climatological    conditions were different between the two years. However, these values in skins    of all tested varieties except <i>Fernão Pires</i>, obtained in 1994, were much    smaller than those in 1993. Catechins and proanthocyanidins were located essentially    in seeds, being 77,2% of total catechins of grape berry, 80,8% of total oligomeric    proanthocyanidins of grape berry and 60,3% of total polymeric proanthocyanidins    of grape berry, then in skins, being 19,7% of total catechins of grape berry,    19,0% of total oligomeric proanthocyanidins of grape berry and 38,9% of total    polymeric proanthocyanidins of grape berry, and very little in pulp, being 3,1%    of total catechins of grape berry, 0,2% of total oligomeric proanthocyanidins    of grape berry and 0,8% of total polymeric proanthocyanidins of grape berry    (mean values of two years). In seeds, the percentages of catechins, oligomeric    and polymeric proanthocyanidins were respectively 4,2%, 29,4% and 66,4%; in    skins, on the other hand, these values were respectively 1,8%, 13,0% and 85,2%    (mean values of two years). The results also show the differences between the    grapevine varieties from the west of Portugal and those from the north of Portugal.  </p>      <p>For all red wines analyzed, polymeric proanthocyanidins were predominant (averaging 65.5%), followed by  oligomeric proanthocyanidins (averaging 27.9%), and catechins were presented in the lowest concentration  (averaging 6.6%). Furthermore, the distribution of catechins, oligomeric and polymeric proanthocyanidins in red wines was similar to that in grapes. </p>      <p><b>Key Words:</b> grapevine varieties, wines, catechins, proanthocyanidins. </p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>      <p align="center">RÉSUMÉ<b> </b></p>     <p align="center"><b>Quantification des catéchines et des proanthocyanidines dans    certains cépages et vins rouges portugais.</b></p>       ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Catéchines, proanthocyanidines oligomères (degré de polymérisation comprenant entre 2 et 1215) et  proanthocyanidines polymères (degré de polymérisation > 12-15) de certains cépages portugais (Fernão Pires, Castelão, Vital, Vinhão, Espadeiro, Azal Tinto) récoltés de l’Ouest et du Nord du Portugal en 1993 et 1994  et de quelques vins rouges de différentes régions portugaises (Dão, Estremadura et Vinhos Verdes) ont été  quantifiées en utilisant la méthode à la vanilline. </p>      <p>Dans la plupart des cépages étudiés, le contenu de catéchines et de proanthocyanidines    des pépins était très similaire dans les deux années, malgré les différentes    conditions climatiques entre eux. Par contre, les teneurs de ces composés dans    les pellicules de toutes les cépages étudiés excepté <i>Fernão Pires</i>, étaient    beaucoup plus basses en 1994. En outre, catéchines et proanthocyanidines sont    présentes essentiellement dans les pépins, ce qui représente 77,2% de catéchines,    80,8% de proanthocyanidines oligomères et 60,3% de proanthocyanidines polymères    du total de la baie. Les valeurs correspondantes dans les pellicules représentent    seulement 19,7%, 19,0% et 38,9% du total de la baie et la pulpe est presque    dépourvue de ces composés, soit 3,1% de catéchines totales de la baie, 0,2%    de proanthocyanidines oligomères totales de la baie et 0,8% de proanthocyanidines    polymères totales de la baie. Dans les pépins, la répartition de catéchines,    proanthocyanidines oligomères et proanthocyanidines polymères était respectivement    4,2%, 29,4% et 66,4% et dans les pellicules 1,8%, 13,0% et 85,2% (valeur moyenne).    Les résultats ont montré aussi la différence entre les cépages de l’Ouest et    du Nord du Portugal. </p>      <p>Pour tous les vins analysés, proanthocyanidines polymères étaient prédominantes,    soit 65,5%, ensuite proanthocyanidines oligomères, soit 27,9%, et les catechines,    seulement 6,6% (valeur moyenne). Donc, la distribution de catéchines, proanthocyanidines    oligomères et proanthocyanidines polymères dans les vins était semblable à celle    dans les raisins. </p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>      <p align="center">RESUMO </p>     <p align="center"><b>Quantificação das catequinas e proantocianidinas em algumas    variedades de videira e vinhos tintos portugueses </b></p>      <p>Neste trabalho, o teor total de catequinas, proantocianidinas oligoméricas (grau de polimerização  compreendido entre 2 e 12-15) e proantocianidinas poliméricas (grau de polimerização > 12-15) de uvas de  algumas variedades de videira portuguesas (Fernão Pires, Castelão, Vital, Vinhão, Espadeiro, Azal Tinto)  colhidas no Oeste e Norte de Portugal em 1993 e 1994, e vinhos de diferentes regiões portuguesas (Dão,  Estremadura e Vinhos Verdes), foi determinado utilizando o método de reacção com vanilina. </p>      <p>Para a maioria das variedades de videira estudadas, o teor de catequinas, proantocianidinas oligoméricas  e proantocianidinas poliméricas nas graínhas das uvas, foi aproximadamente igual nos dois anos de estudo,  apesar das diferentes condições climatéricas entre os dois anos. No entanto, na película das uvas de todas  as variedades ensaiadas, com excepção de Fernão Pires, os teores determinados foram muito mais baixos na  colheita de 1994 do que na de 1993. As catequinas e proantocianidinas localizam-se essencialmente nas  graínhas, atingindo em média 77,2% do total de catequinas do bago, 80,8% do total de oligómeros do bago e  60,3% do total de polímeros do bago, enquanto que nas películas as catequinas representam, em média, apenas  19,7%, os oligómeros 19,0% e os polímeros 38,9% do teor total respectivo no bago. A contribuição da polpa  para o teor total de catequinas e procianidinas do bago é diminuta (3,1% de catequinas, 0,2% de oligómeros  e 0,8% de polímeros). Por outro lado, a distribuição percentual de catequinas, proantocianidinas oligoméricas  e proantocianidinas poliméricas nas graínhas, foi respectivamente de 4,2%, 29,4% e 66,4% (valores médios),  sendo nas películas de 1,8%, 13,0% e 85,2%. Os resultados mostraram também diferenças entre as variedades  das regiões do Oeste e do Norte de Portugal. </p>      <p>Em todos os vinhos analisados, as proantocianidinas poliméricas foram predominantes    (valor médio 65,5%), seguidas pelas proantocianidinas oligoméricas (valor médio    27,9%) e pelas catequinas, cujo valor médio foi apenas de 6,6%. Além disso,    a distribuição de catequinas, proantocianidinas oligoméricas e proantocianidinas    poliméricas nos vinhos tintos era semelhante à da uva. </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><b>Palavras chave:</b> Variedades de videira, vinhos, catequinas, proantocianidinas  </p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp; </p>     <p>Texto completo dispon&iacute;vel apenas em PDF.</p>     <p>Full text only available in PDF format.</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center">REFERENCES BIBLIOGRAPHIQUES </p>      <!-- ref --><p>Arnold R.M., Noble A.C., Singleton V.L., 1980. Bitterness and astringency of    phenolic fractions in wine, <i>J. Agric. Food Chem.,</i> <b>28</b>, 675-678.  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000041&pid=S0254-0223200100010000200001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><p>Bourzeix M., Weyland D., Heredia N., 1986. Étude des catéchines et des procyanidols    de la grappe de raisin, du vin et d’autres dérivés de la vigne. <i>Bull O.I.V.    </i><b> 59</b>, 1171-1254. </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Cheynier V., Prieur C., Guyot S., Rigaud J., Moutounet M., 1997. The structures    of tannins in grapes and wines and their interactions with proteins, in: <i>Proceedings    of ACS Symposium Series 661, Wine: Nutritional and Therapeutic Benefits</i>,    T. R. Watkins (Ed.), 81-93. </p>     <p>Haslam E., 1974. Polyphenols-proteins interactions. <i>Biochem. J</i>., <b>139</b>,    285-288. </p>     <p>Lea A.G.H., Bridle P., Timberlake C.F., Singleton V.L., 1979. The procyanidins    of white grapes and wines, <i>Am. J. Enol. Vitic.</i>, <b>30,</b> 289-300. </p>     <p>OIV, 1990. Recueil des méthodes internationales d’analyse des vins, Office    International de la Vighe et du Vin, Paris. </p>     <p>Oszmianski J., Lee C.Y., 1990. Isolation and HPLC determination of phenolic    compounds in red grapes, <i>Am. J. Enol. Vitic.,</i> <b>41</b>, 204-206. </p>     <p>Revilla E., Alonso E., Bourzeix M., Heredia N., 1991. Dosage des catéchines    et des proanthocyanidols dans les vins, <i>Bull. O.I.V.,</i> F.V. 829. </p>     <p>Ricardo da Silva J.M., Belchior A.P., Spranger M.I., Bourzeix M., 1992. Oligomeric    procyanidins of three grapevine varieties and wines from Portugal,<i> Sciences    des Aliments,</i> <b>12</b>, 223-237. </p>     <p>Ricardo da Silva J.M., Bourzeix M., Cheynier V., Moutounet M., 1991a. Procyanidin    composition of Chardonnay, Mauzac and Grenache blanc grapes, <i>Vitis</i>, <b>30</b>,    245-252. </p>     <p>Ricardo da Silva J.M., Cheynier V., Souquet J.M., Moutounet M. Cabanis J.C.,    Bourzeix M., 1991b. Interaction of grape seed procyanidins with various proteins    in relation to wine fining, <i>J. Sci. Food Agric.</i>, <b>57</b>, 111-125.  </p>     <p>Ricardo da Silva J.M., Darmon N., Fernández Y., Mitjavila S., 1991c. Oxygen    free radical scavenger capacity in aqueous models of different procyanidins    from grape seeds, <i>J. Agric. Food Chem.</i>,<b> 39</b>, 1549-1552. </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Singleton V.L., 1992. Tannins and the qualities of wines, in <i>Plant polyphenols    Synthesis, Properties, Significance</i>, Plenum Press, New York and London,    859-880.</p>     <p>Singleton V.L., Rossi JR J.A., 1965. Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdicphosphotungstic    acid reagent, <i>Am. J. Enol. Vitic.</i>, <b>16</b>, 144-158. </p>     <p>Souquet J., Cheynier V., Brossaud F., Moutounet M., 1996. Polymeric proanthocyanidins    from grape skins. <i>Phytochemistry </i><b>43,</b> 509-512. </p>     <p>Spranger M.I., Roque do Vale F., Sun B.S., Leandro, M.C., Duarte, F.L. 2000.    reactivity of grape seed procyanidins with human salivary proteins, <i>Proceeding    of the XXth international conference on Polyphenols</i>, Martens S., Treutter    D., and Forkmann G. (eds.), Freising-Weihenstephan (Germany), 463-464. </p>     <p>Sun B.S., Leandro M.C., Ricardo-da-Silva J.M., Spranger M.I., 1998a. Separation    of grape and wine proanthocyanidins according to their degree of polymerisation,    <i>J. Agric. Food Chem</i>.<b> 46</b>, 1390-1396. </p>     <p>Sun B.S., Pinto T., Leandro M.C., Ricardo-da-Silva J.M., Spranger M.I., 1999.    Transfer of catechins and proanthocyanidins from grape solids into wine,<i>    Am. J. Enol. Vitic.</i> <b>50 (2)</b>, 179184. </p>     <p>Sun B.S., Ricardo-da-Silva J.M., Spranger M.I. 1998b. Critical factors of vanillin    assay for catechins and proanthocyanidins, <i>J. Agric. Food Chem. </i><b>46</b>,    4267-4274. </p>     <p>Sun B.S., Spranger M. I., Leandro M.C., 1995. Dosage des catéchines et procyanidines    du rasin et du vin. optimisation de la méthode de réaction avec la vanilline,<i>    Proceedings, International Polyphenolic Group Convention;</i> INRA: Palma de    Mallorca, 455-456. </p>     <p>Sun B.S., Spranger M.I., Ricardo-da-Silva J.M., 1996. Extraction of grape seed    procyanidins using different organic solvents, <i>Proceeding of the 18th International    Conference of Group Polyphenols</i>, Vercauteren J., Chèze C., Dumon M.C. and    Weber J.F. (eds.), Bordeaux, 169-170. </p>     <p>Teissedre P.L., Waterhouse A.L., Walzem R.L., German J.B., Frankel E.N., Ebeler    S.E., Clifford A.J., 1996. Composés phenoliques du raisin et du vin et santé,<i>    Bull. O.I.V.</i>, 252-277. </p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Timberlake C.F., Bridle P., 1976. Interaction between anthocyanins, phenolic    compounds and acetaldehyde and their significance in red wines, <i>Am. J. Enol.    Vitic.</i>, <b>27</b>, 97-105. </p>     <p>Vivas N., Glories Y., Lagune L., Saucier C., Augustin M., 1994. Estimation    du degré de polymérisation des procyanidines du raisin et du vin par la méthode    au pdimethylaminocinnamaldéhyde. <i>J. Int. Sci. Vigne Vin</i>, <b>28,</b> 319-336.  </p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <P>ACKNOWLEDGMENTS: Author Baoshan Sun thanks the Funda&ccedil;&atilde;o Oriente    and the Funda&ccedil;&atilde;o para a Ci&ecirc;ncia e a Tecnologia -Minist&eacute;rio    da Ci&ecirc;ncia e a Tecnologia (Portugal) for their grants. </P >     <p>&nbsp; </p>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Arnold]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[R.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Noble]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.C.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Singleton]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[V.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Bitterness and astringency of phenolic fractions in wine]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[J. Agric. Food Chem.]]></source>
<year>1980</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<page-range>675-678</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
