<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0254-0223</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Ciência e Técnica Vitivinícola]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Ciência Téc. Vitiv.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0254-0223</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[INIAV - DOIS PORTOS (Ex-Estação Vitivinícola Nacional)]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0254-02232006000200001</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[2,4,6-Trichloroanisole: A consumer panel evaluation]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[2,4,6-Tricloroanisol: Avaliação por um painel de consumidores]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[2,4,6-Tricloroanisol: avaliação por um painel de consumidores]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="fr"><![CDATA[2,4,6-Tricloroanisol: évaluation par un group de consommateurs]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Teixeira]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Margarida I. V.]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Romão]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. Vitória San]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A03"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A04"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bronze]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M. Rosário]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A04"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Vilas Boas]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Luís]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A05"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade de Lisboa Faculdade de Farmácia ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Lisboa ]]></addr-line>
<country>Portugal</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Oeiras ]]></addr-line>
<country>Portugal</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A03">
<institution><![CDATA[,Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e das Pescas Estação Vitivinícola Nacional ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Dois Portos ]]></addr-line>
<country>Portugal</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A04">
<institution><![CDATA[,Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnológica  ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Oeiras ]]></addr-line>
<country>Portugal</country>
</aff>
<aff id="A05">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade Técnica de Lisboa Instituto Superior Técnico ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Lisboa ]]></addr-line>
<country>Portugal</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2006</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>00</month>
<year>2006</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<fpage>53</fpage>
<lpage>65</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0254-02232006000200001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0254-02232006000200001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://scielo.pt/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0254-02232006000200001&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The "cork taint" is a major problem in wine industry and may caused by the several sources of contamination although wine cork stoppers are usually subject to suspition: 2,4,6-trichloroanisole (TCA) has been frequently associated to this off-flavour. In this work, a consumer panel performed "forced choice" triangular tests in order to measure Odour Detection Thresholds (ODT) and Taste Detection Thresholds (TDT) of TCA in water, hydro-alcoholic solutions (11.5% and 18% ethanol) and white and red wines. A paired preference test was also performed by the panel in order to measure Odour Rejection Threshold (ORT) in white and red wines spiked with TCA. Results obtained show that the ODT and the TDT for TCA were respectively: 0.2 and 0.3 ng/ L in water, 0.9 and 1.7 ng/L in red wine and 1.5 and 1.0 ng/L in white wine. ODT were 4 and 10 ng/L respectively for hydro-alcoholic solutions with 11.5% and 18% ethanol. ORT for white wines was 10.4 ng/L and for red wines 16.0 ng/L. These results suggest that although this group of non trained assessors detected very low concentrations of TCA in wines, they did not reject the wine at these low concentration values.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[O denominado "gosto a rolha" é um problema de grande importância para a indústria vitivinícola e constitui um defeito que aparece por contaminação dos vinhos. Esta contaminação é normalmente atribuída à rolha de cortiça e o 2,4,6-tricloroanisol (TCA) é o composto mais frequentemente associado a este "off-flavour". Neste trabalho, um painel de consumidores efectuou ensaios triangulares de resposta obrigatória, com vista à determinação dos Limiares de Detecção Olfactivos (LDO) e Limiares de Detecção Gustativos (LDG) do TCA em água, soluções hidroalcoólicas (11,5 e 18% etanol) e vinho de mesa branco e tinto. Um ensaio de comparação por pares foi utilizado pelo painel para avaliar o Limiar de rejeição Olfactivo (LRO) em vinhos brancos e vinhos tintos aos quais foi adicionado TCA. Os resultados obtidos mostram que o LDO e LDG em água correspondem respectivamente a 0,2 e 0,3 ng/L, em soluções hidroalcoólicas a 11,5 e 18% o LDO foi de 4 e 10ng/L respectivamente. Nos vinhos tintos o LDO e LDG foi de 0,9 e 1,7 ng/L e nos vinhos brancos foi respectivamente 1,5 e 1,0. O LRO obtido para o vinho branco foi de 10,4ng/L e para o vinho tinto 16,0 ng/L. Os resultados obtidos indicam que, embora este grupo de consumidores tenha detectado a presença de TCA em baixas concentrações nas diferentes amostras testadas, não rejeitaram as amostras de vinho que apresentavam estes teores.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="fr"><p><![CDATA[Le «goût de bouchon» est un problème important dans l’industrie vinicole et est provoqué par la contamination des vins. Cette contamination est habituellement attribuée aux bouchons de liège et le 2,4,6-trichloroanisole (TCA) est l’un des composés la plupart du temps associés à ce goût. Dans ce travail, un panel de consommateurs a effectué des essais triangulaires de choisi «forcé» afin de mesurer les seuils de détection d’odeur (SDO) et les seuils de détection de goût (SDG) de TCA en eau, solutions hydroalcooliques (éthanol de 11.5% et de 18%) et vins blancs et rouges. Un épreuve de préférence par paire a été également exécuté par le panneau afin de mesurer le seuil de rejet d’odeur (SRO) en vin blanc et rouge pointu avec TCA. Les résultats obtenues pour les SDO et les SDG pour TCA dans l’eau étaient 0.2 et 0.3 ng/L, respectivement. Dans les solutions hydroalcooliques avec de l’éthanol de 11.5% et de 18% les SDO étaient 4 et 10 ng/L respectivement. En vin rouge les SDO et les SDG étaient 0.9 et 1.7 ng/L et en vin blanc était 1.5 et 1.0 ng/L respectivement. SRO pour le blanc était 10.4 ng/L et pour les vins rouges 16.0 ng/L. Ces résultats suggèrent que bien que ce groupe de consommateurs ait détecté des concentrations très basses de TCA en vins, ils n’aient pas rejeté le vin à ces valeurs basses de concentration.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[TCA]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Cork taint]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[wine]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[sensory evaluation]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[TCA]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[gosto a rolha]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[vinho]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[avaliação sensorial]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="CENTER"><b>2,4,6-Trichloroanisole: A consumer panel evaluation </b></P>     <p>&nbsp;</p>      <p align="CENTER"><b>Margarida  I. V. Teixeira<Sup>1,2</Sup>, M. Vit&oacute;ria San Rom&atilde;o<Sup>2,3,4</Sup>,  M. Ros&aacute;rio Bronze<Sup>*1,2,4</Sup>, Lu&iacute;s Vilas Boas<Sup>2,5 </Sup></b></P>      <p>&nbsp;</p>      <P align="center"><Sup>1</Sup> Faculdade de Farm&aacute;cia da Universidade de    Lisboa, Av. das For&ccedil;as Armadas, 1649-019 Lisboa, Portugal</P>     <P align="center"><Sup>2</Sup> Instituto de Tecnologia Qu&iacute;mica e Biol&oacute;gica,    Apartado 127, 2784-505 Oeiras, Portugal</P>     <P align="center"><Sup>3</Sup> Esta&ccedil;&atilde;o Vitivin&iacute;cola Nacional    (INIAP), 2565-191 Dois Portos, Portugal</P>     <P align="center"><Sup>4</Sup> Instituto de Biologia Experimental e Tecnol&oacute;gica,    Apartado 12, 2781-901, Oeiras, Portugal</P>     <P align="center"><Sup>5</Sup> Instituto Superior T&eacute;cnico, Av. Rovisco    Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal </P>     <P align="center">*Corresponding author. Tel: +351214469770; fax: +351214417062,    E-mail address: <a href="mailto:mbronze@itqb.unl.pt">mbronze@itqb.unl.pt    </a></P>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p align="center"><I>(Manuscrito recebido em 11.07.06. Aceite para publica&ccedil;&atilde;o    em 23.12.06) </I></p>     <p align="center">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center">&nbsp;</p>      <p align="CENTER"><b>SUMMARY </b></P>      <P align="JUSTIFY">The &#147;cork taint&#148; is a major problem in wine industry  and may caused by the several sources of contamination although wine cork stoppers  are usually subject to suspition: 2,4,6-trichloroanisole (TCA) has been frequently  associated to this off-flavour. In this work, a consumer panel performed &#147;forced  choice&#148; triangular tests in order to measure Odour Detection Thresholds (ODT)  and Taste Detection Thresholds (TDT) of TCA in water, hydro-alcoholic solutions  (11.5% and 18% ethanol) and white and red wines. A paired preference test was  also performed by the panel in order to measure Odour Rejection Threshold (ORT)  in white and red wines spiked with TCA. Results obtained show that the ODT and  the TDT for TCA were respectively: 0.2 and 0.3 ng/ L in water, 0.9 and 1.7 ng/L  in red wine and 1.5 and 1.0 ng/L in white wine. ODT were 4 and 10 ng/L respectively  for hydro-alcoholic solutions with 11.5% and 18% ethanol. ORT for white wines  was 10.4 ng/L and for red wines 16.0 ng/L. These results suggest that although  this group of non trained assessors detected very low concentrations of TCA in  wines, they did not reject the wine at these low concentration values. </P>    <P align="JUSTIFY"><b>Key  words:</b> TCA; Cork taint; wine; sensory evaluation </P>      <p>&nbsp;</p>      <p align="CENTER"><b>RESUMO</b></P>      <p align="CENTER"><b>2,4,6-Tricloroanisol: avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o por um painel  de consumidores </b></P>      <P align="JUSTIFY">O denominado &#147;gosto a rolha&#148; &eacute; um problema  de grande import&acirc;ncia para a ind&uacute;stria vitivin&iacute;cola e constitui  um defeito que aparece por contamina&ccedil;&atilde;o dos vinhos. Esta contamina&ccedil;&atilde;o  &eacute; normalmente atribu&iacute;da &agrave; rolha de corti&ccedil;a e o 2,4,6-tricloroanisol  (TCA) &eacute; o composto mais frequentemente associado a este &#147;off-flavour&#148;.  Neste trabalho, um painel de consumidores efectuou ensaios triangulares de resposta  obrigat&oacute;ria, com vista &agrave; determina&ccedil;&atilde;o dos Limiares  de Detec&ccedil;&atilde;o Olfactivos (LDO) e Limiares de Detec&ccedil;&atilde;o  Gustativos (LDG) do TCA em &aacute;gua, solu&ccedil;&otilde;es hidroalco&oacute;licas  (11,5 e 18% etanol) e vinho de mesa branco e tinto. Um ensaio de compara&ccedil;&atilde;o  por pares foi utilizado pelo painel para avaliar o Limiar de rejei&ccedil;&atilde;o  Olfactivo (LRO) em vinhos brancos e vinhos tintos aos quais foi adicionado TCA.  Os resultados obtidos mostram que o LDO e LDG em &aacute;gua correspondem respectivamente  a 0,2 e 0,3 ng/L, em solu&ccedil;&otilde;es hidroalco&oacute;licas a 11,5 e 18%  o LDO foi de 4 e 10ng/L respectivamente. Nos vinhos tintos o LDO e LDG foi de  0,9 e 1,7 ng/L e nos vinhos brancos foi respectivamente 1,5 e 1,0. O LRO obtido  para o vinho branco foi de 10,4ng/L e para o vinho tinto 16,0 ng/L. Os resultados  obtidos indicam que, embora este grupo de consumidores tenha detectado a presen&ccedil;a  de TCA em baixas concentra&ccedil;&otilde;es nas diferentes amostras testadas,  n&atilde;o rejeitaram as amostras de vinho que apresentavam estes teores. </P>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<P><b>Palavras chave:</b> TCA; gosto a rolha; vinho; avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o  sensorial </P>      <p>&nbsp;</p>      <p align="CENTER"><b>R&Eacute;SUM&Eacute;</b></P>       <P align="CENTER"><b>2,4,6-Tricloroanisol: &eacute;valuation par un group de consommateurs  </b></P>      <P align="JUSTIFY">Le &laquo;go&ucirc;t de bouchon&raquo; est un probl&egrave;me  important dans l&#146;industrie vinicole et est provoqu&eacute; par la contamination  des vins. Cette contamination est habituellement attribu&eacute;e aux bouchons  de li&egrave;ge et le 2,4,6-trichloroanisole (TCA) est l&#146;un des compos&eacute;s  la plupart du temps associ&eacute;s &agrave; ce go&ucirc;t. Dans ce travail, un  panel de consommateurs a effectu&eacute; des essais triangulaires de choisi &laquo;forc&eacute;&raquo;  afin de mesurer les seuils de d&eacute;tection d&#146;odeur (SDO) et les seuils  de d&eacute;tection de go&ucirc;t (SDG) de TCA en eau, solutions hydroalcooliques  (&eacute;thanol de 11.5% et de 18%) et vins blancs et rouges. Un &eacute;preuve  de pr&eacute;f&eacute;rence par paire a &eacute;t&eacute; &eacute;galement ex&eacute;cut&eacute;  par le panneau afin de mesurer le seuil de rejet d&#146;odeur (SRO) en vin blanc  et rouge pointu avec TCA. Les r&eacute;sultats obtenues pour les SDO et les SDG  pour TCA dans l&#146;eau &eacute;taient 0.2 et 0.3 ng/L, respectivement. Dans  les solutions hydroalcooliques avec de l&#146;&eacute;thanol de 11.5% et de 18%  les SDO &eacute;taient 4 et 10 ng/L respectivement. En vin rouge les SDO et les  SDG &eacute;taient 0.9 et 1.7 ng/L et en vin blanc &eacute;tait 1.5 et 1.0 ng/L  respectivement. SRO pour le blanc &eacute;tait 10.4 ng/L et pour les vins rouges  16.0 ng/L. Ces r&eacute;sultats sugg&egrave;rent que bien que ce groupe de consommateurs  ait d&eacute;tect&eacute; des concentrations tr&egrave;s basses de TCA en vins,  ils n&#146;aient pas rejet&eacute; le vin &agrave; ces valeurs basses de concentration.  </P>      <p>&nbsp;</p>      <p>Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.</p>     <p>Full text only available in PDF format.</p>      <p>&nbsp;</p>      <p align="CENTER"><b>REFERENCES </b></P>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<!-- ref --><P>Bertrand A., 1998. Les differentes formes de &laquo;go&ucirc;t de  bouchon&raquo; dans le vin. In: <I>XXIII Congr&eacute;s Mondial de  la Vigne et du Vin-</I>Vol. II Lisboa, 585-591. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000033&pid=S0254-0223200600020000100001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><P>Bertrand A.&nbsp;, Barrios M.L., 1994. Contamination de bouchons par  les produits de palettes de stockage des bouteilles. <I>Rev. Fran. OEnologie,  </I>149: Nov/Dec. </P>      <P>Callejon R.M., Trancoso A.M., Morales M.L., 2006. Analysis of  chloroanisols in cork by stirbar sorptive extraction and gas c hromatography-mass spectrometry. <I>Talanta</I>, (in press)  doi: 10.1016/ j.talanta.2006.09.020. </P>      <p>Casey J., 1999. T&acute;ain&#146;t necessarily so. History and research  shed light on cork&#146;s role in musty/ mouldy taints of bottled wine.  <I>Wine Industry Journal</I>, 14 (6), 49-56. </P>      <p>Cantagrel R., Vidal J. P., 1990. Research on compounds responsible for  cork taint in cognacs. In: 6<Sup>t<Sup>h </Sup></Sup>International Flavor  Conference, Flavors and Off-flavors Elsevier Science pp. 139-157. </P>      <p>Chatonnet P., Guimberteau G., Dubourdieu D. Boindron, J.N., 1994.  Nature et origine des odeurs de &laquo;&nbsp;moisi&nbsp;&raquo; dans  les vaves. Influence sur la contamination des vins. <I>J. Int. Sci.  Vigne Vin, </I>28, 131-151. </P>      <p>Chatonnet P., Labadie M-D, 1995. Contamination des locaux vinicoles et  alt&eacute;rations des vinscontr&ocirc;le de qualit&eacute; de  l&#146;atmosph&egrave;re des chais. <I>Rev. Fr. Oenol.</I>, 74, 19-21. </P>      <p>Chatonnet P., Bonnet S., Bouton S., Labadie M-D. (2004) Identification  and responsability of 2,4,6-tribromoanisole in musty, corked odors in wine.  <I>J. Agri. Food Chem., </I>52, 1255-1262. </P>      <p>Curtis R.F., Land D.G., Griffiths N.M., Gee M., Robinson D., Peel J.L.,  1974. Chloroanisoles a cause of musty taint in chicken and their microbiological  formation from chloroph&eacute;nols. <I>J. Sci. Food Agric.</I>, 25, 811-828. </P>      <p>Delwiche J., 2004. The impact of perceptual interactions on perceived flavour.  <I>Food Quality and Preference</I>, 15, 137-146. </P>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Ezquerro O., Tena M.T., 2005. Determination of odour-causing volatile  organic compounds in cork stoppers by multiple headspace solid-phase  microextraction. <I>J. Chromatogr. A</I>, 1068, 201208. </P>      <p>Fischer C., Fischer U., 1997. Analysis of cork taint in wine and cork  material at olfactory sub threshold levels by solid phase micro extraction.  <I>J. Agri. Food Chem., </I>45, 1995-1997. </P>      <p>Griffiths N.M., 1974. Sensory properties of chloroanisols. <I>Chemical  Senses Flavour</I>, 1, 187195. </P>      <p>Insa S., Salvad&oacute; V., Antic&oacute; E., 2006. Assays for the  simultaneous determination of chloroanisols and chlorophenols from  contaminated cork samples. <I>J. Chromatogr. A</I>, 1122, 215-221. </P>      <p>ISO, 2004. Standard 4120: Sensory Analysis- Methodology- Triangular test </P>      <p>ISO, 1992. Standard 5492: Sensory Analysis- Vocabulary </P>      <p>ISO, 2005. Standard 5495: Sensory Analysis- Methodology- Paired comparison test </P>      <p>Lorenzo C., Zalacain A., Alonso G.L., Salina M.R., 2006. Non destructive  method to determine halophenols and haloanisoles in cork stoppers by  headspace sorptive extraction. <I>J. Chromatogr. A</I>, 1114, 250-254. </P>      <p>Montiel A., Rigal S., Welt&eacute; B., 1999. Study of the origin of  musty taste in the drinking water supply. <I>Water Science and Technology</I>,  40 (6), 171-177. </P>      <p>Moore E., Pravda M., Guilbault G., 2003. Development of a biosensor for  the quantitative detection of 2,4,6-TCA using screen printed electrodes.  <I>Anal. Chim. Acta, </I>484, 15-24. </P>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>Ochiai N., Yamashita S., Daishma S., Heiden A., Hoffman A., 2001. Determination  of trace amounts of off-flavor compounds in drinking water by stir bar sorptive  extraction and thermal desorption GC-MS. <I>Analyst, </I>126 (10), 1652-1657. </P>      <p>Pereira C.S., Marques J.J., San Rom&atilde;o M.V., 2000. Cork taint in  wine: scientific knowledge and public perception- a critical review.  <I>Crit. Rev. Microbiol.</I>, 26 (3), 147-162. </P>      <p>Prescott J., Norris L., Kunst M., Kim S., 2005. Estimating a &laquo;consumer  rejection threshold&raquo; for cork taint in white wine. <I>Food Quality and  Preference, </I>16 (4), 345-349. </P>      <p>Rib&eacute;reau-Gayon, P., 1998. <I>Trait&eacute; d&#146; &#140;nologie</I>-Vol. 2.  Paris: Dunod pp. 293-301, 318. </P>      <p>Rui M., Mestres M., Busto O., Guash J., 2006. Determination of total  chloroanisols in different kind of cork stoppers. <I>Anal. Chim. Acta </I>563,  310-314. </P>      <p>Sanvicens N., Sanchez-Baeza F., Marco M.-P., 2003. Immunochemical  determination of 2,4,6-trichloroanisole as the responsible agent for the  musty odour in foods. 1. Molecular modelling studies for antibody production.  <I>J. Agri. Food Chem., </I>51(14), 3924-3931. </P>      <p>Soleas G., Yan J. Seaver T., Goldberg D., 2002. Method for the gas  chromatographic assay with selective detection of trichloro compounds  in corks and wines applied to elucidate the potential cause of cork taint.  <I>J. Agri. Food Chem., </I>50 (5), 1032-1039. </P>      <p>Suprenant A., Butzke C.E., 1997. Implication of odor threshold variations  on sensory quality control of cork stoppers. <I>Am. Journal Enol. Viticul.</I>, 48 (2) 269. </P>      <p>Tindale C.R., Whitfield F.B., Levingston S.D., Nguyen T., 1989. Fungi  isolated from packaging materials: their role in the production of  trichloroanisole. <I>J. Agri. Food Chem., </I>49, 437-447. </P>      <p>Waterhouse A., 2001. Natural products of wine. www: <a href="http://waterhouse.ucdavis.edu/ven219/index_m.htm" target="_blank">http://waterhouse.ucdavis.edu/ven219/index_m.htm</a>,    in 5 Nov. 2003. </P>      ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[ ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Bertrand]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="fr"><![CDATA[Les differentes formes de «goût de bouchon» dans le vin.]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[XXIII Congrés Mondial de la Vigne et du Vin]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>II</volume>
<page-range>585-591</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Lisboa ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
