C.M. Lopes*, A. Monteiro, J.P. Machado, N. Fernandes, A. Araújo
* Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: carlosmlopes@isa.utl.pt, Tel.: 351-213653450. Fax: 351-213 623262.
(Manuscrito recebido em 29.02.08. Aceite para publicação em 23.06.08)
SUMMARY
Grapevine vegetative growth, yield, fruit composition and wine quality were studied in the Estremadura Winegrowing Region of Portugal in a ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ slopping non-irrigated vineyard. During three seasons three treatments were compared: soil tillage (control), permanent resident vegetation, and permanent sown cover crop. When compared to soil tillage, the inter-row sward treatments displayed a lower predawn leaf water potential from bloom to mid-ripening. These differences in vine water status did not affect vine yield or berry sugar accumulation; however, in the third season after experiment setup it induced a significant reduction in vegetative growth in the sward treatments, compared to soil tillage. This vegetative growth reduction had a positive effect on grape composition by reducing titratable acidity and increasing berry skin total phenols and anthocyanins. Those differences were also detected in the wines by the judges who gave a better classification to the wines from the sward treatments. Our results indicate that cover cropping can be a valuable tool for controlling vigour and enhancing wine quality in this winegrowing region.
]]> Keywords: grapevine, cover crops, growth, yield, quality.
RESUMO
Enrelvamento em vinha de encosta não regada: II - efeitos no crescimento vegetativo, produção e qualidade do mosto e vinho, casta "cabernet sauvignon"
Numa vinha da casta ‘Cabernet Sauvignon’ instalada na região da Estremadura – Alenquer - estudou-se o efeito do enrelvamento da entrelinha no crescimento vegetativo, rendimento e qualidade da uva e do vinho. Durante três anos compararam-se três tratamentos alternativos: mobilização da entrelinha (testemunha), relvado natural e relvado semeado. Comparativamente à modalidade mobilizada as videiras das modalidades relvadas apresentaram um potencial de base mais baixo durante o período floração–meia maturação. Estas diferenças no estado hídrico da videira não afectaram o rendimento nem a acumulação de açúcar nos bagos no entanto, no terceiro ano de ensaios, provocaram uma redução significativa no crescimento vegetativo das videiras das modalidades relvadas, comparativamente à modalidade mobilizada. Esta redução do crescimento vegetativo induziu um efeito positivo na composição da uva através da redução da acidez total e do aumento da concentração de antocianas e fenóis nas películas do bago. Estas diferenças foram também detectadas na análise sensorial do vinho, na qual os provadores atribuíram uma melhor classificação aos vinhos das modalidades relvadas. Os nossos resultados indicam que, neste “terroir”, o enrelvamento da vinha é uma técnica cultural recomendável pois permite controlar o vigor e, indirectamente, melhorar a qualidade da uva.
Palavras Chave: videira, enrelvamento, crescimento, rendimento, qualidade.
Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.
Full text only available in PDF format.
]]>
REFERENCES
Afonso J.M., Monteiro A., Lopes C.M., Lourenço, J., 2003. Enrelvamento do solo em vinha na região dos Vinhos Verdes. Três anos de estudo na casta ‘Alvarinho’. Ciência Téc. Vitiv., 18, 47-63.
Agulhon R., 1996. Intérêt des nouvelles techniques d’entretien des sols de vigne pour la viticulture, l’œnologie, l’environnement et la santé. Progrès Agric. Vitic. 113, 275-278.
Bergqvist J., Dokoozlian N., Ebisuda N., 2001. Sunlight exposure and temperature effects on berry growth and composition of Cabernet Sauvignon and Grenache in the Central San Joaquin Valley of California. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 52(1), 1-7.
Campos L., Franco J.C., Monteiro A., Lopes C.M., 2006. Influência do enrelvamento na abundância de artrópodes associados a uma vinha da estremadura. Ciência Téc. Vitiv., 21(1), 33-46.
Caspari H.W., Neal S., Naylor A., 1997. Cover crop management in vineyards to enhance deficit irrigation in a humid climate. Acta Hortic. 449, 313-320.
Cifre J., Bota J., Escalona J.M., Medrano H., Flexas J., 2005. Physiological tools for irrigation scheduling in grapevine Vitis vinifera L.. An open gate to improve water-use efficiency? Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 106, 159-170.
Crozier P., 1998. Enherbement permanent et mulch: aspects agronomiques. Phytoma, 511, 42-45.
]]> Costello M.J., Daane K.M., 1998. Arthropods. In: Cover Cropping in Vineyards. A Grower’s Handbook. 93-106. Ingels C.A., Bugg R.L., McGourty G.T., Christensen L.P. (eds), University of California, Publication 3338. Oakland. USA.Deloire A., Carbonneau A., Federspiel B., Ojeda H., Wang Z., Costanza P., 2003. La vigne et l’eau. Progrès Agric. Vitic. 120, 79-90.
Dokoozlian N.K., Kliewer W.M., 1996. Influence of light on grape berry growth and composition varies during fruit development. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 121, 869-874.
English J., Bledsoe A., Marois J., Kliewer W., 1990. Influence of grapevine canopy management on evaporative potential in the fruit zone. Am. J. Enol. Vitic., 41, 137-141.
Folorunso O.A., Rolston D.E., Prichard T., Louie D.T. 1992. Soil surface strength and infiltration rate as affected by winter cover crops. Soil Technology, 5, 189-197.
Geoffrion R., 1999. L’enherbement permanent, 40 ans aprés. Phytoma, 519, 25-27.
Geoffrion R., 2000. L’enherbement permanent contrôlé des sols viticoles. Vingt ans de recherches sur le terrain en Anjou. Phytoma, 530, 28-31.
Gulick S.H., Grimes D.W., Munk D.S., Goldhamer D.A., 1994. Cover-crop-enhanced water infiltration of a slowly permeable fine sandy loam soil. J. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., 58, 1539-1546.
Keller M., Hrazdina G., 1998. Interaction of nitrogen availability during bloom and light intensity during veraison. II Effects on anthocyanin and phenolic development during grape ripening. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 49, 341-349.
Kondouras S., Van Leeuwen C., Seguin G., Glories Y., 1999. Influence of water status on vine vegetative growth, berry ripening and wine characteristics in mediterranean zone (exemple of Nemea, Greece, variety Saint-George, 1997). J. Int. Sci. Vigne et Vin, 33(4), 149-160.
]]> Le Golf-Guillou I., Marsault J., Riou C., 2000. Impacts de l’enherbement sur le fonctionnement de la vigne, la composition des moûts, les durées de fermentation et la qualité des vins. Progrès Agric. Vitic. 117, 103-110.Linares R., Fuente M., Junquera P., Baeza P., 2007. Response of a Merlot vineyard to several soil management practices in a mediterranean environment. In: Proceedings XV GESCO International Symposium. Vol. 1, 371-377. Inst. Agriculture and Tourism (ed.), Porec, Croatia.
Lopes C.M., Pinto P.A., 2005. Easy and accurate estimation of grapevine leaf area with simple mathematical models. Vitis, 44(2), 55-61.
Lopes C.M., Monteiro A., Rückert F.E., Gruber B., Steinberg B., Schultz H.R., 2004. Transpiration of grapevines and co-habitating cover crop and weed species in a vineyard. A “snapshot” at diurnal trends. Vitis 43, 111-117.
Maigre D., Aerny J., 2001. Enherbement permanent et fumure azotée sur cv. ‘Gamay’ dans le Valais Central. Revue Suisse Vitic. Arboric. Hortic. 33, 343-349.
Maigre D., Aerny J., Murisier F., 1995. Entretien des sols viticoles et qualité des vins de Chasselas: influence de l’enherbement permanent et de la fumure azotée. Revue Suisse Vitic. Arboric. Hortic., 27(4), 237-251.
Monteiro A., Moreira, I., 2004. Reduced rates of residual and post-emergence herbicides for weed control in vineyards. Weed Res., 44, 117-128.
Monteiro A., Lopes C.M., 2007. Influence of cover crop on water use and performance of vineyard in Mediterranean Portugal. Agri. Ecosyst. Environ., 121(4), 336-342.
Monteiro A., Lopes C.M., Machado J.P., Fernandes N., Araújo A., Moreira I., 2008. Cover cropping in a slopping non-irrigated vineyard. I – Effects on weed composition and dynamics. Ciência Téc. Vitiv., (this volume).
Morlat R, Jacquet A., Asselin C., 1993. L’enherbement permanent contrôlé des sols viticoles: Principaux résultats obtenus en Anjou. In: Proceedings 7th GESCO International Symposium. 89-95. CIVC – Mumm Perrier-Jouet (ed.), Rheims, France.
]]> Morlat R., Jacquet A., 2003. Grapevine root system and soil characteristics in a vineyard maintained long-term with or without interrow sward. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 54, 1-7.O.I.V., 1990. Recueil des méthodes internationales d´analyses des vins et des moûts. Office International de la Vigne et du Vin (Ed), Paris.
Pacheco C.M.A., Laureano O., Tomé J.A., 1991. Culture et non culture de la vigne: résultats de production, vigueur et composition des moûts, sur huit années d’essais. In: Annales ANPP, 3, 249-255.
Pellegrino A., Lebon E., Voltz, M., Wery J., 2004. Relationships between plant and soil water status in vine (Vitis vinifera L.). Plant and Soil, 266, 129-142.
Pradel E., Pieri P., 2000. Influence of a grass layer on vineyard soil temperature. Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research 6, 59-67.
Prichard T.L., 1998. Water use and infiltration. In: Cover Cropping in Vineyards. A Grower’s Handbook. 85-90. Ingels C.A., Bugg R.L., McGourty G.T., Christensen L.P. (eds), University of California, Publication 3338. Oakland. USA.
Ribéreau-Gayon J., Peynaud E., Sudraud P., Ribéreau-Gayon P., 1972. Traité d’Enologie. Tome 1. Sciences et Techniques du Vin, Dunod, Paris.
Rodrigues M.L., Chaves M.M., Wendler R., David M.M., Quick W.P., Leegood R.C., Stitt M., Pereira J.S., 1993. Osmotic adjustment in water stressed grapevine leaves in relation to carbon assimilation. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 20, 309-321.
Smart R.E. and Robinson M., 1991. Sunlight into wine. A Handbook for winegrape canopy management. 88 p. Winetitles, Adelaide.
Spayd S.E., Tarara J.M., Mee D.L., Ferguson J.C., 2002. Separation of sunlight and temperature effects on the composition of Vitis vinifera cv. ‘Merlot’ berries. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 53, 171-182.
]]> Williams L.E., Matthews M.A., 1990. Grapevine. In: Irrigation of Agricultural Crops. 1019-1055. Agronomy monographs, Nº 30, ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison (ed.), Wisconsin, USA. ]]>